Whoopi Goldberg Calls Glenn Beck A 'Lying Sack Of Dog Mess' [UPDATES]

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Whoopi Goldberg Calls Glenn Beck A 'Lying Sack Of Dog Mess' [UPDATES] stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-20-09 01:26 PM   |   Updated: 06- 4-09 06:34 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Whoopi Glenn Beck

Glenn Beck went on "The View" today. It did NOT go well.

Nevertheless, it was DELIGHTFUL, by God. In the clip below, watch as Barbara Walters and Whoopi Goldberg pin Beck down for lying on the radio about an encounter they all had on the train to the White House Correspondents' Dinner. Beck is forced, at first, to walk back his "mischaracterization" of the encounter. But then, things go ZOMGY as Goldberg calls him a "LYING SACK OF DOG MESS," which is hilarious. Then Walters freaks out on him for claiming to be a reporter and yet not bothering to check his facts. And really, it just gets even more bonkers from there. Honestly, if you were to take a drink every time Beck comes off as totally disingenuous, you will require a new liver by the end of the segment. DO NOT DO THIS, OBVIOUSLY.

[WATCH.]

In the second segment, the discussion gets itself partially back on the rails, but only in that the show's hosts are no longer venting their aggravation with Beck telling falsehoods about their train encounter. Beck talks about how he hates everyone in Congress and how everyone should resign. But then Beck gets stumped by a question from Barbara: "What are your real convictions?"

His answer: "I believe in God. I believe in the founding of this country. I believe George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson were geniuses."

So there you have it. Glenn Beck really, really believes in God, the names of some Presidents, and that the United States was founded, somehow, at some point in the past.

UPDATE: Via Media Monitor Teri McCarthy, here's the second part, which goes okay until Walters starts asking Beck for his convictions:

Story continues below

ANOTHER UPDATE: Glenn is TERRIBLE upset at the terrible way the View ambushed him, like they were his Fox colleague, Bill O'Reilly or something!

Glenn knew this wasn't going to be pretty -- but his interview with the ladies on The View was even worse than anticipated, mostly because they wasted an entire segment on accusations that Glenn 'lied' about who said hello to who first on his Amtrak train ride with Barbara and Whoopi to the Correspondents dinner in Washington DC. The saddest part is that not only did they waste an entire segment on a completely insignificant, petty, humorless and incidental point - Glenn had already clarified the point the day before! Tune in to Fox News tonight at 5pm for Glenn's first response to the 'liar liar pants on fire' ambush interview by the ladies on The View.

A LAST UPDATE: Glenn Beck called into his own show today to respond to the way he was treated on The View - something he could have done whilst actually on the show while it was happening but didn't, I guess. This is called "pulling a Jim Cramer."

Watch:


BECK: Judge, you listen to my radio show. I tell stories. I tell about experiences of my life and everything else, and I told the story about riding on the train with the two ladies of The View, and apparently I was a liar because I said that -- which is true, that she -- Barbara Walters said hello to me. Instead, it was I said hello to Barbara Walters. I walked up to her -- I guess that's what we need to spend our time on for 7 minutes.

As usual, Beck is being disingenuous by reducing the whole encounter to a dispute over who said hello to who first. In actuality, the "story" Beck told was about how: 1) Goldberg and Walters reserved seats on Amtrak, the subtext being that they were acting like some sort of celebrity divas, 2) implied that Walters was unpleasant in her conversation by affecting a mocking and exaggerated imitation of her voice, and 3) implied that it was Beck's great influence and magnetism that caused the View ladies to approach him and seek his attention, when in actuality, it was the reverse.

Beck took leave of his show thusly:

BECK: What kind of person would go on national radio and say he introduced himself or they introduced themselves to him when, indeed, the truth, your honor, is that he introduced himself to them?


NAPOLITANO: Oh, boy. are you going to be back tomorrow, big guy?

BECK: I'm going to hang up the phone, take a little more Nyquil so I can rest medicine.

The answer to your first question is "a lying sack of dog mess." Enjoy getting bombed on Nyquil, though!

ANOTHER UPDATE: Glenn Beck complained and complained and complained that Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters had got a seat on Amtrak reserved. This aspect of the story wasn't of much concern to me. But it mattered to Beck, greatly. As it turns out, this great mystery has been penetrated: at the request of ABC News, Amtrak held seats for Goldberg and Walters.

What remains an extant concern is of course, Beck's depiction of his encounter with Goldberg and Walters. Why did Beck go on the radio and distort the encounter, making it seem like the pleasant exchange that all parties had was unpleasant? Why did he go out of his way to make it seem like the View hosts were "acting like some sort of celebrity divas?" Why did he feel the need to ruthlessly mock Walters, adopting a mocking imitation, and portraying her as some sort of harridan? The two View hosts clearly believed that they had had a cordial conversation, and were obviously very taken aback at the way Beck described their conversation to his radio listeners. And when confronted on the View, Beck's first instinct -- the correct one -- was to apologize.

Beck needs to clear this matter up, because it sure makes him look like a lying sack of dog mess!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Glenn Beck went on "The View" today. It did NOT go well. Nevertheless, it was DELIGHTFUL, by God. In the clip below, watch as Barbara Walters and Whoopi Goldberg pin Beck down for lying on the radi...
Glenn Beck went on "The View" today. It did NOT go well. Nevertheless, it was DELIGHTFUL, by God. In the clip below, watch as Barbara Walters and Whoopi Goldberg pin Beck down for lying on the radi...
 
Comments
2225
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (59 pages total)
- Cogs I'm a Fan of Cogs 31 fans permalink

Whether he is lying or telling the truth Beck comes off as a failed standup comic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 05/22/2009
- cltclt I'm a Fan of cltclt 6 fans permalink
photo

He's launching a comedy tour and being paid for it. I don't like the fact that he presents himself as a commentator yet the people that watch his show believe he's doing "news".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 05/23/2009
photo

Dang, Glenn Beck looks like one of those bullies that make your life miserable in high school...

Brava Ladies of the View!

Didnt watch the segment but it seems that Republican ElizaB***h was awfully quiet! Wonder why...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 05/22/2009
photo

He lied but Rethuglicans cannot discern truth anymore. They make it up as they go along, and eventually the roads become full of their shi t.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 05/22/2009

If you had ever listened or watched Beck, you would know he is not a Republican. He hammers both sides. Obviously Baba did not do her research or she would have known he is not a journalist. Speaking of full of shi t....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 05/22/2009
- StillweRise I'm a Fan of StillweRise 127 fans permalink
photo

What subject did he hammer republicans on? ever.

fox would not ALLOW such a act to occur.

was it on his radio show? what subject, and what did he say on it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 05/22/2009
- cltclt I'm a Fan of cltclt 6 fans permalink
photo

Being registered "unaffiliated" or "libertarian" does not mean he is not a Republican. I registered "unaffiliated" where I live, but vote mostly with the Democrats. I'm closer to them on a lot of issues. The fact that he things Sarah Palin is good and Joe Biden is bad tells you all you need to know about his politics. I guess Joe Scarborough is not a Republican either. If he loves this country so much, he should run for office. He says he wants everyone in Congress to resign, who's going to take their places? He doesn't want to give up his cushy job and seat from NY to DC with Barbara and Whoppi. He's as big a part of the media elite as anyone but he would never admit it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 05/23/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 382 fans permalink
photo

Kinda like Pelosi? Is she a Rethuglican in Pr0gresso-clothing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 05/22/2009
- StillweRise I'm a Fan of StillweRise 127 fans permalink
photo

what is your proof nancy lied.

and are you equally outraged that our country tortures?

and that it was proven to be used to try to link al-queda and iraq?

seriously... justify the Nancy (possibly) Knew outrage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 05/22/2009
- Carrie-On I'm a Fan of Carrie-On 5 fans permalink
photo

someone isn't listening to the latest truth about the CIA's claims. Some of their wording was colloquialisms designed after the fact (post-Pelosi question time!). Trust the CIA - Pannetta needs to grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Unlike the lies from Princess Pelosi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 05/24/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

"You must be out of your mind to think that soon as democrats took over in 2006 it suddenly became there fault. And the same could be said for the year that Bush took over in 2000."

I never said it was their fault. I just get sick and tired of people blaming Bush for everything. It's both parties' fault. I'm out of my mind huh? Do you want to know what 2 factors caused the bank failure? The greed of banks by giving loans to people that had no business getting them just so they could make some quick money and the combination of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton forcing banks to be far less selective when they gave out loans (the republicans are to blame here also because they did little if anything to stop it). According to them "not enough minorities" had houses so they started giving out loans to anyone who asked and they inevitably defaulted. You bleeding heart liberals were mainly responsibly for this mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/22/2009
- jsijason I'm a Fan of jsijason 34 fans permalink
photo

The Community Reinvestment Act was definitely a big part of this mess. Don't forget Congress had a hand in it though, it was entirely Clinton.

Banks being forced to meet a quota of lending in certain zip codes is not the right way to handle discrimination. Most Banks are interested in money, not the color of the person borrowing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 05/22/2009
- StillweRise I'm a Fan of StillweRise 127 fans permalink
photo

CRA was passed by a republican congress and signed by a democratic president. then sat idle FOR YEARS until the banks could figure out a way to make a buck off of it.

