Jon Meacham: Newsweek Getting Smarter To Reflect Changing Times

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Jon Meacham: Newsweek Getting Smarter To Reflect Changing Times stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-18-09 12:08 PM   |   Updated: 06-18-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Meacham Newsweek

It's not your father's Newsweek, but that's not what Jon Meacham wants it to be.

The 76-year-old magazine is in the midst of a dramatic overhaul — a redesigned and reorganized issue hits newsstands today; a new Newsweek.com rolled out last week; the magazine is slashing its circulation in favor of a smaller, but more engaged (and high-paying) audience; and soon, the company will move from its Midtown Manhattan headquarters to a decidedly hipper (and cheaper) location in downtown New York.

Structurally, the magazine has been reorganized into four parts, what Meacham calls a shift from organization by "content to genre." In the front of the book, Periscope has become Scope, a section of short-form content. The magazine's columnists have been assembled together in a section called The Take, and after a features well, there is a culture section.

"The culture section replaces the more traditional nation/foreign/business/arts section structure," Meacham said in an interview last week. "I think it puts us in a stronger position to produce things with high caliber magazine values."

But more important than the structure, the magazine's mission has changed — indeed, it looks (with its increased use of white space and more dramatic use of photography), feels (with its heavier stock), and reads (with articles like Meacham's interview of President Obama and Tina Brown's profile of Nancy Pelosi) more like a monthly magazine than a newsweekly.

"We will be engaging, in depth, and tethered to the news but not trapped by it," Meacham said. "Our goal was not to scramble around getting little mentions of things that were in the news. A key part of this process is putting out the magazine that only we would want to read and not pretending that the generic reader out there needs a remedial course in current events."

It's that "only we" factor that is driving the magazine's effort to slash its rate base and court an elite audience that will pay more for each issue.

"The goal is by this time next year to be down to 1.5 million subscribers who will be paying slightly more for the magazine in order to produce a more engaged and definable demographic audience for advertisers," Meacham said. "The magazine is quite inexpensive now to subscribe to, and even after we raise it it's not terribly expensive. I think at the highest end it'll end up being something like $0.85/week, far less than a good cup of coffee these days."

And while it may sound as though Meacham is aiming to make Newsweek more like The Economist — something he's claimed to be interested in many times before — he cautioned that his magazine is unlike anyone else's.

"I hesitate to compare it to other magazines just because this is Newsweek and what we want to do," he said. "I love The Economist, I love the New Yorker, I love Time magazine, I love the Atlantic — I admire all of those editors and all of their staffs, but I just think in a country of 307 million people, in a globalized age, there's room for a lot of different voices and I think we need a lot of different voices. And we're going to be one of them."

Meacham called the redesign process — which he undertook with design firm Number 17 — "incredibly invigorating and liberating," but he emphasized that while he was excited to reimagine the magazine, it is the product of "76 years of blood, sweat, and tears and excellent work of the folks who came before us."

"We stand on the and in the shadow of the people who have been putting this magazine out week in and week out since 1933," he said. "And it's not that Newsweek wasn't good before today. It has always been an excellent magazine for the times, but the times have changed, and the business realities have changed."

It's not your father's Newsweek, but that's not what Jon Meacham wants it to be. The 76-year-old magazine is in the midst of a dramatic overhaul — a redesigned and reorganized issue hits newsstan...
It's not your father's Newsweek, but that's not what Jon Meacham wants it to be. The 76-year-old magazine is in the midst of a dramatic overhaul — a redesigned and reorganized issue hits newsstan...
Featured Comments:
BushBites
Funny headline.

Guess they figured they had to be dumber during the Bush Era.

 Favorite Reply
Have something to say?

Report Corrections
 
Comments
91
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

I never read Newsweek. It is generally weak.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 05/19/2009
- ibivi I'm a Fan of ibivi 12 fans permalink
photo

Are you kidding? It is Mcnews now. I don't see it surviving too long. It has had its day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 05/23/2009

As a subscriber, I got my first copy of the "new" Newsweek yesterday. The content is fine. The graphics are dreadful and make the entire magazine look as if it were created by an adman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 05/19/2009
- Periwinkle I'm a Fan of Periwinkle 50 fans permalink

We stopped subscribing to Newsweek when Meacham took over and turned it into Jesusweek.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 AM on 05/19/2009
photo

the solution is better articles...NOT opinion pieces and pundits

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 05/19/2009
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 252 fans permalink

Meacham is a tool.

His apologist, accommodating drivel throughout the Bush crime spree was revolting... especially on Morning Joke, which is -- of course -- also revolting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 05/19/2009
- ClaraKCMO I'm a Fan of ClaraKCMO 6 fans permalink
photo

Does anyone remember when Bush&Co villified Michael Isikoff for the Periscope bit on Gitmo, torture and the flushing of the Koran?

I re-upped my subscription for the maximum time, I believe it was five years at the time.

Is it a little too soft and fluffy at times, yes. Are they in love with Obama, probably. But they do have good articles and great columnists.

I plan to stay with them. I seek tons of other sources; but I am fiercely loyal to my newsweek.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 05/19/2009

Newsweek - shill for the empire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 05/18/2009
- Citizen54 I'm a Fan of Citizen54 15 fans permalink

Changing the name of the "Periscope" section to "Scope" is really going to ensure their success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 05/18/2009

newsweek is not necessary. it never mattered. just fold and find jobs under the desks of fanatical republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 05/18/2009
- Heady I'm a Fan of Heady 4 fans permalink

Am I the only one who doesn't give a crap that they look different? I would much rather prefer quality.

Give me investigative journalism.

Give me information, the tools with which I can form an opinion and keep up with things. Give me edgy editorials that kick my ass into thinking.

Not just a pretty magazine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 05/18/2009
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 270 fans permalink
photo

NEWS WEEKS LAST STORY ON BUSH WHITE WASHED 6 YEARS OF HISTORY USING A 14 YEAR OLD BOY.

Shameful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 05/18/2009

white people writing for white people from a eurocentric perspective is what these magazines do best. if you don't believe that, pay a visit to any of these bastions of credible journalism to see how many top editors and staffers are people of color. not just black or latino - of color, period. if they had more of a diversity of voices, opinions and information that wasn't the usual status quo establishment bullshit, they might be able to expand their audience instead of watching it shrink year by year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 05/18/2009
photo

As a subscriber to Newsweek, I've grown increasingly disappointed with it. It's become less of an investigative newsweekly, and more a collection of poorly-reasoned editorials on politics and religion. It's headlines often seem designed to provoke rather than intrigue. I voted for Obama and contributed to his campaign (a first for me), but I am appalled by how many times Newsweek has put him on their cover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 05/18/2009
- zola77 I'm a Fan of zola77 28 fans permalink
photo

Agreed. Those editorials are painful to read.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 05/18/2009
- blooddoc I'm a Fan of blooddoc 8 fans permalink
photo

Ditto. Not only is the new format visually unappealing (too stark and simplistic), but the writers seem less interested in enlightenment and more interested in mental masturbation (see George Will). If the publishers are looking for a way to cede ground to TIME, they may have found it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 05/18/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 145 fans permalink

Meacham is too sanctimonious to me. When on television, he comes across like a medieval monk. He tries so hard not to offend he says nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 05/18/2009
photo

Yeah, his job is to keep the status quo happy, like all the corporate rag editors. Have you heard it's a conservative country? Can't tell ya how many times he's said it...must be so, eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 05/18/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 145 fans permalink

He is so convinced it is a conservative country he has missed the indications that it is not!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 05/21/2009
- cnick I'm a Fan of cnick 8 fans permalink
photo

He's definitely preachy, the magazine has gone way down hill!! Time too, the end is near.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 05/19/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 145 fans permalink

Yes, he is way too preachy! I think he was hired when the evangelical movement was at its most influential.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 AM on 05/21/2009
- cinesimon I'm a Fan of cinesimon 59 fans permalink

Meacham is one of the most intelligent, creative and ho9nest people within the field of journalism today.

I have no doubt he's going to enable great success of the magazine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 05/18/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 260 fans permalink
photo

I agree, but also concede the criticism on the rest of the page. I personally love to listen to him speak, he knows both sides yet is able to transcend them. However; the direction he's taking with his magazine doesn't seem to be so high-minded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 05/18/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect