GOP Senators OK With Race-Based Sotomayor Attacks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - GOP Senators OK With Race-Based Sotomayor Attacks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | June 1, 2009 05:31 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, center, meets with unidentified members of the White House Counsel's office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House Complex in Washington , Monday, June 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of her Supreme Court journey shifts to Capitol Hill.

One week after President Barack Obama introduced her to the nation, Sotomayor on Tuesday starts private, informal meetings with key Senate leaders of both parties. So begins the choreographed march the White House hopes will land her on the nation's highest court, perhaps for decades to come.

Quietly but aggressively, a White House team loaded with confirmation veterans is working daily to help Sotomayor and promote the narrative that Obama began: a seasoned federal judge who overcame hardship as a youngster and would deliver justice that reflects respect for the law but an understanding of real life.

Republicans, though, are poised to push Sotomayor about whether she would put her own views above the law and rule as an "activist."

Sotomayor was at the White House on Monday, consulting with White House attorneys and going over her Senate questionnaire. Her response to the document _ an extensive survey of her life, public statements, rulings and political activities _ is expected soon.

Beyond the Senate meet-and-greets, Sotomayor is likely to spend most of her week at the White House.

The judge herself is staying mum in public, as is custom. News photographers could cover her White House visit Monday, but reporters could not.

Barring a huge surprise, she is expected to be confirmed. Democrats control 59 seats in the Senate, where a majority vote is needed for confirmation.

Story continues below
advertisement

On Tuesday, Sotomayor is expected to visit 10 senators, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.; Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the chairman of the Judiciary Committee; and Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the panel's top Republican.

She's also slated to meet with the No. 2 Democrat and Republican, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and to lunch privately with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., a Judiciary member and her unofficial chaperone during the confirmation process.

The roughly half-hour, closed-door meetings _ known as "courtesy calls" _ are as important for the courtly tone they set for the beginning of the Senate's debate on Sotomayor as for the few moments of candid conversation they offer senators and the nominee. A more substantive and freewheeling discussion of her record and past will come with the impending release of the detailed questionnaire, which will likely yield fodder for her supporters and detractors.

Sotomayor, 54, would replace retiring Justice David Souter.

First, she'll have to meet with many of the senators who get to vote on her confirmation. Her Tuesday visits include two Judiciary members, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, as well as home-state Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.

The White House has not identified any one person to shepherd Sotomayor's confirmation, but rather a team of insiders working on her behalf. They are helping her with the questionnaire, prepping her for her hearings, reaching out to Capitol Hill and working on strategies to stay on message in the media.

The team meets each morning and evening with Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, and senior Obama adviser David Axelrod.

Leading the group is Cynthia Hogan, chief counsel to Vice President Joe Biden. She was Biden's lead counsel when he was chairman of the Judiciary Committee during the Senate confirmation reviews of justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Other key members are Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, chief counsel of Judiciary during the confirmation hearings of justices Clarence Thomas and David Souter; White House counsel Greg Craig and deputy counsel Cassandra Butts, both heavily involved in Sotomayor's vetting; White House associate counsel Susan Davies, who served as top counsel to the Judiciary Committee under Leahy; deputy communications director Dan Pfeiffer, who oversaw the media rollout of Sotomayor's nomination; and Stephanie Cutter, a strategist seasoned in Senate politics, campaigns and the Clinton White House.

The administration is reaching outside for help, too. Ricki Seidman, who held senior roles in the Clinton White House and worked for the Obama campaign as a top aide to Biden, is coordinating the White House's message with those of supportive interest groups.

Obama wants the Senate to confirm Sotomayor before its August vacation. The White House formally started the clock Monday, sending her nomination to the Senate.

Leahy on Monday stepped up his calls for quick Judiciary Committee hearings, saying the sessions are Sotomayor's only opportunity to respond to harshly worded criticism by prominent Republicans such as talk-show host Rush Limbaugh and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Both have called Sotomayor a racist for 2001 comments in which she said the decisions of a "wise Latina" judge would be superior to those of a white male. Limbaugh on Friday compared choosing her to tapping a former Ku Klux Klan leader for the job.

In a conference call with reporters, Leahy said: "I'll give everyone plenty of time to read all her cases and prepare for it. But I'm not going to sit around and wait forever and just have these attacks go on, be unanswered."

Democrats hope the incendiary remarks by some Republicans outside Congress will enhance their chances of getting GOP senators, who have been much more tempered in their comments, to agree to a swift timetable for her confirmation. That could mean hearings as early as the first full week of July.

But McConnell seemed to suggest that was unlikely.

"Judge Sotomayor has a long record and it will take a long time to get through it," the GOP leader said Monday on the Senate floor.

___

Associated Press writer John Curran in Montpelier, Vt., contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of he...
WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of he...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
346
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 204 fans permalink
photo

That isn't surprising. Since when DIDN'T the GOP support racist hate speech?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 06/01/2009

Why not ask some of the pre-LBJ senators in office, like Byrd or Akaka or Inouye?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 06/01/2009
- JMBrodie I'm a Fan of JMBrodie 263 fans permalink
photo

There are a lot of dirty hands. Some repented. Some did not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 06/01/2009
- cinesimon I'm a Fan of cinesimon 58 fans permalink

LBJ was a right wing menace posing as a centrist.

Don't blame us for LBJ: blame Texas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 06/01/2009
- chriss0114 I'm a Fan of chriss0114 24 fans permalink
photo

ah yes---the turtle even heaped mighty praise on jesse helms!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 06/01/2009

Pretty much the same length of time as the Democrats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 06/01/2009
- cinesimon I'm a Fan of cinesimon 58 fans permalink

We've changed with the times - we badly needed to.

Unless your movement does the same, the reasonable people within it will disappear - either into their churches, forever denouncing politics, or to the conservative wing of the Democratic party - where they are more than welcome.
If we can't get a mature and intelligent political dialogue from the republican party, we will have to do it within our own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 06/01/2009
- Janskats I'm a Fan of Janskats 5 fans permalink

The "watching quietly" part is what counts. They'll still all be tarred as the racists they are, unless they come out and clearly get in the face of their cohorts in crime, proponing all this garbage. If they don't actually get livid and red-faced and jump up and down against what's being said and done by Longblah and the Small One, it's just going to say the truth..tha­t they are in complete support of their pitch!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 06/01/2009

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison is full of crap.

She voted NO to Sotomayor's confirmation to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1998.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 06/01/2009
- 20090120 I'm a Fan of 20090120 5 fans permalink

She is....and what's even worse is she's running for Governor against someone cut from the same cloth in the GOP....Ric­k (the D.ic.k) Perry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 06/01/2009
- hapiday I'm a Fan of hapiday 99 fans permalink
photo

Wasn't conservative talk radio created for the purpose of having a voice of the Republican party to express what these Senators cannot. Conservative media is allowed to say anything they want. These corrupt Senators can hide behind the radio and tv personalities and say they have a right to free speech. They have no intentions of silencing them. See anyone see the smirk on McConnell's face when he was commenting? He basically looked like he wanted to bust out laughing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/01/2009
- jemiltd I'm a Fan of jemiltd 92 fans permalink
photo

The only problem comes when people are not able to differentiate between who is a politician and who are overpaid gusts of wind whose fan base willingly dine on the verbal vomit they continue to offer. Rush has gotten too many apologies from those who are supposed to represent the people who voted for them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 06/01/2009
- C IH8U2 I'm a Fan of C IH8U2 22 fans permalink
photo

The Repubs keep trying to use the NewHaven Firefighters case as an example of her so called R@c!sm, but fail to mention that hispanics were part of that litigation too. So she was be discriminitive against her fellow hispanics???? FAAAAIIIIILLLLLL. Thanks for playing repubs, but try again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

All of their talking points have been a fail, but they can rely on the fact that their audience will never check the facts. They can say she eats bats and their audience will nod and drool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 06/01/2009
- SF13 I'm a Fan of SF13 11 fans permalink

lol that's a good one, Republicans despise facts. Ask Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 06/01/2009
- KHAAANNN I'm a Fan of KHAAANNN 38 fans permalink

Cowards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 06/01/2009
- Char59 I'm a Fan of Char59 11 fans permalink

They are not making them stop because this is what they all believe in, just to weak to admit it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 06/01/2009
- alwqb I'm a Fan of alwqb 18 fans permalink
photo

The Senate Republicans send out the commentators to do their dirty work and hide like little children. The GOP's goose is cooked and it's overdone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

You are absolutely right. The Senate Republicans are really underestimating the Hispanic vote. The Spanish speaking stations are running this like crazy. It's not just making those saying these things look bad....it'­s making the entire GOP look bad, and they still don't get it.
My God, how many more seats do they need to lose until they realize they better start playing differently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 06/01/2009
- JMBrodie I'm a Fan of JMBrodie 263 fans permalink
photo

Slash and burn politics are without limit. Scorched earth. Nothing less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 06/01/2009

Miguel Estrada.

Enough said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 06/02/2009
- edgeways I'm a Fan of edgeways 4 fans permalink

given the story below this one is about the GOP being all white, this story should surprise..­. who?

As much as the Democrats fight amongst each other one has to wonder... It seems like the Democratic party truly reflects America in it's diversity, of ethnicity and opinion. Whereas the republicans are a mono-cultural party, working on remaining pure.

If the Rs would kick out the blatant racists, and hardcore social conservatives they would lose a few elections, but, there would be a gradual shift as the more conservative Ds gravitated towards the Rs, and we might actually have two viable parties without all the over the top racism that current inundates much of the R party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 06/01/2009

Well, like Will Rogers said "I don't belong to an Organized Political Party... I'm a Democrat".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 06/01/2009

True. As Clinton himself said: Bush's cabinet was the most culturally and ethnically diverse cabinet in U.S. history.

Oh, sorry, that's the opposite of your point. Gotta hate those facts that keep getting in the way of a simplistic view of the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 06/02/2009
- Diogenis I'm a Fan of Diogenis 65 fans permalink

I just lost any remaining respect for the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 06/01/2009
- Jeff1958 I'm a Fan of Jeff1958 41 fans permalink
photo

What took so long?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 06/01/2009

You had some? Lost all respect for both parties long ago. There is so little difference in the two. They differ only in the details of whose rights they want to suppress. Both are heading towards the same destination (all powerful central state), they just are taking different routes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 06/01/2009
- claudiam I'm a Fan of claudiam 24 fans permalink
photo

I just can not believe how out of touch these people are! We are a multi-ethnic country and they had better get used to it! claudiatucsonaz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 06/01/2009
- MrBoBo I'm a Fan of MrBoBo 6 fans permalink

Los Republicanos son peligrosos fanaticos.
Anglo Man

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

Of course they are ok with it - it is what they believe. But being cowards, they always let someone else say it.

Good to know they are working hard to keep the GOP an irrelevant minority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 06/01/2009
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 76 fans permalink

Failing to denounce the attacks on Sotomayor indicates agreement. The fact that the accusations of racism are based on a statement that was taken completely out of context makes the GOP Senators' silence even more despicable. They are, in fact, endorsing a lie with their very silence.

Not that I'm surprised, mind you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 06/01/2009

Explain the phrase in context please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 06/01/2009
- JMBrodie I'm a Fan of JMBrodie 263 fans permalink
photo

Tell you what -- let's walk this back 400 years or so.

Let's talk about the wise men who ruled that mixed race marriages were illegal and no guarantor of freedom. Let’s talk about the wise judges whose rulings affirmed slavery as a national policy. Let’s talk about the wise judges who upheld Plessy and Dred Scott.

And let's talk about your poster boy for reverse discrimination -- Alan Bakke. Here was a man who got turned down for the Cal-Davis med school because he was older than the usual admittance. Had he sued for age discrimination I would have been right there.

Instead, he went after three African Americans who had scores on the entrance exam lower that his.

What he did not challenge were the 36 younger whites who also scored below him.

I am thinking someone from another "background," of another "worldview," may have ruled in a different way. Of course, if such a person could have set on the benceh we may not have needed a Plessy or Dred Scott case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

It was from a speech about judicial rulings on discrimination cases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 06/01/2009
- liz I'm a Fan of liz 3 fans permalink

Read the speech for yourself, and if you do not understand it, bring your questions here tomorrow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 06/01/2009

National Republican party 1980 - 2009

If these guys think they can bash Latinos and still get elected, then go for it. Many of them left the part after the immigration debate. The folks who were holding on are swithing sides as we speak.

The fact is that Sotomayer has gone to the best schools in the country, graduated at the top of her class, and been a sitting judge (confirmed twice by congress) for over 18 years. If you take that resume and STILL say she is unqualified then you are indeed a racist.

If they were smart they would try to have an intellegant debate over her careeer work and not about passing comments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 06/01/2009

That has nothing to do with it it is the way she said it and other rulings that she has made, not one GOP senator has called her racist but it is Ok for the Hollywood types to get on TV and call people that went to teaparties racist and make jokes about it. Rush does not represent the GOP party just himself and all Newt said was that if a white person had said that he would have to pull his nomination because people would say it is racist. it can not work one way racist comment whether meant or not can not be allowed by public figures or people in the public eye.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 06/01/2009

They are trying to have an intelligent debate about her comments, the media just finds any chance to accuse conservatives of racism too tempting to ignore. Thus, the content of this particular piece - where the senators are trying to ignore the racism accusations, but are accused of being racist because they are ignoring the debate.

What conservatives are really concerned about is her interpretive method for law, the substance of which can be seen in the speech as a whole, and it is, at minimum, deserving of serious debate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 06/01/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect