Charge Your iPod, Kill A Polar Bear? Environmental Alarms Raised Over Home Electronics

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Charge Your iPod, Kill A Polar Bear? Environmental Alarms Raised Over Home Electronics stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GREG KELLER | May 13, 2009 01:15 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE -- This Monday, May 22, 2006 file photo provided by Mary Sage shows a polar bear near Barrow, Alaska. Charge your iPod, kill a polar bear? The choice might not be quite that stark, but an energy watchdog is alarmed about the threat to the environment from the soaring electricity needs of gadgets like MP3 players, mobile phones and flat screen TVs. In a report Wednesday, May 13, 2009, the Paris-based International Energy Agency estimates new electronic gadgets will triple their energy consumption by 2030 to 1,700 terawatt hours, the equivalent of today's home electricity consumption of the United States and Japan combined. (AP Photo/Joseph Napaaqtuq Sage, file)

PARIS — Charge your iPod, kill a polar bear?

The choice might not be quite that stark, but an energy watchdog is alarmed about the threat to the environment from the soaring electricity needs of gadgets like MP3 players, mobile phones and flat screen TVs.

In a report Wednesday, the Paris-based International Energy Agency estimates new electronic gadgets will triple their energy consumption by 2030 to 1,700 terawatt hours, the equivalent of today's home electricity consumption of the United States and Japan combined.

The world would have to build around 200 new nuclear power plants just to power all the TVs, iPods, PCs and other home electronics expected to be plugged in by 2030, when the global electric bill to power them will rise to $200 billion a year, the IEA said.

Consumer electronics is "the fastest growing area and it's the area with the least amount of policies in place" to control energy efficiency, said Paul Waide, a senior policy analyst at the IEA.

Electronic gadgets already account for about 15 percent of household electric consumption, a share that is rising rapidly as the number of these gadgets multiplies. Last year, the world spent $80 billion on electricity to power all these household electronics, the IEA said.

Most of the increase in consumer electronics will be in developing countries, where economic growth is fastest and ownership rates of gadgets is the lowest, Waide said.

"This will jeopardize efforts to increase energy security and reduce the emission of greenhouse gases" blamed for global warming, the agency said.

Existing technologies could slash gadgets' energy consumption by more than 30 percent at no cost or by more than 50 percent at a small cost, the IEA estimates, meaning total greenhouse gas emissions from households' electronic gadgets could be held stable at around 500 million tons of CO2 per year.

If nothing is done, this figure will double to around 1 billion tons of CO2 per year by 2030, the IEA estimates.

Televisions are one area where much improvement could be made, Waide said.

The IEA estimates the world will soon have 2 billion TVs in use _ or an average of 1.3 televisions for every household with electricity. In addition to becoming more numerous, TVs are also getting bigger screens and are being left on for longer each day. The group predicts 5 percent annual increase in energy consumption between 1990 and 2030, just from TVs alone.

Waide said simple measures, such as allowing consumers to regulate the energy consumption of their gadgets according to the features they actually use, should be adopted to counter this growth.

He said governments also need to encourage minimum performance standards and easy-to-read energy labels, so consumers can take energy efficiency into account along with price when buying home electronics.

PARIS — Charge your iPod, kill a polar bear? The choice might not be quite that stark, but an energy watchdog is alarmed about the threat to the environment from the soaring electricity needs o...
PARIS — Charge your iPod, kill a polar bear? The choice might not be quite that stark, but an energy watchdog is alarmed about the threat to the environment from the soaring electricity needs o...
Filed by Alex Leo  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
46
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 139 fans permalink
photo

Why measure consumption in nuclear plants instead of solar panels and wind mills?

quote:
The world would have to build around 200 new nuclear power plants just to power all the TVs, iPods, PCs and other home electronics expected to be plugged in by 2030, when the global electric bill to power them will rise to $200 billion a year, the IEA said..
Most of the increase in consumer electronics will be in developing countries, where economic growth is fastest and ownership rates of gadgets is the lowest, Waide said.
/quote

Especially in "developing countries" where there is already less established corporatist infrastructure, why bother with expensive, dangerous, dirty, centralized, command economy types of energy technology such as nuclear, or even hydroelectric? Microloans have the highest rate of return of *any* investment on Earth, so why isn't the IMF putting solar panels on every rooftop in every "developing country"? Because profit is only their secondary motive. Control, via dependence economies, is their job #1.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 05/15/2009

Polar bears are one of the few animals that actually hunt people. We should be so lucky.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 05/15/2009
- JnrNorman I'm a Fan of JnrNorman 6 fans permalink

I have an AMD PC the micro-processor uses 50 watts only.
By cutting overall electric consumption FLAT SCREENS fit into the picture just fine.
Its scaremongering your bad if you eat hambergers grill outdoors run a flat screen bad bad bad!


Bloomberg lies to NYC FireFighters

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/616.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 05/14/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 83 fans permalink
photo

The problem is enhanced by idiotic humans that leave stuff burning whether they are using it or not. The real problem lies in the fact that the private sector cannot change things fast enough, and washington is owned by the very businesses that are the hugest part of the problem. Until the rats nest of that marriage between big business and washington is cured, (good luck with all that), humanity's future is bleak, very bleak, at best.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 05/14/2009
- mick7191 I'm a Fan of mick7191 36 fans permalink
photo

It's gotta end sometime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 05/15/2009
photo

Have you ever noticed how many of these environmental alarms would tend to destroy western civilization if we actually believed them? Is that a coincidence?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 05/14/2009

you need to reorganize how western society is powered and fueled its really not that hard and the long run looks alot better than the route were on now

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 05/15/2009
- ReedYoung I'm a Fan of ReedYoung 139 fans permalink
photo

Yes, I have noticed. And no, it is not a coincidence.

It would be irresponsible to sound an alarm for anything less than the real, documented phenomena which pose the gravest threats to the greatest number of people. Pretending that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program in 2002, or that he had ties to al Qaida, ever, were such acts of irresponsibility. In contrast, dependence of almost everybody on Earth on centralized, industrial sources of power, many of which in turn depend on dwindling supplies of hydrocarbon fuels [http://www.princeton.edu/hubbert/] instead of installing our own solar and wind power collectors; deteriorating quality of water in increasing numbers of regions; deteriorating diversity of seeds and crops -- loss of "hybrid vigor" thanks to corporatist models of industrial agriculture [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/why-bananas-are-a-parable_b_156102.html] and drastic climate change [http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/57966.html http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071213101419.htm] caused by radiative forcing of carbon dioxide [http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm] from industrial and vehicle emissions all qualify as real, near term threats to modern civilization.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080402100001.htm

If you don't find each of these examples alarming, you're part of the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 05/15/2009
- Trilby I'm a Fan of Trilby 10 fans permalink
photo

I have noticed that our large flat-screen TV throws off a tremendous amount of heat. That probably means it is consuming more energy than the old-style set. Plus, my idiot husband runs it every waking hour, plus MORE on weekends.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 05/14/2009
photo

Sure, the flat screens use more energy than the old CRT televisions. Doesn't everybody know that?

And my wife runs ours day AND night, not just waking hours.

But then we pay our electric bills OURSELVES.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 05/14/2009

its nice to be apart of the problem isnt it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 05/15/2009

Let me just go back to the stone age and live in a cave eating berries so my conscience will be at ease.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 AM on 05/14/2009
photo

That's the goal of the human-haters who are the rabid environuts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 05/14/2009

no their goal is to clean up the mess that our ancestors who thought and think like you have made

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 AM on 05/15/2009

Stop shaving your body hair, let them grow naturally...

http://vanillaseven.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 05/13/2009
- vie2012ne I'm a Fan of vie2012ne 21 fans permalink

If the polar bears want to live, they should generate some electricity -- put 'em all on treadmills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 05/13/2009

Yep, some of those bears look a little chubby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 05/15/2009
- Pearlswan I'm a Fan of Pearlswan 34 fans permalink
photo

Hold on. I think nanotechnology has solutions in development to address this problem. Also, I have seen some prototypes for solar-cell jackets, hats, backpacks and more that allow you to plug in your device and charge it with the sun. You can just plug your device into the backpack or jacket and go for a walk and when you get home your device is fuly charged. And, what about using your bicycle to recharge your device while you ride it to work? The pedal power is a lot like windmill power and right now we are collectively wasting that potential energy. The solutions are as multifarious as the devices that need charging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

So we are to trust that none of the nanobots will be defective, begin replicating uncontrollably, and eat up the entire Earth?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 05/14/2009

hey look theres the right wing fear mongering of any change or scientific advancement we all know and love

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 AM on 05/15/2009
- conserv47 I'm a Fan of conserv47 6 fans permalink

I found this quite humorous since our current technology is NOWHERE near this scenario. Maybe you need to lighten up alittle bit and try to find some JOY in your life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 05/16/2009

As long as we continue pushing for renewable energy, we won't have to worry too much about our electricity consumption. If all our energy is renewable and clean, we can use as much as we want. The sun, wind, and other sources provide nearly limitless sources of energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 05/13/2009

Unfortunately, we are decades from having 100% renewable energy. We are still building coal burning power plants. Conservation today may mean fewer of them get built and fewer mountains removed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 05/13/2009
- wgsalter I'm a Fan of wgsalter 6 fans permalink

China's building one coal-fired plant per WEEK. So, good luck with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/14/2009

That's quite possibly one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read. Even "free" energy costs a lot of money to capture and someone has to pay for it. Energy efficiency is crucial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 05/13/2009

I did not say this energy will be free. Of course it won't, nothing is free. In the long run it will be much, much cheaper to use renewable energy. We won't have to spend money on mining or drilling, we won't have to pay for the obscene lifestyle of the Saudi royal family, we won't have to drown from the rising sea level, we will have better air to breathe which will increase our health, lowering our health care costs, and I could go on and on and on about the savings we could get with renewable energy. I'm also an electrical engineer, so I know how all of this works, you cannot call me an ignorant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

Do you have a clue how ALL our energy needs could be renewable?

Oh, well, nobody else does, either!

Even if 100% were solar-generated, THE SUN IS GOING TO FLARE UP AND INCINERATE THE EARTH AND THEN DIE OUT IN ABOUT 2 BILLION YEARS!

NOTHING is 100% renewable for very long.

Take the long view.

The only hope of humanity is, in the long run, in SPACE EXPLORATION and COLONIZATION OF THE UNIVERSE. Try to deny it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 05/14/2009
- wgsalter I'm a Fan of wgsalter 6 fans permalink

Thanks for pointing out the flaw with the argument about fossil fuels not being renewable. Obviously, if one takes the long view, today's bloggers are tomorrow's fossil fuel...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 05/14/2009

Wow why dont you start with baby steps first junior, if the human race is still around when the sun flares up ill be highly surprised, and you might want to try walking on the moon more than once before you start amening space colonization

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 AM on 05/15/2009

Solar energy is still going to outlast any fossil fuels by billions of years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/15/2009
photo

Another reason to shun the NYT:

"In its closing months, the Bush administration is pulling out all the stops in its eight-year effort to undermine the Endangered Species Act. In mid-August, the administration proposed two dangerous regulatory changes. One would free the government from considering the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on polar bears and other imperiled wildlife."­--editoria­l, New York Times, Oct. 25, 2008

"Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has upheld a Bush administration finding that the Endangered Species Act is not a suitable tool for restricting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases threatening the polar bear and its habitat. We agree..."-­-editorial­, New York Times, May 13, 2009

Another example of "It's wrong if Bush does it, but OK if Obama does it."

How many more of these examples can you find, children?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

Very interesting article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/13/2009

This analogy to iPod killing polar bears is a good one. Just imagine total world electric consumption fifty years from now. There probably won't even be any cockroaches left.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 05/13/2009
- BearsLeft I'm a Fan of BearsLeft 10 fans permalink

Not the electric cockroaches anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

A large TV with 5 speaker surround-sound uses many hundreds of times the power an Ipod uses. Ipods are certainly not the problem....as long as the computer you load them with is powered down when not in use....lol...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 05/13/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect