Sotomayor's Baseball Ruling: Conservatives Go To Bat

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Sotomayor's Baseball Ruling: Conservatives Go To Bat stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


Posted: 05-26-09 02:29 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Soto

It was destined to come to this.

The initial salvos in the Supreme Court confirmation battle for Sonia Sotomayor are being played out on fairly traditional lines. But after the president introduced his pick for the Supreme Court vacancy by praising her work in "saving baseball" following the 1994 strike, conservatives are trotting out some new ammunition: not just that this claim is greatly exaggerated but that it exposes all that is wrong in Obama's judicial philosophy.

From the National Review's Ted Frank:

We're hearing (from the president of the United States) that Sotomayor "saved baseball." That's nonsense. In 1995, Judge Sotomayor ruled on an NLRB petition seeking an injunction against the Major League Baseball owners' lockout of the players. As I noted at the time, the court hearing the matter would be making a straightforward ruling on labor law, and the owners were plainly in the wrong legally in claiming an impasse in December when there were negotiations going on later in March. Any judge randomly assigned to the case would have made the same ruling. Indeed, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit, in an opinion by conservative Judge Ralph Winter, unanimously upheld Sotomayor's grant of the injunction.


To say that the judge in the case saved baseball (or expressed sympathy for highly paid baseball players, as Kathryn snarks below) is making the very mistake that separates conservative viewpoints on the role of the judiciary from Obama's view of the judiciary as activist. A judge acts as an umpire, making the calls of balls and strikes. Neither the judge nor the umpire is supposed to decide that one party is more sympathetic than the other and deserves the benefit of the ruling.

Putting aside whether Obama's view of what happened resembles that of someone who firmly believes in an active judiciary, the record seems pretty clear that Sotomayor's ruling did, in fact, get major league baseball operating once more. Whether or not someone else would have made the same decision is debatable. But a Democratic strategist sent over a few clips from that time period that not only praise Sotomayor's work but also note that she was able to accomplish what a federal mediator and White House could not.

New York Times, 8/12/04: "Ten years ago today the players stopped playing, beginning a strike they would end 233 days later after a federal judge issued an injunction that prevented the owners from unilaterally establishing new work rules in the absence of a new collective bargaining agreement. With her ruling, Judge Sonia Sotomayor accomplished what a federal mediator, Bill Usery Jr., and the White House had failed to do as the strike progressed. The Clinton administration asked Usery to become involved in the talks, and after he had been unable to budge the two sides, the White House summoned negotiators to Washington just before Christmas. In thinking that the White House could induce a settlement, President Clinton's advisers were evidently as naive as Ravitch initially was."

Roger Abrams, Legal Base, Page 175: "The surprising hero in this battle of the 1990s was not a player, an owner, or a union official. In April 1995, federal district court judge Sonia Sotomayor, at the behest of the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, stepped up to the plate to enforce the national labor law principle of good father bargaining. Sotomayor bats ninth on our Baseball Law All-Star Team. For now, she has had the final say."

New York Times, 4/1/95: "In her two-and-a-half years on the bench, U.S. District Judge Sonia Sotomayor has earned a reputation as a sharp, outspoken and fearless jurist, someone who does not let powerful interests bully, rush or cow her into a decision. She lived up to that billing Friday morning, when the fate of major league baseball was thrust into her hands. After a two-hour hearing in which she grilled both sides on the fine points of labor law, she took only 15 minutes to issue an injunction that could break the deadlock in the baseball strike. Ruling from the bench, Sotomayor chided baseball owners, saying they had no right to unilaterally eliminate the 20-year-old system of free agents and salary arbitration while bargaining continues...'She's tough and tenacious as well as smart,' said Justice Jose Cabranes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, a mentor and former professor of Sotomayor at Yale Law School. 'She is not intimidated or overwhelmed by the eminence or power or prestige of any party, or indeed of the media.'"

Claude Lewis column (originally in Philadelphia Inquirer), 4/6/95: "Sonia Sotomayor, the federal judge whose injunction seems to have saved the season, now is as much a part of baseball lore as Joe DiMaggio, Willie Mays, Ted Williams, Jackie Robinson, Hank Aaron and Mike Schmidt."


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!


It was destined to come to this. The initial salvos in the Supreme Court confirmation battle for Sonia Sotomayor are being played out on fairly traditional lines. But after the president introduced h...
It was destined to come to this. The initial salvos in the Supreme Court confirmation battle for Sonia Sotomayor are being played out on fairly traditional lines. But after the president introduced h...
 
Comments
53
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Diogenis I'm a Fan of Diogenis 65 fans permalink

The Republicans continue to bat in the breeze!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 AM on 05/27/2009
- smchp I'm a Fan of smchp 75 fans permalink
photo

....and this just in, the GOP is taking a stand against Apple Pie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 AM on 05/27/2009
photo

Conservatives hate everything else about America -- why not baseball?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 05/26/2009

the sound of one hand clapping!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 05/26/2009

So by Mr. Frank's own admission Judge Sotomayor followed legal precedent in her ruling on the baseball strike. So she followed the rule of law - isn't that exactly what "conservative jurists" are supposed to do? The same is true in the New Haven Fire Dept. case. The right condemns her when she does exactly what they demand. Moreover, the whole premise of "judicial activism" is a red herring. Cases get to the Supreme Court because there is no legal precedent; the law is unclear or there are conflicting rulings in the Circuit Courts. By definition Supreme Court Justices must "make law". That is not a bad thing - it is in keeping with the Constitution and the brilliant design of our government institutional structure as laid out by our founding fathers. Why won't legal scholars make this case in a way that the average American can understand and accept?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 05/26/2009
- Doofus I'm a Fan of Doofus 25 fans permalink
photo

Have to wait & see if George Will weighs in, as he cares more
about baseball than practically anything. What he has had to say
so far is this, the last paragraph of his current column, which is
where he always places what it was he really wants to put across:

' Perhaps Sotomayor subscribes to the Thurgood Marshall doctrine: "You do what you think is right and let the law catch up" (quoted in the Stanford Law Review, summer 1992). Does she think the figure of Justice should lift her blindfold, an emblem of impartiality, and be partial to certain categories of persons? A better jurisprudential doctrine was expressed by a certain Illinois state legislator in a 2001 radio interview: "The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. ... It says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf." '

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 05/26/2009
- Phxflyer I'm a Fan of Phxflyer 72 fans permalink
photo

Yet another swing and a miss by the republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

Perfect pun, my friend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 05/26/2009
- Thabit I'm a Fan of Thabit 15 fans permalink

For that matter once again Repubes prove that they are ..... Bush League

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 05/26/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 64 fans permalink

You give the right-wingers too much benefit of the doubt: you imply that they actually have any brains left

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 05/26/2009
- globality I'm a Fan of globality 16 fans permalink

It did seem odd how important the baseball decision was to Obama.

Considering the whole foundation of baseball's special status in congress is illegal.

men hitting balls with sticks so that crappy beer can be marketed to the masses.

And they call Obama an elistist. sounds more like joe six pack :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 05/26/2009
- JadedAggie I'm a Fan of JadedAggie 9 fans permalink

He mentioned it because although it is a rather meaningless decision and was in fact an easy one, it is very politically potent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 05/26/2009

There seems to be some confusion among the Republicans that any Judge would have done what she had. They obviously are ignoring the state of the legal system. As a lawyer I see judges afraid to make decisions at the state level for fear of retribution at the ballot box. I cannot imagine that there is a significant amount of difference at the federal level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 05/26/2009

I think what the conservatives are really angry about is that she went to bat against the owners. Don't you know it is the GOP who has been waging the war on America on behalf of its owners? Having you heard their battle cry,"drill here, drill now?" They want more oil company profits. They want less taxes on the top 1%, who owns over 40 % of the national wealth! They want more business tax breaks, regardless of whether a company ships its jobs over seas, or maintains the same working standards enjoyed by those here in the US.

So yeah the GOP is angry against this appointment, she ruled against the Owner-ship Society that the GOP clearly loves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 05/26/2009
photo

Don't forget that one of these very owners was a guy by the name of George W Bush.

hmm.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 05/27/2009
- SoccerNana I'm a Fan of SoccerNana 21 fans permalink
photo

These losers need to move to Alaska where they can see Russia from the Guvnah's house!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 05/26/2009
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 492 fans permalink
photo

Now the GOP is going to slam our baseball players?

That's a non starter if ever there was one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 05/26/2009

swing and a miss!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 05/26/2009
- tel8034 I'm a Fan of tel8034 89 fans permalink

Three strikes and the rethugs are out ..........­..........­. One would hope that at least the rethugs have the common sense to research an issue before they start their HATE and NO campaign.

Once again the LYING rethugs have proven how inept and out of touch they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 05/26/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect