More

Obama Naval Academy Commencement Speech: President Speaks To Military Graduates

DARLENE SUPERVILLE   05/22/09 10:42 PM ET   AP

Obama

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — President Barack Obama promised graduating midshipmen at the U.S. Naval Academy on Friday that, as their commander in chief, he will only send them "into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary." In his first address to military graduates, Obama also pledged to invest in the men and women who defend America's liberty, not just in the weapons they would take with them into battle against 21st century threats.

"I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support that you need to get the job done," the president told more than 1,000 graduates during a sun-splashed ceremony at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium.

Obama said he has halted reductions in the Navy, is building up the Marine Corps and investing in the hardware _ combat ships, submarines and fighter aircraft _ they'll need to do their jobs. He promised higher pay, enhanced child care and improved support and other benefits.

"In short, we will maintain America's military dominance and keep you the finest fighting force the world has ever seen," Obama said, as more than 30,000 watched from the stands.

The president also praised the role of Navy SEALS in freeing a U.S. sea captain by killing his Somali pirate captors last month.

"The extraordinary precision and professionalism displayed that day was made possible, in no small measure, by the training, the discipline and the leadership skills that so many of those officers learned at the United States Naval Academy," Obama said in his first public comments on the matter.

Among those receiving degrees was John S. McCain IV, the son of Obama's presidential rival, Sen. John McCain, who watched from a front-row seat on the grassy field with his wife, Cindy, his mother, Roberta, and several of his children. Had the Arizona Republican, who also graduated from the academy, defeated Obama, McCain could have addressed the Class of 2009 himself.

Obama and "Jack" McCain, a fourth-generation academy graduate, shared a handshake, an embrace and a few words when the young man was called up to receive his diploma, following in the footsteps of his father, grandfather and great-grandfather.

Obama did not recognize Sen. McCain in his speech; the White House says it was out of respect for the family's wishes. But the president did say a few words about his rival for the presidency before he left the White House. He praised the senator as he signed legislation giving the Pentagon new power to curtail wasteful defense spending. McCain was a sponsor of the bill.

"Senator McCain couldn't be here today because he's making sure he has a good seat to watch his son graduate from the Naval Academy in a few hours, and that's where I'm headed as soon as I catch my ride over here," Obama said at the bill signing in the Rose Garden.

Presidents typically deliver the commencement address at one of the service academies each year. Friday's speech was the third graduation address by Obama in the past nine days. He used the previous two to tackle issues that threatened to overshadow both events.

At the University of Notre Dame last Sunday, abortion opponents protested Obama's appearance because he supports abortion rights. Obama took on the debate, telling graduates of the Roman Catholic university that people on both sides of the issue must stop demonizing one another.

At Arizona State University, where Obama spoke on May 13, the issue was the school's decision not to award him an honorary degree on grounds that he hadn't accomplished enough. Obama said he agreed, saying no one's body of work is ever complete.

On Thursday, Obama delivered a different kind of speech, one in which he sought to regain control of the emotional debate over closing the detention center for suspected terrorists in Cuba. He denounced "fear-mongering" by political opponents and insisted that maximum-security prisons on the U.S. mainland can safely house the dangerous detainees he wants transferred from Guantanamo Bay.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney countered the same day with a speech denouncing some of Obama's actions as "unwise in the extreme" and repeating his contention that the new president is endangering the country by turning aside Bush-era policies.

___

On the Net:

U.S. Naval Academy: http://www.usna.edu

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 244
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:26 PM on 05/22/2009
the most dangerous place in the world is the deck of an aircraft carrier when they're just PRACTICING. These guys are 'in harm's way daily.' And they love it. The problem is that these officers have a role to play in helping the president enforce his judgment about when you put civilians in harm's way b y sending marines and soldiers to their lands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrueThis
09:33 PM on 05/22/2009
This article is so.....conflicting to the point that it's ridiculous.
09:15 PM on 05/22/2009
Not sending mil grads to war is like not letting a life guard save a drowning person for fear that they might drown too. They signed up. Send them all while they still think they know everything.
10:54 PM on 05/22/2009
The message was, Obama will send them to war only if absolutely necessary, unlike W. It's all there in those words above your post.
08:01 AM on 05/23/2009
Really? Thanks! I was trying to figure out what those crazy lines were. Turns out they were "words". Hey! Wait! I'm using "words" right now! This is amazing! I cant thank you enough!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
07:58 PM on 05/22/2009
That doesn't cut it, Obama. Junior also went to war for a cause, that cause being to enrich his friends, make Iraq safe for American oil companies and add 'war president' to his resume. And in every respect he succeeded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sysmgr1345
08:33 PM on 05/22/2009
You missed a big one: My daddy and his buddy Dick said "boy, I wish we could have gotten Saddam the first time around."
05:26 PM on 05/22/2009
Mr. President when we go to work there's never a right cause. War is a crime period.
06:38 PM on 05/22/2009
Tell that to those that attack us..The US has never just started a war willy nilly..when we've gone to war its been in response to an attacker..wake up you crazy person..of course who in their right mind wants war..silly just silly and oh yea naive as heck.
08:13 PM on 05/22/2009
Naive and crazy are words of a person who thirst blood.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
08:20 PM on 05/22/2009
That may have been true until Iraq/Bush came along.
10:39 PM on 05/22/2009
Have you ever lost anyone you love in a terrorist attack?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
05:21 PM on 05/22/2009
Would A Cause be like Iraq and Afghanistan ??
Probably so !!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Weirdwriter
07:26 PM on 05/22/2009
So there's no distinction between why we went into these countries?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
05:04 PM on 05/22/2009
This speech is why it is important to never again elect Republicans to the WH. In Obama's speech there were no scare tactics, no straw men to knock down. Democrats have always been measured in use of military force and when they do use it, they do so humbly because they know they are asking Americans to die or to kill other people. Republicans seem to almost relish the body count, as if it is some indication of their toughness and stoicism. Republicans support the troops when they are clean and shiny and make good photo ops, but it's the Dems who stand with them when they are half dead, crippled and broken. Republicans cynically exploit the troops for political purposes (a tax cut means one for the troops, too). Democrats know war and combat is best left to those who experience it and the professionals who help them. The article did state Obama's mention of the Seals who shot the pirates and this was the first time he did. Professional. No cheap theatrics or sunshine patriotism.
05:15 PM on 05/22/2009
Why is it so many people here like to hear his psychobabble?
05:36 PM on 05/22/2009
I'd say it was cheap theatrics to say he wouldn't send them to war needlessly, implying that others had.
Cheap, low and small.
One of these days, he's going to have to stand for something other than trashing his predecessor (especially since he's continuing many of the policies he campaigned against).
Wearing very thin.
06:07 PM on 05/22/2009
War, police action, is something of last resort, unlike Iraq. Obama is right on.
11:02 PM on 05/22/2009
Nearly five thousand troops die in an unnecessary and counter productive war in Iraq and you don't like it being mentioned by the new Commander in Chief to the Naval Academy graduates. That says everything about your bias.
04:47 PM on 05/22/2009
Obama can't seem to make a speech without running against Bush. I wonder how long the public will be able to tolerate it.
05:10 PM on 05/22/2009
I suspect for as long as the former administration (i.e. Cheney) continues to launch a daily offensive against the new President.
05:38 PM on 05/22/2009
That would be defense. Mr. Obama, like no other president before, has made a steady habit of trashing the Bush administration. You wouldn't be hearing from Mr. Cheney were that not the case. I can't blame him for stepping out to defend himself.
Mr. Obama's attacks are cheap, misleading, and sleazy politician fare. I expected better of him.
06:29 PM on 05/22/2009
Sensiblethinking I think he doesn't do it enough, when
I look at my 401k plan and how it has shrunk anything
he saids about Bush/Cheney that is demoralizing is alright with
me. Besides what's wrong with telling the truth. Something
we have not had in the past 8 years. This past President and
the Republican party have all but destroyed this country's enconomy.
04:20 PM on 05/22/2009
What concerns me is the whole rationale of using violence to achieve goals and almost deifying the military as the primary focus of achieving those goals. President Obama is leagues ahead of President Bush, but I still fear that as a nation we are buying into much of the same after all.

The days of "might for right" needed to arise to move away from the barbarism etc. of the middle ages, the holy wars were not "holy", so shouldn't we be dialoguing to higher ground after so many centuries?
10:25 PM on 05/22/2009
And how exactly do you dialogue to higher ground when you have a situation like.....oh, say terrorists flying your airplanes into the pentagon, buildings in NY and trying for the White House?
Maybe the military could have gotten on the phones and talked the terrorists out of it???
photo
Moshe
Shalom to all
04:18 PM on 05/22/2009
"President Obama vows not to send military graduates to war without cause."

To be fair, Bush/Cheney had a cause: Halliburton/MIC/Big Oil
04:17 PM on 05/22/2009
More lofty rhetoric signifying nothing. The US no longer fights "wars". Now, we engage in "Overseas Contingency Operations". Our presence in Afghanistan is counterproductive and only ensures more death and profits for the MIC. Obama's better half is losing the fight with his dark side, which is, ironically the white half that seems to be W.
04:49 PM on 05/22/2009
As you have learned. What Obama says is meaningless. It's the "feel good" rehtoric of the day written by his speech writers. It's what he does....which often is very disconnected from who he says he is or what he says he will do.

Only tax the rich? Now he wants to tax soda, candy, beer, and health care benefits. His only tax the rich promise didn't last very long. Or does he now think we are all rich?
06:10 PM on 05/22/2009
This is a tax on "products" not your salary. This is "discretionary" spending so if you don't like it don't buy soda, candy or beer. Also, it's not a tax on health benefits - it's a tax FOR health benefits. The revenue generated is to help pay for health care for those less fortunate which I would hope MOST would think is the right thing to do. Believe it or not people are going to get sick whether they have health care or not so you might as well pay for a preventive health care plan now or we're going to pay for their emergency care later. Either way you're going to pay.

As a general comment, so many people are so self-centered and greedy that they're unwilling to give a red cent to help people in need - just sickening at times.
10:42 PM on 05/22/2009
"Obama's better half is losing the fight with his dark side, which is, ironically the white half that seems to be W."

That was brilliant!
03:41 PM on 05/22/2009
His speech is so wrong in so many ways.

He said: "I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support that you need to get the job done,"

Ignoring what you believe of Pres. Bush and his actions I ask you the following:

What happens if we are attacked here or overseas and we must respond immediately? Do we wait until we have "well-defined goals"; do we wait until "the equipment and the support you need..." is in place? How do we define these ideas, this commitment?

If Roosevelt had waited until we had "well-defined goals", the outcome of WWII would have been different. If Truman had waited until "the equipment and support..." was c o m p l e t e l y in place, we would never have entered the Korean War, and the world would be much different (read worse) today.

These statements are not realistic, these promises are not keepable, and it shows a lack of leadership and pandering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raiseup151z
04:08 PM on 05/22/2009
calm down buddy...I am sure if we are attacked...Our military will not hesitate to act and will not disappoint you...have faith in our military.
05:41 PM on 05/22/2009
Let me clarify. I have no doubt that Pres. Obama would respond to an attack or crises, and, in spite of what Jazz and Bubbi wrote, I do have the belief he will do the responsible thing.

I was trying, apparently unsuccessfully, to point out that his statements were not "responsible".

As to Jazzdrummer, he did NOT imply an Iraq situation. His statement was universal, not selective.

And, Bubbinator, it appears from your post you've already hit the ol' beer keg.
04:13 PM on 05/22/2009
If Obama had to respond immediately to a situation, I have no doubt he WOULD respond immediately.
What he is saying is, he won't send troops into another poorly thought out situation like Iraq again.

It's pretty obvious you're looking for any reason to criticize the president since I'm guessing he wasn't your choice.
04:20 PM on 05/22/2009
In the eyes of the die hard Republicans, President Obama could cure cancer, end world hunger, solve the economic problem, and he'll still be criticized. Oh, sure he cured cancer, but AIDS is still around. Oh, sure, he solved world hunger, but he used tax dollars, oh he solved the economic problems, but that was the Bush policies that finally kicked in - Give me a freakin' break pall. Why don't you do the world a favor and educate your self, or drink beer and play with your gun.
03:28 PM on 05/22/2009
How was putting Navy Seals into harms way to go as.sa.ss.in.at.e those Somali pirates 'absolutely necessary'?

Were they planning on setting off a dirty nuke in Chicago?
photo
Bitsko
He of the smoldering eyes
03:42 PM on 05/22/2009
Your argument is stretchier than a rubber band.
04:16 PM on 05/22/2009
If you want to condemn Obama's actions then think of something that he has turn his head on like the prosecution of Bush and his administration's criminal and war crimes.

About Obama keeping alive Bush's illegal data mining illegally of American citizens.

About Obama changing his statement about renegotiating the free trade bill with has outsource permanently our jobs overseas.

About the health insurance bill they will be forcing everyone to buy into except their exceptions and did not let the single payer have a word of input.
03:28 PM on 05/22/2009
obama, the guy who said

"war with Iran is NOT off the table"

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=95022§ionid=351020101

this guy is still piggybacking on the whole W0T and 9ll manufactured fairytales

that should tell you what he's getting at.

and what we're headed for.

BTW...
sw!ne flu is a m!l!tary path0gen (Wayne Madsen)

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4730.shtml
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4724.shtml
photo
Bitsko
He of the smoldering eyes
03:44 PM on 05/22/2009
The same Wayne Madsen who wrote in 2008 "suggested that the criminal prosecution of New York State governor Eliot Spitzer was partly due to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad"? (Wikipedia) You mean that guy? No thanks.
03:54 PM on 05/22/2009
well yes, that is the one...

what are you suggesting?

that saying anything about !srael! civilian murder!ng services is a mark of lack of credibility right off the bat?

we understand what kind of puppet and dual citizen art student you are.

why don't you go back to your country of primary allegiance and

get out of MY country?
aristippe
no more war for oil
04:39 PM on 05/22/2009
woo-woo alert
03:25 PM on 05/22/2009
obama, the guy who said

"war with Iran is NOT off the table"

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=95022§ionid=351020101

this guy is still piggybacking on the whole WOT and 9/11 manufactured fairytales

that should tell you what he's getting at.

and what we're headed for.

BTW...
swine flu is a military pathogen (Wayne Madsen)

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4730.shtml
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4724.shtml
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raiseup151z
04:32 PM on 05/22/2009
your a fruit cake who was hiding in his closet for last 8 years and decided now to come out and blame everything on Obama...

So... WOT and 9/11 crap you talking about...he cannot tackle that right now.... otherwise he will loose his main agenda ...which is to help the people of this country fight with poverty, health coverage, economy, education.. I am sure he will go after the "fairy tales" after he has accomplished what he has to do for us - the general public.