Enter 2001

GWB gave a major address on it early in his predency (reference "ownership society"


enter predatory lending. enter phil gramm. enter de-regulation, allowing the banks to offer so many services that some conflicted. (which allowed them to BECOME too big to fail)

if you are gonna cite history.. cite ALL of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 05/22/2009
photo

In the minds of most economists the root of the current economic situation was the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act in 1999. Pushed by the right under the influence of the banks, and signed by Bill Clinton.

There is plenty of blame to go around. However to attempt to place blame upon the current administration is disingenuous because we cannot determine the affects as of yet of their attempts to rectify our economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 05/22/2009
photo

thats it , you conservatives can never admitt your faults , just pass the blame on to the liberals and be done with it , right? Thats why we are not voting for you anymore, get it ?
THE BANK FAILURES WERE MAINLY DUE TO DEREGULATION WHICH YOU PEOPLE STILL WANT TO KEEP, AND WE WANT TO CHANGE AND REGULATE THE MARKET SO IT DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.
PEOPLE WILL JUST CHEAT THE SYSTEM IF THERE ARE NO RULES, PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 05/22/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 382 fans permalink
photo

Bush tried to regulate Fannie & Freddie MULTIPLE TIMES... but the Dems blocked it each time with a party-line vote.

If Bush had been successful, we wouldn't be here. Go ask Barney and the Crew why they blocked Bush from regulating F&F.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

The regulations were already firmly in place but weren't being enforced because that would stop lining the pockets of Chris Dodd and Barney Frank because of their connections to the big federal lending companies. The fact is, until we stop electing inept and corrupt politicians (e.g. cheat on their taxes, pork barrel spending), nothing will change. This is on both sides of the aisle but there seems to be an insane amount in the Obama administration. That’s “change we need” apparently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 05/24/2009
- cltclt I'm a Fan of cltclt 6 fans permalink
photo

That's a small part of the bank failures. Banks and investment companies repackaged bad subprime mortages together with prime and had the rating companies call them all AAA debt. This is the part that Limbaugh, Beck, and the other "news" people leave out when they talk about the mortgage mess. Bush was bragging for years about the "minority" home ownership rate going up also, I never hear that mentioned either. Minorities are maybe 13-20% of the population, not enough to bankrupt this economy if they all had a loan that they never paid. Sounds like you bought Fox and CNBC's rationale hook line and sinker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 05/23/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Actually, Bill Clinton enacted the "minority" housing mess. Bush is no better, but let's give blame where blame is due.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 05/26/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

First of all, your numbers are way too low. 15% of the total population are African-American and I believe Latinos are around the same or higher. I'm not just talking about minorities. Clinton's bill required loans to be given out to certain zip codes regardless of income because the banks were "discriminating" against low-income people. Since certain zip codes are much poorer than others, those loans inevitably defaulted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 05/26/2009

Wow! All this bickering over something so minor. He DIDN'T LIE. Listen to the radio show carefully. Not once did he say Barbara and Whoopi approached him first. And they say the right wingers are the only ones closed minded. This just proves that close mindedness runs on both the left and the right. Check your facts. Oh, and I agree that the View owes Glenn Beck an apology. Those two women attacked him like to two vicious dogs going for the kill. They just lost one avid viewer of The View. It was extremely distasteful and I expected a little bit better from all of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/22/2009
- cltclt I'm a Fan of cltclt 6 fans permalink
photo

He did lie, he claimed Barbara called him over, she didn't. He approached her. Maybe you can support Elisabeth in getting her own show on Fox (not news, Commentary) channel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 05/23/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Why, so there’s no conflicting view? That's what I want, 5 liberals sitting around a table complaining about Bush years after he left office and being cheerleaders for Obama. Bring it on!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/24/2009
photo

Whoopie was having trouble scheduling an appointment with her optometrist.

So he had to "phone in" her exam while the show was on.

Watching from his office himself, he asked her, "What do you see in front of you."

Whoopie told him.

The optometrist determined Whoopie's eyeglass prescription did not need an upgrade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/22/2009
- Carrie-On I'm a Fan of Carrie-On 5 fans permalink
photo

She needs a real doctor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

"Someone who claims that "the economy didn't go into the toilet until the democrats took over in 2006", i.e. somehow it's the Dems fault that the Deregulated Free Market House Of Cards came crashing down, is either intellectually dishonest, a completely ignorant right-wing tool, or both."

I see, so socialism and/or communism is a far better form of government. We all know how well that worked in the Soviet Union. There's still a Soviet Union and they're doing great, right? Right?? Well, at least North Korea is prospering nicely. Oh, crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 05/22/2009
- BassMent I'm a Fan of BassMent 42 fans permalink
photo

There is no more Soviet Union (USSR). It's been dissolved for over 20 years.

The Soviet Union never practiced communism as defined by Marx. Neither has China, nor North Korea, nor Cuba. What these countries practice (while CLAIMING they are following communist principles) is in fact a feudalistic oligarchy supported by a military dictatorship/police state. There has never been a communist state as Marx defined the concept.

In a true communist dynamic, all members of the society share equal ownership in all of the society's belongings. Each individual contributes according the best application of whatever skills they possess, and no individual's contribution is deemed more worthy than any other individual's. The closest we have ever had in recorded history to this ideal was the early Christian church (read Acts).

In a socialist dynamic, certain aspects of the society's production are managed by the state. This does not preclude the possibility of private enterprise or privately owned business. It simply means that in those instances where a governmental agency disinterested in profiting for itself will provide better management of production, it does so.

And yes, socialism, applied prudently and regulated in its expansion via public participation in government, can work much better than what we're experiencing in this country with our enslavement to lassaiz-faire capitalism. Read up on Sweden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/22/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 382 fans permalink
photo

The point is: human frailty prevents these systems from working as intentioned.

Sweden is simply run like a large corporation... similar to Singapore, Inc.

With only 9 million people, Sweden's employees... i mean citizens... have a comfortable standard of living and good health and retirement benefits. How do you feel about Euro-S0cialism now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 05/22/2009
- WoodyCPM I'm a Fan of WoodyCPM 81 fans permalink

Many pre-literate societies were also based on what we think of as "socialist" principles. All members of the societies were valued, all had a role to play and all and were "cared for" by what the group provided. Food was shared, resources were distributed according to need, all had health care. Most Native American societies operated loosely on these principles. The early Christians and Judaism's "Jubilee Year" concept and modern Kibbutz also incorporate some of these principles.

In contemporary America, it's every man for himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Learn to detect sarcasm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/24/2009
photo

Our Government is no closer to socialism now than it was in January. Paranoia about our Government is being stoked by the right wing to try and destabilize this administration.

And to clarify, not all socialistic ideas are awful, i.e. police, fire, postal.

A shining example of a healthy mix of capitalism/socialism is Norway which right now is doing fine in the world. Any extreme form of capital distribution (capitalism/socialism/communism) is destructive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 05/22/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 382 fans permalink
photo

That's such a silly argument... as if a local community can't pay for a fire or police department.

Who is spreading this weak argument?

Let me clarify this for you:

S0cialism is simply state-run capitalism
C0mmunism is simply state-run capitalism
Pr0gressivism is simply state-run capitalism

Free market capitalism is simply the market running capitalism... with the government as referee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

"The real issue is racism, sexism and ageism. Listen to his words. His concern is that the train seats were reserved; not by "Joe Amtrak Biden" - use Becks own words -but by a black comedian, Ms. Goldberg, and a white mature woman, Ms. Walters."

Ageism? You liberals are priceless. Every time someone disagrees with you, you have to pull the race card, sex card or whatever card. That's half the reason you got Obama in the white house even though he's about as qualified as I am to be president. Actually, I would be doing a better job. I wouldn’t be spending about 5 generations of peoples’ money at least. If you didn't vote for Obama it's because you're a racist. If you don't want illegal immigrants freely coming into the country, you must be a racist against Latinos. If you want the terrorists dead you must be a racist, not because you don't want to be killed yourself. The radical left is so ridiculously out of touch it's not even funny, and before you start calling me a right-wing crazy person, I'm not. In fact, I have a relative that's so right wing that I won't even go over to her house. I didn't vote for Bush in 2004 and I think gay marriage and weed should be legal. I voted for McCain only because Obama is so laughably unqualified and it's certainly showing. I probably would have voted for Hilary if she had gotten the nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 05/22/2009
- BassMent I'm a Fan of BassMent 42 fans permalink
photo

My problem with you, starkcr31, is not your positioning on the political spectrum of liberal and conservative. It's that your posts are comprised entirely of anecdote, jingoism and opinion. You seem to have an acute allergy to fact-based analysis and rational argumentation.

This is why it's so pathetically simple for "us liberals" to shred your posts. You seem to believe that your pronouncement that "Obama is so laughably unqualified" makes it so. It does not.

You seem to think that your assertion that liberals engage in "insane spending" negates the historical fact that the last three times that the size/cost of government expanded to such a degree that deficits were incurred were all under conservative Republican administrations (Reagan, BushI, Bush II)... under the "liberal" Clinton, the size/cost of government was reduced and deficits were flipped to surplus.

You're good at repeating (or at least typing) the Rushian talking points, but you lack the discipline to present cross-referenced facts, statistics, or historical analysis to back up your sloganeering.

Which kind of describes the Republican party, now that I think of it. No wonder you guys got clobbered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 05/22/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 382 fans permalink
photo

For someone who thinks you can import a governmental system that manages 9 million moderately affluent, largely homogeneous, people... into a melting pot of 350 million with a Mexico on the porous border... needs to do a reality check.

S0cialized systems work very well in small, homogeneous countries which have huge sovereign funds invested in growth markets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 05/22/2009
- omobob I'm a Fan of omobob 41 fans permalink
photo

Woopie calls them as she sees them. You da Lady! Glen Beck is a phony masquerading as a spokesman for the common man. Hard to keep in touch with the common man when you’re pulling down millions a year. This guy can’t smile, he only smirks. Smirking because of the hilarious ponzi scheme called the Glen Beck Show.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

“You consider yourself a "moderate conservative" -- that's funny. And who, pray tell, is more conservative than you?”

I knew I would get attacked on this site. Anyway, there are plenty of people more conservative than me. I’m not against gay marriage and I’m not very religious (in fact, I’m agnostic). I’m also not against abortion (in extreme cases like where the mother’s life is in danger). I just don’t agree with pretty much all the liberal policies (besides the ones mentioned). Insane spending, pacifism, being lenient on illegal immigration so they can come into the country and get free health care that raises my insurance costs, stealing my money to give to people who don’t feel like working, universal health care (my mother is from the UK so she’s told me how great that is; waiting 6 freaking months to see a doctor), etc. Shall I go on?

“Someone who claims that "the economy didn't go into the toilet until the democrats took over in 2006", i.e. somehow it's the Dems fault that the Deregulated Free Market House Of Cards came crashing down, is either intellectually dishonest, a completely ignorant right-wing tool, or both.”

I’m not “right-wing” as you say. Everyone wants to blame Bush for this mess but the fact is that the economy was fine until the democrats took over congress. That may be a coincidence but it’s a fact. If you bothered to actually research it you’d realize I’m right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 05/22/2009
- Atmus I'm a Fan of Atmus 10 fans permalink

"I"m not "right-wing" as you say. Everyone wants to blame Bush for this mess but the fact is that the economy was fine until the democrats took over congress."

You may in fact not be right-wing, but you are out of your frickin' mind.

Maybe YOU didnt notice the economy slumping until the democrats took over congress by all of.....2 people? in 2006.
But you probably also think that policies get enacted immediately and they immediately effect the economy on day 1. The economy slumping in 2006/07 was a causality of failed policies and overspending between roughly 2002 - 2006/07.

You must be out of your mind to think that soon as democrats took over in 2006 it suddenly became there fault. And the same could be said for the year that Bush took over in 2000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 05/22/2009
photo

Liberal Policies?

Our Country was founded on liberal policies. It would seem you are applying the use of the word liberal to define anything you don't like or agree with. That however is not the definition of the word. If we are to engage in debate let us at least attempt to speak the same language.

I know not whom you are speaking about, please clarify.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 05/22/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

That's true, but liberal policies are defined far differently now than they were back then. They were for small government intervention, not big, so basically their "liberal" policies were more like conservatism is now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 05/24/2009
- dlvme2 I'm a Fan of dlvme2 15 fans permalink

He is a butt and when he called into his show - wow! It was not really about who said hi to who first it was how he characterized the entire event which made them sound like they asked for special priviledges and were acting - what is the word diva-like and he made it into a more dramatic event then it was - it was really not about who said hi to who first really it was about how he made them out to be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 05/22/2009
- TopDog I'm a Fan of TopDog 8 fans permalink
photo

Glenn Beck is full of crap and so are all the ladies of the View. A couple of sacks of crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 AM on 05/22/2009
- dlvme2 I'm a Fan of dlvme2 15 fans permalink

It was his characterization of Whoopi and Barbara that upset them and he did lie - he made them out to look diva-like and well it was just not a good way to character someone. Then they went onto another topic and he went back to the train incident. But he did lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 05/22/2009
- mi I'm a Fan of mi 13 fans permalink

Whoopi said it all, what a pooper scooper he is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 AM on 05/22/2009

It was delightful to watch him sweat and squirm. More power to the ladies of The View. I propose that they take over Sunday morning political discussions with assorted pundits. They are not afraid to ask inconvenient questions, unlike the David Gregory and George S. types.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 05/22/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (59 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect