GM Bankruptcy Looms As Bondholders Shun Tender Offer

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - GM Bankruptcy Looms As Bondholders Shun Tender Offer stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER and DAN STRUMPF | 05/27/09 11:34 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Map shows number of GM factory employees by state

DETROIT — General Motors bondholders felt they deserved something like a 58 percent stake in the company in exchange for their billions of dollars in debt. What they were offered wasn't even close.

The bondholder rejection virtually ensures GM will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection within days.

"They said no. That's it. They tried. That's why they're going to have to file," said John Pottow, a professor at the University of Michigan who specializes in bankruptcy.

The government, which has already extended nearly $20 billion in loans to GM, ordered the company to come up with a plan that 90 percent of its bondholders would agree to. But the government allowed it to offer only 10 percent of the company's stock. GM was forced to withdraw the offer Wednesday after it fell far short.

A person familiar with discussions between GM and the government told The Associated Press any Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing would probably come around the government's Monday deadline for GM to finish restructuring or enter court protection. The person asked not to be identified because the talks are private.

To avoid an in-court restructuring, the government had said GM must shed debt, cut labor costs and close plants.

GM bondholders are owed about $27 billion, the largest chunk of GM's roughly $58 billion in debt. They were offered the 10 percent stake to wipe out the debt, well short of the 58 percent they wanted.

A GM bankruptcy protection filing would be the fourth-largest in U.S. history and the largest for an industrial company.

Story continues below
advertisement

Like its crosstown rival Chrysler, which was angling Wednesday for a judge's permission to sell most of its assets to a group headed by an Italian automaker, GM was pulled down by debt, high labor costs and a devastating sales slump.

The government has poured billions into the two companies, fearing the ripple effects of catastrophic job losses might push the economy into a depression. The pair employ more than 126,000 people in the U.S., and hundreds of thousands of others rely on the companies working for parts suppliers, dealerships and other associated businesses.

GM spokesman Tom Wilkinson said company's board would meet later this week to decide its next move. He would not reveal what percentage of bondholders accepted the debt-for-equity offer, but GM said it was "substantially less" than needed.

Meanwhile, Germany pressed for an independent future for General Motors Corp.'s Europe-based Opel unit. The foreign minister said "the lights must not go out" on Opel even as the parent company heads for bankruptcy court.

Opel's supervisory board approved a plan to pool GM's European assets _ including plants, sales operations and patents but excluding Sweden's Saab brand _ for a new investor, said Karin Kirchner, a spokeswoman for GM Europe.

GM would choose any new investor, but Germany would decide on whether a new owner would get further government assistance, and if so what kind. But a high-level meeting hosted by Chancellor Angela Merkel to discuss the future of Opel ended Wednesday night without a decision. Germany's economy minister, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, said after talks that lasted most of the night that Germany does not yet have the security it needs to provide bridge funding for Opel.

Two investors _ Italy's Fiat Group SpA and Canadian auto parts maker Magna International Inc. _ remain in the running but U.S. financial investor Ripplewood Holdings LLC has bowed out.

Offering a glimmer of hope that GM might avoid seeking bankruptcy protection, the United Auto Workers union agreed to take only a 20 percent stake in GM, down from the original plan of 39 percent.

Analysts speculated that the move would free up 19 percent of GM's shares to be used elsewhere, perhaps to sweeten the deal for bondholders. But that never happened, and now the U.S. government, which may have to commit billions more to GM's court-supervised restructuring, stands to become a majority owner.

Under the debt exchange plan announced by GM last month, bondholders were to get 225 shares of GM stock for every $1,000 they had in debt, a 10 percent stake. Current stockholders would end up owning just 1 percent of the company.

GM's biggest bondholders, mostly big banks and other institutional investors, have opposed the swap from the start. Smaller bondholders _ individual investors like retirees and families _ have complained about the terms, too.

Some analysts said GM's bondholders may be holding out for better terms in bankruptcy court, where they would normally get up to 40 percent of their holdings back.

Many large investors also hold insurance policies known as credit default swaps that would reimburse them if GM goes under. That might be a better deal than battered GM stock.

For the bondholders, "If you're bullish on the prospects of the company, you might think that's a great deal," Pottow said. "If you're bearish on the prospects of the company, you might not think that's a great deal."

___

Associated Press Writers Philip Elliott in Washington and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report.

DETROIT — General Motors bondholders felt they deserved something like a 58 percent stake in the company in exchange for their billions of dollars in debt. What they were offered wasn't even clo...
DETROIT — General Motors bondholders felt they deserved something like a 58 percent stake in the company in exchange for their billions of dollars in debt. What they were offered wasn't even clo...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
823
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- twofish I'm a Fan of twofish 18 fans permalink

I thought the point of pouring money into the auto companies was to save jobs. Now they're even ending dealership arrangements, which will throw thousands out of work for no reason (no benefit to the auto company), and it will slow the recovery if it does come (no one wants to buy a new car with no nearby dealership for warranty maintenance). So we'll have spent billions and still lose countless jobs and beggar the unions. Was this the plan? Who are the winners? A few bondholders? Oh, and Toyota.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 05/28/2009

the whole point of going into bankruptacy is to be allowed to end dealership agreements. Otherwise, it would have been prohibitively expensive to end franchise agreements (due to strong franchise laws).

only a bankruptacy can bypass that.

GM needs bankruptacy to survive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 AM on 05/28/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

The Obama Administration sure has done a piss poor job working out this GM situation. Hundreds of thousands, maybe as many as a 3 Million (with suppliers and dealers included) American Jobs are going up in smoke starting next week with the Chapter 11. If Obama had just taken $100 Billion from the $878 Billion Stimulus Program and developed and Industrial Policy with GM at it's core, than I believe this economy could have recovered within 2 years but now, with GM failing, tthis isn't going to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 05/28/2009

This is a very sad day, but GM brought this on themselves. What was once the largest corporation in the world made missteps for 30 years since the early 70s. They produced far too many lousy cars and seemed to expect that the consumers would keep buying them.

The Vega (Did they really expect this to compete with Toyota)
X-cars, like the Citation (I know, I owned one)
The Cadillac Cimarron (They were kidding right)

just to name the worst of the worst.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 05/27/2009

In another source it was stated the U.S. may put in $30 billion. That's a lot of money folks.

So far I have supported Obama on this. I guess I would probably say OK to this new money as well. But I would feel a lot better if he had said after he put the new money in Chrysler, or puts the money in GM, that no matter what happens, success or failure, the U.S. will not be putting in another dime after this.

Believe it or not these bailouts COULD derail health care, as well as Obama's re-election. At some point if these companies can't make it, they're going to need to be cut loose, even under a democratic Pres. Same with the banks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/27/2009
- DLBSR I'm a Fan of DLBSR 13 fans permalink

Or the auto industry bailouts could help pay for healthcare over the long term. When GM becomes profitable, and it will with the participation of the American people, the earnings should be committed to the programs we are currently borrowing from China to pay for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

So you don't like 2 percent as your share? how about 1 percent?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 05/27/2009
- BlueZoo I'm a Fan of BlueZoo 44 fans permalink

How about ZERO! Last time I checked, nothing from nothing = nothing! The "recalcitrant bondholders" - as I understand it - are UNSECURED and that puts them at the bottom of the totem pole in a bankruptcy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

You know I just love all of these armchair quarterbacks when it comes to the UAW and other unions. Have any of you ever read a union contract? Have any of you ever been involved in contract negotiations? Have any of you worked in an Auto Plant? Have any of you ever been in any Auto plant and watched what the workers do all day? Have any of you ever been in charge of an auto plant or major manufacturing facility? I'm betting the answer is NO!!! Therefore, until you have an INFORMED, EDUCATED opinion your words are just blah, blah, blah and mean absolutely nothing...­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 05/27/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 207 fans permalink
photo

I love how the Goopers whined and cried about those poor little bank executives who were "screwed" out of the "bonuses" they were handed because it was in their contract..­.

Yet these Goopers are the exact same people who hate on the union members who actually ARE screwed, all the time, despite having a contract which one would think protects them.

Goopers truly do hate the middle class. And America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 05/27/2009
- ejhickey I'm a Fan of ejhickey 11 fans permalink

President Obama has asked the bondholdrs to 'sacrifice" and accept the government' offer. As a bondholder here is my anawer to the President: NO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 05/27/2009
- jweider I'm a Fan of jweider 30 fans permalink
photo

Well then go ahead and lose it all. See if we care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 05/27/2009
- ejhickey I'm a Fan of ejhickey 11 fans permalink

Won't lose it all and neither will the other bondholders. I want 100% on the dollar. Ater i am paid what I am owed GM , the UAW and Obama can do what they want. Until then I have one question: Where's my money?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 05/27/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 274 fans permalink

Another Main Street company bankrupted by Wall Street Hedge Funds!

TARP funds are rewarding the Hedge funds for forcing the Bankruptcy.

Hedge Funds insured their Bonds with AIG.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/27/2009
- Portnoy I'm a Fan of Portnoy 15 fans permalink

Have you heard the latest right wing conspiracy theory? Apparently they are running around telling everyone who will listen that the Chrysler dealerships that were closed were either NOT minority owned or were contributors to Republican Politicians!

They just don't give up! I mean seriously.­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 05/27/2009
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

I am pro-union, and anti-Toyota for its anti-labor practices. That said, the fact is that GM cannot compete with the likes of Toyota unless it can become as ruthless and anti-labor as Toyota. GM is paying retirement and health insurance for non-productive former workers. Toyota hires something like 1 full time employee for every 10 temporary migrant worker employee and avoids any benefits. The problem with GM is that the legacy costs have to be shed. But how to do that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 05/27/2009
photo

Apparently Toyota doesn't believe that trained chimps deserve lavish benefits packages worth more than the average American makes in total pay. They pay their workers generous wages given their skill set. There's nothing "anti-worker" about that. You can be "anti-union" without being "anti-worker" you know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

"You can be "anti-union" without being "anti-work­er"..." Well said. The unions had their place in history, now they have become too greedy. Yes, in general, CEO's make too much money but the board members have the say on the CEO salaries. But... The unions have strong-armed the companies into the unreasonable compensation that is now unsustainable.

Everyone likes to make the CEO's the bad guys, but the unions killed the auto industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 05/27/2009
- arachne646 I'm a Fan of arachne646 5 fans permalink

These "lavish benefits" were negotiated years ago as part of a contract in lieu of cash paid to these "nonproductive former workers" for hourly labour which was making the company a pile of money. Are you saying the system of business law that underpins free enterprise is worthless?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 05/27/2009
- Portnoy I'm a Fan of Portnoy 15 fans permalink

Maybe GM should start building cars that Americans want to buy, instead of the SUVs. Time to end the suffering of the American auto industry. Mass transit now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/27/2009

If GM didnt build SUV's, they would of been gone 10 years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 05/27/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

Mass transit ain't worth a crap except in the most crowded cities. For 90% of the country it is useless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 05/28/2009
photo

Do you realize that those retirees paid part of their wages toward those retirement benefits for 30+ yrs???? Do you realize they only get a whole whopping $1000 a month???? Do you realize they no longer have any eye care or dental benefits???? Do you realize that those retirees have to mail order all of their prescriptions just like the active workers or they aren't covered??? Do you realize that a giant list of drugs were banned for coverage??? Do you realize they have to pay $25 per prescription out of their own pocket???? Do realize they must pay $100 for any ER visit, even if they broke their arm or are having chest pains???? Do you realize they have to pay $275 of their medical care before insurance kicks in???? Do you realize that a lot of those worker put THEIR OWN MONEY into a company PSP for extra retirement savings, most was in GM stock, so they lost almost all of their extra retirement money????

Know what you speak before you speak it!!!!! NONE OF THEM ARE GETTING RICH AND IT WAS THEIR MONEY OUT OF THEIR OWN PAYCHECKS!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 05/27/2009

It is not as if we live in a cardboard box in a dark closet. There are business models all over the world that deal with the same issues. If it wern't for the banking scam many of these companies would be in great shape. Their workers have a living wage, health care, and a pension plan, why can't we lay the responsibility where it belongs, on the greedy, shortterm profit "investors". If there are viable business models throughout Europe and Asia, why aren't we looking at what they do and we don't. Workers at Fiat and Toyota in Japan have a living wage, healthcare and a pension, so its possible. The difference here is that the big 3 executives have had their tongues stuck on wall st. butt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 05/27/2009
- DLBSR I'm a Fan of DLBSR 13 fans permalink

Actually, the nationalization of GM is a golden opportunity for the taxpayers to begin earning our way out of our current financial doldrums. We now own GM and thus, the future success or failure of this company is now our responsibility. As owners we must demand this company be restructured, consolidated, and re-tooled to produce the high quality, affordable, green machines of the future. We can build the cars of tomorrow right here in America in manufacturing and assembly plants we own. Plants owned by Americans, not the Japanese, Chinese, or Koreans. We can and will build these cars ourselves, for ourselves, and the world markets. We have spent and borrowed our way to economic ruin, we now must try to earn our way to prosperity. GM can be transformed into a profitable taxpayer-owned entity and return future earnings to the taxpayers to help pay for the very programs we are now borrowing from China to pay for. Yes, it is a huge investment and some say a considerable risk. But it is an investment in ourselves with our own money and the only thing we need to guarantee siccess is ourselves. Turns out it is not risk at all, it is an opportunity. Many of you have always wanted to own your own business, now you do. Let's go for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 05/27/2009
- Cogitoe I'm a Fan of Cogitoe 4 fans permalink

It will indeed be an interesting and enlightening experiment. We will soon have a GM majority owned by the government, a Chysler majority owned by employees and a Ford majority owned by investors. Ten years from now which one will be on top? My bet is with Ford. Anyone else care to wager?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 05/27/2009
- mrfreeze I'm a Fan of mrfreeze 141 fans permalink
photo

Personally, I think we will see a more regional market share: GM should attack the big-vehicle/truck market for the more rural areas. With Chrysler's merger with FIAT, it could very well dominate the highly populated urban areas. Ford should specialize in the in-between markets...­....just a thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 05/27/2009
- DLBSR I'm a Fan of DLBSR 13 fans permalink

Ford is definitely in the drivers seat with respect to the domestic auto industry. So long as the entire industry is profitable, I don't really care which is rated number one. It is critical we salvage and expand our domestic manufacturing infrastructure. The nationalization Of GM is a darn good start to that goal. For GM, the taxpayers, government, and labor must be bold. GM must be necessarily reshaped from the top down. The new owners of GM will demand change for an company that is both fundamentally and systemically flawed. Poor management, substandard quality, contemptible product development, and the lack of pioneering designs are characteristic for GM. Management salaries and wages must become industry competitive. Perks such as stock options and corporate jets must be terminated along with any CEO or senior manager that through their decisions and policies, have contributed to the downfall GM. We can and should replace these people with CEO’s and managers with proven track records in business. Labor is not exempt from contributing to the downfall of this once great company. No longer can the domestic auto industry afford to absorb labor costs that are reportedly up to $30 higher per hour than the competition such as Toyota, but labor does deserve to earn a comfortable living wage. Labor understands this, it will be painful but it will cooperate. After all, labor is now part owner of this company.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 05/27/2009
- Portnoy I'm a Fan of Portnoy 15 fans permalink

Ford is doomed. When GM starts building more ecological and economical friendly, they will have a large new market for them. The Obama Administration was smart to nationalize GM and Chrysler. We need to take the companies that people depend upon for jobs and make sur they are productive and that all the workers share in the profits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 05/27/2009
- atlantajoe I'm a Fan of atlantajoe 8 fans permalink

Not a fair bet, Barack and his labor loving buddies will just pump more money into the sinkhole, look at social security.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 05/27/2009
- mauibob I'm a Fan of mauibob 20 fans permalink

"GM can be transformed into a profitable taxpayer-owned entity"

No, it will now be a government and union owned company that will supply the unions with a bought and paid for supplier of never ending funds to keep their uncompetitive practices in place. I will never buy a UAW made car ever again. Ford, GM or otherwise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 05/27/2009
- DLBSR I'm a Fan of DLBSR 13 fans permalink

There will always be those that feel that way. I am not pro-union or anti-union having never been employed by a unionized company. I will always however, support those industries and enterprises that produce products with value and employ Americans. You obviously have the right to purchase whatever you want from wherever it is manufactured. I do find it remarkable however for anyone to allow ideology to rule over common sense. As a taxpayer, you are now part owner of GM, you are contributing your hard earned tax dollars to this company but yet, you will not purchase products from the company you own due to ideology? If you think about it, that just doesn't compute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 05/27/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 207 fans permalink
photo

Maybe if the Big Three wouldn't have been defrauding their retirement program for decades, the unions wouldn't have to own a huge chunk of their companies.

Typical know-nothing far right talking point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 05/27/2009
photo

GM is a capital destruction machine that is now owned by the biggest debtor on the planet. In the past 10 years, GM has lost $400 billion in assets. It now stands at a negative equity position of $86 billion, a reflection that its debt-to-assets ratio is 2-to-1, meaning if it shut its doors today and sold everything, it would still owe $86 billion to creditors.

Ironically, by keeping GM alive, the government has made a green revolution in automobiles less likely. Automakers which could swoop up GM's assets in liquidation at bargain prices are instead forced to compete with GM, Chrysler, and the Government for materials, labor, and sales, all the meanwhile these smaller companies will have to pay taxes to their competitors.

GM needs to be culled like a rabid animal before it causes further harm to our economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/27/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

You may think so, I don't and neither does the Government. Look at the facts. GM Domestic Employment in 1991 -- 303,000. Projected GM Domestic Employment January 2011 -- 40,000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 05/28/2009
- mrfreeze I'm a Fan of mrfreeze 141 fans permalink
photo

I don't claim to understand the complexity of the American Automobile Industry but I've always had a sense that:

1) The endless war between management and labor was exceedingly destructive: it blinded both sides to a rapidly changing world

2) The unions managed to negotiate things into their contracts that ultimately crippled the company...­...and....­.

3) Management at the highest level of the car companies were short-sighted and insular to the point of crippling the industry

4) Both parties failed to see the huge global shifts occurring: foreign competition, oil prices, a shift in consumer tastes, etc. They always seemed to be behind the next, new movement and, of course, the Americans could never condescend to European or Asian ideas

I find it hard to imagine that all the smart economists, analysts, investors and others didn't know this collapse was inevitable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 05/27/2009
- mauibob I'm a Fan of mauibob 20 fans permalink

Some prudent investment advise. Now that the Obama administration has made money owed unions more senior to secured debt, do not ever invest in bonds of a unionized company. You will not be secured as promised.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 05/27/2009
- don I'm a Fan of don 26 fans permalink
photo

The bond holders hold unsecured debt. It says so right at the beginning of the article. The lack of cooperation of the bondholders is pushing GM into bankruptcy where they will receive up to 40% of their investment back from the courts and there are a number of them that have insurance, credit default swaps, that will cover everything. In other words, their greed is bringing GM down. The unions granted concessions and the government made loans to keep GM afloat and viable. The capitalists want to take their ball and go home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 05/27/2009
- atlantajoe I'm a Fan of atlantajoe 8 fans permalink

that is what they should do, let the union bosses start their own car company and they can pay their employees one hundred an hour.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 05/27/2009

Yes it's "unsecure" but the law says they get paid first and stock holders get what's left. They traded the benefits of growth for security, but that doesn't matter to Obama so he can have his union buddies and the government steal what is not legally theirs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 05/27/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 207 fans permalink
photo

And how much would that investment be worth if Obama had not stepped in? It would be worth about as much as the word of a conservati­ve... which is to say, less than nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 05/27/2009
- sueinmn I'm a Fan of sueinmn 101 fans permalink
photo

I have an idea. Lets just give them all what they want. (business and bankers) Lets let it happen until we the people cant even afford the rent to roof our families or the food we need to survive. Give them back health care and lets also strip away the health care and retirement funds from all of Government! Lets go to slave labor until we all barely survive. Until we witness people dying on the streets for lack of. THEN POSSIBLY WE WILL ALL AGREE TO REVOLUTIONIZE AND SAY ENOUGH, NO MORE. END IMPORTS AND GREED, not buy choice but by force! Only until we all starve will we agree that we are getting rolled over and the gop pundants need to starve to feel this effect!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 05/27/2009

Funny you say that. You live in the most prosperous country in the world! The Russians and Chinese were starving, millions died, and then they woke up and became capitalists! WAKE UP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 05/27/2009

Not more then a few short months ago Obama and his minions were hammering his political opponents for saying, "Obama wanted to take over the "US" auto companies and bankruptcies would have been the legal and best approach to deal with GM and Chrysler". Now, we find out Obama did want to take over the US automakers and control the auto industry. And, the horror stories about what would happen if an automaker went bankrupt, never mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 05/27/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 207 fans permalink
photo

Who's that talking point from, DrugRush or VoteFraudCoulter?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 05/27/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect