EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

NYT Public Editor Slaps Friedman, Dowd, Andrews

First Posted: 6/24/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Times

New York Times:

IT has been a busy week or two for the ethics police -- those within The Times trying to protect the paper's integrity, and those outside, ready to pounce on transgressions by Times journalists.

Read the whole story: New York Times

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:11 PM on 05/26/2009
That money was returned in five months under a Friedman Unit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonani
A woman of substance
04:14 PM on 05/25/2009
The next time a lowly doctoral student is taken outside, beaten, torched, and then relegated to never never land for stealing another persons thoughts or verbatim words let them use the Dowd Defense. Shameful!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
01:52 PM on 05/25/2009
Plagiarism = Good cause for firing in the newspaper business.
10:43 AM on 05/25/2009
Not that I condone what the writers in question did. I do not. However, I find it interestin­g that the NYT holds itself to a higher standard than the typical republican writers and talk show hosts who claim to be fair and balanced. With the latter, speaking fees (many very substantia­l) are the norm, even though paid by groups who clearly are not “education­al and other nonprofit groups for which lobbying and political activity are not a major focus.” The higher standard by media such as the NYT gets used by the republican right wing as fodder for their rants about how the media has a liberal bias; and, except for outlets like Media Matters, they are never called on their bias when reporting stories or reporting on what others who they condemn as liberal are reporting. With the republican right wing the balancing of the truth against sensationa­lism always comes down in favor of sensationa­lism - any everyone seems content to let it slide because it is what the republican­s do and it is expected from them. Why is that?
10:37 AM on 05/25/2009
Wait, so Krugman isn't included??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
01:33 PM on 05/25/2009
Krugman is the one best reason anybody should look for the NYT. Dowd is OK; she is an excellent reporter at heart; but her columns are merely (sometimes delightful­ly) snarky. It depends on whose ox is gored. Friedman is more dubious since he is shallow and his opinions are suspect.
12:46 AM on 05/26/2009
Please tell me that it was an accident that you used the words "Dowd" and "reporter" in the same sentence.
10:36 AM on 05/25/2009
does anyone with a brain still read the NYT?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:06 PM on 05/26/2009
I do. I'm a major Krugman fan.
04:10 PM on 05/27/2009
Used to be a huge Krugman fan, but not anymore. Had to face reality when he began claiming that the way out of a problem created by excessive debt would be to create even more debt. (Huh!!!) And when he began suggesting that huge deficits don't matter, because the interest rates are low. And when he began suggesting that if the American consumer chose not to continue to buy so much then the federal government ought to just force them to buy. And when he suggested that excessive saving is a problem, not a solution. Don't know what happened to him, maybe he began hanging out with Friedman. But he doesn't make a lot of sense to me anymore.
01:23 PM on 05/26/2009
Some of us don't watch Fox News.
09:53 AM on 05/25/2009
At least, Clark Hoyt wrote a pretty interestin­g story. It's great
when Mo Do gets caught up in some snarky details, and Thom
Friedman is rich enough that $75K is just walking around money.

Still the best paper in the US, try though they might to make it not so.
03:56 PM on 05/25/2009
"Still the best paper in the US"

High praise, indeed!
09:43 AM on 05/25/2009
So long NYT.

Your motto is now "All the Lies Fit to Print."
08:45 AM on 05/25/2009
How lucky Dowd is, stole a paragraph, and got off of the hook, with a feather duster....
08:44 AM on 05/25/2009
Dowd is an equal opportunit­y humiliater and not worth reading, Friedman helped Bush beat the drum for war and the invasion of Iraq and he would have to pay me to listen to one of his speeches.

These people are very much like the Newspaper they work for, fading rapidly in importance and relevancy.
09:02 AM on 05/25/2009
my sentiments exactly. do not forget Judith Miller
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 AM on 05/25/2009
dowd is both a phony and a hypocrite. she trashed the dems for years and years helping rupublican­s have a strangleho­ld on this country. now that the tide has turned and only dems are welcomed in the upper east side, she is all kissy kissy on everythhin­g obama. she is the biggest phony around and a big bore to boot. she has no ideas for solving any problem this country has. she is incapable of positive thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruEngineHearing
Happiness needs new pursuers...
07:04 AM on 05/25/2009
This is a little pissy, don't you think?:

"I do not think Dowd plagiarize­d, but I also do not think what she did was right."

Unless you are making an accusation that she actually tried to get away with something, then your comment is the cheap feel here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:26 AM on 05/25/2009
“I just wasn’t paying attention,­” Friedman said.

Same as when he led the cheering section for the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Wonder when we're going to start judging the merits of columnists­, not just on how eloquently they weave word-pictu­res and collect Pulitzers, but also on how often they're proven grotesquel­y, unforgivab­ly WRONG...
07:50 AM on 05/25/2009
Spot on. But as long as they are commercial­ly viable they will live on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
10:12 AM on 05/25/2009
Exactly. These columnists should have been fired -- particular­ly Friedman, who has been murderousl­y wrong on the most important issues of the day and utterly vapid when he wasn't wrong.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gib
My micro-bio is empty
02:22 AM on 05/26/2009
Not to mention pompous, self-impor­tant, and pretentiou­s.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonCosenza
05:45 AM on 05/25/2009
I just wasted 7 minutes of my life reading that article. Thanks, Hoyt and NYT. Keep fighting the good fight against columnists caught not paying attention and reporters with poor personal finances. Seriously, I'm surprised reporters even have finances these days... maybe that's the biggest scandal.

Oh BTW, did you hear that there's 2 wars and a recession going on?
12:54 AM on 05/25/2009
Time to give some others a shot.