"Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - "Planet Money" Reporter Paints Elizabeth Warren As Agenda-Driven stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-15-09 12:12 PM   |   Updated: 05-15-09 03:42 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Meltdown Bailout

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dilly and a half! Chittum calls the interview "cringeworthy," a "disaster," and, most appropriately, a "dismal example of bubble thinking." If that last blast reminds you of comedienne Tina Fey's explication on "the bubble" -- the safe space from which the privileged and coddled project their incompetence without concern for consequences -- you couldn't be more right! Check out some of this nonsense!

As Chittum details (and you may listen to the entire interview here) the entire foundation of Davidson's exchange is that Warren is fueled entirely by populist animus and cannot be considered a fair arbiter from the point of view of bankers. Warren objects to this premise, saying, "I just think you're wrong. I'm somebody who believes in free markets. The American middle class is under assault... basically since the 70's... I'm not an advocate. i don't get paid for anything. I'm an empiricist. I'm data driven."

The "bubble thinking" then starts in earnest:

DAVIDSON: I think you're well known... as someone whose work points to a conclusion that banks and credit-card companies are giving a raw deal to consumers -- I think it would not be terribly hard to find people who would agree with you -- that your work is in opposition to the banks.


WARREN: If you don't have somebody who cares about American families, then they don't have a seat at the table in this debate. I think this point is really important. We have a little tight insider world who understand exactly what synthetic derivatives are. My job in this world is to make sure that when these enormous profound decisions are being made, that the American family is there. That they are part of that process... because the decisions that are made will be different.

And that's exactly right! Ordinary Americans don't understand the world of synthetic derivatives. This is precisely the sort of thing that gets discussed in the business press entirely from the perspective of clucking, cliquish, insiders. This is precisely why Julie Satow and I did a video that started to scratch the surface of what derivatives are. Since we did so, by the way, people have sent us emails, thanking us, but there's no need to do that! The derivatives market exploded and landed on everyone's head, and people are entitled to know why that happened. Ordinary people deserve answers! I believe that journalists are obligated to at least attempt to provide them! And Elizabeth Warren simply agrees with that contention. Bully for her!

But, wow, Adam Davidson? He is simply NOT OF THIS EARTH. Read this nonsense!

DAVIDSON: The American families are not -- These issues of crucial, the essential need for credit intermediation are as close to accepted principles among every serious thinker on this topic. The view that the American family, that you hold very powerfully, is fully under assault and that there is -- and we can get into that -- that is not accepted broad wisdom. I talk to a lot a lot a lot of left, right, center, neutral economists [and] you are the only person I've talked to in a year of covering this crisis who has a view that we have two equally acute crises: a financial crisis and a household debt crisis that is equally acute in the same kind of way. I literally don't know who else I can talk to support that view. I literally don't know anyone other than you who has that view, and you are the person [snicker] who went to Congress to oversee it and you are presenting a very, very narrow view to the American people.


WARREN: I'm sorry. That is not a narrow view. What you are saying is that it is the broad view to think only about trying to save the banks [Davidson sputters] and say "Hey! the American economy will recover at some point and we'll worry about the families [Davidson talking over]." I think that is the narrow view and I think I have the broad view. The broad view is that these two things are connected to each other. And the notion that you can save the banking system while the American economy goes down the tubes is just foolish.

Davidson seriously DOES NOT BELIEVE there is an acute household debt crisis? Isn't household debt at the very root of the subprime mortgage crisis? Isn't the issue of household debt at the very root of the health care crisis? For years, major industries have depended on American consumers being willing to drive themselves deeper and deeper into debt in order to keep spending and spending and spending. And those same inducements were made in the mortgage market, the same false dreams, sold by the same insiders, who can't be bothered to explain what synthetic derivatives are to ordinary people.

But now, those mortgages are resetting, and, unsurprisingly, tons of people are defaulting on them. And those that will avoid default will only do so by vastly curtailing spending. They won't be buying that new car, or that new furniture, or the cool new gadget, or going on vacation. This is going to cause the market to reel. And beyond avoiding future debt, households will start paying down their debt as well. They'll look to get out from under their credit card burden -- and the threat of zeroing those balances is causing the credit card companies to retaliate by lowering credit limits and jacking up interest rates. This is precisely the "assault on the middle class" that Warren describes. All of this ENTIRELY ELUDES Davidson, who is straight up livin' in that bubble!

Planet Money might want to think about returning to our own solar system, maybe!

UPDATE: It has been pointed out that since this interview occurred, Davidson has apologized for the overall tenor of this interview, which seems pretty appropriate!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
Yesterday, CJR's Ryan Chittum posted a blistering critique of NPR's Adam Davidson's attempt at an interview with TARP overseer Elizabeth Warren on "Planet Money," and, baby, it is a well-deserved dill...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
406
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- 452021 I'm a Fan of 452021 2 fans permalink

President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending “unsustainable,” warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries.

“We can’t keep on just borrowing from China,” Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. “We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.”

I thought the left said this was a Hannity, FOX News, Tea Party talking point and now Obama is saying it. WOW!!! What do you left wing loons think now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

No, what we're saying is that this has been going on for 20 years - trade imbalance and public debt- and the conservatives haven't made a peep until the last couple months.

Also, the reason the current situation is this way is because of conservative free-market supply-side economic policy. Obama inherited the deficit, and now is trying to change WHAT we deficit spend on, with the ultimate goal of reeping the returns on these investments (stimulus package) years down the road to pay down the debt-- just like after WWII.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 05/15/2009
- santadog42 I'm a Fan of santadog42 3 fans permalink

And where did all this debt come from? Have you been asleep for the past 8 years? Obama is spending money in an attempt to deal with the economic crisis. Whether these policies will be successful or not is yet to be seen. But he didn't rack of all of this debt in the last 4 months. We had a surplus in 2000, and after 8 years of tax cuts for the rich, an unnecessary and poorly managed war against a country who did not attack us or pose any threat to us, and profligate spending on the part of a Republican president and a Republican congress (for the first 6 years) our national debt has exploded. I may be a "left wing loon", but at least I've been paying attention to what has been going on in this country for the last 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

I just listened to the entire 74 minute interview and at times it seems they weren't even in the same conversation. The interviewer's need to be right and sound impressively informed got completely in the way of him hearing what his interview subject had to say.

I don't think he's accustomed to being told he's flat out wrong and after that he just seemed to dig in his heels and keep returning to his fixed point of view rather than flowing with and being informed by what she was saying.

It was shocking to hear how little grasp he had of what she was trying to say - that the financial/banking crisis and the crisis in the middle class with debt, income stagnation, etc. were profoundly related and not a matter of priorities that needed to be "triaged" in order of acuteness. I'm glad that upon listening to himself he was able to hear just how thick and intellectually shallow he was being.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 05/15/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 78 fans permalink

Planet Money just fell out of orbit on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 05/15/2009
- madHenry I'm a Fan of madHenry 74 fans permalink
photo

Dude is no Jerome McDonald, that's for sure. He's always been the dimmest bulb on NPR.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 05/15/2009

What I cannot figure out is how did banks and business get on without the able consumer? Who approved those loans and mortgages to consumers that could barely make the payments? What were the guidelines? Who were the wise ones that set up those guidelines only to turn around and blame the consumer? Some wisdom.
People, I mean families and all living human individuals, are the larger part of the circle. To think otherwise is preposterous and reeks of bigotry and stupidity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 05/15/2009
- AmeriGus I'm a Fan of AmeriGus 11 fans permalink

The interviewer had the agenda.

Davidson sounds ridiculous and in need of jettisoning...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 05/15/2009
- Christian I'm a Fan of Christian 30 fans permalink
photo

It amazes me that there are so many people with very short field of views, their ability to think on broad perspectives with empathy for all at the table is beyond their mental scope. It just seems that there are so many "not to bright" people our there these days. The republican base down here in the south represents the least educated in our society, people who need things in simple terms to get their heads around it. The republicans have been making fun of intelligence for years calling educated people "pin heads" and it has directly played a part in the IQ quotient of their party and the citizen they claim to support. No doubt, this guy was a republican.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

Well put

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 05/15/2009

I fully agree that he was way off base in this interview in all of the ways pointed out.

But in his defense he has done good work before. I do understand things like how CDO's shifted from insurance to gambling thanks to his work on the show.

I have noticed his ideological bias, but it isn't the "I don't care about the truth" crap spewed on CNBC and Fox, it's the forgivable kind, pure ignorance. You have to discern what he has to offer and when he is out of his element...however that's always true. Arianna isn't always right and Lou Dobbs isn't always wrong...I was going to use Rush or Bill O'Reilly, but they might be always wrong... Who knows, they're so busy "carrying water", who knows what or why they really believe.

I wouldn't get rid of him just yet, he could mature...it is a show run by young people, they have that ability still, sometimes.

It would really be great if Warren would do another interview with them where she gets to lay out her opinions and rationale as, unfortunately, that was a missed opportunity at that time, but now they are so chastened they would do it right this time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 05/15/2009
- Marnie1 I'm a Fan of Marnie1 41 fans permalink

Once again we see a clueless Repocon puppet.
No wonder the economy is so screwed up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

The root problem is the decline of the middle class. Lets face facts people who are not contributing to the tax role 43% and rising, a full 43 % of the American population does not meet the minimum compensation to pay taxes. That is horrific, and during the last 20 some odd years the middle class has eroded and continues to erode. Replacing income with access to credit is an unsustainable monetary system.

Obviously an amped up banking system that bases its monetary growth on over burdening the average low wage worker with what in effect is an interest rate tax only supports a plutocratic minority. What Davidson fails to realizes is that type of system needs an increasing in real wages not a year on year stagnation or falling real wage.

Basically the average guy cant keep up with a rent to own society. Not with out the third or fourth job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 05/15/2009
- TomFox I'm a Fan of TomFox 11 fans permalink
photo

...but we keep being told that the WalMart effect basically means an increase in real income as opposed to nominal income.

BTW, great post. These are the same folks b*tching about all people not paying paying their fair share. Well it would be nice to pair a fair share if you could at least meet the minimum income requirement to pay taxes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 05/15/2009

I have heard Ms. Warren speak severally times on shows like "Morning Joe" and I have found her to be very impressive. Frankly, I'm glad there is someone like her overseeing things like TARP. Of course, there is a consumer debt problem here as well and it is intertwined with the bank and mortgage crisis. Banks fed credit cards to consumers like drug dealers feeding addicts. Then they can't figure out how so much debt, much of which can't be paid off, was piled up. It is like giving a mortgage to someone w/o the means to pay and wondering why you end having to foreclose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 05/15/2009

They say the Reagan era is over but no, it's just been institutionalized into mainstream thinking. Save the banks and it will trickle down to the populace.
Trickle on is more like it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

"The Reagan era has been institutionalized into mainstream thinking."

So true, especially in the media. It's a large root of the resistance Obama is facing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 05/15/2009

Barrrrf! First, the government shoves TARP money down the throats of the nation’s largest financial institutions, whether they wanted or needed it or not. (And most, recall, did not.) Next, Congress appoints an oversight panel that ends up being headed by—egad!—industry scourge Elizabeth Warren. Sure enough, nothing these institutions have done since is up to Warren’s standards. Now she’s demanding taxpayers have “a place at the table” as compensation decisions get hashed out. Guess what? Nobody invited the taxpayers to the table in the first place. They barged their way in. It’s like the guy who crashes the wedding then complains that bride’s family overpaid for the catering. . . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

I'm sure tax payers are very sorry about crashing the party they're paying for. I think it's pretty short sighted to ignore demand as a primary component of the problem. This is why we always get the double dip during recent recessions. Lenders are recapitalized but consumers can't take advantage. But by all means, let's do the same thing again. It does seem to eventually work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 05/15/2009
- Christian I'm a Fan of Christian 30 fans permalink
photo

Bull, these bankers are pigs at the troff and they should have had their banks taken away from them, they have shown they don't have the smarts to run them profitably haven't they? They are lucky they have a seat at the table. The real injustice is that they are still fat and rich, they should have been fired and the profits they made over the last 5 years forfeited back to the banks for the share holders and tax payers, that would have been justice! As far as I am concerned, they have shown they care nothing for the country and I want someone at the table that represents the citizens of this country. You believe the money lenders own the temple and should be free to do as they wish, I side with Christ and call for them to be cleared from the temple grounds. It was that event and teaching that lead to Usury Laws for hundreds of years until the free traders convinced the politicians to remove them. What is fair and right doesn't enter the question for people like you, this is free enterprise and one should be able to charge what the market will bear. You probably go to church on Sunday too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 05/15/2009
- TomFox I'm a Fan of TomFox 11 fans permalink
photo

actually pigs eat, hogs get slaughtered. These people are hogs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 05/15/2009
photo

Clone this woman and put her in charge of everything!

When I'm really depressed about the world (like today), along comes an article about Elizabeth Warren and I feel like there is hope in the world - like the fog lifts for a moment and I see so clearly.

After this episode is over, I suggest we put Elizabeth Warren's portrait on the $20 bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 05/15/2009

While this was a heated discussion between the two, I think Davidson acknowledged himself that he stepped over the line. From my point of view, I quite like heated discussions every now and then (and by the way both had good points), sometimes the interview world is a little too sterile, a little too polite. I want to hear people challenged on their point of view and I want them to passionately defend it. I think the Planet Money Team in general are professional and very good at reporting on financial issues in an accessible way. I think Elizabeth Warren is an incredibly talented individual and I wish she were in a position to take more decisive action, but she's not and she's human and therefore fallible. Davidson did his job, not perfectly, but then again even a site like Huffington can relate to that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 05/15/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect