Geithner Plans To Give Recycled TARP Money To Small Banks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Geithner Plans To Give Recycled TARP Money To Small Banks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-13-09 12:20 PM   |   Updated: 05-13-09 12:41 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Geithner

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced Wednesday morning that the Treasury Department plans to give small banks access to bailout funds returned by big banks to the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

"Using the proceeds of the repayments we expect to receive from some of the largest banks, we plan to re-open the application window for banks with total assets under $500 million under the Capital Purchase Program," Geithner said in his remarks to the Independent Community Bankers of America during its summit in Washington.

At least two lawmakers have questioned the legality of recycling TARP money after Geithner announced in April that the TARP would benefit from $25 billion in repaid funds, a number that climbed to $35 billion in a Washington Post story on Saturday. The law says that revenue from the sale of troubled assets "shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public debt."

On Tuesday, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) delivered a tirade on the House floor, saying the administration's plans to recycle bailout funds suggests an "it's not illegal if Wall Street wants it" governing philosophy.

"The statute is very clear," Sherman said. "Whatever is returned to the Treasury goes into the general fund."

A Treasury spokeswoman told the Huffington Post last week that the law says principal repaid under the Capital Purchase Program "is put back into the TARP pool of funds." The CPP, a $250 billion sub-program of the TARP, injects capital into firms in the form of investments in preferred shares.

The distinction between revenue from the sale of troubled assets and repaid principal was the impetus for an amendment by Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) last week that would have specifically banned the Treasury from recycling repaid principal. The amendment failed, 47-48, but a Thune spokesman told the Huffington Post that "no one should be taking a one-vote margin as authorization to act counter to the intent of Congress."

Brad Sherman doesn't buy the capital-revenue distinction in the first place. In his remarks Tuesday, the California Democrat (who voted against the bailout) said the law is clear that the preferred stock purchased under the CPP counts as a troubled asset.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Troubled asset is defined as any financial instrument that the Secretary... determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote financial stability," Sherman said. "The preferred stock that we are about to sell or that the companies are about to repurchase from us is exactly this defined troubled asset."

Economist James Galbraith is skeptical of the Treasury's recycling plans as well.

"It would be very interesting to know what other revenues the government has, that Treasury might assume unilateral control over under similar principles," wrote Galbraith in an email to the Huffington Post. "For example, why not consider that income taxes of government employees are just a return of income previously paid to civil servants? Then Treasury would not need to consult Congress on the use of that money either."

The Treasury did not immediately respond to an inquiry from the Huffington Post on Wednesday.

Sherman's interpretation seems to square with the language in the bailout bill. Here's how the Emergency Economic Recovery and Stability Act defines a troubled asset:

(9) Troubled assets.--The term "troubled assets'' means--


(A) residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary determines promotes financial market stability; and

(B) any other financial instrument that the Secretary, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote financial market stability, but only upon transmittal of such determination, in writing, to the appropriate committees of Congress.

Here's what the law says about where revenue from the sale of troubled assets should go:

Transfer to Treasury.--Revenues of, and proceeds from the sale of troubled assets purchased under this Act, or from the sale, exercise, or surrender of warrants or senior debt instruments acquired under section 113 shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public debt.



Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced Wednesday morning that the Treasury Department plans to give small banks access to bailout funds returned by big banks to the Troubled Asset Relief Progra...
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced Wednesday morning that the Treasury Department plans to give small banks access to bailout funds returned by big banks to the Troubled Asset Relief Progra...
 
Comments
199
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

Title must say that Geither and the US were paid back with interest and now will loan the money to small banks to get them over the hump. They will also pay us back with interest.

If we are suddenly fiscally responsible, then get after the GM situation, money we will never see and get after the CEO who wants 20 million for tanking a great American company.

Get after Pelosi adding 180 Billion of pure spending that we will never see again to the TARP lending.

Get after 15 Trillion of wasted spending over the next 10 years on health care.

Get a grip. Being fiscally responsible means objectivity and focusing on the big messes. The biggest is SPENDING or money without payback.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 05/19/2009
- Bude I'm a Fan of Bude 165 fans permalink
photo

Check out Eliot Spitzer on the Rachel Maddow show.

We're screwed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

What is needed, is to break up these TOO BIG TO FAIL BANKS. Failure to do so will only lead to them failing again and the tax payer having to bail them out, yet AGAIN.

Re-instate the Glass-Stegall act. Do it ASAP. Break up BOA, Breakup CITI-Corp and the rest. NOW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 05/13/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

Slow down Geronimo!

Just what do you think will happen if the 8,200 banks with less than 1 billon in assets each get full access to TARP loans? Those TARP loans cost them 5%, which makes it too expensive to sit on. They will go after the business loans of the too-big-to-fail banks.

That my friend is how "breaking up the big guys" works. Loan at a time small business will determine which banker gets their business, and which bank has demonstrated too irresponsible a behaviour to get, or keep, their business.

But to do that small banks need capital, tens of billions of capital. That's where a TARP loan comes in. This restructuring of the banking community can happen very quickly, most small businesses have revolving lines of credit that have been effected, some severely, and are looking for relief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 05/14/2009

What day is this? More slimy conduct we've witnessed since we voted for Barack Obama, & witnessed like this :If it's Wednesday, the White House & its team announce one thing in their craftily crafted lawyers' loophole language;then act on the loophole. If it's Thursday,a W.House team memberl announces what they want us to know about what really happened. If it's Friday,the president engages evasionary tactics but appears at the W.House mike & tells us forcefully why it is what it is. If it's Saturday the team & some bankers come to the W.House for glasses of water & a scolding from the president after he holds the debate on why the bankers should continue to charge usurious credit card interest rates & why they must keep every billion given to them for lending. The Bankers will beat the two team members who did not slupport the bankers. If it's Sunday , the president will rest.If it's Monday,the press secretary will make a yeoman's effort to explain what really happened & what really was meant by one of the speakers at one of the TV moments.If it's Tuesday, it means the media undertakes to criticize the president for, "What appears to be a flip-flop by the president, but then,Wolf, he knows more about it than we & the other politicians do?" If it's . Who cares...it­'s only getting worse.We who voted for this president, hoping his word was his bond, can't tolerate anymore incredibly unscruplous betrayal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 05/13/2009
- Senzasord I'm a Fan of Senzasord 14 fans permalink

Perhaps at long last some of the bailout money will end up actually being lent to people and businesses on main street instead of being used by Wall Street for bonuses or acquisitions. This was what was supposed to have happened to begin with but the executerrorists on Wall Street who caused this economic depression simply don't see their misuse of funds as a problem. All they want is business as usual and to hell with the country. The small banks on the other hand will take the money and lend it out to get the economy moving again one customer at a time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 05/13/2009

Some of the financially sound small banks could have grown into big banks were it not for the bailout of big banks. So much for playing by the rules to get ahead.
Sterling Greenwood/Aspen Free Press

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 05/13/2009
- cheforacle I'm a Fan of cheforacle 38 fans permalink
photo

Why no article on Treasury's announcement they plan to regulate derivatives like credit default swaps? The NYT reported this hours ago:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/business/14regs.html?hp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 05/13/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

Great news chef. Imagine if Dubya had done this 4 years ago.

Is anyone still engaged in credit default swaps? That's kind of like finding out that the street walker has gonorrhea - still great to look at but.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 05/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 362 fans permalink
photo

Last June Geithner invited 17 of the largest banks (in violation of administrative law) to set their own rules for a monopoly over the OTC. Now he seeks to legitimize this through legislation and the number of banks participating in this monopoly is 7.

In the same timeframe, these same big banks set up a new derivatives clearinghouse and limited purpose bank, ICE Trust, in collaboration with the ICE exchange, NYMEX, NYBOT, the Clearing Corp., and CME. They got the greenlight from the Fed in March to begin trading and clearing derivatives.

In the middle of the article: "Shares of CME Group Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. rose after Bloomberg News reported Geithner"s plan."

That's why.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 05/13/2009
- HC4BO I'm a Fan of HC4BO 34 fans permalink
photo

Ummm ...

That good ole legal money laundering ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

AUDIT THE FED CALL PELOSI

House Bill HR 1207

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 05/13/2009
- cheforacle I'm a Fan of cheforacle 38 fans permalink
photo

Why is Huff Po not leading with an article on the front of the NYT about Geithner's submission of a proposal to step up regulation of derivatives? Is the desire to bash Geithner so incessant here that when he does something which I believe most here would find agreeable, it cannot be conveyed to the public.

Here's a link to the NYT article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/business/14regs.html?hp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 05/13/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

You're right. Bashing Giethner attracts eyeball for the ads. Huffpost is just a business.

They are probably working on a headline right now, something like:

"Geithner Is Stealing Your Credit Default Swaps"
"Geithner Caught Trying To Swap Defaults For Credit"
"Geithner & Bernanke Conspire Against Insurance Industry"
"Geithner Tries To Outlaw Swap Meets"

They'll come up with someting..­.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 05/13/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 257 fans permalink

Table Scraps.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 05/13/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

I want to know how much Rep. Brad Sherman was bribed by the big banks to try to prevent the small banks from competing on equal terms. What does Rep. Brad Sherman have against small banks. How much stock does he, or his family, own in big banks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 05/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 362 fans permalink
photo

As the banking stress test results come in, the JOURNAL takes a closer look at money's stranglehold on politics. Bill Moyers speaks with Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) on campaign finance reform, big lobbying, and making Washington work for the people rather than special interests.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/05082009/watch.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/13/2009
- ctjs I'm a Fan of ctjs permalink

Geithner is clueless. He is shooting in the dark hoping to hit the mark but he is shooting blanks. What bank would take this money and let the government set salaries for the officers? The dying, the dead, and/or the cheats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 05/13/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 30 fans permalink
photo

That does not apply to small banks. Only the "too big to fail" banks have those restrictions. For a small bank to get a TARP loan they need to pass a more stringent stress test than the one used on "too big to fail" banks. Small banks have been getting TARP loans all along, though most of the money has went to "too big to fail" banks just to keep the entire system from collapsing.

Look around your community, the most sound community banks are the ones borrowing TARP (at a higher rate than normal because it is the only capital available). Those banks are using that money to offer small businesses loans when the "too big to fail" banks say, "oh we can't actually loan money, we justr need it to pump up our stock prices".

This is HOW the banking system gets restructured - loan at a time. Between small business owners and small bankers (who's kids attend the same schools), who else can we better trust to determine who survives and thrives as we rebuild our economy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 05/13/2009
photo

I am getting less and less happy with Geithner. He is not ignoring the law. I am not sure he cared about the law from the start.

I think this is going to bite Obama in the butt in 10 and 12.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 05/13/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect