Obama Addresses "Identity Politics" Accusations (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Addresses "Identity Politics" Accusations (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffingtion Post/AP
First Posted: 05-29-09 05:20 PM   |   Updated: 05-30-09 06:30 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sotomayor

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama on Friday personally sought to deflect criticism of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, who finds herself under intensifying scrutiny for saying in 2001 that a female Hispanic judge would often reach a better decision than a white male judge. "I'm sure she would have restated it," Obama flatly told NBC News, while criticizing "all this nonsense that is being spewed out" by Sotomayor's critics.

The quote in question from Sotomayor has emerged as a rallying call for conservative critics who fear she will offer opinions from the bench based less on the rule of law and more on her life experience, ethnicity and gender. That issue is likely to play a central role in her Senate confirmation process.

Obama defended his nominee, saying her message was on target even if her exact wording was not.

"I think that when she's appearing before the Senate committee, in her confirmation process, I think all this nonsense that is being spewed out will be revealed for what it is," Obama said in the broadcast interview.

More from the interview (full transcript below):

OBAMA: You know, she was pointing out, in that same essay, that it was nine white males who passed down Brown versus Board of Education, which is probably responsible for me sitting here. So that's hardly the kind of statement that would indicate that she subscribes to identity politics. In fact, what she really subscribes to is the exact opposite. Which is the sense that all of us have life experiences and struggles. And part of the job of a justice on the Supreme Court, or any judge, is to be able to stand in somebody else's shoes, to be able to, you know, understand that the nature of the case, and how it has an impact on people's ordinary day to day lives.

Also on Friday, Tom Goldstein, a partner at the law firm Akin Gump, published an analysis of 50 recent race-related cases that Sotomayor had ruled on. "In those 50 cases, the panel accepted the claim of race discrimination only three times," Goldstein wrote. "In all three cases, the panel was unanimous; in all three, it included a Republican appointee. In roughly 45, the claim was rejected. (Two were procedural dispositions.)"

The president's damage control underscored how the White House is eager to stay on message as the battle to publicly define Sotomayor picks up.

Obama's top spokesman, Robert Gibbs, told reporters about Sotomayor: "I think she'd say that her word choice in 2001 was poor."

Story continues below
advertisement

Gibbs, however, said he did not hear that from Sotomayor directly. He said he learned it from people who had talked to her, and he did not identify who those people were. Sotomayor herself has made no public statements since her nomination became official Tuesday and was not reachable for comment.

A veteran federal judge, Sotomayor is poised to be the first Hispanic, and the third woman, to serve on the Supreme Court.

She said in 2001: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." The remark was in the context her saying that "our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."

Sotomayor's comments came in a lecture, titled "A Latina Judge's Voice," that she gave in 2001 at the law school of the University of California, Berkeley.

After three days of suggesting that reporters and critics should not dwell on one sentence from a speech, the White House had a different message Friday.

"If you look in the entire sweep of the essay that she wrote, what's clear is that she was simply saying that her life experiences will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through, that will make her a good judge," Obama said in the broadcast interview.

Sotomayor appears headed for confirmation, needing a majority vote in a Senate, where Democrats have 59 votes. But beyond the final vote, White House officials are pushing for a smooth confirmation, not one that bogs down them or their nominee. Plus, Obama wants a strong win, not a slim one.

Obama told NBC that part of the job of a Supreme Court justice is to stand in somebody else's shoes and that Sotomayor will do that. "That breadth of experience, that knowledge of how the world works, is part of what we want for a justice who's going be effective," Obama said.

TRANSCRIPT FROM NBC NEWS:


WILLIAMS: "This is the quote, 'I would hope that a wise Latino woman, with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.' It's your judgment perhaps, having talked to the judge, that as we say, that's one of those she'd rather have back if she had it to redo?"


OBAMA: "I'm sure she would have restated it. But if you look in the entire sweep of the essay that she wrote, what's clear is that she was simply saying that her life experiences will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through - that will make her a good judge.

And you know, she was pointing out, in that same essay, that it was nine white males who passed down Brown versus Board of Education, which is probably responsible for me sitting here. So that's hardly the kind of statement that would indicate that she subscribes to identity politics. In fact, what she really subscribes to is the exact opposite. Which is the sense that all of us have life experiences and struggles. And part of the job of a justice on the Supreme Court, or any judge, is to be able to stand in somebody else's shoes, to be able to, you know, understand that the nature of the case, and how it has an impact on people's ordinary day to day lives.

And so her, as a Latino woman part of her job is gonna be to listen to the farmer in Iowa. And you know, if he's upset about a farm regulation. And be able to understand how hard it is to farm. And what that means. And to be able to incorporate that into her decision making. It means that she has an understanding of what a corporate CEO might be thinking. And she had those experiences as well. Having worked as a corporate litigator. That breadth of experience, that knowledge of how the world works, is part of what we want for a justice who's gonna be effective. And I think that when she's appearing before the senate committee, in her confirmation process, I think all this nonsense that is being spewed out will be revealed for what it is."

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama on Friday personally sought to deflect criticism of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, who finds herself under intensifying scrutiny for saying in 2001 that a f...
WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama on Friday personally sought to deflect criticism of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, who finds herself under intensifying scrutiny for saying in 2001 that a f...
 
Comments
2881
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)

I hope Attorney General Eric Holder, get nominated the next time around to the Supreme Court. That will sure scare the hell out Republican wingnuts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 05/31/2009

Democrats invented "Identity Politics" to attack every conservative ever brought up in the nomination process. Now that Soniasota defines herself as a racist...favoring women & minorities...the Democrats cry foul. You invented this crap so live with it when it bites you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/31/2009

I don't like right wingers, if it was up to them blacks would have never got their civil rights or their right to vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 05/31/2009

Many Americans stepped into a new mindset with a leap of faith in electing Obama. In the process, we learned that we can change the world for the better. It is refreshing to see an American President working in this way to help us live up to the promise that is America. Her nomination, and appointment, will be a victory for America; for that idea, that promise that is America.

The Sotomayor nomination also shows us that there is still a lot of Americans suffering from fear and uncertainty. Perhaps more importantly, there are still elements in our society who will attempt to translate that fear into hate, prejudice and bigotry for political gain. The most instructive aspect of this response is that her credentials and her life story speak for themselves--as does their misguided attempts to discredit her. We are better than that.

We, as a country, are learning to do the work, to evaluate the complete person. We no longer have a mindset that allows an exemplary career of sacrifice and distinction to be undermined by an errant ambiguous phrase taken out of context. No longer can anyone--not even elected officials--tell us who to hate on such a weak platform. Americans susceptible to this type of sound byte manipulation has diminished to the point where those that attempt it, diminish their own political viability and suffer the karmic shame and disgrace of their own actions. This is indeed both illuminating and refreshing. Well done.

rchazr

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 05/31/2009
- DonCosenza I'm a Fan of DonCosenza 27 fans permalink
photo

I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, but I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not find a better way of saying what she meant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 05/30/2009
- Garybot I'm a Fan of Garybot 47 fans permalink
photo

This reminds me of the Geitner situation. It's not a problem that he didn't pay his taxes, and that his reason for not having paid them is that he was too stupid to use a computer program, and he's a nice guy and I'm sure he didn't mean to do it, and now he has paid them. Sure, we'd all get that kind of a pass.
Obama on Sotomayor - Obama defended his nominee, saying her message was on target even if her exact wording was not. Sounds like a problem for a Supreme Court Justice, if she can't say what she means. How can her message be on target if she doesn't say what she means?
When Brian Williams asked Obama if he thought she would redo her answer if she could, Obama answered that he was sure she would have. How is he sure? So now he knows what she really wanted to say. Is it possible she actually meant what she said?? If she is confirmed, will President Obama speak for her often? Will he speak for the other Judges, also?
Does 1 + 1 = 2 ? Maybe not always.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 05/30/2009

Her blather means any white man in front of her court is in trouble...according to Soniasoto's own mouth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 05/31/2009
- 3Dubyadot I'm a Fan of 3Dubyadot 12 fans permalink
photo

Obama: America used poor choice of vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 05/30/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 275 fans permalink
photo

WTF! Is that even English?

Bushlover: the 4th r/e/i/ch has been rejected. Return to the bunker and don't come back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 05/30/2009

Obama & Soniasota...both Affirmative Action products...got in with lower standards. Why would minorities allow this lib idea and practice? Taints one's achievements.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 05/31/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

Here is a moderated comment:

When evaluating two candidates for promotion, one of the two Asian men evaluating the candidates said,

"I would hope that a wise Asian male with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Hispanic woman who hasn't lived that life."

And so they gave the job the the Asian guy instead of the Hispanic woman. Now is that totally racist or what?

-----------

Let's see if it takes 14 hours for this one to be posted as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 05/30/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

The proprieters of this site actively control the message by practicing censorship

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 05/30/2009
photo

Yep. Though I'd challenge you to find a forum as popular as this that doesn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 05/30/2009

Exactly right...the venom and nastiness out of the lefties in here...all OK.

Reasoned responses from conservatives do not get on...I know this to be the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 05/31/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

Reading the comments on this page it is clear, so called liberals and progressive are just as racist as conservatives. Racism knows no bounds and does not discriminate. All the posts that refer to "old white men" are racist.

Let's be real, the statements of Bill Clinton, "Jesse Jackson won S C too" and Jesse Jackson, "Hymeetown" prove that the left does not have the moral high ground on this subject. Most of you, especially the Euros that post here, have no idea what racism, sexism are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 05/30/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

Oh, look this one showed up 4 days later.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 05/31/2009
- DIdaho I'm a Fan of DIdaho 25 fans permalink

"How niave do you have to believe the left buys what they are spewing out?"

Well, let's see. Summa Cum Laude Princeton. Yale Law Review. Prosecutor, District Judge, Appellate Judge. Confirmed twice by Congress. Y'know, as Bush and Rove said, elections have consequences. You scared that a Latina might have her life experience influence her votes? Good. You should be. Me, as an old white guy, I'm not scared at all. Naive? Not in the least. I'm an American, after all. Melting pot. Everyone has a say. When I give, I get. I'm a small business owner, have been for 30 years. Do I get a seat at the table? No. Will a Latina, up from the projects, in touch with the down-trodden, pull up from the bootstraps, inclined toward the dispossessed help me? Yeah..

What's the Right spewing? That an experienced, qualified, otherwise excellent candidate should be rejected simply because she's said that her life experience might make her more qualified than a white guy? As a white guy, that doesn't bother me in the least. I agree. Discrimination is not limited to color, or to gender. We favor what we know. What we think we know. Big companies, big contributors, that's who we favor. What about the little guys?

This is simple. She has the qualifications. She has the experience. I didn't make you choose Palin. It was your choice. You lost. This is the consequence. She is qualified, she is experienced.
Live with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 05/30/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

She's a stone cold racist. And any judge caught saying what she said either needs to correct it, which she has not, or they live the labels that are assigned to her. Hispanic female racist.

It was only 12 short months ago when Hillary was throwing the "kitchen sink" at Obama that we saw just how racist her supporters could get. They were self professed liberals but they were just racists who were hiding their true feelings, and judging from the comments here, I bet Sotomayer supporters are mostly Clinton supporters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 05/30/2009
- grn1 I'm a Fan of grn1 6 fans permalink

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." The remark was in the context her saying that "our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."

hah, thatb is probably why my Latina friends only like dating white men. It's not the respect they get it's because they are teaching them something???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 05/30/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 33 fans permalink

Her remark was made after she cited, "The Judicature Journal has at least two excellent studies on how women on the courts of appeal and state supreme courts have tended to vote more often than their male counterpart to uphold women's claims in sex discrimination cases and criminal defendants' claims in search and seizure cases."

and also after citing several legal scholars opinions on whether or not it was possible to separate ourselves from our gender and national origins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 05/30/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 33 fans permalink

There was no apology needed because the comment was taken out of context.

In her lecture at this symposium for hispanic lawyers, she made the statement, "... I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." in reference to, "The Judicature Journal has at least two excellent studies on how women on the courts of appeal and state supreme courts have tended to vote more often than their male counterpart to uphold women's claims in sex discrimination cases and criminal defendants' claims in search and seizure cases."

"Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case."

This is a huge non-issue and I wish Obama had not apologized. She was correct in what she was saying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 05/30/2009
- Garybot I'm a Fan of Garybot 47 fans permalink
photo

After all you wrote you then come to the conclusion that she was correct in what she said?

1 + 1 = 7

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/30/2009
- MadHeart I'm a Fan of MadHeart 116 fans permalink

I'll be glad when the most silenced minority of all, the full throated atheist of any color or gender, is able to be elected to any office in the country. It is estimated that 15% of Americans now profess no "faith" or belief in a "god" and we are growing every year. When that happens, there truly will be a separation of church and state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 05/30/2009
- lobear00 I'm a Fan of lobear00 25 fans permalink

Obama, once again the GOP is playing you and the public, and the democrats, they need a diversion from the policy of "Torture" , and Obama you played right into their hands, you acknowledged their phony claim, and now this is all they have to harp about.

The media is playing this right to the hilt, this is the media's cash cow. Its time to get back on track, get back to talking about the torture and not give the media and the GOP their dirt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 05/30/2009
- garymc8 I'm a Fan of garymc8 32 fans permalink

When America is comprised of ALL MALE WHITES, then the gop can load up the court with all white men. Until that time comes we SHALL have a reresentative group of jurists in proportion to our vast population. PS. you lost get over it you babies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 05/30/2009
- DIdaho I'm a Fan of DIdaho 25 fans permalink

I just reported a fact. "My Mother the Car?" It was never in reruns, so far as I know. 25-54? I'm 55, as I said, and I can only dimly remember it. I flip over to Fox when MSNBC is on commercial. I try to be "Fair and Balanced." This is a revealing poll, it shows that O'Reilly viewers are significantly out of touch with the mainstream, media or otherwise. Perhaps Fox has younger viewers. But they weren't involved enough to participate in the poll.

Fox numbers are incredibly misleading, since Fox News is provided for free on satellite and cable packages, whereas MSNBC requires a fee. Fox claims roughly twice the viewers of MSNBC, but they have three times the outlets.

And the numbers are instructive. Hannity and O'Reilly pull around 2.5 million, averaging about half that. They're down around 20% since the election, MSNBC is down about twice that. Makes sense. Most people simply want to live their lives. Interest peaked during the election, but Obamatards such as myself - well, we won. Back to our lives. Those who lost, they're still involved, they're still angry, they still want to continue the fight -So they want to continue the battle, they need the support Fox provides. So they keep tuning in, they keep looking for that edge they lost, they keep hoping for that spark (teabags, anyone?) that will restore what they fear they have lost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 05/30/2009
photo

One point I might add, due to the economic conditions, many people have downgraded their cable or cut off their service entirely, so they are no longer accessing MSNBC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 05/30/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect