More

GM Dealerships Closing

DAN STRUMPF and TOM KRISHER   05/15/09 10:41 PM ET   AP

Gm Dealership Closing List

NEW YORK — General Motors on Friday told about 1,100 of its dealers _ one in five _ that they would be dropped by late next year, adding to the economic pain radiating from the beleaguered Detroit automakers to cities and towns across the country.

Including Chrysler's decision a day earlier to eliminate a quarter of its own, about 1,900 dealerships _ many pillars of their communities and heavy advertisers for local media _ learned in a matter of 48 hours that they would be forced either to sell fewer brands or close altogether.

The GM dealerships will be eliminated when their contracts end late next year.

"We're 98 years old. We're two years from a hundred, and I don't want to go out at 99 years," said Alan Bigelow, whose family runs a Cleveland-area Chevrolet dealer that learned it was on GM's hit list.

While GM doesn't own the dealers, the company says its network is too big, causing dealers to compete with each other and giving shoppers too much leverage to talk down prices and hurt future sales.

Several hundred of the GM dealers knew already they were headed for closure, but most of them learned for the first time Friday. The National Automobile Dealers Association, an industry group, says the GM and Chrysler cuts combined could wipe out 100,000 jobs.

Both GM and Chrysler are scrambling to reorganize and stay alive in a severe recession that has pummeled car and truck sales for U.S. automakers, which had already been losing market share to foreign companies for decades.

Chrysler LLC is already in bankruptcy protection, and industry analysts say General Motors Corp. is making its cuts now in preparation for a bankruptcy filing June 1. The company says it would prefer to restructure out of court.

GM declined to reveal which dealers will be eliminated. Many dealers vowed to fight, first through a 30-day company appeal process, then possibly in court.

GM's dealers are protected by state franchise laws, and the company concedes it would be easier to cut them if it were operating under federal bankruptcy protection. GM says it's trying to restructure outside of bankruptcy because of the stigma of Chapter 11.

Chrysler dealers have fewer options because the company has already filed for bankruptcy protection, and federal bankruptcy judges generally trump state law. And Chrysler said on Thursday that its cuts were final.

GM outlined a plan to cut about 40 percent of its 6,000-dealer network by the end of 2010 in hopes of getting the company back on its feet. Besides the 1,110 dealership cuts, the company will shed about 500 dealerships that market the Saturn, Hummer and Saab brands, which GM plans to phase out or sell.

And when the surviving dealers' contracts are up in late 2010, GM will cut still more by not offering renewals to about 10 percent of the dealers who are left. Dealers could stay open selling used cars or other brands, but GM and Chrysler cuts will still leave cities across the U.S. with empty buildings, vacant lots and perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost tax revenues.

FedEx letters bearing the bad news began arriving Friday morning at GM franchises around the country. The letter states that dealers had been judged on sales, customer service scores, location, condition of facilities and other criteria.

While the targeted dealers represent about 20 percent of GM's total, they make only 7 percent of its sales, the company said.

The cuts will allow the surviving dealers to expand the size of their markets, so they have a better chance of staying healthy and attracting private investment, said Mark LaNeve, GM's North American vice president of sales and marketing.

"Over time, they just can't afford to invest in their business to the degree the competition has," LaNeve said.

Toyota, for example, generally has larger and newer showrooms and service departments than GM and Chrysler dealers _ making those dealerships more attractive to potential buyers.

The Obama administration's auto task force, which is overseeing the GM and Chrysler restructuring because both have received billions of dollars from the government, was aware GM would cut dealers, LaNeve said. But he stressed the company made the decision on how many and where.

Chrysler is aiming to close its nearly 800 dealers by June 9, and those outlets may try deep discounts to clear out their remaining inventory. But in the long run, prices for cars and trucks will probably rise for customers as dealerships disappear.

"No longer will people be able to shop between three or four dealers within 15 minutes of each other for the best cutthroat price," said Aaron Bragman, an automotive industry analyst with the consulting firm IHS Global Insight.

As GM and Chrysler lost market share to Japanese and other overseas brands, they ended up with too many dealers. So did Ford Motor Co., which has managed to stay healthier than either of its Detroit siblings.

In the 1980s, GM, Chrysler and Ford accounted for more than 75 percent of U.S. sales, but that dropped to 48 percent last year. GM alone held nearly 51 percent of the market in 1962, but only 22 percent last year.

Bigelow was stunned to get his termination letter. He said he believed the dealership was meeting all of GM's criteria to stay in business. He said sales had dropped in the recession _ but he didn't know of many dealers who were doing better.

Many of the dealership's 45 employees have been there for 30 years or more. He said they pledged to stay and fight the closing "until there's no more fight left."

___

AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher reported from Detroit. Associated Press writer Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Julie Satow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:39 PM on 05/18/2009
NO One in my American Family would even think of owning an Asian Vehicle!!!!!!!!!
11:45 AM on 05/28/2009
You mean you'd rather buy a Ford made in Brazil than a Toyota made in Ohio?
03:08 PM on 05/18/2009
YUP Liberals have ruined our country

http://www.drive-american.org/letters.htm
11:30 PM on 05/17/2009
Does anyone realize its the Banks again? If the banks dont lend, we dont buy cars. I know for a fact, of Thousands of bad loans the bank gave car buyers, knowing they didnt even have a job, or a drivers license. Also, does anyone realize how many more people are going to be out of work? I am! The car world is very small. Husbands, wives, brothers, sisters...all work in the same industry. Wiping out the dealers, wipes out families! Should the auto dealers be bailed out? no, but nor should have AIG. They need to be fixed! The banks need to be held accountable.
11:40 PM on 05/17/2009
I would rather bailout 10 GM's than a single AIG. Manufacturers like GM produce value in our economy, AIG's ilk only consume value.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
123dee
Forward America - Obama 2012
01:50 AM on 05/17/2009
The entire American automotive industry did this to themselves with very poor
business decisions. They kept their head in the sand for to many years, unknowing
or unwilling to address the future market place.
12:57 AM on 05/18/2009
You hope for the failure of the Big Three so you can push your un-American agenda, I choose to drive a thirty year old Ford, and you know something, it gets 26 mpg and has a v/8 Thats right. So put that in your ultra liberal agenda pipe and smoke it. You will mandate nothing! You are the problem not the solution here. You try and push your liberal agenda's and make our country weak and available for an attack. I Sir with for one That people like you wouldn't speak for the people of this country. You will not force me to drive a death trap! I will do my part as a "GOOD and TRUE" American and battle your ultra liberal agenda all the way until my death.

What we need in this country is a $6500.00 tariff on all foreign vehicles to level the playing field. "NOW" that would help.

Also how are we disposing of all the used auto batteries once they're spent?

Seem to be more hazardous waste to me. Are we now going to fill our landfills with these toxic battery's? I guess you do not care about that right.

You just care about selling ultra liberal imports in our USA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
04:41 PM on 05/16/2009
shoppers too much leverage to talk down prices and hurt future sales.

Most dealers in my region went to a no haggle price a few years ago! What are they saying, talking down prices. Thats totally BS!!
03:15 PM on 05/16/2009
Most of the people are uninformed idiots who have no real knowelegde of the US auto industry or how a car dealership functions!!! I am a highly intelligent individual who could pass any lie detector test. The dealership I work at also sells both american made and foreign vehicles and have many less quality issues on the GM vehicles than the imports. In fact, Toyota had more recalls due to quality issues in the last two years than Ford and GM combined with far less vehicles manufactured by Toyota. In closing my dealership operates on a zero tolerence policy on lieing and have a very dignified advertising campaign with no gimmicks!!! So before you lump all car dealers together, understand there are poor examples in every business and are usually the exception, not the rule!!!!
03:14 PM on 05/16/2009
Thanks Liberals
Now we will have thousands more OOW OUT OF WORK!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
04:44 PM on 05/16/2009
What do Liberals have to do with this? The GOP ruined the economy and thanks for F~~~ked up goes to them!
05:54 PM on 05/16/2009
Obama sided with Wall street Banksters and they are destroying US manufacturing.
JRsNana
The most important things in life aren't things.
01:49 AM on 05/17/2009
Do not even attempt to toss this into the Democrats corner you Republican a@@hole! You guys F*&C*ED up everything you touched for 8 long years and these are the results. You can try to blame it on a 130 day old administration, but it's not going to go very far. Do some freakin' research and find out how many jobs the Bush Administration lost over the course of 8 years then come back and whine at us some more.
02:59 AM on 05/17/2009
Wow. Why don't you say what you really think? :-)
12:48 PM on 05/16/2009
American auto manufacturers were doing better than most Americn industries that had to compete head on with foreign manufacturers who receive full support from their governments. Then Wall Street speculators jacked gas prices over $4 a gallon and kllled the market. Then Wall Street con men ruined the country's Credit liquidity further damaging auto sales and auto companies ability to raise credit. Also as a result of Wall Street's credit freeze, they also created the severe Recession which put the American auto industry on life support. Then last month Wall Street (Geithner) insisted foreign countries are not manipulating their currencies to give their industries a cost advantage.

Then Wall Street (through their ownership of the Administration) appointed a Wall Street car czar who's first act was to perform a takeover coup of GM by forcing out the CEO and replacing him and most of the board of directors with his loyalists. His second act was to force Chrysler into the arms of his business friends at Fiat. Fiat receives 20% of Chrysler for no money! Bottom line is Wall Street will force US manufacturers to lose market share to foreign competition. But after the dollar crashes and foreign goods are doubled in price, the US manufacturers will not be able to ramp up to their former size because Wall Street/Administration mishandled the auto bailout
12:53 PM on 05/16/2009
Obama: How is that creating 3.5 million jobs coming along as you destroy a million auto industry jobs?

Obama: How is that begging for a trillion dollars in loans from foreign manufacturing countries coming along? You are destroying American manufacturing and handing market share to foreign manufacturers.
12:55 PM on 05/16/2009
You have watched TV and gotten stupid. The balance sheets of GM and Ford both show negative equity for the last three years, meaning they were insolvent and operating on loans. When Daimler sold Chrysler in 2007, it had a hard time finding buyers. Wall Street didn't wreck the auto companies, they wrecked themselves.
02:04 PM on 05/16/2009
finally someone who has actually read the balance sheets !!
05:21 PM on 05/16/2009
Since both Bush and Obama are sold out to Wall Street it is not surprising all our manufacturing sectors have been hurting. Obama with Summers and Geithner are protecting foreign importers from enforcement of fair trade laws. Foir example Geithner last month said China is not deliberately controling their currency for the sake of benefiting their exporters. Summers is the biggest proponent of outsoucing.

The big three have been restructuring their fixed costs over the last 3 years and this involved large up-front costs. Wall Street refuses to come clean on their hidden liabilities whle GM has been rapidly reducing their costs through buy-outs.

Wall Street did wreck the auto industry through their control of the government, unfair trade policies/enforcement, their manipulating of oil, their freezing of credit, their creation of the Recession/Depression. Wall Street Banksters gave 5.1 billion to politicians, probably 100 times the amount from the auto industry including Unions. Wall Strreet books are crooked to the point of being meaningless with Geithner's approval.
12:08 PM on 05/16/2009
What kind of mob-monopoly bonehead move is this? If they were closing because they were decreasing production and won't be selling as many cars to dealerships, that would make sense. But GM doesn't make sense, just like their balance sheet doesn't make sense. Allowing dealerships to compete with each other, driving down the price, is healthy for the company. Prices are supposed to go down, not up, during a depression.
01:51 PM on 05/16/2009
driving down prices is good for the consumer but not for the company!! that cuts on their margins.

Which school did you go to? or all you did was GED?
02:31 PM on 05/16/2009
All prices (inputs, wages, final) are supposed to go down during a recession as people start saving more and demand less goods.
05:34 PM on 05/16/2009
Remember Obama appointed a Wall Street Gorden Geko as car czar. Rattner's first act was to announce GM and Chrysler must pass impossible goals or he would force them into bankruptcy. (Bankruptcy or even the threat of bankruptcy kllls sales. Thanks Obama). Then Rattner performed a corporate coup at GM by demanding the CEO quit and stacking the new management including the Board of Directors with his Wall Street loyalists.

You can blame Rattner and Obama for any boneheaded corporate decisions that klll GM's market share.
05:51 PM on 05/16/2009
They've been insolvent for years. They should have gone into bankruptcy years ago. The bankruptcy is a good thing, the capital they have at their disposal (factories, laborers, offices) need to be allowed to go to more competent managers.
10:23 AM on 05/16/2009
GM plans China-built vehicles for US market

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/motoring/news/article.cfm?c_id=9&objectid=10572501
08:45 AM on 05/16/2009
A Fed-Ex arrival at a Chevy dealership on Friday must have been akin to the 40's war movie scene where the Western Union messenger arrives at a home delivering a telegram that changes lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bola47
11:33 PM on 05/15/2009
let's see, 1100 fedex packages at a cost of ?. how about an email which costs nothing. detroit loves to waste money, especially when it comes from the taxpayers as a bailout.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeanette Ponder
01:07 AM on 05/16/2009
Nah. You can't track email. With FedEx, you have signature confirmation and tracking - crucial for business matters like this. Plus, GM probably has a huge discount on shipping with them, as most large businesses do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bola47
05:40 AM on 05/16/2009
if you print out your log of sent emails, most courts will accept that as legal proof of a sent document.
10:30 PM on 05/15/2009
The GM dealerships will be eliminated when their contracts end late next year.

"Thanks little 3" Toyota Honda Nissan
10:57 PM on 05/15/2009
Thanks to the "big 3" for their complete failure to keep their finger on the pulse of consumer preferences, for failing to produce a quality, competitive product and for aligning themselves with big oil companies. It’s sad that our country has taken a terrible hit because of their incredibly poor business acumen.

Unfortunately, Toyota, Honda and Nissan won the contest because they deserved to win it.
11:38 PM on 05/15/2009
The contest may appear to have been won by Toyota, Nissan, and Honda to some but you need to understand ALL car makers are having some very serious issues, even Toyota which has seen its sales slump just as the Big Three has seen their sales slump. Keep in mind 70% of Toyota's annual sales are here in the US. Toyota's fiscal year ended March 31 with a year end loss (the first loss since 1950) of approximately 350 billion Yen ($3.5B US). I am unsure in which quarter(s) these losses occurred but to imply Toyota remains profitable while the Big Three are not is disingenuous. Compare this loss to the $17.4 B (US) profit Toyota posted for FY 2008, and you will realize Toyota actually suffered a $21 billion dollar negative change in profitability in a 12 month period, a serious setback for this company.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:38 AM on 05/16/2009
Unfortunately, you are absolutely right.
JRsNana
The most important things in life aren't things.
11:18 AM on 05/16/2009
The BIG 3's arrogance and stubborness has led to this moment. Too bad they didn't look at a working model (oh- that's right - they did) like Toyota. After seeing how and why Toyota was so successful, they praised them and then went right back to do it their own way. Why not? "The government won't let us fail." They made terrible decisions on branding and quality (look at some of the crash test results from these cars - do you want to put your kids in them?), and they kept paying their CEOs RIDICULOUS amounts of money for their arrogance and stubborness. I'm sure next we're going to get B17 on the hit list, that being the old Republican fight song about those darned auto workers and their alleged $78 an hour pay demands. I wish you guys who want to bash the "little 3" would do your homework. These guys have employees right here in the United States of America who are not in danger of losing their jobs. Why is that? Huh? What could possibly be the difference?
10:26 PM on 05/15/2009
If this country is going to see any improvements in the economy anytime soon, it seems to me we must come to the realization we as a country have made some critically fundamental mistakes over the last 30 years or so and begin to reset our economy on the foundations on which to build long-term sustainable economic growth. We have exported most of our manufacturing and industrial infrastructures, a huge portion of the science and technology sectors, and are now becoming a significant importer of the the most critical commodity of all, food. Now we are sitting back and waiting on the government to provide the answers for a crisis the government is largely responsible for creating and worse, we are looking for solutions from the very individuals some say are principally culpable for creating the crisis. We can choose to continue down the path our leaders have chosen for us and that is to continue spending and borrowing our way to economic ruin while the unemployment rate soars past 9% on it's way to some dangerous & historical high level or we can learn to earn our way out of this crisis by being bold but rational. We must invest in ourselves by investing our limited resources into our remaining manufacturing and industrial infrastructures, while striving to expand both. Call your senators and representatives and demand Main Street be allowed to invest in ourselves so that we can begin to earn our way out of this crisis.
01:31 AM on 05/16/2009
I'm with you and the government shares much of the responsibility but people in this country need to think harder about what they're buying and where it's made and think less about getting it for the cheapest price possible from a chain store. Nothing will change until we as consumers change our buying habits and demand items made in America by Americans from stores owned by individuals.
09:14 AM on 05/16/2009
I agree with both of you. It's as if many Americans are looking everywhere but towards themselves for the situation we are in. The government failed to regulate, but we didn't have to get ourselves into financial ruin because we thought we could have it all. Some will be fine, but they are the ones who never went for the idea of buy now and pay later. Make no mistake, I do think the government should have done more to prevent to keep the banks in check. But if we are honest with ourselves we will admit that our arms weren't twisted as we got more house than we needed and more stuff to fill that house than we can use. Both the government and the consumers need to make changes or this will happen again.
01:36 AM on 05/16/2009
This country will not see any improvements, any soon, no matter what we do. Don't worry.

:-(
photo
MIKEBC
Old school Roosevelt democrat
09:31 PM on 05/15/2009
I think many of them will go to selling used cars and I hope they can keep most of their people.