iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

RACHEL ALEXANDRA: First Filly To Win Preakness Since 1924

BETH HARRIS   05/17/09 12:49 AM ET   AP

Preakness Stakes

BALTIMORE — Girls rule! The best 3-year-old in the land just happens to be a filly named Rachel Alexandra.

Jockey Calvin Borel all but guaranteed victory in the Preakness Stakes and, boy, did she deliver, becoming the first filly in 85 years to win the second leg of the Triple Crown.

A rangy bay _ as big as most of the horses she beat _ Rachel Alexandra shot to the front Saturday and wasn't seriously challenged until a late close by Kentucky Derby winner Mine That Bird.

By beating him she ended any chance that thoroughbred racing would have a Triple Crown winner this season. Affirmed was the last Triple Crown winner in 1978.

Rachel Alexandra led by a head at the quarter and half-mile poles. She stretched it to a half-length at the three-quarters pole. She was ahead by four lengths going down the stretch. In the end, the 9-5 favorite won by a length in her first race against the boys.

The win also validated Borel's decision to climb off Mine That Bird and stay on the filly as her regular rider.

Now Borel may get a shot at a personal Triple Crown, if Rachel Alexandra goes on to the Belmont Stakes in three weeks. The 1 1/2-mile race is the most grueling of the three.

"I'm not worried about nothing," he said. "It's going to take a racehorse to beat her."

Rachel Alexandra had already beaten up on her own gender, winning her five previous races by a combined 43 1/2 lengths.

Musket Man finished third, as he did in the Derby, followed by Flying Private and Big Drama.

Rachel Alexandra covered 1 3-16 miles in 1:55.08 and became the first horse to win at Pimlico from the No. 13 post on the far outside. She paid $5.60, $4.60 and $3.60. Mine That Bird returned $6.60 and $4.80, while Musket Man paid $5 to show.

"I'm thrilled to death with the race my little horse ran," said Chip Woolley Jr., who trains Mine That Bird. "You have to give that filly credit. She's a great one."

Rachel Alexandra earned $660,000 from the purse of $1.1 million.

Papa Clem was sixth, followed by Terrain, Luv Gov, General Quarters, Friesan Fire, Pioneerof the Nile, Tone It Down and Take the Points.

The last filly to win the Preakness was Nellie Morse in 1924. Rachel Alexandra became the second filly to go off as the wagering favorite and win. Whimsical at 8-5 odds was the first, in 1906.

Rachel Alexandra stumbled slightly leaving the gate, then stuck her head in front at the first turn and refused to give way.

Her first challenge was to get rid of Big Drama, a persistent presence from inside down the backside and into the final turn. Once she shook him loose and opened up the four-length lead at the top of the stretch, Mine That Bird made a run at her.

Borel sensed she was tiring, and took firm hold of the reins.

"I had to put the bit in her mouth because she was kind of struggling," he said. "It kind of took a lot out of her."

Still, she had enough left at the end and crossed the finish line to the cheers of 77,850 fans _ the smallest crowd since 1983 _ at Pimlico.

"Awesome," said Bob Baffert, who trains Pioneerof the Nile. "Rachel Alexandra is amazing. She took the heat and kept on going."

The most impressive of Rachel Alexandra's performances was her stunning victory by 20 1/4 lengths in the Kentucky Oaks, the day before the Kentucky Derby.

This ending was far different from the last time a filly challenged the boys. Eight Belles finished a gallant second in last year's Kentucky Derby, then broke both front legs while galloping past the finish line and was destroyed on the track.

This time, it was all cheers. No tears.

"Rachel Alexandra was great," trainer Todd Pletcher said. "She took it right to them, led every step of the way. She deserves a lot of credit."

Rachel Alexandra, marked by two white spots on her head, wasn't even supposed to be in the Preakness. Her original owners, who named the filly after a 13-year-old granddaughter, didn't nominate her to the Triple Crown races, believing fillies should run only against their own gender.

After the Oaks, Rachel Alexandra was sold to Jess Jackson, founder of Kendall-Jackson winery, and Harold McCormick.

They ponied up $100,000 to buy her a spot in the race, and the gamble paid off.

"There was a lot of social criticism and doubt about whether she was capable," Jackson said. "I think I would've taken some heat if she hadn't performed well, so that takes some heat off my shoulders."

Borel had total faith in the filly, making the unprecedented decision to dump Mine That Bird after his stunning Derby victory at 50-1 odds.

"She's the best horse in the country right now, bar none," he said.

The last filly to win a Triple Crown race was Rags to Riches, who beat the Jackson-owned Curlin in the 2007 Belmont Stakes. Her victory was the first by a filly in that race in 102 years.

The start of the Preakness was delayed slightly when Big Drama reared up in the gate and dumped his rider. Rachel Alexandra stood at the opposite end, waiting patiently for the biggest test of her life.

Unlike the Derby, Mine That Bird had a tougher trip with Mike Smith, Borel's replacement, aboard. A light rain fell at the start of the race, but it didn't turn the dirt track into the kind of slop that he flew through to win at Churchill Downs.

"My hats off to her. She's a talented, talented mare," Smith said. "Anyone else would have caved."

Borel crossed the finish line, wagging his right index finger to signal their No. 1 status.

"Turning for home, I knew I was home free," he said.

Fans hoping for a rematch in the Belmont will have to wait a few days for a decision, although Mine That Bird will definitely run.

"I'll depend on her. The horse always tells you if they're ready," Jackson said. "Would we love to run? Yes. Could she win? We think so. We've already shown she can run with colts. It's a question now of her best interest."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

BALTIMORE — Girls rule! The best 3-year-old in the land just happens to be a filly named Rachel Alexandra. Jockey Calvin Borel all but guaranteed victory in the Preakness Stakes and, boy, did s...
BALTIMORE — Girls rule! The best 3-year-old in the land just happens to be a filly named Rachel Alexandra. Jockey Calvin Borel all but guaranteed victory in the Preakness Stakes and, boy, did s...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 206
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:53 PM on 05/17/2009
Fillies get a 5 lb allowance because they're usually smaller/lighter and less aggressive. Probably makes no difference.

Mine That Bird actually doesn't have the soundest bloodlines, so I'm glad he won't be passing them on. The Unbridled line isn't known for soundness, and his grandsire was retired after the Derby with an injury. Rachel Alexandra actually has sounder bloodlines. Neither one is great yet.

Rachel's performance was remarkable for many reasons. She was moved to a new barn, with new groom and trainer, less than 2 weeks ago, she was never supposed to have run this past weekend and had not been trained for this race, she set fast early fractions, she was floated wide on the turn and lost ground, and she apparently didn't like the track. She had every right to get tired. She would also have had every legitimate excuse had she lost - but she won despite it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lerrin
01:51 PM on 05/17/2009
Nothing against MTB's jockey (Mike Smith) or RA, BUT:
MTB would have likely had a better ride had Chantal Sutherland been riding him (who rode him to SEVERAL significant wins in Canada), if only because she was more familiar with the individual horse (this being Smith's first flight on the Bird).
Yes, that relationship between horse and rider CAN matter (FAR more than the insignficant 5#s that has folks caterwalling).
It's somewhat mind-boggling that she wasn't asked to 'fly' the Bird.
CANNOT imagine that she was not available.
Gets even more dicey given that Smith and Sutherland are linked off-track.
12:38 PM on 05/17/2009
Here's the whole story on the purchse of "the Bird" and his pedigree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_that_bird

There was an article in the Toronto Sun a while back that indicated "Bird" liked fillies a lot more than he liked to run - so he was gelded; now that he could care less about the fillies, he runs like Hell and seems to love it.

Hope this helps - Bird is a great horse - unfortunate that he will not produce offspring but the lines he came from are well built and certainly don't end with Bird.

Congrats to RA - here's her story:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Alexandra

Last link - "why filles carry less weight than colts" - http://books.google.com/books?id=q1FRFw1FImgC&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=why+do+fillies+carry+less+weight+than+colts&source=bl&ots=yV4WFsAYcF&sig=wsuSYu2ZgAX3jbiHfVcnfrquo_A&hl=en&ei=YjwQSvbZHaCm8QTthKShBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPA146,M1

Usually the fillies aren't as big, strong or fast as the colts - so they are given allowances. All other non female horses in the race must carry the same weight.

Hope all this helps. :) Bird is still a great horse and a great story - RA is a great filly - she'll soon retire to produce some fine foals of her own.
11:38 AM on 05/17/2009
I heard no one went this year because of some stupid new regulation
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ohioan730
10:58 AM on 05/17/2009
Its been that long since a female won? I suppose females are used just for breeding? I didn't know that but I don't really keep up with horseraces much. Anyway, good for Rachel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
11:20 AM on 05/17/2009
No, the males are usually bigger and stronger than the fillies, that's all.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
10:36 AM on 05/17/2009
What a beautiful, big girl!
these horses are highly competitive, they love to run..........and win.
08:08 AM on 05/17/2009
What does, "put the bit in her mouth" mean? Is that why her teeth are showing in the one of the photos? Did the bit tear up the inside of her mouth? Why do people like stuff like this? Seems cruel and gross.
08:54 AM on 05/17/2009
All Borel meant was that he had to apply pressure to keep her running. As she was tiring from the hot fractions, she was ready to "spit the bit" - It would be difficult to be able to control a horse without the useage of bits. There is no need for rough or mis-treatment of introducing bits to horses. Just take time with them so, they get used to the bit. However, if you want to talk cruel and gross, suggest you consider the Charge of the Light Brigade. Taking horses into combat against machine guns, cannon fire and the like is truly gross and cruel.

Mine That Bird was very much into his bit as he closed rapidly after having to check and swing wide. However, at the end, you witnessed some truly excellent horses near the wire, whether male or female. RA was where Winning Colors should have been had it not been for the mean spirited Woody Stevens and his flunky, Pat Day.
12:06 PM on 05/17/2009
Mine That Bird is really a better horse than Rachel Alexandra. He is capable of remarkable bursts of speed. If he hadn't been blocked in the stretch during the Preakness, he'd have caught up and won. In a two-horse race, Mine That Bird would clean Rachel Alexandra's clock.
10:37 AM on 05/17/2009
Putting a horse on the bit or putting the bit in the mouth means that he needed to communicate with her. There's a vacant space on the gums behind the horse's teeth where the bit lies. If the horse takes the bit and holds it with its teeth, the communication is lost and the horse runs wild. Borel simply wanted to control the horse more by communicating with her via the bit. The bit doesn't tear up the mouth if used properly by an experienced rider, which Borel is. Hope this helps and I welcome any other thoughts.
11:11 AM on 05/17/2009
Thank you for the info. It is helpful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ImaVeteran
07:55 AM on 05/17/2009
I thought they added lead weights to a horse to make the horse carry the same weight as the others.
I heard this 30 years ago. Don't know if it's true though.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
10:35 AM on 05/17/2009
It's calling "handicapping"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lochnessmonster
07:19 AM on 05/17/2009
Great Race but I was hoping Mine That Bird would have won. I love the fact that Luv Gov was named after Spitzer!
03:17 AM on 05/17/2009
Ok, I just learned that in the Preakness Rachel Alexandra only carried 121 lbs. of weight and all of the colts had to carry 126 lbs. of weight. Now tell me - is this fair? If she wants to compete against the colts, she should have had to carry the same weight as they did.

For all of you crowing about how she beat the boys, why was she not required to carry the same weight as the boys?
photo
JohnFromCensornati
Free your mind and your ass will follow.
06:17 AM on 05/17/2009
Do you really think that 5 lbs is significant to 1,000 lb animals? I don't.
07:40 AM on 05/17/2009
Five Pounds? This was not Phar Lap having pounds and pounds placed upon his back - For one, thing, she outweighed MTB by a hundred pounds. The five pounds has been traditional for years for young horses. Five pounds did not the difference make. The difference was the loss of lengths for MTB when he had to check and switch to run wide. However, Rachel Alexandra is one of the finest specimens of horse flesh, I have ever witnessed. This is one gorgeous young lady. If, one was a Bonny Ledbetter looks player, they wouldn't have needed a racing form. RA was perfection, while MTB and Musket Man were close behind. My wife cold decked the trifecta strictly on looks. Now, onward to Belmont, where MTB can use the extra distance. This little guy is no fluke. But, I do wish Wiggins could have been in the winner's circle instead of the dispenser of drugs; no not to Curlin and RA, but to his other runners. Wiggins did all of the work in developing RA. He deserved the spotlight, not Asmussen.
03:12 AM on 05/17/2009
Who cares what's the gender of the winner, except feminists? They're animals, for G_d's sake. The jockey, on the other hand, can write his own ticket; as he chose both winners to ride.
03:19 AM on 05/17/2009
So true. Some have posted that this was a great win for women!! What????? She's not a woman, for God's sake, but a horse. A very beautiful and talented one, but still an animal.

And she had a 5 pound weight advantage, carrying only 121 lbs. of weight to the colts required 126 lbs.
08:56 AM on 05/17/2009
The drop-dead gorgeous Rachel weighs 100 pounds more than the marvelous Bird.
07:48 AM on 05/17/2009
That's it, downplay her gender. I resent the word "feminists" as used. What is the reason for this word......because men are selfish, self-centered, not quite evloved beings who MUST feel superior to something, so they do their best to keep women down. We don't need that word.....we just need women who will step up and show the world that the mess the world is in was created by these blowhards who think they are superior.

Rachel did that yesterday!!!! Nothing can be said to take away that win........she stood up !!!!!!!
08:42 AM on 05/17/2009
Maybe comparing women to animals isn't the best analogy, especially one that had to be whipped to win...
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
10:38 AM on 05/17/2009
Her win IS a great metaphor. I just love horses!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:12 AM on 05/17/2009
The Triple Crown is so hard to achieve because of the differences in race length and track conditions. Notwithstanding that Rachel Alexandra didn't race the Derby; she has no chance at the TC. A rare horse balances speed vs endurance for the 1 1/4 Derby and 1 3/16 Preakness, then less than a month later holds out in the 1 1/2 mile Belmont. It's funny that one horse is the "best ever" after a win, however decisive. Horses are specialists just like human runners. I have two horses: one big mare who races any horse even on the other side of a rail, but sprints herself out. She's a jumper, never raced. My appaloosa gelding, however, gallops endlessly, pony-express style, and at 19 seemingly never gets tired. The first five minutes he's behind my mare, but eventually he chugs past her. Endurance horses are different. They don't sprint, and they don't save energy for the end. Horses - they're not machines. My hope is that they let Rachel Alexandra tell them if she's fit for Belmont. If she's not, and they take her anyway, she'll try her darndest and that's not a good thing. She earned the right to rest on her laurels. If I was Rachel's trainer, and I even had a small, tiny doubt she wasn't suited for the 1 1/2 mile Belmont, I would never put her in it. She's a competitive, big, athletic girl and I am impressed by her courage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
01:02 AM on 05/17/2009
congrats!!!
12:51 AM on 05/17/2009
Also, I know Mike Smith is a great jockey, but that was the first time he ever road Mine That Bird. I think Borel in the saddle would have made that extra length difference. I think Borel made a mistake, even though he won the race with Rachel Alexandra - he actually could have been the jockey of a triple crown winner if he rode Mine That Bird.
03:19 AM on 05/17/2009
I don't think that Borel thinks that he made a mistake. It's obvious he really loves Rachel Alexandra and feels a special connection to her. I think that means much more to him than the Triple Crown laurels.
08:40 AM on 05/17/2009
I don't think love comes into the equation. I doubt Borel would have "loved" her quite as much if she had come in last in her last race. Borel chose the horse he thought would win (which he was absolutely correct about) but I think he really assumed Mine That Bird had no chance. It turns out he did have a chance, and I just think Borel's decision took away that chance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 AM on 05/17/2009
It's a wonderful accomplishment for the owners, but it also proves that Mine that Bird was no fluke, as I saw him gaining on the winner as they crossed the wire. Rider error at this level: no way! But his detractors in the Derby are silenced. He beat all the boys!