"Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - "Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-15-09 12:12 PM   |   Updated: 05-15-09 03:42 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Meltdown Bailout

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dilly and a half! Chittum calls the interview "cringeworthy," a "disaster," and, most appropriately, a "dismal example of bubble thinking." If that last blast reminds you of comedienne Tina Fey's explication on "the bubble" -- the safe space from which the privileged and coddled project their incompetence without concern for consequences -- you couldn't be more right! Check out some of this nonsense!

As Chittum details (and you may listen to the entire interview here) the entire foundation of Davidson's exchange is that Warren is fueled entirely by populist animus and cannot be considered a fair arbiter from the point of view of bankers. Warren objects to this premise, saying, "I just think you're wrong. I'm somebody who believes in free markets. The American middle class is under assault... basically since the 70's... I'm not an advocate. i don't get paid for anything. I'm an empiricist. I'm data driven."

The "bubble thinking" then starts in earnest:

DAVIDSON: I think you're well known... as someone whose work points to a conclusion that banks and credit-card companies are giving a raw deal to consumers -- I think it would not be terribly hard to find people who would agree with you -- that your work is in opposition to the banks.


WARREN: If you don't have somebody who cares about American families, then they don't have a seat at the table in this debate. I think this point is really important. We have a little tight insider world who understand exactly what synthetic derivatives are. My job in this world is to make sure that when these enormous profound decisions are being made, that the American family is there. That they are part of that process... because the decisions that are made will be different.

And that's exactly right! Ordinary Americans don't understand the world of synthetic derivatives. This is precisely the sort of thing that gets discussed in the business press entirely from the perspective of clucking, cliquish, insiders. This is precisely why Julie Satow and I did a video that started to scratch the surface of what derivatives are. Since we did so, by the way, people have sent us emails, thanking us, but there's no need to do that! The derivatives market exploded and landed on everyone's head, and people are entitled to know why that happened. Ordinary people deserve answers! I believe that journalists are obligated to at least attempt to provide them! And Elizabeth Warren simply agrees with that contention. Bully for her!

But, wow, Adam Davidson? He is simply NOT OF THIS EARTH. Read this nonsense!

DAVIDSON: The American families are not -- These issues of crucial, the essential need for credit intermediation are as close to accepted principles among every serious thinker on this topic. The view that the American family, that you hold very powerfully, is fully under assault and that there is -- and we can get into that -- that is not accepted broad wisdom. I talk to a lot a lot a lot of left, right, center, neutral economists [and] you are the only person I've talked to in a year of covering this crisis who has a view that we have two equally acute crises: a financial crisis and a household debt crisis that is equally acute in the same kind of way. I literally don't know who else I can talk to support that view. I literally don't know anyone other than you who has that view, and you are the person [snicker] who went to Congress to oversee it and you are presenting a very, very narrow view to the American people.


WARREN: I'm sorry. That is not a narrow view. What you are saying is that it is the broad view to think only about trying to save the banks [Davidson sputters] and say "Hey! the American economy will recover at some point and we'll worry about the families [Davidson talking over]." I think that is the narrow view and I think I have the broad view. The broad view is that these two things are connected to each other. And the notion that you can save the banking system while the American economy goes down the tubes is just foolish.

Davidson seriously DOES NOT BELIEVE there is an acute household debt crisis? Isn't household debt at the very root of the subprime mortgage crisis? Isn't the issue of household debt at the very root of the health care crisis? For years, major industries have depended on American consumers being willing to drive themselves deeper and deeper into debt in order to keep spending and spending and spending. And those same inducements were made in the mortgage market, the same false dreams, sold by the same insiders, who can't be bothered to explain what synthetic derivatives are to ordinary people.

But now, those mortgages are resetting, and, unsurprisingly, tons of people are defaulting on them. And those that will avoid default will only do so by vastly curtailing spending. They won't be buying that new car, or that new furniture, or the cool new gadget, or going on vacation. This is going to cause the market to reel. And beyond avoiding future debt, households will start paying down their debt as well. They'll look to get out from under their credit card burden -- and the threat of zeroing those balances is causing the credit card companies to retaliate by lowering credit limits and jacking up interest rates. This is precisely the "assault on the middle class" that Warren describes. All of this ENTIRELY ELUDES Davidson, who is straight up livin' in that bubble!

Planet Money might want to think about returning to our own solar system, maybe!

UPDATE: It has been pointed out that since this interview occurred, Davidson has apologized for the overall tenor of this interview, which seems pretty appropriate!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
406
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- HisPetGoat I'm a Fan of HisPetGoat 76 fans permalink
photo

I had the horrible vision of Adam Davidson losing his comfortable job and winding up homeless. Although the experience may teach him humility, how sad it would be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 05/17/2009
- azdirk I'm a Fan of azdirk 15 fans permalink

Over the years, I have used credit (never a credit card) to buy big ticket items, such as cars, tractor mowers, campers, etc., rather than expend capital. I then paid back the loans ahead of time. In essence, I was renting money and the interest was the rent I was paying. The problem with today's family debts is that there is no capital to preserve. There is no fall-back position if things go sour.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

We must all pay off the credit cards and then shred them... never, never, never again use debt to finance anything... pay cash. If you don't have the cash do without.
our families, our households and indeed our individuals.. we are all under assault.. literally, by financial markets that have zero interest in keeping us healthy financially or otherwise... what will happen when we are all broke? I feel that circumstance is not too far from becoming reality.
Democrats nor Republicans have the answers.. our so called representatives in the house and the senate are all the same - they have been bought and payed for by the money stolen from our economy legally... and they have all created the means for the markets to do so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 05/17/2009
- Hawaii5-0 I'm a Fan of Hawaii5-0 16 fans permalink
photo

Better yet, write your Congressman to apply the usury laws, or repeal the reinterpretation of the usury laws so we can all sue the CC companies for usury. Our elected reps should be representing us, not corporate interests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 05/18/2009
- AZ85283 I'm a Fan of AZ85283 12 fans permalink

Can't do that in this world. I wanted to rent a car and they told me I needed a credit card not my debit card, took me two hrs to find something with my address on it to prove that my address is legal. They made stupid comments like you could close your account, and when I said I could not pay the credit card they just looked dumb. Also had the same issue with U-haul. Will be taking a trip in June and wonder if not having a credit card will be a problem?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 05/18/2009
- snesich I'm a Fan of snesich 27 fans permalink
photo

"...you are the only person I've talked to in a year of covering this crisis who has a view that we have two equally acute crises: a financial crisis and a household debt crisis that is equally acute in the same kind of way. I literally don't know who else I can talk to support that view. I literally don't know anyone other than you who has that view..."

What "Planet" is this guy Davidson on, anyway? What kind of "Money" is he talking about? Who gave him his job? How could someone be so obtuse? So uninformed? So clueless?

So much for this claptrap about NPR being "liberal".

"Agenda"?!?! And what "agenda" do you have, Mr. Davidson? Are you a lackey for certain financial interests or just lazy and ignorant, or some of each?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

What does acute mean?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 05/17/2009
- AZ85283 I'm a Fan of AZ85283 12 fans permalink

Maybe she should have replied that he needed to talk to someone other than the bankers, the Wall St. welfare cheaters, the big insurance CEO and talk to ordinary people that have lost their jobs, their homes and their pensions. Then maybe he could have found someone else who would know that there is two crisis going on in this country. He should not only apologize but resign --he's too stupid to hold his position.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 05/18/2009

" I think you're well known... as someone whose work points to a conclusion that banks and credit-card companies are giving a raw deal to consumers -- I think it would not be terribly hard to find people who would agree with you -- that your work is in opposition to the banks."
= AD HOMINEM

" I talk to a lot a lot a lot of left, right, center, neutral economists [and] you are the only person I've talked to in a year of covering this crisis who has a view that we have two equally acute crises: a financial crisis and a household debt crisis that is equally acute in the same kind of way. I literally don't know who else I can talk to support that view. "
=APPEAL TO (unspecified, perhaps nonexistant) AUTHORITY

The public discourse is **** because it is ALL, ALL RHETORICAL FALLACY. NO ONE SEEMS TO KNOW WHAT A VALID ARGUMENT SOUNDS LIKE ANYMORE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 05/17/2009
- HisPetGoat I'm a Fan of HisPetGoat 76 fans permalink
photo

He also uses argumentum ad ignorantiam and ad populum.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 05/17/2009
- GEOehms I'm a Fan of GEOehms 5 fans permalink
photo

And let's not forget ad lib and ad con, to be sure, ad hoc ad infinitum. Adios.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 05/17/2009
- DonRoberto I'm a Fan of DonRoberto 136 fans permalink
photo

I am always amazed at those who think America's financial problems are all macroeconomic. The biggest problem facing America is microeconomic, in the same way that all politics is local. American families are falling behind financially; the ones that are not yet in crisis are worried, because they are only one layoff, one illness, or one credit rate hike away from crisis themselves.

The massive Republican redistribution of wealth from the middle classes to the very richest amongst us has been a direct result of deregulation, regressive tax cuts, and selective enforcement of existing regulation. Strengthening the middle class will require reasonable and enforceable re-regulation of the financial, healthcare, and insurance industries, so that ordinary working Americans will once again get a fair deal --- instead of a fleecing --- from companies that should be competing for their business, but which increasingly see their customers as shortterm resources to be exploited and discarded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

Oops. I forgot to post a link to the info about the NY AG letter.

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2009/apr/apr23a_09.html

Commentary available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owv1hir-1S0&feature=channel

By the way, you won't find anything about this letter on Elizabeth Warren's COP web site, even though she is one of only four officials to whom it was addressed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

Surreal. Elizabeth Warren is the person who cannot think outside of the bubble, and she clearly has an agenda. She has the same agenda all participants in the mainstream discourse have: to prop up an unsustainable system.

Ask yourself this: Why has she done absolutely nothing to inform the American public of a letter addressed to her by the New York attorney general accusing Secretary Paulson and Chairman Bernanke of major U.S. securities law violations? The answer: Because she knows that the financial system requires lawless behavior, and that any transparency will bring it to its knees.

Final point: I am a law student taking Payment Systems, and we use a book authored by Professor Warren. The wire-transfer system allows large corporations to transfer vast sums of money around the world in a virtually risk-free manner. Using banks, it is just as easy for a Chicago company to ensure payment from Bombay or Johannesberg as it is for the company to get paid by a Charlottesville company. The laws are pretty much the exact same all around the world.
What is striking about Professor Warren's book is that she never asks a simple question that screams out at anyone who thinks about sustainable system: Is that a good idea? Should it be so easy to contract with someone halfway around the world? Know why she doesn't ask that? Because it doesn't even occur to her anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 05/17/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 70 fans permalink
photo

After listening to the broadcast, I still have utmost respect for Elizabeth Warren :-)

IT'S ALL CONNECTED FOLKS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/17/2009
photo

I've watched Elzabeth Warren of the Daily Show and Real Time with Bill Maher and the lady obviously knows what she is talking about. The jerkola from Planet Money is a Repub t00/, who doesn't mind Wall Street getting hundreds of billions as long as not a dime goes to the poor or middle class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 05/17/2009

You have got to be kidding me. As a fan if both Planet Money (it takes many of the complex issues that are facing our society at the moment and truly simplifies them down to the level that everyone should be able to understand) and Huffington Post I think this discussion is stupid. Lets focus all this anger and hatred at the Bankers, Congress and the Regulators that got us into this mess. What Adam was doing was asking Elizabeth Warren to address several of the accusations that have been leveled against her.

One of the things that got us into this mess is that we did not listen to all views.

Get over it and get on to the people that need to be attacked. All this does is distract the anger from where it belongs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 05/17/2009

Thank heaven for Elizabeth Warren. We watched her every chance we got & felt as if we had one person n whom we could place trust in her integrity as a person & expert in finance & economy. We don't see her reflected an iota in the acts or omissions of Obama- for whom we voted by the millions, never before for a Democrat. He has harmed us beyond the Bush Cheney Congressional corruptions if that seems possible, because we believed his scripted roles played & played again then jettisoned with pragmatic ease that added the stress of betrayal of our babies' futures that he let disappear in the lunacy of the totally corrupt politician-corporate complex intent on killing the Golden Goose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 AM on 05/17/2009
- LeLoup I'm a Fan of LeLoup 33 fans permalink
photo

Davidson was trying to imitate Bill-O I guess. Unprofessional, argumentative, disrespectful, (Try to find one money manager or banker he treated the same way...good luck!) and obviously clueless. I mean, it doesn't take a Nobel prize in Economics to realize that an economy like the USA, that is 72% consumer-driven, NEEDS financially healthy consumers to thrive.

In a word, a disaster of an interview.

As for Planet Money, it started in an awesome way with their initial collaboration with This American Life. The shows "A giant pool of money" and "Another Frightening Money Show" were outstanding pieces of investigative journalism that explained in plain English, complex econ concepts with context at that.

Alas, the quality of the show has degraded rather significantly since then. The interview with Professor Warren was the nadir.

Can they rebound?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 05/16/2009
- drlouise I'm a Fan of drlouise 17 fans permalink

Conservatives don't hate America! They just distract people with their conservative social agenda while they rob people blind and fill their own pockets. Cheney and his ilk must be unbelievably rich now with their ties to Halliburton, or is it Blackwater now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 05/16/2009
- moongal6 I'm a Fan of moongal6 82 fans permalink
photo

the former veep has over half a million shares of Halliburton and KBR. These stocks are still doing okay.
He also gets $15,000 a month for his 'pension' from Hallib..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 05/16/2009
- cjt1957 I'm a Fan of cjt1957 19 fans permalink

LBJ's widow, Lady Bird Johnson was KBR/Halliburtons largest stock holder untill her death. I guess at least one Dem did OK on their profits....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 05/16/2009
- LHoney I'm a Fan of LHoney 43 fans permalink
photo

I've always thought Johnson was on the grassy knoll because Kennedy was going to end the vietnam war...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 05/17/2009
photo

Lady Bird didn't invent a war to boost her stock portfolio...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 05/17/2009
photo

Saw Ms Warren on Bill Maher last night and her explaination and plans made a lot of sense to me. Our current financial situation has been 50 years in the making. And what party has been in power for most of that time? THE GOP. Their deregulation and disregard for the middle class is what got us here.

We can only hope that in the 4 years president Obama can make some real long lasting changes that affect the prosperity for the next 50 years

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 05/16/2009
- cjt1957 I'm a Fan of cjt1957 19 fans permalink

Of those 50 years, how many were the Dems in controll of Congress. Remember ALL Spending bills have to Start in the House... Keep trying, you may convence some under educated that the problems come from only one party, not both...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 05/16/2009
photo

Not one party. One philosophy. The philosophy that our financial institutions should be run like the lawless Old West. Sorry there are too many thieves out there pardner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 AM on 05/17/2009

You could of at least spelled "convince" correctly, while talking about the "uneducated"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 05/17/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect