Global Business Urges Countries To Cut Greenhouse Gases

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Global Business Urges Countries To Cut Greenhouse Gases stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN HEILPRIN | 05/26/09 03:46 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Australian actress Cate Blanchett seen at the climate change conference World Business Summit, Monday May 25, 2009, in Copenhagen, Denmark. The Actress was invited because of her involvement in the environmental Australian Conservation Foundation. (AP Photo/POLFOTO, Tariq Mikkel Khan)

COPENHAGEN — Global business leaders added momentum to prospects for a new U.N. climate treaty by agreeing Tuesday that the world must cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by mid-century by setting specific limits on carbon.

Government officials reported little progress in setting such limits, however, showing how distant a new treaty remains.

Some 500 CEOs and other top business experts said at the conclusion of the three-day World Business Summit on Climate Change in Denmark that "immediate and substantial" emissions cuts were needed by 2020, followed by cuts of at least 50 percent of 1990 levels by 2050. They said governments should use the marketplace to set a global price on carbon instead of taxing it, according to a statement from conference organizers.

Under cap-and-trade, the government establishes a market for carbon dioxide by distributing credits to companies that emit greenhouse gases. The companies can then invest in technologies to reduce emissions to reach a certain target or buy credits from other companies that already have met their emission reduction goals.

But there is widespread dispute over the details of how cap-and-trade would work, with critics saying it would lead to higher costs for some consumers and could hurt bruised economies.

The business leaders said governments' overriding aim at a December U.N. meeting in Copenhagen on replacing the 1997 Kyoto Protocol should be limiting the global average rise in temperature to a maximum of 2 degrees Celsius.

Global temperatures have risen 0.22 degrees (0.12 degrees Celsius) since 1990, according to one U.S. government estimate. The U.N.'s chief panel on climate change estimates that the risk of increased severe weather will rise if the global average temperature increases between 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) and 3.6 degrees (2 degrees Celsius) above 1990 levels.

"There is nothing to be gained through delay," the statement said, and the richest countries should be the first to make the biggest emissions cuts.

Story continues below

Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen told participants "your words are sweet music in my ears," and called for developed countries to lead the way and enact emissions cuts of 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050.

But doing that will be difficult. At a separate meeting in Paris, French Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo, playing host to talks among the world's biggest polluters, said the United States had backpedaled on promises to slash carbon emissions but China appeared "absolutely determined" to make deep cuts.

Borloo suggested President Barack Obama wasn't following through on an earlier call for requiring deep cuts in U.S. carbon emissions.

"We want to tell them, 'Yes, you can,' you can do a lot more," Borloo told Europe-1 radio in a report card on the Major Economies Forum, which brought together the 17 countries that produce four-fifths of global carbon emissions.

The top U.S. negotiator on climate change, Todd Stern, defended the Obama administration's commitment to what he called a "seismic change" in the country's carbon emissions and attitude toward fighting global warming.

Stern said the overall U.S. targets were on a par with what Europe is proposing though are calculated differently.

"I don't think they are going to match. I don't think they need to match," he said. "We advanced the ball, though we have a long way to go to get to Copenhagen."

Obama has called for an 83 percent reduction in greenhouse gases from 2005 levels by the year 2050 using cap-and-trade. His budget plan had banked on raising $646 billion in revenues from 2012 to 2019 from auctioning emission credits to companies, but it appears unlikely to gain Congress' approval.

If governments agree in Copenhagen in December to set new limits to make carbon dioxide a scarcer commodity, CEOs said, their companies can lead the way to a greener economy.

"We're going to have to fundamentally redefine our business models in a low-carbon world," said James Rogers, chairman of U.S.-based electricity provider Duke Energy Corp.

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol's mandatory cuts in greenhouse gases, which have produced mixed results, expire in 2012.

The United States never signed on to Kyoto, citing the costs to the economy and lack of participation by China, India and other fast-developing countries. But some of those countries have said rich countries are not aggressive enough in cutting their own emissions.

The hosts of the Paris meeting said they made progress on finding $100 billion a year to help poor countries limit pollution and adapt to climate change.

The next major round of U.N. climate talks toward a new treaty will begin in days in Bonn, Germany.

___

Associated Press writers Angela Charlton and Tobias Schmidt in Paris contributed to this report.

COPENHAGEN — Global business leaders added momentum to prospects for a new U.N. climate treaty by agreeing Tuesday that the world must cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by mid-century by sett...
COPENHAGEN — Global business leaders added momentum to prospects for a new U.N. climate treaty by agreeing Tuesday that the world must cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by mid-century by sett...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Cyberoptic I'm a Fan of Cyberoptic 7 fans permalink

What is keeping these businesses from doing this themselves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

I have a couple questions. Of the 500 CEOs saying we need to cut GHG emissions, how many head companies that actually produce more than a nominal amount of GHGs? In other words, which of these CEOs have anything to lose by being forced to buy carbon tax credits? Also, how many of the countries which signed the Kyoto treaty have posted reductions in their output of GHGs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 05/26/2009

THEY ARE GOING TO STEAL OUR MONEY.............GLOBAL WARMING IS BS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

sour grapes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 05/27/2009
- JnrNorman I'm a Fan of JnrNorman 6 fans permalink

Obama loves new dirty coal electric plants moutain top removal GMO corn susidies with chemical fertilizern and pesticides

The Obama Deception
http://brasschecktv.com/page/593.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 05/26/2009

Hey, this seems like big news. Business leadership signing up for the pain of reconfiguring the economy toward sustainability is big news. Why they did not take names of the CEOs who are committed to this is strange to me. If you really want accountability and transparency, where are the reporters asking simple questions and reporting the actual facts on the ground????

What a huge missed opportunity!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/26/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect