Obama's New Emissions Rules Will Transform US Auto Fleet

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama's New Emissions Rules Will Transform US Auto Fleet stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER | May 19, 2009 09:23 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this June 2, 2008 file photo, electric hybrid cars are plugged-in to charge during a demonstration of the vehicles in Seattle. AFS Trinity says it has the only working plug-in hybrid vehicles with a 40-mile "all-electric" range. President Barack Obama outlined Tuesday, May 19, 2009, the nation's first comprehensive effort to curb vehicle emissions while cutting dependence on imported oil, calling the plan an historic turning point toward a "clean-energy economy." (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, file)

DETROIT — Some soccer moms will have to give up hulking SUVs. Carpenters will still haul materials around in pickup trucks, but they will cost more. Nearly everybody else will drive smaller cars, and more of them will run on electricity. The higher mileage and emissions standards set by the Obama administration on Tuesday, which begin to take effect in 2012 and are to be achieved by 2016, will transform the American car and truck fleet.

The new rules would bring new cars and trucks sold in the United States to an average of 35.5 miles per gallon, about 10 mpg more than today's standards. Passenger cars will be required to get 39 mpg, light trucks 30 mpg.

That means cars and trucks on American roads will have to become smaller, lighter and more efficient.

Eric Fedewa, vice president of global powertrain forecasting for the auto consulting firm CSM Worldwide in Northville, Mich., said the changes will make pickup trucks so much more expensive that they will be used almost exclusively for work.

And instead of a minivan or SUV, more parents will haul their families in much smaller vehicles with three rows of seats _ something more like the Mazda 5 small van, he said. The Mazda 5 gets about 28 mpg on the highway.

"I think what you'll see is a lot more creativity in interior packaging," Fedewa said. "You'll get more rows of seats where you traditionally had cargo space."

Already on Tuesday, some drivers were skeptical. Dixie Bishop, who runs a plumbing business in San Antonio that uses vans, worries the new requirements will drive up her costs at a time when customers are cutting back on repairs.

"Are they going to take my horsepower down?" she asked. "I have to be able to carry old water heaters and toilets. It's not beneficial for me to haul one water heater at a time. We need the power to pull these heavy items."

Story continues below
advertisement

The changes will start with smaller cars and trucks, and improvements to the internal combustion engine, Fedewa said. Automakers also already working on new technology, including direct fuel injection and high compression of the air-fuel mixture, that will make cars and trucks more efficient.

Car companies are rewiring vehicles so components such as air conditioners and power steering pumps are powered by electricity rather than by the engine, saving fuel.

And they're developing computer-controlled transmissions with six or more gears, adding efficiency, and rolling out more gas-electric hybrids _ among the few cars sold today that meet the 2016 standards.

Of course, developing the technology will cost money _ billions of dollars _ and automakers will pass that on to their customers.

The Obama administration says the changes mean the average vehicle would cost about $1,300 more, although some private analysts say the increase will be much heftier. The administration says gas savings will make up the difference in about three years.

Automakers have said they need stable, relatively high gasoline prices to create a market for electric vehicles. General Motors fears rolling out its rechargeable Chevrolet Volt next year with gas at $2 per gallon.

American consumers have already shown their car-buying habits can change rapidly depending on gas prices. When fuel cost $4 a gallon last summer, people flocked to smaller cars. Gas is much cheaper now, and sales of hybrids have plummeted.

"The U.S. consumer has consistently chosen performance over fuel economy given the relatively low cost of fuel," David Leiker, senior automotive analyst for Robert W. Baird & Co. in Milwaukee, wrote in a note to investors.

The Volt is designed to run 40 miles on battery power when it is fully charged. After that, a small internal combustion engine kicks in to generate electricity and keep the car going. Other automakers are working on similar systems.

But the Volt is expected to sell for $35,000 to $40,000, and buyers may be unwilling to pay that much for a sedan, even if tax credits help ease the burden, unless gas prices soar.

Rechargeable electric vehicles, which under government calculations could get 100 mpg or more, will help automakers meet the standards and offset sales of larger, less-efficient models.

Under Obama's plan, the sale of of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids could also generate "super credits" that would count as more than one vehicle when an automaker determines its average fuel economy and emissions figures.

The new rules cause manufacturers "to accelerate their technology plans, probably a little more aggressively than they originally thought," said Tony Posawatz, who heads development of the Volt's technology. "For us, we feel comfortable that we've got choices."

Just a few years ago, GM and other auto executives were doubtful they could meet even less stringent standards, but Posawatz said the technology has changed since then, especially with new lithium-ion batteries.

GM also is looking at electric trucks, which may bring them even closer to the goals, he said.

Earlier this year, Toyota said it planned to launch as many as 10 new hybrid models worldwide by early 2010, and it plans to bring a new version of the Prius to the U.S. in the coming weeks. Honda's new Insight hybrid is already on sale in the U.S. Mazda, meanwhile, has said it plans to focus less on hybrid vehicles and more on improvements to its basic internal combustion engine.

___

AP Auto Writers Kimberly S. Johnson and Dan Strumpf in New York, AP Energy Writer John Porretto in Houston, and Associated Press Writer Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.

DETROIT — Some soccer moms will have to give up hulking SUVs. Carpenters will still haul materials around in pickup trucks, but they will cost more. Nearly everybody else will drive smaller cars...
DETROIT — Some soccer moms will have to give up hulking SUVs. Carpenters will still haul materials around in pickup trucks, but they will cost more. Nearly everybody else will drive smaller cars...
Loading...
 
Filed by Nick Graham
 
Comments
193
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 (4 pages total)
- carman1967 I'm a Fan of carman1967 2 fans permalink

I am married, I have 4 children. When we travel somewhere for the weekend......1 night since I work on Saturday, we have our 2006 Yukon Denali XL loaded with our kids and our stuff. This is the case for many "soccer moms" that the story is referring to. So when we can not buy these vehicles anymore, whether it be price or availability, we will be forced to drive 2 more fuel efficient vehicles. Now let's do the math, 2 vehicles transporting 6 people, and six people's stuff at 35 MPG in each vehicle. So in a 350 mile trip, my family will burn 10 gallons of fuel in each vehicle for a total of 20 gallons of gasoline. Right now in one vehicle with my family traveling 350 miles in our Denali enjoying each other's company, being safer in a larger vehicle, paying insurance on one vehicle, paying taxes on one vehicle, will burn about 21.5 gallons of fuel. Go ahead and say that many people don't have the need for space that I do with 4 kids but, how many "soccer moms" carpool their kids to practice, school. etc. and need room for equipment, book bags, band equipment etc? This will result in more people driving their smaller cars more miles and we will be using nearly as much gas yet spending billions on research without changing our consumption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 05/19/2009
- newiceage I'm a Fan of newiceage 9 fans permalink
photo

What are you babbling about,

You think liberal fascism is going to stop with them telling you what kind of motor vehicle you are going to drive.

Silly girl. That is going to be the least of your worries.

How about them telling you when, where and what work you will be doing, what type of home you can live in, at what tempature you can keep your home, what electronics and appliances you can use and when, what you can and cannot eat, drink, smoke, what your children will be indoctrinated into and so on and so on

Till finally you won't have worry about 4 children families in the future. The libs already think 2 children is too many you not not good for the planet. And the birth every american immediately causes the death of 5 african babies anyhow.

In fact, you should really be ashamed of your oversized family and how your overtaxing the planet and stop being so selfish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 05/20/2009
- prosha I'm a Fan of prosha 9 fans permalink

Yep, big changes coming. Band equipment, yikes. When we all are allocated $12,000 per family per year from ACORN as our only legal income we won't be worrying much about where to put the band equipment. We are seriously outnumbered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 05/20/2009
- barra I'm a Fan of barra 10 fans permalink
photo

Bullseye!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 05/20/2009
- pipetoe I'm a Fan of pipetoe 19 fans permalink
photo

You also will not be allowed to travel in two cars...You will ordered to stay at home...where you belong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 05/20/2009
- johnr49 I'm a Fan of johnr49 81 fans permalink

Typical Republican scare-mongering - Cheney would be proud of you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 05/20/2009
- Cheesemelt I'm a Fan of Cheesemelt 17 fans permalink
photo

Let us not forget that CAFE standards, et al, are always subject to whatever party is in the Oval office.
And with the timeline being what it is, there's an unfortunately good chance these new standards won't ever come to fruition. Further, this presupposes the US auto industry will rebound.

I'm not so sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 05/19/2009
photo

Your profile makes me hungry.

Good points, BTW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 AM on 05/20/2009
- Harrier I'm a Fan of Harrier 12 fans permalink

It is a law that makes no sense. Going to 35 MPG can be done now. There are electric car companies that if infused with more money can produce car that do better than that by far and meet customer demands in two years

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 05/19/2009
photo

I factor that we forget is that shifting a car dependence to electricity will have no real effect in such a short time span.

Let's postulate. A majority of Americans buy and electric/gas hybrid to keep fuel costs down. Now. Where does the majority of our power come from?? COAL. Coal is a huge and effiecient provider of electricity. It's use does have a negative effect on the enviroment but is the best means of providing electircal power. Making auto engines that require an electrical charge will cause a higher demand for that electricity, thus increasing the need for production of electricitry by coal. Well positioned power companies will monopolize the industry as they abuse the laughable Cap and Trade Policy( bound to become law) which allows them to buy emmision rights. Many smaller companies will glady sell those rights and cash out of the market. The end result, Obama and the left have breathed new life the Monster they hoped to destroy. ..........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 05/20/2009
photo

Every means to produce electriciy has enviromental conseqences. Hydro/electirc dams displace species and mess up watersheds, destroying land habitiats. Windmills are super expensive to maintain and theycrowd grasslands. Solar panels increase heat in the areas they are placed and have short life spans. All of these effects are small, that is scientific fact. But multiply their use exponentially and we create different enviromental problems, but they are problems none the less.

Lets state a fact. Human sustainment will always require a huge impact on the enviroment short of returning to coloinial ways. Even the libs don't want to give up thier comfy beds.

My point in short. New sources of energy cannot be near as effiecent as fossil fuels. Even if they could be advanced to that point, they carry their own enviromental challenges. Chaniging where the energy for vehicles comes from has little if no impact.

Maybe the money would be better spent researching meta-physics so that we can levitate our vehciles where we want to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 05/20/2009
photo

Right and now all the right wingers and Wall Streeters are screaming about how this will eat into the "big 3's" profits.

At least drains know what hemisphere they're in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 05/19/2009
photo

It's no coincidence that 85 percent of oil lobby money goes to GOP members of Congress. They will drag their feet on this until they obstruct it or Capital Hill passes it with reconciliation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 05/20/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect