Crash diet: GM getting in shape for Chapter 11

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Crash diet: GM getting in shape for Chapter 11 stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-29-09 07:50 AM   |   Updated: 06-29-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gm Preps

DETROIT — The speed at which General Motors Corp. exits bankruptcy protection would depend a lot on the shape the company is in when it enters. GM has three more days to tidy up.

Bankruptcy experts say the more operational, labor and financial concessions the automaker gets lined up in advance of its likely Chapter 11 reorganization, the faster the ailing automaker can emerge a leaner, stronger company _ one that will be nearly three-quarters-owned by taxpayers.

More pieces started coming together Thursday after a bloc of GM's biggest bondholders agreed to the Treasury Department's sweetened deal to wipe out $27 billion of the automaker's unsecured debt in exchange for company stock.

Workers across the country won't know until Monday which 14 plants GM will close, shedding 21,000 more jobs, but an announcement on the fate of GM's Hummer brand is expected Friday, when talks are scheduled to resume in Germany about the future of GM's European Opel unit.

[If you have any information regarding which plants GM is planning to close, email us at submissions+GMplants@huffintonpost.com]

GM's union employees also finish voting Friday on whether to ratify a modified contract that would cut some of their benefits but slash the automaker's labor costs.

And GM's board of directors will begin two days of meetings to decide what the automaker will do when its government restructuring deadline arrives Monday.

A person familiar with GM's plans said it was "probable" that the company would file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Monday. The person did not want to be identified because the plans were still under discussion with the U.S. and Canadian governments.

Story continues below

GM's new road map, outlined in a regulatory filing Thursday, would briefly send the automaker into bankruptcy protection, erase most of its debt and eventually have it emerge leaner and stronger.

A senior Obama administration official estimated that GM would be under bankruptcy protection for 60 to 90 days, longer than Chrysler's expected reorganization because GM is bigger and more complex. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the negotiations.

The U.S. Treasury, which already has loaned GM $19.4 billion, would get 72.5 percent of the new company's stock and provide $30 billion in additional financing to keep the new GM operating under bankruptcy protection.

Canada's government is expected to provide an additional $9 billion, the administration official said.

A United Auto Workers trust that will take over retiree health care expenses will get 17.5 percent, and the old GM, effectively owned by the bondholders, would get a 10 percent stake.

GM's existing shareholders will probably lose everything.

"It's fair to say that there would be little to no recovery," the official said.

The proposal is similar to what has happened to Chrysler, already under Chapter 11 protection. A bankruptcy judge is expected to decide Friday whether to approve the sale of most of its assets to Italian carmaker Fiat Group SpA.

The administration official said that although the government hopes to get back as much of the money loaned to GM and Chrysler as possible, it never envisioned recovering much of the initial $13.4 billion in aid.

Eventually, the government hopes, GM can return to profitability, which would allow the government to sell its GM stock. But the risks for taxpayers are daunting, with U.S. auto sales near their lowest level in 27 years.

"We will come out of this rid of some of the historic legacy costs that have been dragging us down for the last 20 years or so," GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said Thursday at an Automotive Press Association luncheon in Detroit. "We will come out of it with an all new focus on product development."

Under the government's offer, bondholders would get 10 percent of the stock in a newly formed GM, the same as a proposal that they shunned earlier this week. But the new offer also gives them warrants to buy an additional 15 percent stake, possibly at a discount.

That would come only if they agree to support selling GM's assets to a new company under bankruptcy court protection.

The revised offer amounted to an ultimatum: Go along with the government auto task force's proposal or face substantial reduction in the amount of stock and warrants they will get.

"They have sweetened the deal by adding the warrants to the equation," said Pete Hastings, senior analyst with Morgan Keegan & Co. "It's enough for me to have moved from rejecting the deal and trying our luck in bankruptcy court to the side of recommending the deal."

A bloc of bondholders who represent about 20 percent of GM's $27 billion in unsecured debt called the deal unfair but said they'll take it rather than roll the dice in bankruptcy court and risk getting even less.

Two coalition of smaller bondholders, meanwhile, opposed the offer, saying it remained unfair to retirees who depend on GM bonds for income and was overly favorable to the UAW.

Union President Ron Gettelfinger said in a telephone interview he did not want to get into a debate with bondholders while the union was pushing for ratification of concessions to GM. Union members were to wrap up voting Friday.

The filing didn't specify how many bondholders would be needed to make the deal work. The government had demanded that 90 percent agree to the previous offer, and it fell far short. The Obama administration official said the government would not require a specific percentage of bondholders to approve the new proposal but would make a judgment call based on the level of support.

Representatives of the committee of larger bondholders were trying to contact the thousands of GM bondholders before a deadline of 5 p.m. Saturday.

The government plan envisions the slimmed-down new GM with $17 billion in long-term debt and $9 billion in debt-like preferred shares. That would be 61 percent less than its debt load now.

Only $8 billion of the existing U.S. government loans would remain on the books. The remainder would be converted into equity and preferred shares.

The Obama administration official said the holders of GM's $6 billion in secured debt would be "protected" but declined to elaborate.

Trading of GM shares was halted for a short time Thursday morning. They fell 3 cents to end at $1.12 after a day of volatile trading.

___

Associated Press Writer Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.

DETROIT — The speed at which General Motors Corp. exits bankruptcy protection would depend a lot on the shape the company is in when it enters. GM has three more days to tidy up. Bankruptcy exper...
DETROIT — The speed at which General Motors Corp. exits bankruptcy protection would depend a lot on the shape the company is in when it enters. GM has three more days to tidy up. Bankruptcy exper...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
112
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

So who replaces GM when this pos gets kicked out of the DJIA?

I always wanted UPS in the DJ but since its already in the transportation index, they might not bring it in. The committee was very clever replacing KFT with AIG....nice move to decrease the volatility of the index. KFT is a great company but i didnt think its represenative enough for the index.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 05/31/2009
- kstuff I'm a Fan of kstuff 5 fans permalink

Those who believe that this bankruptcy won't effect them are in denial. The domino effect of diminished pensions, loss of jobs and health care for the families supported by GM and Chrysler will absolutely stun the US economy. It won't be pretty. And it could be political suicide for the Obama Administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 AM on 05/30/2009

Nope. Won't effect me at all. My company has probably not sold a single product to GM, ever. I don't have a car made by them and I live nowhere near any of their production facilities, at least as far as I know. So why should I be worried, again?

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

You don't get it apparently. Your taxes will be paying for all of those workers that will lose their jobs in unemployment, health care, medicaid and food stamps (because there are no other jobs). Also, your community is going to lose all of that tax base from any plant, supplier and/or dealership. That effects teachers, schools, police, fire fire fighters, and all city, state and county services. Also, all of those people that have no jobs will not be purchasing merchandise or hiring anyone's services unless your a bankruptcy attorney. There are auto related businesses in ALL 50 states. People don't think about textiles, rubber, tires, radios, steel, plastic, leather ( effects ranchers), chrome, mining (iron ore), carpeting, sm. light bulbs, headlights, paint, chemicals, computer chips, wiring, etc, etc, etc......

So, like "kstuff" said, it will effect EVERYONE!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 AM on 05/31/2009
photo

One other thing, did you know that GM produces 78% of there vehicles here and they pump billions of tax dollars into the economy, the foreign auto makers only produce 17% of their vehicles here?????? Do you know how the rest of all your Asian and Mexican produced vehicles assembled and parts are made. They use slave labor and exploit human beings. They put more pollutants in the atmosphere and in the ground than any U.S. made vehicle ever would. They have almost no EPA Standards (we have strict EPA Standards here) and human rights protection. If you don't believe me you can research it all online. Toyota even imports slave labor into Japan and puts them in dorms they are not even allowed to leave from except to go to work. Therefore, you just defeated the purpose of your GREEN CAR!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 AM on 05/31/2009
- YewNeekId I'm a Fan of YewNeekId 26 fans permalink

Well here's a few examples Sparky:

1) The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is going to have to pickl up any pensions that GM dumps out on. The PBGC is funded by you. And me. And everybody else that pays taxes.

2) All those nice workers are going to default on their prime - not subprime - mortgages starting the next wave of bank collapses

3) Reduced tax revenue from all of those nice workers is going to most states as well as the federal government. Bad enough that Obama is spending money like a g.angsta with a pocket full of stolen credit cards, but reduced tax revenue will put further burdens on the system

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 05/31/2009
photo

At the end of the day, it's all about that xXx $ gUaP $ xXx

LOL

http://www.ShawnDrewry.com

http://www.YouTube.com/DrewryOnlineLive

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 05/29/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 132 fans permalink

I'd like the conservatives among us to help me understand why, for the past 5-6 years, there was no outcry over the US taxpayer supporting industry, infrastructure and job creation in Iraq, to the tune of 400 million a day, but when it is done here through stimulus bill or auto loans, then it's socialism, nationalization, unconstitutional, Marxism, sell out to unions for votes.

I want to know what Republi-cons have against working people in THIS country? Why they feel that anyone who gets a break, earns a good wage regardless of education, can afford the middle class nicieties, that this person is a leach, a deadbeat loser, the reason for the demise of the capitalist system, if not western civilization itself.

What is it that drives you people to revere the monied classes that would throw YOU under the bus for an extra penny ROI, but the guy that goes to work everyday you despise, you think he always makes too much, are expert on how much his labor is worth and how he should learn to do with less.

Why do Rep-cons hate working people?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 05/29/2009

Since when is compounding one mistake (Iraq) with another (bailing out GM) considered smart? Since the stopped teaching logic in high school?

Just wondering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Come on KTM, you can do better than that. I would like to hear you answer on this one since you seem to know it all when it comes to the U.S. auto industry and GM. Please educate this poor, uneducated, overpaid, and lazy UAW/GM worker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 05/29/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 62 fans permalink

And what do we get for the $20B thrown at GM already? Nothing!

Now consider this, a $5,000 tax credit for every new american car purchased in 2009 and 2010. For the same $20B you could help 4 million cars get built and sold, That's about what GM sold in the US in 2006. It pumps revenue into GM, helps families needing new vehicles, stimulates the economy, and keeps people working.

But what do our genius leaders do? Throw money into a corporation, they use it up planning for BK! That, my friend, is community organizing economics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Wow, another tax credit solution! Genius!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Sad though, that this blatant double standard is overlooked day in and day out. But, when a couple of uneducated windbags start spewing their twisted opinion as fact, many of the lemmings in this country are happy to follow them off the cliff of sanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 05/29/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 132 fans permalink

Gee, guys, I was hopin' someone might answer my question. Food fight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Hmmm. Does this mean that I have to put the brakes on picking up my new CTS this summer? I'll probably still roll the dice and get one anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 05/29/2009

Yawn.

Liquidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

If you did not see this coming you must have been really smoking somthing, since the first dollars were trickled out anyone who knows anything about business knew GM had to go into bankrupcty. you can not have such a high negative cash flow as long as they have. We are going to spend at least 100 Billion before all said and done and end up with a tiny GOVERNMENT MOTORS company that will never turn a profit. They are done

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 05/29/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 62 fans permalink

They will never recover. They may stay in business but will never recover from this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

FWIW, Hyundai started selling cars here in the late 80's. They were such pieces of crap you couldn't even trade them in for new Hyundais, and the company's days here seemed numbered. The management used their cost advantage to improve the product, give it a terrific warranty and now they're selling great cars very successfully.

IF GM and Chrysler model Hyundai's experience, in a few years we could be looking at some phenomenal products. That'd be great for them, their customers AND all of us who like our Toyotas as well. I'm in favor of giving them the chance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 05/29/2009
- YewNeekId I'm a Fan of YewNeekId 26 fans permalink

GM can not recover until they free themselves of the shackles of union labor costs. Bankruptcy is the only way to do this.

It is illogical that a high school dropout that screws lug nuts on a truck makes twice as much as the average school teacher in the US.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Can you please do a little tiny bit of research before you post? Please!? Firstly, you cannot work at GM or Ford or Chrysler without graduating from high school. Secondly, GM workers make the same hourly wage as the transplants. do. Are you aware that Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Audi, Mercedes, and Hyundai all have union workers in their plants overseas? The only plants that they own that do not, are here in the U.S.. They can all seem to turn a profit with unionized labor. Maybe the problem at GM is bad management, not the union? Ever consider that one? Its not as if management comes to us on the line and asks which new models they should put into production, or how they should market them, or how to design them. Please educate yourself before spouting off the typical talking points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 05/29/2009

wow a high school graduate. I am thoroughly impressed !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 05/29/2009
- zukervati I'm a Fan of zukervati 25 fans permalink
photo

Rethuglicans still won't admit that GM is effectively nationalized - I'm sure Hegel, Nietzsche and Marx are LoL in their graves!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 05/29/2009

Every Republican in the country knows that GM is nationalized. Why do think people call it Obama Motors? Or Government Motors? They were talking about it on Power Lunch today and the only person who thought the current GM deal isn't ridiculous was the Democrat, Julie something, always stands up for Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 05/29/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 62 fans permalink

We'll see now that UAW and Obama owns controlling interest. I'm sure this company will turn around in a hurry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 05/29/2009
- YewNeekId I'm a Fan of YewNeekId 26 fans permalink

The uaw has a large stake, but not controlling interest. As soon as the uaw got controlling interest in Chrysler they started trying to sell it - not much committment to the company there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

And in there lies the problem. There # 1 responsibility or any union is to make sure the company is profitable and growing. If not they are sure to fail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

Once again, more lack of knowledge from you. The UAW was not trying to sell their share in Chrysler or GM because they are not committed to the company. They got these shares of the companies as payment for the funding of the VEBA instead of taking cash. They want to sell there shares so they can fund retiree health care. The big 3, not the UAW, pushed for this VEBA during the 2007 negotiations to minimize their legacy costs. The UAW accepted this although a lot of the membership didn't like it to help with the companies long term viability.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/29/2009
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 56 fans permalink
photo

Plants will close but think twice if you expect to see any of the various office buildings that GM occupies across the United States closing. Nope, those will stay open while the blue collar worker suffers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/29/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 132 fans permalink

Not true. Can't speak for GM, but as a 15 year Chrysler white collar, non union employee I can tell you from experience that I WISH we had a union to protect us. Many of the non-manufacturing related functions at Chrysler are now manned by, literally, skeleton crews.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 05/29/2009

Skeletons are designing Chryslers? No wonder that the curs look so fleshy... the designer puts on what he craves most himself...

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 05/29/2009
- ran6110 I'm a Fan of ran6110 10 fans permalink
photo

The workers who are the only ones to actually produce anything have to give wage and benefit concessions. What concessions are the executives putting on the table?

Actually what I would really like to see is Congress having to make wage and benefit concessions! I mean really, what have they done for the tax payer?

Also, I have a feeling the politicians have been bought by a few asian countries to get rid of the american auto industry and let them have free access.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 05/29/2009

Honda and Toyota builds cars in US. Employs thousands, and has no UAW to contend with. Grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 05/29/2009
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 56 fans permalink
photo

In fact, both Honda and Toyota do have plants that are organized. And generally, even if they are not under a UAW contract they pay comparable wages and benefits.

GM's problem is and always has been management. They never figured out how to build cars that led the market and were afraid of the heat they would take from Wall Street if they didn't report increasing profits. So they built cars that made a lot of short term profits and failed to invest in the long term R& D for the future like Toyota with their Prius Hybrid. Part of that was because the Republican tax structure didn't really provide incentives to make those long term investments. In Japan, pure R&D, as much of the Prius development was, is written off 100% as an expense during the year it is spent. In addition, at one time the Japanese government provided additional incentives to spending on pure R&D. It's a difference between looking at next quarter's P&L so you get your Executive bonus vs. looking at the long term health of the company because you are responsible for the lives of the people working for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 05/29/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 132 fans permalink

How come no one ever mentions that in 2008 Rick Wagoner got a 33% salary increase (not pension, not options, not deferred compensation, but cash salary.) Please tell me how anyone can complain about a UAW guy making $28/hr straight time, being asked to break his contract and give back, while the guy driving the bus into the ditch gets a third again raise?

And the reason overall, total UAW compensation is more costly? The Detroit autoworkers are older than the transplant car company workers because the companies in Detroit have been around longer. Aging work force in any industry means increased compensation costs.

As for union givebacks? Go ask the airlines how well that worked for them. They still can't make money, all they can do is not lose it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/29/2009
- skahimself I'm a Fan of skahimself 4 fans permalink

Two things:

Most of the workers don't "produce" jack. People who stand in an assembly line pushing a green button or bolting on a bumper aren't "producing" anything. Quit acting like the factory workers all have phD's and are hand-carving cars from blocks of granite.

The only people actually producing something are the engineers and designers of the cars. Those on the factory floor are glorified helper monkeys doing the jobs they can't have robots do. They are not the glorified producers you make them out to be comrade.

Secondly, Toyota has several production plants in the country. Their workers are paid a fair wage for their time (not the glorified $80K + the bumper stampers of the UAW make) and the companies are healthy.

What does that tell you about their business model and disregard for the UAW vs General Failures' business model?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

First off, learn what a fully burdened wage is and why to not compare it with a straight hourly wage. Secondly, read this if you think the Toyota workers in the US get considerably less than the UAW.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_17/b4081038999094.htm?chan=magazine+channel_news

Toyota will indeed be faced with legacy costs just like the domestics (in the US). If you work in the US at all, which I presume you do, and you're middle class, you owe some credit to unions for the living wage you make.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 05/29/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 132 fans permalink

There are 3 reasons why a job pays very well.

One is it requires a high level of knowledge, skill and reponsiblity, a brain surgeon, for example.

Another is the job is very dangerous, a deep sea welder, for example (note this type of job many require a lot of training, but not to the levels of the professional class.)

A third is that the job, simply stated, sucks. That is, it is horribly, mind numbingly monotonous drudgery and no one would last more than a few months on it unless there was sufficient incentive. Like pushing the button on the assembly line.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 05/29/2009
photo

LOL If our jobs are so easy and any "monkey" can do it, come try it out. I bet you wouldn't last a week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 05/29/2009
- freeme6 I'm a Fan of freeme6 2 fans permalink

actually the only ones to benefit from these bankruptcies are theunions, the taxpayer will lose about 50 billion but as schumer said america just does't care!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 05/29/2009

Ten years and $100 billion too late. Can you imagine all the good that one could have done with the money that was burnt in the stove pipe over there at GM? Incredible... that's at least a full university education for every high school graduate since 2000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 05/29/2009

I'm pro Obama, and hate rethugs, but why are we bailing these defunct companies. I just can't believe we are spending money on these losers. If this is not socialism what is?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 05/29/2009
- YewNeekId I'm a Fan of YewNeekId 26 fans permalink

So bailing out wall street was ok?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/29/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect