McChrystal Choice Suggests Special Ops Strikes Will Continue

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McChrystal Choice Suggests Special Ops Strikes Will Continue stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-13-09 09:41 AM   |   Updated: 05-13-09 09:44 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Special Ops

Gareth Porter | Inter Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 12 (IPS) - The choice of Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to become the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan has been hailed by Defence Secretary Robert Gates and national news media as ushering in a new unconventional approach to counterinsurgency.

But McChrystal's background sends a very different message from the one claimed by Gates and the news media. His long specialisation in counter-terrorism operations suggests an officer who is likely to have more interest in targeted killings than in the kind of politically sensitive counterinsurgency programmes that the Obama administration has said it intends to carry out.

In announcing the extraordinary firing of Gen. David McKiernan and the nomination of McChrystal to replace him, Gates said that the mission in Afghanistan "requires new thinking and new approaches by our military leaders" and praised McChrystal for his "unique skill set in counterinsurgency".

Media reporting on the choice of McChrystal simply echoed the Pentagon's line. The Washington Post said his selection "marks the continued ascendancy of officers who have pressed for the use of counterinsurgency tactics, in Iraq and Afghanistan, that are markedly different from the Army's traditional doctrine".

The New York Times cited unnamed "Defense Department officials" in reporting, "His success in using intelligence and firepower to track and kill insurgents, and his training in unconventional warfare that emphasizes the need to protect the population, made him the best choice for the command in Afghanistan..."

The Wall Street Journal suggested that McChrystal was the kind of commander who would "fight the kind of complex counterinsurgency warfare" that Gates wants to see in Afghanistan, because his command of Special Operations forces in Iraq had involved "units that specialize in guerilla warfare, including the training of indigenous armies".

Story continues below

But these explanations for the choice of McChrystal equate his command of the Special Operations forces with expertise on counterinsurgency, despite the fact that McChrystal spent his last five years as a commander of Special Operations forces focusing overwhelmingly on counter-terrorism operations, not on counterinsurgency.

Whereas counterinsurgency operations are aimed primarily at influencing the population and are primarily non-military, counter-terrorism operations are exclusively military and focus on targeting the "enemy".

As commander of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) from April 2003 to August 2008, he was preoccupied with pursuing high value al Qaeda targets and local and national insurgent leaders in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan - mostly through targeted raids and airstrikes.

It was under McChrystal's command, in fact, that JSOC shifted away from the very mission of training indigenous military units in counterinsurgency operations that had been a core mission of Special Operations Forces.

McChrystal spent an unusual five years as commander of JSOC, because he had become a close friend of then Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld came to view JSOC as his counter to the covert operations capabilities of the CIA, which he hated and distrusted, and Rumsfeld used JSOC to capture or kill high value enemy leaders, including Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda's top leader in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

In 2005, JSOC's parent command, the Special Operations Command (SOCOM), was directed by Rumsfeld to "plan, synchronize and, as directed, conduct global operations against terrorist networks in coordination with other combatant commanders". That directive has generally been regarded as granting SOCOM the authority to carry out actions unilaterally anywhere on the globe.

Under that directive, McChyrstal and JSOC carried out targeted raids and other operations against suspected Taliban in Afghanistan which were not coordinated with the commander of other U.S. forces in the country. Gen. David Barno, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has said that he put a stop to targeted airstrikes in early 2004, but they resumed after he was replaced by McKiernan in 2005.

U.S. airstrikes which have caused hundreds of civilian deaths have become a major political issue in Afghanistan and the subject of official protests by Afghan President Hamid Karzai as well as by the lower house of the Afghan parliament. Many of the airstrikes and commando raids that have caused large-scale civilian deaths have involved Special Operations forces operating separately from the NATO command.

Special Operations forces under McChrystal's command also engaged in raiding homes in search of Taliban suspects, angering villagers in Herat province to the point where they took up arms against the U.S. forces, according to a May 2007 story by Carlotta Gall and David E. Sanger of the New York Times.

After a series of raids by Special Operations forces in Afghanistan in late 2008 and early 2009 killed women and children, to mounting popular outrage, McChrystal's successor as commander of JSOC, Vice Adm. William H. McRaven, ordered a temporary reduction in the rate of such commando raids in mid-February for two weeks.

However, the JSOC raids resumed at their original intensity in March. Later that month Gen. David Petraeus issued a directive putting all JSOC operations under McKiernan's tactical command, but there has been no evidence that the change has curbed the raids by Special Operations Forces.

President Barack Obama's National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones responded to Karzai's demand for an end to U.S. airstrikes by saying, "We're going to take a look at trying to make sure that we correct those things we can correct, but certainly to tie the hands of our commanders and say we're not going to conduct air strikes, it would be imprudent,"

The airstrike in western Farah province that killed nearly 150 civilians last week, provoking protests by hundreds of university students in Kabul, was also ordered by Special Operations Forces.

McChrystal's nomination to become director of the Joint Staff at the Pentagon in May 2008 was held up for months while the Senate Armed Services Committee investigated a pattern of abuse of detainees by military personnel under his command. Sixty-four service personnel assigned or attached to Special Operations units were disciplined for detainee abuse between early 2004 and the end of 2007.

Capt. Carolyn Wood, an operations officer with the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion, gave military investigators a sworn statement in 2004 in which she said she had drawn guidance for interrogation from a directive called "TF-121 IROE," which had been given to the members of Task Force 121, a unit directly under JSOC.

However, the military refused to make that document public, despite requests from the American Civil Liberties Union and other human rights groups, protecting McChrystal from legal proceedings regarding his responsibility for detainee abuses.

He was never held accountable for those abuses, supposedly because of the secrecy of the operation of JSOC.

Although he has been linked with detainee abuses and raids that kill numbers of civilians, McChrystal has not had any direct experience with the non-military elements of such a strategy.

W. Patrick Lang, formerly the defence intelligence officer for the Middle East, suggested in his blog Monday that the McChrystal nomination "sounds like a paradigm shift in which Obama's policy of destroying the leadership of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan takes priority over everything else".

The choice of McChrystal certainly appears to signal the administration's readiness to continue Special Operations forces raids and airstrikes that is generating growing opposition by Afghans to the U.S. military presence.


Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy. The paperback edition of his latest book, "Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam", was published in 2006.



Get HuffPost World On Facebook and Twitter!


Read more from Inter Press Service

Gareth Porter | Inter Press Service WASHINGTON, May 12 (IPS) - The choice of Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to become the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan has been hailed by Defence Secretary Robert ...
Gareth Porter | Inter Press Service WASHINGTON, May 12 (IPS) - The choice of Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to become the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan has been hailed by Defence Secretary Robert ...
Loading...
 
Filed by Stuart Whatley
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Hmm...first ouster of a theater commander since MacArthur....war expanding to Pakistan, hundreds of civilians killed....somehow I'm not feeling any safer. Neither does libertarian Army vet Lonnie Holcomb, whom I interviewed today...see youtube.com/watch?v=6lHxnA8AuoY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 05/13/2009
- Solaris123 I'm a Fan of Solaris123 17 fans permalink
photo

You don't "feel" safe? Hows this of any importance to the world.
People like you also didn't "feel:" safer on D-day or after Midway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 05/14/2009
- iLogos I'm a Fan of iLogos 6 fans permalink

Pretty much.

This is a good choice. The writer seems to think that because the last few years of McChrystal were in anti-terrorism rather than counter-insurgency as being proof of the wrong tack being taken... Two things, there is no counterinsurgency to speak of in Afghanistan these days... it is mostly Taliban and Al Qaeda forces using terrorist tactics. 2. Part of any anti-terrorism program you always include a political side that seeks to manage local conditions minimizing blow-back as well as developing a network of informants that will feed you intel.

Whether McChrystal is the best person for the job I don't know, but his training and history certainly look like a step in the right direction to this progressive vet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/13/2009
- wm1066 I'm a Fan of wm1066 34 fans permalink
photo

I seem to remember some one saying, after 911, that we should just send in the A-Team.( aka TV series in the 80's) But Nooo bush had to invade the country right next to it instead!!!!
And we had a Special Ops team that could have gotten them at Tora Bora.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 05/13/2009
- JennyT I'm a Fan of JennyT 2 fans permalink

THe choice of McChrystal makes me very uneasy. The article points out the difference between counterinsurgency and counterterrorism, which is significant to real success in AF. I am not convinced that McChrystal is the best choice on the counterinsurgency front. His role in the Tillman cover-up and his proximity to units responsible for excessive detainee abuse are major red flags. While I'm all for targeted attacks, I'm finding it hard to believe that McChrystal, a protege to both Rumsfeld and Petraeus, is going to be able to win the trust of the AF and Pak people, and quell /thwart the counterinsurgency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 05/13/2009

What can we do in Afghanistan that the Afghan Army can't? Why the hell are we still there? We'll guarantee another attack on ourselves with all of these civilian deaths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 05/13/2009
- Solaris123 I'm a Fan of Solaris123 17 fans permalink
photo

"What can we do in Afghanistan that the Afghan Army can't? "
Everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 05/14/2009
- Solaris123 I'm a Fan of Solaris123 17 fans permalink
photo

I've been posting for years hoping special ops will become the mainstay of Afghani operation. THANK YOU Barak!
This is the only thing that works--bring the fight to the enemy. make them spend majority of their time on defense rather than offense. Make it mobile and back it up by air power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 05/13/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect