iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Government Motors: US Will Own 60% Of GM

Gm

JIM KUHNHENN and KEN THOMAS   06/ 1/09 12:41 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — General Motors, the humbled auto giant that has been part of American life for more than 100 years, will file for bankruptcy protection on Monday in a deal that will give taxpayers a 60 percent ownership stake and expand the government's reach into big business.

It would be the largest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history, and the fourth-largest overall. In addition, a GM bankruptcy would be unprecedented as the federal government would pump billions more into the company.

Underscoring the government's extraordinary role, President Barack Obama planned to announce his support for GM's restructuring strategy at a midday appearance at the White House, much as he did in April when Chrysler sought court protection.

GM president and CEO Fritz Henderson planned to hold a news conference in New York immediately following Obama's announcement.

Administration officials said late Sunday the federal government would pump $30 billion dollars into GM as it makes its way through bankruptcy court. That's besides the $20 billion in taxpayers' money that the Treasury already lent to the automaker.

The $30 billion is to help GM through the Chapter 11 proceeding and move it through its restructuring plan. It doesn't have the money to run the business right now. The money would come from what remains of the $700 billion rescue fund for the financial sector.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity in advance of Obama's public remarks, said the administration expects the court process to last 60 to 90 days. If successful, GM will emerge as a leaner company with a smaller work force, fewer plants and a trimmed dealership force. The company will stick with its four core brands _ Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC _ and jettison four others.

The company plans to cut 21,000 employees, about 34 percent of its work force, and reduce the number of dealers by 2,600.

"There is still plenty of pain to go around, but I'm confident this is far better than the alternative," Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said Sunday after being briefed about the developments by the president. "It's a new beginning, it's a rebirth, it's a new General Motors."

The government's ownership stake and huge financial injection represents yet another remarkable intervention into the American private sector. The Treasury has stepped in to help banks, it has taken majority ownership in insurance conglomerate American International Group and it has guided Chrysler through bankruptcy protection proceedings.

Despite its sizable ownership, administration officials said the government intends to stay out of day-to-day management decisions. It says it intends to shed its ownership stakes "as soon as practicable."

The day to day operations will be carried out by GM's management. But a majority of the board of directors will change and the administration will have a hand in helping select them.

"Our goal is to promote strong and viable companies that can quickly be profitable and contribute to economic growth and jobs without government involvement," a fact sheet issued by the White House and the Treasury Department said.

Still, it was Obama who ordered the firing of former GM CEO Richard Wagoner a month ago. And it was the Obama administration that instructed GM to trim itself to a point that it could break even by selling 10 million cars a year. It's current break even point is 16 million cars.

Even as the White House stressed that it would run the day-to-day operation of the car company, the arrangement was fraught with potential conflicts. The Obama administration has proposed tougher fuel efficiency requirements that GM will need to abide by and has pumped billions into the auto company's lending arm and assured consumers that it will backstop GM warranties.

GM plans to name turnaround executive Al Koch to serve as its chief restructuring officer to help the company through bankruptcy protection, said a person familiar with the matter. The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity, was not authorized to speak about the appointment publicly.

Koch, a managing director with AlixPartners LLP, is a veteran turnaround specialist who helped Kmart Corp. through its Chapter 11 reorganization. He will lead the separation of the automaker's assets into a "New GM" and the remaining parts of the company that will form "Old GM." Koch will lead the management team that winds down the "Old GM" company once the automaker emerges from bankruptcy.

A majority of the Detroit automaker's unsecured bondholders have accepted a deal viewed as crucial to reorganization, and Germany agreed to loan $2 billion to GM's German unit, Opel, as part of its acquisition by a Canadian auto parts supplier.

The moves don't change much for GM, but better prepare it for a bankruptcy protection filing, said Rebecca Lindland, an auto analyst for the consulting firm IHS Global Insight.

"The more agreements GM has with its interests, the better the bankruptcy is going to go," she said. "It's not a game changer at all."

It would be the largest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history, and the fourth-largest overall. In addition, a GM bankruptcy would be unprecedented as the federal government would pump billions more into the company, and take a 72.5 percent interest in the automaker.

On Sunday a group of large, institutional bondholders, representing 54 percent of GM bondholders, agreed to exchange their unsecured bonds for a 10 percent stake in a newly restructured company, plus warrants to purchase a greater share later. They had balked at an earlier offer, that gave them 10 percent of the company without the warrants.

Beyond the bankruptcy announcement Monday, GM is expected to reveal 14 plants it intends to close and name the buyer of its Hummer division. One of those plants, however, will reopen as a new small car factory. The decision to build the new car in the United States appears to address previous labor and congressional concerns that GM was considering importing a small car from its plants in China.

By building the car in the U.S., the share of U.S. produced cars for U.S. sale will increase from 66 percent to more than 70 percent.

In Germany on Sunday, the government agreed to loan GM's Opel unit $2.1 billion, a move necessary for Magna International Inc. to acquire the company.

The Canadian auto parts supplier Magna will take a 20 percent stake in Opel and Russian-owned Sberbank will take a 35 percent, giving the two businesses a majority. GM retains 35 percent of Opel, with the remaining 10 percent going to employees.

The German funds are available to Opel immediately, as it attempts to shield itself from cuts if GM files for bankruptcy protection. Opel employs 25,000 people in Germany, nearly half of GM Europe's work force. Under the deal, four factories in Germany would stay open saving jobs.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who was traveling to China, followed the developments closely. The Treasury on Thursday offered bondholders 10 percent of a newly formed GM's stock, plus warrants to buy 15 percent more to erase the debt. Last week, GM withdrew an offer of 10 percent equity after only 15 percent of the thousands of bondholders signed up.

The current 54 percent acceptance represents only $14.6 billion, but by lining up support in advance of a bankruptcy protection filing, GM is likely to find it easier to persuade a judge to apply terms of the sweetened offer to the rest of its unsecured debt.

It could also help the automaker get through the court process more quickly, said Robert Gordon, head of the corporate restructuring and bankruptcy group at Clark Hill PLC in Detroit.

The company made a huge stride toward restructuring Friday when the United Auto Workers union agreed to a cost-cutting deal.

GM's fate and the federal government's intervention was scrutinized on several Sunday morning talk shows.

"I think the government auto bailout was a big mistake," said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on CNN's "State of the Union" program. "We could have let these companies go through the bankruptcy process much earlier."

In a typical Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, the company files a plan of reorganization that must be voted on by creditors. In each class of creditors, the plan would have to be approved by holders of two-thirds of the claims and a majority of the number of individual creditors who vote.

But the GM case is anything but ordinary, and it appears the company will sell some or all of its assets to a new entity that would become the new GM, rather than submit a plan to reorganize the old company.

GM's stock tumbled to the lowest price in the company's 100-year history on Friday, closing at just 75 cents after trading as low as 74 cents. In a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, the shares would become virtually worthless.

___

AP Auto Writers Kimberly S. Johnson and Tom Krisher in Detroit and AP Business Writer Harry Weber in Atlanta contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — General Motors, the humbled auto giant that has been part of American life for more than 100 years, will file for bankruptcy protection on Monday in a deal that will give taxpayers ...
WASHINGTON — General Motors, the humbled auto giant that has been part of American life for more than 100 years, will file for bankruptcy protection on Monday in a deal that will give taxpayers ...
Filed by Marcus Baram  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:25 PM on 06/01/2009
Why GM should be running the Feds

Missing in news reports on Chrysler and General Motors is the enormous role that they play in society, which touches almost every area of our lives, especially our children. The focus has been primarily on the numbers, leaving out the social leadership activities of Chrysler, General Motors and Ford.

The average person does not see the impact these companies have in their communities, businesses and lives, because the news media fails to factor it in its reporting. There were no questions asked at GM's press conference today on what happens to GM's massive socieal role in society.

We complain about the health and financial industries ripping off consumers, but ignore the corporations that have taken on decades of social leadership. What about the tens of thousands of charitable causes, businesses, educational, and community activities where the Big Three have been the biggest supporters? In many cases they have set the example for other corporations, and the federal government.

This country needs more corporations that support society and promote business development and diversity, as the Big Three have done. While much of our taxpayer dollars go to administering the government and less going directly to society programs, the Big Three have set the example.
08:01 AM on 06/01/2009
Now that Obama is the defacto CEO of GM, will he/should he order the creation of the EV2? BTW, what was the carbon footprint of his date in NY?
08:21 AM on 06/01/2009
The Feds give jack about carbon footprints, they just want the public to so they can tax them for it.
08:36 AM on 06/01/2009
Probably less the the carbon footprint left by Bush when he took AF1 from Crawford to DC to sign Terry Schiavo legislation. Oh, wait, Republicans don't believe in that global warmimg stuff.
08:53 AM on 06/01/2009
So it's okay for Obama to pollute unnecessarily because Bush did it? Can anyone stop using Bush as a way to apologize for Obama's missteps?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:47 AM on 06/01/2009
While retirees and workers get axed of their livelyhood and health benefits, the bankers get paid back 100% of their loans. According to Greg Palast, it seems to me totally illegal

http://www.gregpalast.com/grand-theft-auto-how-stevie-the-rat-bankrupted-gm/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mogamboguru
I am a liar. Don't believe me.
07:46 AM on 06/01/2009
Test
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mono
06:56 AM on 06/01/2009
This blame game will go on but the responsible party here is GM itself. The major screw up happened when the brand started competing with each other, same cars/SUVs in different brand name. People are not that dumb. Just look at Saturn OUTLOOK, Chevy TRAVERSE, Buick ENCLAVE and GMC ACADIA. They are all built on same platform.

Japanese don't have this problem and they are thinking of future technology unlike us. It is lack of foresightedness on our part.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:22 AM on 06/01/2009
Ford also builds their cars on the same few platforms.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mogamboguru
I am a liar. Don't believe me.
07:49 AM on 06/01/2009
But after intenational standards.

Fords sell worldwide.

Try to sell the US-made GM-cars elswhere but inside the USA. It's simply impossible, because their quality is so poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prettyinpink
Liberalism-Ideas so good-they're MANDATORY
07:27 AM on 06/01/2009
The Japanese also value their businesses. The government knows we all can be lawyers and bankers. They do not allow the states to change the emmision rules every few months. They partner with industry and find common goals ways to achieve them.

In this country we choke the industries that the greens feel are not living up to their standards. Drive them into bankrupcy or to offshore production because it is impossible to make a profit given the insane rules.

In the end it was big government that killed 2 of the big 3.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mogamboguru
I am a liar. Don't believe me.
07:51 AM on 06/01/2009
Nonsense.

American are by far nott green enough yet.

20 MPG fuel-consumption for a sedan is a joke everywhere in the world - except America.

In Europe, you can buy 60 MPG-cars over the counter today.

Name an american car, which can achie that.
06:40 AM on 06/01/2009
Being managed by the government is a step up from the disastrous mess in private hands for decades. Its about time! And as a bonus we get to own a share in the company and serves as an incentive to buy american.

Kelly
http://www.stockcoupons.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:18 AM on 06/01/2009
I like the idea that taxpayers will someday be entitled to get their money back, if and when GM can turn a profit. Owning a share of the company, without too much involvement in the day-to-day operations, sounds like a good plan.

On the other hand, it is difficult to imagine a company management team running things more poorly than GM's.
07:13 AM on 06/01/2009
the United States Government, under the auspices of the IRS, took over management of the Mustang Ranch. They mis-managed it so badly that the establishment had to be closed. How in the world does one not make money selling sex and booze? Only the US government could do such a thing. They will do the same for Government Motors. The US taxpayer has footed the bill, and will never, ever receive, even indirectly, any return on our "investment".
I will never, ever again buy any product made by GM or Chrysler.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:26 AM on 06/01/2009
Surely you jest. The federal govt. is the model for mismanagement.
photo
slobone
We have met the enemy and he is us
05:01 AM on 06/01/2009
So the moral of this story is if you do everything wrong the government will bail you out, and if you do everything right (Toyota) you now have to compete against the US government?
05:28 AM on 06/01/2009
GM has had and has a lot of problems, but if the people in the financial system had not, aided and abetted by the Bush administration, broken the economy, GM would not be facing bankruptcy. Breaking the economy was not GM's fault. Letting GM go bankrupt without government assistance in helping it come back would make the recession even worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:26 AM on 06/01/2009
As one of the largest companies in Japan, they have tremendous power in shaping the policies of that government which effect them. The import/export laws of Japan have been written to help Japanese companies while hurting foreign companies.
They also asked for and received massive tax incentives from the local and state governments here in this country, in those locations where they have built plants.
Toyota is not a White Knight.
04:41 AM on 06/01/2009
We owe our fall into Socialism not on Obama but on the crooks of the last 15 years... The Barney Franks, The Nancy Pelosis, the Harry Reids, the Ted Kennedys and of course the big spending George Bush group. The were hired/elected to be our 'watchdogs' and instead they became paid turds for the crooks and money-changers on Wall Street and in the Bank boardrooms of America. They stood by and watched as we were raped and robbed by the folks that were lining their campaign coffers... sounds like the USSR instead of the USA doesn't it?

Has the tipping point arrived yet or are we all such fat and lazy has-beens that were will continue to lay back and allow ourselves to be pummeled in the rear?
03:49 AM on 06/01/2009
I've heard about how Toyotas, Hondas, etc... are so great and are green vehicles over and over again. Did you know they build less than 17% of their cars here? GM builds 78% here. The countries they build those cars in have almost NO EPA STANDARDS. They use slave labor and exploit human beings, even Toyota. Look it up online and see for yourself, it sickening!!!! Therefore, you just defeated the purpose of your "GREEN" vehicle. Those countries pollute more than any car here ever will. Don't they live in the same atmosphere as we do????
http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=562
04:37 AM on 06/01/2009
Toyota builds more cars here in the US than F or GM (well if not more but pretty close). definitely not in the range of % you are saying.
06:28 AM on 06/01/2009
You are absolutely dead wrong. http:// levelfieldinstitute.org
02:41 AM on 06/01/2009
At long last, the saying is true: What's good for General Motors is good for the USA.
02:18 AM on 06/01/2009
We don't own own anything unless we are getting paid dividends from our shares.

The government own it.....no us(U.S)
03:09 AM on 06/01/2009
Both Bush and Obama threw money at this problem! Remember to big to fail, they needed to file bankruptcy a while ago! Billions flushed down the toilet! How many communities across the US could have used all this money, to not have cutbacks in schools and after school programs, not to mention school vouchers in DC that Obama did away with and much more! It is a DISGUSTING waste of tax payer dollars! Remember "tighten your belts" "fiscal responsibility" etc! I hope you had a nice time in New York Mr. President! Hopefully you did not fly too low over NYC and scare the hell out of people again!
05:32 AM on 06/01/2009
"How many communities across the US could have used all this money"

If the Republicans with the help of some right-wing democrats had not used the filibuster to for a reduction in the size of the stimulus program, there would have been a lot more money for those communities.
05:33 AM on 06/01/2009
"Remember "tighten your belts" "fiscal responsibility"

Belt tightening by the government during a recession makes the recession worse.
02:11 AM on 06/01/2009
Personal Note*= I've been paying special attention to our markets and what they been most reactive to. For investors to invest they need to gamble at a casino with "house rules" so that cheating isn't allowed. Las Vegas is the perfect example of how Wall Street should be run. It is an orderly risk that anyone who walks into it knows their stakes and can choose how much or how little they wish to risk in order to make it big. Government does deal in chances it deals in absolution, I apologize to the President but there's nothing absolute about Businesses, they last only for so long before they go under. You cannot save Wall Street by throwing money at the banks because the money will go absolutely nowhere. It is people that move money around the fastest within this country, the faster money can move around in this country the faster Wall Street can export the transfer of money around the world kickstarting an effect. This all started when people stopped having access to money and necessities, hence necessities of the people are the problem. Solve this problem by giving people what they need in order to produce. I have plenty of ideas on what kinds of stuff we should be producing in order to get this economy going again. Anyone interested in hearing them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InedaName
Clowns to the Left of me. Jokers to the Right.
02:10 AM on 06/01/2009
I don't believe in no car,
***I don't believe in General Motors,***
I don't believe in the President,
or the League of Women Voters.
I don't believe in these things,
all these things might ***fail,***
I don't believe it's gonna snow,
it might sleet rain or hail.

--Violent Femmes, "Faith," 1986
02:08 AM on 06/01/2009
As Eric Smidt from Google states "America can be and should be manufacturing leader in the world with the best science and technology." I agree with this statement. The key word that he empahisized during this exchange was "Innovation." It is because America is a constantly changing country that we have succeeded so thus far without coming to a complete stop. We must build a car in this race to become number 1 globally. This car must be an "American Car" built by everyone Government,Business, and the people in between. We all want to win this global race for success but first we need to work the GPS and pick a route successful route to get there. I believe this was the overall point of Jim Owens CEO of Catepillar. That we must be competative, we must have the drive to do more with less and GM has lost that edge.