Obama: Efforts To Undermine Sotomayor's Nomination Will Fail

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama: Efforts To Undermine Sotomayor's Nomination Will Fail stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffingtion Post/AP   |  
First Posted: 05-30-09 10:41 AM   |   Updated: 05-31-09 10:20 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

AP: WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama expressed confidence Saturday that efforts to scuttle Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court will fail despite intensified scrutiny of her judicial career. He said senators should work quickly to elevate the federal appeals judge.

"I am certain that she is the right choice," the president said in his weekly radio and Internet address in which he scolded critics who he said were trying to distort her record and past statements. Those include her 2001 comment that a female Hispanic judge would often reach a better decision than a white male judge.

With the Senate returning this coming week from its holiday break, Obama said he hopes it begins the confirmation process without delay. He said he expects his nominee to be on the bench when the Supreme Court begins its new term in October.

In the interim, Obama said he expects "rigorous evaluation" of his nominee but added: "What I hope is that we can avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down this process, and Congress, in the past."

He derided "some in Washington who are attempting to draw old battle lines and playing the usual political games, pulling a few comments out of context to paint a distorted picture of Judge Sotomayor's record."

"But I am confident that these efforts will fail," Obama added, "because Judge Sotomayor's 17-year record on the bench _ hundreds of judicial decisions that every American can read for him or herself _ speak far louder than any attack; her record makes clear that she is fair, unbiased and dedicated to the rule of law."

On Friday, Obama personally sought to deflect criticism about Sotomayor's comment in a 2001 lecture that "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

The quote in question from Sotomayor has emerged as a rallying call for conservative critics who fear she will offer opinions from the bench based less on the rule of law and more on her life experience, ethnicity and gender. That issue is likely to play a central role in her Senate confirmation process.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I'm sure she would have restated it," Obama told NBC News, without indicating how he knew that.

Obama also defended his nominee, saying her message was on target even if her exact wording was not.

"I think that when she's appearing before the Senate committee, in her confirmation process, I think all this nonsense that is being spewed out will be revealed for what it is," Obama said in the broadcast interview, clearly aware of how ethnicity and gender issues are taking hold in the debate.

A veteran federal judge, Sotomayor is poised to be the first Hispanic, and the third woman, to serve on the Supreme Court She appears headed for confirmation, needing a majority vote in a Senate, where Democrats have 59 votes. But White House officials also want a smooth confirmation, not one that bogs down them or their nominee.

As a senator, Obama supported a failed attempt by Democrats to stall President George W. Bush's nomination of Samuel Alito to the high court.

___

Associated Press writer Ben Feller contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov

AP: WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama expressed confidence Saturday that efforts to scuttle Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court will fail despite intensified scrutiny of her judi...
AP: WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama expressed confidence Saturday that efforts to scuttle Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court will fail despite intensified scrutiny of her judi...
 
Comments
578
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Gosh I wish if I'm fortunate enough to get a job again that I have someone sell me as well as President Obama has sold Judge Sotomayor.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 05/30/2009
- dwright I'm a Fan of dwright 311 fans permalink
photo

Actually Sotomayor may be the only Justice on the court that is neither conservative or liberal, but a true jurist that follows the law - more pragmatic like Obama

I truly am sick of labels since no one is all one thing or another

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 05/30/2009
- Petey131 I'm a Fan of Petey131 29 fans permalink

From the websaite of LA RAZA:

Many people incorrectly translate our name, "La Raza," as "the race." While it is true that one meaning of "raza" in Spanish is indeed "race," in Spanish, as in English and any other language, words can and do have multiple meanings. As noted in several online dictionaries, "La Raza" means "the people" or "the community.­" Translating our name as "the race" is not only inaccurate, it is factually incorrect.

"Hispanic" is an ethnicity, not a race. As anyone who has ever met a Dominican American, Mexican American, or Spanish American can attest, Hispanics can be and are members of any and all races.
The term "La Raza" has its origins in early 20th century Latin American literature and translates into English most closely as "the people" or, according to some scholars, as "the Hispanic people of the New World." The term was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world"s races, cultures, and religions. Mistranslating "La Raza" to mean "the race" implies that it is a term meant to exclude others. In fact, the full term coined by Vasconcelos, "La Raza Cósmica," meaning the "cosmic people," was developed to reflect not purity but the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/30/2009
- wisecrack I'm a Fan of wisecrack 10 fans permalink

Race or breed is the true meaning. We can dance all day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

Y hablas espanol?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 05/30/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 120 fans permalink
photo

And you can pontificate on the meaning of the Spanish words from what perspective? Are you a linguist? Do you have a degree in Romance languages? My students define the term La Raza as the community. Vengo de la raza puertoriqueno en Nuevo York. E tu?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/30/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

Redifining La Raza is only a wolf in sheep's clothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 05/30/2009

"burt2009"

Your are obviously a Mono-Lingual, you are not qualified to speak on this topic, you ignorance is showing!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

Petey is not redefining but rather clarify for the uninformed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 05/30/2009

THIS IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO EDUCATE THE GENERAL PUBLIC ABOUT,

LA RAZA DOES NOT LITERALLY TRANSLATE TO RACE, FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK ONLY ONE LANGUAGE OUT THEIR, YOU WILL BE SURPRISED TO KNOW THAT WORDS FROM DIFFERENT LANGUAGES HAVE DIFFERENT MEANINGS IN EACH LANGUAGE, SOME TIMES THEY TRANSLATE WELL, MOST OF THE TIME THEY LOOSE THEIR MEANING IN TRANSLATION. LA RAZA IS METAPHORIC,

THOSE THAT READ IT AS RACE IN ENGLISH ARE JUST FILTERING IT THROUGH THIS NATIONS HISTORICAL CONTEXT, WHICH IS A LOADED WORD IN ENGLISH, ESPECIALLY IN THIS COUNTRY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 05/30/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

One really has to led a shelter life or be very naive to believe no thought of forming La Raza as defined in Spanish "Race" as an organization. It was designed to catagoize a people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 05/30/2009
- dnegri I'm a Fan of dnegri 132 fans permalink

To that "KKK - La Raza" analogy (Gingrich, Tancredo, others...)­, I say: La Raza is an organization that emphasizes the value of multi-culturalism, the KKK would like this country to be uniracial and unecultural. So, who's ideas about America are most like those of the KKK? Tom Tancredo or Sonia Sotomayor?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 05/30/2009

Which the KKK was of the dem party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 05/30/2009
- TexasMom I'm a Fan of TexasMom 4 fans permalink

I also wondered how many times Tancredo has spoken out about how horrible and racist the KKK is. I don't understand why this guy (Tancredo) is so afraid of hispanics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 05/30/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

La Raza is a political organization much like the NAACP.

They endorsed Alberto Gonzales nomination to become Attorney General.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 05/30/2009
- janpradder I'm a Fan of janpradder 7 fans permalink

I'm sure that when Obama voted against Alito, it was a respectful "no". Not slander and slime thrown at him. That's not Obama's way. The republicans on the other hand are allowing the vilest of their party have a field day with racist, chauvinistic attacks.

Go on guys, you are revealing yourselves for what you are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/30/2009

Bull the seantors are not calling her anything it is the non elected officals just as it was for the dems against Bushes picks. The left was all against the Bush nominations the same that the right is now. Obama even threathen to filabuster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 05/30/2009
- wisecrack I'm a Fan of wisecrack 10 fans permalink

Provide facts if you're sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

Republicans confirmed Sotomayor when she was the elder Bush's nominee.

This only makes the "racist, chauvinistic attacks" seem even more INSANE than they already are in and of themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 05/30/2009
- 2tango I'm a Fan of 2tango 24 fans permalink

Is really sad the way everybody here, and there is judging because of the media is making so much fuss out of it.

Its truth Sotomayor is better than any White Hypocrite in Washington, An is truth that Republicans are Spook because they are becoming a White-Minority.

Is truth that until recently the "whites" were descriminating everybody that didn't look like them(still-do)

I am a white-lati­n-european­, An independent voter as well, And all white-Republicans should be a shame of them selves.

Now...what I see in here is everybody Talks like lawyers, or Professors in mathematics, And non have the credencials to match this Woman, Neither the media(just­-poor-goss­ipers)

Right now we have Justices, that shouldn't be there, in fact the "suprime-Court" it shouldn't be there either.
Because it is the creator of all anti-common-sense in this society.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 05/30/2009

I think you are racist against whites, all anyone is saying is that if a white person had said the same thing they would be called racist, there is a double standard and everyone knows it. She is the one at fault, as the story goes she has been trying for the SCOTUS her entire life and should have known better than to say what she did. Do I think she is racist, who knows but she does need to answer the questions about some of her remarks and ruling, It is like this with every SCOTUS nomination and the dems and the left are just as bad as the gop and the right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/30/2009
- webrock I'm a Fan of webrock 2 fans permalink
photo

What angers me is, that no matter what Obama or the Democrats do, the Republicans and the conservatives always find faults as if they are perfect themselves­....Which by the way, the're not.
All this negatism is exactly what the Republican wants...If you were constantly being bombarded with negative talks and attitude you too would believe life sucks....t­ake a break people! read some positive news for a change....­Or read the Bible...Je­sus is always ready to listen...i­f you give him the chance...

GOD BLESS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/30/2009
- Altruth I'm a Fan of Altruth 58 fans permalink

They have to live up to their name "The Pary of NO"!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/30/2009

God the dems are just as bad they were all against Bushes picks and did the same thing that the gop is doing now, How soon people forget, that Obama was one of the main critics of Bushes picks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 05/30/2009
- dnegri I'm a Fan of dnegri 132 fans permalink

Repubs ultimately don't want to undermine Sotomayor. They want to get their maximum face time on Tv in the hearings, but above all they (meaning the hard core right wing) just want to be able to send out fundraising emails to the blathering idiots of their base. People who can't even recognize an out and out hypocrite panderer such as Newt Gingrich. Expect to see Giuliani, the Mittster and Palin weighing in soon .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

Of course she will be confirmed. Geithner didnt pay his taxes and he was confirmed. This is just alot of UGLY noise for the far right and as USUAL, the MSM picks up this junk t create a story that is not there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 05/30/2009
- MrRight77 I'm a Fan of MrRight77 2 fans permalink
photo

Wrong, the key word is "BETTER" then a white male. Perception is reality!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

"In this fascinating interview, Justice Ginsburg gives several very current examples of those consequences. She points to the unbelievable decision by her fellow justices that discrimination against a pregnant woman is not sex discrimination, and that the trauma felt by the 13-year-old girl who was strip searched was not real. "They have never been a 13-year-old girl," she said. "I don't think that my colleagues, some of them, quite understood­."

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/mary-kate-cary/2009/05/20/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-experience-shows-the-supreme-court-needs-more-women.html

When Sonia Sotomayor says "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life” the key phrase is "who hasn't lived that life." She brings experiences as a Latino and a woman that a black male like Clarence Thomas cannot bring; that a Jewish woman like Ruth Ginsburg cannot bring; or that any of the white males can bring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 05/30/2009
- dwright I'm a Fan of dwright 311 fans permalink
photo

Can't we just agree that EVERY ONE brings their own unique experiences that others don't??? My father died when I was 3, I was up rooted and moved across the country. I was a tom boy and everyone thought I was a boy and treated me as such, as I grew older I was teased by people that assumed I was gay ( not that there is anything wrong with that) however it caused internal confusion in me. I knew however that the reason I liked being around and playing with boys is well, I liked being around boys :-)

I lived through our city's forced integration - National Guard coming to the H. S. - Parents sitting in cars with gu.ns ready.

Sexual harassment at work in a good ole boy company (defense contractor) that would cost you your job if you opened your mouth.

No one wants to hear my whole life story - I am just saying EVERYONE brings their own BAGGAGE with them. EVERYONE>

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 05/30/2009
- llisa I'm a Fan of llisa 29 fans permalink

Exactly!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 05/30/2009
- MrRight77 I'm a Fan of MrRight77 2 fans permalink
photo

All this would not even be an issue if she would have been properly vetted,President Obama seems at times to shoot from the hip.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

Examine her record not just a speech, shoot from the hip...HE IS WINNING!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/30/2009
- Petey131 I'm a Fan of Petey131 29 fans permalink

"Mr. Right" you are very Wrong!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 05/30/2009
- dwright I'm a Fan of dwright 311 fans permalink
photo

What turnip truck did you fall off of? She was properly vetted and this is all stupid hype.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

- More experience in the Federal courts than any sitting justice as a prosecutor, litigator and judge.
- Graduated not just summa cum laude but number 2 in her class at Princeton
- Served as editor of the Yale Law Journal
- Precedent-setting judge on cyberlaw
- Ruled on environmental law, civil rights, corporate litigation, worker's rights, religious expression and free speech.

She's well-vetted and well-qualified.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 05/30/2009
- ullyses I'm a Fan of ullyses 4 fans permalink

I'm sure that she was properly vetted. Don't you think that the WH learned their lesson from the Tom Daschal fiasco? A certain amount of noise from the other side is to be expected but at the end of the day she will be confirmed. We just have to get this little dance over with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 05/30/2009
- december30 I'm a Fan of december30 24 fans permalink

PLEASE NOTE:

It does not matter who the President picks, she/he could be latina, latino, woman, gay, straight, blue pink, white, purple or red, THE REPUBLICANS ARE MAKING IT IS ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA and they have forgotten the American People rejected their tactics November 4, 2008. A lot of Americans do not want this man as President but he is. America is at such a cross road and all they want to do is act and be about nonsense. Our economy is in a peril as well as our healthcare and energy alnd education. What a pathetic group the Republicans are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 05/30/2009

I've actually thought the (elected) Republicans have handled this very well. They have basically said, her judicial work is pretty good, there are a few statements shes made that require a closer look before we can sign off on this, but overall, this is not a bad pick.

Its the unelected nuts like Limbaugh that are throwing a hissy fit. Thankfully they dont have a vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 05/30/2009
- dwright I'm a Fan of dwright 311 fans permalink
photo

unfortunately or fortunately the elected Republicans don't actually run their Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 05/30/2009
- dnegri I'm a Fan of dnegri 132 fans permalink

Oh, I don't know. Checkout what Sen. Roberts said as he announced he's already going to vote NO. Based on? The bogus talking point about her "legislating from the bench", which has already been thoroughly debunked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

Sotomayor's record is emerging as more conservative than liberals would ever have expected from a Democratic president. The Republicans' sideshow is distracting from the Democratic base's objections to Sotomayor's nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

Not conservative, or libreal, but pragmatic like the president

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 05/30/2009
- DJ23 I'm a Fan of DJ23 14 fans permalink
photo

I've always hated the way the Right wingers refer to anyone that is not on the far right as a "liberal".

I see now it goes both ways. The Left wingers do the same thing. Your statement is an example of this.

I think Sotomayor is more of a moderate. That's what is also being said by sensible people on the left.

You chose to say she is "more conservative than liberals would ever have expected".

That says more about you than Judge Sotomayor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

Sotomayor is a moderate. Obama is a moderate. What is surprising?

I'm an idealist and a liberal. I could not get myself elected to public office.

I help frame the argument at the borders, but finally the President, a pragmatist, has to do the politically viable thing IN the picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 05/30/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 120 fans permalink
photo

I see her record as not only conservative but maybe self-preserving. She cannot side with plaintiffs due to fear of being judged negatively for it. We actually have no idea of how liberal, conservative or pragmatic she will be. If she is a practicing Cath.olic, then there's other things to weigh. She has actually not ruled on cases that would give us insight into her thinking and leanings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/30/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 59 fans permalink
photo

The President is absolutely right about this issue. The GOP have Limbaugh, Steele, Rove and others making fools out of every Republican in Washington who isn't speaking out against the dirty tatics. This will backfire in the latino community and with women in general and the GOP will lose these voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 05/30/2009

Bull, the dems did the same thing against Bushes picks it is politics, she does need to say what she meant about her remark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

Please cite references of Democratic sexist and prejudiced attacks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 05/30/2009
- debrief I'm a Fan of debrief 14 fans permalink
photo

Sorry, this is an entirely different ballgame. Nobody was troubled by what happened to Alito and Roberts, except the already commited repugs, (no pun intended). This situation has far direr consequences for you numbn.u.t.­s. Primary and Gen election over, same Obama...br­illiant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 05/30/2009
- llisa I'm a Fan of llisa 29 fans permalink

Sotomayor is the best qualified judge to be nominated in 100 years. Why is anyone arguing about her race?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 05/30/2009
- burt2009 I'm a Fan of burt2009 16 fans permalink

It's ok, you can come in out of the rain now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 05/30/2009
- dnegri I'm a Fan of dnegri 132 fans permalink

Because that's all Republicans have to argue about. And raising "race" issues has always worked well with their paranoid angry white male base.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

What does that mean? "Best qualified"?

All it takes to qualify to be a US Supreme Court justice is a pulse. You don't even have to be a lawyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

And you propose that having a pulse is the best criteria for selecting a Supreme Court justice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 05/30/2009
- cjk002 I'm a Fan of cjk002 33 fans permalink
photo

It means she has served more time as a judge, a prosecutor, and a lawyer than anyone nominated to the court in the last 100 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 05/30/2009

You watch to much msnbc, she is the same as all the others that have been nominated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 05/30/2009
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

Most experienced.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 05/30/2009
- jazzybo I'm a Fan of jazzybo 4 fans permalink
photo

There seems to be some concern about loading the court up with too many Roman Catholics.
If they profess to be what they say they are how can they not be biased? Not all people want the
Pope dictating policy in this country.Ju­st sayin?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 05/30/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 178 fans permalink
photo

I know a lot of Latin women who do not take the Pope or Catholicism very seriously. After all, they have to pay the price!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 05/30/2009
photo

I'm a liberal & I've got concerns about this nomination.

There are going to be lines of questioning that, if past is prologue for future, Sotomayor will decline to answer. She'll get away with it, because, "It's likely to come before the court in the future."

The intention of the founders wasn't to have to buy a pig in a poke. Everyone interprets laws according to their own point of view, & what's judicial activism to one person isn't to another. How long does stare decisis make?

These nominees can say anything; this is the only opportunity you get to grill them. The senators on the Judiciary Committee accept that hot potato issues are off the table for discussion. I don't agree.

Once a justice is on the court, that's it. It's a lifetime appointment. We saw in the Roberts confirmation process that Roberts lied about how he would rule from the bench, & that was this practice of avoiding tough issues.

Reagan, the Bushes and Clinton all have loaded up the judiciary with right-of-center to rightwing judges (Clinton, too, in an effort to be liked by Republicans, stacked the court with conservatives), & now it seems that Obama is following that trend.

From what I've read of Sotomayor's decisions, when all things are equal she seems to err on the side of corporations over the lone citizen. Perhaps there is a Clarence Thomas quality (anti-affirmative action reaction) to her decisions. I want to know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 05/30/2009
- Cookie100 I'm a Fan of Cookie100 55 fans permalink
photo

ALITO: Senator, I tried to in my opening statement, I tried to provide a little picture of who I am as a human being and how my background and my experiences have shaped me and brought me to this point. … And that’s why I went into that in my opening statement. Because when a case comes before me involving, let’s say, someone who is an immigrant — and we get an awful lot of immigration cases and naturalization cases — I can’t help but think of my own ancestors, because it wasn’t that long ago when they were in that position. [...]

And that goes down the line. When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­**********­*******
ANYONE REMEMBER THIS? GUESS HE USES HIS EXPERIENCE TO JUDGE THINGS AS WELL. IF YOU READ HER ********EN­TIRE******­** QUOTE, THERE IS NOTHING UNUSUAL IN WHAT SHE SAID!

H Y P O C R I T E S

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 05/30/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect