Iran Missile Test: Ahmadinejad Says It's Within Israel's Range

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iran Missile Test: Ahmadinejad Says It's Within Israel's Range stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALI AKBAR DAREINI | May 20, 2009 01:11 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This image made from television broadcast Wednesday, May 20, 2009 by the Iranian television station, IRIB, is said by them to show the launch of a Sajjil-2 surface-to-surface missile. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran test-fired a new advanced missile Wednesday with a range of about 1,200 miles, far enough to strike Israel and southeastern Europe. The solid-fuel Sajjil-2 surface-to-surface missile is a new version of the Sajjil missile, which Iran said it had successfully tested late last year with a similar range. (AP Photo/IRIB via APTN)

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran test-fired a missile capable of striking Israel, U.S. Mideast bases and Europe on Wednesday _ a show of strength touted by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as he battles for re-election next month against more moderate opponents.

The U.S. responded by saying Iran must choose between destabilizing the Middle East or accepting the dialogue offered by President Barack Obama. The U.S. leader threatened earlier this week that Iran could face further international sanctions if it does not respond positively by year-end to U.S. attempts to open negotiations on its nuclear program.

Israel said the test appeared to be Iran's response to a positive meeting on Monday between Obama and new Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

U.S. officials confirmed the launch and Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said in Washington that Iran is at a crossroads and must choose its course.

"They can either continue on this path of continued destabilization in the region or they can decide that they want to pursue relationships with the counties in the region and the United States that are more normalized," said Whitman. "Our concerns are obviously based on nuclear ambitions and the implications that long- and medium-range missiles have with respect to that," he added.

Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst at Jane's Information Group, said the test "does not change the strategic equation" in the region because Iran has had the ballistic missile capability to hit Israel and much of the Middle East for more than a decade with its Shahab missiles.

It was likely intended to send a message to the Obama administration that Iran cannot be bullied into talks and also to show the country's strength in hopes that would boost Ahmadinejad's popularity among voters in the June 12 election, Vatanka said.

Iran says its missile program is merely for defense and its space program is for scientific and surveillance purposes. It maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian energy uses only.

Story continues below
advertisement

Tehran said the solid-fuel Sajjil-2 surface-to-surface missile has a range of about 1,200 miles. It is a new version of the Sajjil missile, which the country said it successfully tested late last year and has a similar range. Many analysts said the launch of the solid-fuel Sajjil was significant because such missiles are more accurate than liquid fuel missiles of similar range, such as Iran's Shahab-3.

"Defense Minister (Mostafa Mohammad Najjar) has informed me that the Sajjil-2 missile, which has very advanced technology, was launched from Semnan and it landed precisely on the target," state radio quoted Ahmadinejad as saying. He did not name any targets for the missile when he spoke during a visit to the city of Semnan, 125 miles east of the capital Tehran, where Iran's space program is centered.

Italy said its foreign minister, Franco Frattini, canceled a planned trip to Iran on Wednesday because Ahmadinejad wanted to meet in Semnan rather than in Tehran.

Najjar said the Sajjil-2 differs from the Sajjil missile because it "is equipped with a new navigation system as well as precise and sophisticated sensors," according to Iran's official news agency.

Sajjil means "baked clay." It is a reference to a story in the Quran, Islam's holy book, in which birds sent by God drive off an enemy army attacking the holy city of Mecca by pelting them with stones of baked clay.

Two U.S. officials confirmed the missile launch, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record.

"It appears the test was a success," one official said. "It appears they launched a medium-range missile."

After the test, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned that if Iran manages to produce nuclear weapons, it would "spark an arms race" in the Middle East.

Iran's nuclear and missile programs have alarmed Israel. Prime Minister Netanyahu pressed Obama to step up pressure on Tehran when the two met in Washington on Monday.

Moshe Arens, a former Israeli defense minister who trained in the U.S. as an aerospace engineer, said Wednesday's test was apparently part of Iran's broader quest to develop more advanced missiles and nuclear capability.

"They're increasing their abilities to launch rockets of longer and longer range that go beyond Israel and into Europe and eventually will carry nuclear weapons," he said. "They're troublemakers and you have to deal with troublemakers."

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called for Israel's elimination, and the Jewish state has not ruled out a military strike to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat. The Israeli government has been skeptical of U.S. overtures to Iran, which have received a mixed response from Ahmadinejad.

Many Western experts have expressed skepticism about Iran's professed military achievements, saying the country provides no transparency to verify its claims. Most believe Iran does not yet have the technology to produce nuclear weapons, including warheads for long-range missiles.

The U.S. released an intelligence report about 18 months ago that said Iran abandoned a secret nuclear weapons program in 2003 under international pressure and has not restarted it.

Israel and several other countries have disputed the finding. But many in the West at least agree that Iran is seeking to develop the capability to develop weapons at some point. A group of U.S. and Russian scientists said in a report issued Tuesday that Iran could produce a simple nuclear device in one to three years and a nuclear warhead in another five years after that.

The study published by the nonpartisan EastWest Institute also said Iran is making advances in rocket technology and could develop a ballistic missile capable of firing a 2,200-pound nuclear warhead up to 1,200 miles "in perhaps six to eight years."

After the testing of the Sajjil in November, a senior U.S. military official said Washington believed Iran was testing the first stage of what would be a two-stage rocket. Multiple stages allow long-range missiles to use less fuel.

The launch came just weeks before the vote that could influence Iran's response to the U.S. outreach. Two of the three candidates approved by Iran's constitutional watchdog to run in the June election are reformists who favor improving ties with the West.

The hard-line president has been criticized by his opponents and others for antagonizing the U.S. and mismanaging the country's faltering economy. On Wednesday, the constitutional watchdog approved three candidates to challenge Ahmadinejad, setting up a showdown between reformists and hard-liners.

___

Associated Press Writers Pamela Hess in Washington and Steve Weizman and Ian Deitch in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran test-fired a missile capable of striking Israel, U.S. Mideast bases and Europe on Wednesday _ a show of strength touted by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as he battles for re-...
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran test-fired a missile capable of striking Israel, U.S. Mideast bases and Europe on Wednesday _ a show of strength touted by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as he battles for re-...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski
 
Comments
637
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

It has very interesting and enlightening to go through the comments of my friends on the subject under consideration. I found that maximum commentators were in favor of Israel be disarmed of nuclear armament and Israel must stop dragging USA to War for it cause as it did time and again in the recent past and still to date is trying to do so.

They a concerned that because of Israel activities the Third world is nagging at the door step. They also criticized Israel for dillydallying sit down with the road map on two state issue agreed to by earlier Government of Israel. The present Israel PM was arrogant during his last recent visit to USA.

They agreed that both Iran and Israel to asked to disarm and give up nuclear program and destroy all nuclear establishments, which will be the beginning of ending all nuclear developing competition through the world. The UNO must be empowered to enforce stoppage of nuclear development by all countries. this should be done with the help of superpowers, where in the super powers too have to stop nuclear development project and destroy all the WMDS they have as an example to the world community as a true viable saviors of the world in its true sense of the term "SAVIORS OF WORLD SECURITY".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 05/21/2009

people dont get that iran is a country whose leader has stated that he wants to "wipe israel of the map". they have nuclear ability. israel is a country like any other county-they want to defend themselves. they have every right to do that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 05/20/2009
- skialethia I'm a Fan of skialethia 154 fans permalink
photo

Iran is surrounded on all sides by U.S. forces! Iran has never attacked another country in hundreds of years! Iran would never set off a nuclear weapon and put other Muslims in jeopardy! Iran would never risk destroying the Dome of the Rock! Isra_li leaders have also made statements that threaten Arabs, and Isra_l ACTUALLY HAS over 200 nuclear warheads!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 05/20/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 22 fans permalink
photo

Stop repeating that lie about "wipe Israel off the map".
http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/rumor-of-the-century/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 05/20/2009

so your saying he just quoted someone who said that the "regime that controls jerusalem must vanish of the page of time". what does that mean?

the "regime" in question is israel
i cant imagine that "vanish from the page of time" is something to pleasant. its pretty much the same idea as wiping of the map

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 05/20/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 22 fans permalink
photo

More anti-Iran propaganda­..

The authors quote a "study published by the nonpartisan EastWest Institute [that] also said Iran is making advances in rocket technology and could develop a ballistic missile capable of firing a 2,200-pound nuclear warhead up to 1,200 miles "in perhaps six to eight years."

The authors intentionally omitted the rest of the sentence: "in perhaps six to eight years OF A DECISON TO DEVELOP AND PRODUCE SUCH A WARHEAD."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Perhaps if Israel got rid of its nukes, then Iran would ditch theirs. I don't know of any other country where we all wink and nod as Israel "neither confirms or denies" their nuclear arsenal. It's ridiculous. Why doesn't Israel join the NPT, as Iran has? Ahmedinejad should do the same thing(neither confirm or deny), just to get people to jump on him, and then he can say : "Well, Israel's been doing this for decades, why can't we?" I expect there will be a long silence...
Israel has a history of trying to get us to do their fighting for them...USS Liberty, anyone? Let's not fall for it this time,folks!
Iran's no threat!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 05/20/2009

Why shouldn't they have missiles! I would want missiles too if Israel was that close!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

How bourgeois.

If you can't be the first on your block to have them, at least be the second.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

All your religions are the real threat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 05/20/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 270 fans permalink

Fear Panic!!!!!!!!

Iran has missiles!

Iran has domestic nukes and reprocessing plants!

Obviously, nuke power tech is the same tech as nuke Bombs.

Better invade Iran before they can become "sovereign­."

Thanks to the USA,

Sovereign = Nuke Bombs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 05/20/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 86 fans permalink
photo

The Iranian people need their OWN REVOLUTION NOW. They need to Storm whatever is their Bastille. These so called leaders, these little men who truly believe they are just going to be allowed to create nuclear weapons, who will succeed in nothing more than bring death and ruin to so many innocent Iranians, HAVE GOT TO GO. As sure as the Taliban and their viscious treatment of innocent women and children need to go, so too must these men who would bring ruin to Iran go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 05/20/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 105 fans permalink
photo

So What?

Who cares, Pakistan is a real threat, not a manufactured one.

And it can reach Israel, fine they have retreated from the world stage and have chosen the same path Hamas did, total war, no diplomacy.

And now as a nation that embraces war crimes, we have no moral standing to tell Iran anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 05/20/2009
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 86 fans permalink
photo

Bravo. Well said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

I second the "well said"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 05/20/2009

(Not to mention)911 was planed right here

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Author Thomas L. Friedman wrote a great epic journal several years back,
"From Beirut to Jerusalem".
It chronicles all the nutsy stuff that happened in unpredictable Beirut
in the 70's and 80's.
He states that during the formation of the Israel,
the Palestinian state issue was unfortunately never resolved -
with most of the land divided up going to Egypt and Jordan, for example.
Friedman is very impartial in his observations - he does not take sides -
and he should be an ambassador in this region.
Where's Obama on this ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 05/20/2009
- jackstpaul I'm a Fan of jackstpaul 10 fans permalink

Most of the land went to Israel. The Partition allotted 55% of the land to a Jewish state and 45% to a Palestinian state, despite only 33% of the population being Jewish and 67% Arab, Sound fair? How many Americans realize this?

Then, in fighting right before and after the Partition of May 15, 1948, Israel conquered another 23% of the Land--land allotted to the Palestinians.

78% for a Jewish state, 22% for the Palestinians. Egypt and Jordan took over the remaining land under trustee arrangements; they did not claim or make the land part of their own states.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 05/20/2009
- opine2u I'm a Fan of opine2u 14 fans permalink

Taking Thomas L. Friedman's theory of a Flat Earth policy, it would take Israeli's thousands of years of looking around, before they bumped into an Iranian, or ever saw a bomb arc its way to Israel.

Actually Thomas, Flat could probably help straighten this whole thing out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Israels' sabre-rattling with Obama prompted Irans' sabre-rattling missle launch. Netanyahus' hard-line stance on Iran is helping Ahmedinejad get re-elected by rallying their extremist elements. If the PM weren't trying to be such a hard*ss, Iran would probably elect a more Western-friendly leader (they were sick of Ahmedinejad, but not anymore I bet). Netanyahus' complete disregard to even acknowledge (or utter the words) a two-state solution is Israels biggest problem. The PM could (at least begin to) defuse the entire situation by entering talks pertaining to such a solution. I hope they snap out of warmonger mode sooner than later.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 05/20/2009
- mcnary I'm a Fan of mcnary 2 fans permalink
photo

Hey big surprise, we have a nuke sub with Iran's name on it. We did the testing about thirty years ago.
Should we be scared?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/20/2009

At some point the American people is going to get tired of Israel dragging them into military conflicts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 05/20/2009
- yakaria I'm a Fan of yakaria 16 fans permalink
photo

When has Israel dragged America into a military conflict?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Who is it that Israel has military conflicts with that our government doesn't have military conflicts with?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 05/20/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 22 fans permalink
photo

Check out Karen Kwiatkowski's tales of Israeli Generals visiting the DOD Office of Special Plans. This was the neocon nest whose purpose was to ensnare us in attacking Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 05/20/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 270 fans permalink

Who supplies Israel's weapons?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 05/20/2009

What other group likes to play dress up and cause trouble all over the world as much as Israel -except Blackwater who learned it from them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 05/20/2009
- jackstpaul I'm a Fan of jackstpaul 10 fans permalink

Iraq, Lebanon, Israel/Palestine, every Israeli war—1967, 1973, and the numerous non-wars not occurring because of Israel's overwhelming military superiority based on US support, or ones that the US deliberately prevented Israel from starting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 05/20/2009

we just can't solve the world problem by starting a war. to attack Iran would be a big mistake.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 05/20/2009
- BeasleysMom I'm a Fan of BeasleysMom 149 fans permalink

Yes, especially since we are broke and have no manpower left because of the Bush/Cheney/Iraq debacle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 05/20/2009
photo

Our "National" gaurd in Iraq no less... & at a stop-loss at that!?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 05/20/2009
- whitehawk I'm a Fan of whitehawk 16 fans permalink

Isreal has been casting a web over this entire situation, once again pulling U.S into this 'fake' blustering of going to war with Iran. Isreal should keep their nose clean, if they want the world's help in mainting their homeland, and must give Palestine a state for palistinians, they must stop this raffle ticket discussion. We owe nothing to Isreal. American Jews must stop using other countries to aid it's will on surrounding countries.

The Republican's started this march into Iran over a year ago and it is the most idiotic discussion ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 05/20/2009
- BeasleysMom I'm a Fan of BeasleysMom 149 fans permalink

Israel not "Isreal"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 05/20/2009
- whitehawk I'm a Fan of whitehawk 16 fans permalink

I use the English dictionary, not the American one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 05/20/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect