GOP Senators OK With Race-Based Sotomayor Attacks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - GOP Senators OK With Race-Based Sotomayor Attacks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | June 1, 2009 05:31 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, center, meets with unidentified members of the White House Counsel's office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House Complex in Washington , Monday, June 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of her Supreme Court journey shifts to Capitol Hill.

One week after President Barack Obama introduced her to the nation, Sotomayor on Tuesday starts private, informal meetings with key Senate leaders of both parties. So begins the choreographed march the White House hopes will land her on the nation's highest court, perhaps for decades to come.

Quietly but aggressively, a White House team loaded with confirmation veterans is working daily to help Sotomayor and promote the narrative that Obama began: a seasoned federal judge who overcame hardship as a youngster and would deliver justice that reflects respect for the law but an understanding of real life.

Republicans, though, are poised to push Sotomayor about whether she would put her own views above the law and rule as an "activist."

Sotomayor was at the White House on Monday, consulting with White House attorneys and going over her Senate questionnaire. Her response to the document _ an extensive survey of her life, public statements, rulings and political activities _ is expected soon.

Beyond the Senate meet-and-greets, Sotomayor is likely to spend most of her week at the White House.

The judge herself is staying mum in public, as is custom. News photographers could cover her White House visit Monday, but reporters could not.

Barring a huge surprise, she is expected to be confirmed. Democrats control 59 seats in the Senate, where a majority vote is needed for confirmation.

Story continues below
advertisement

On Tuesday, Sotomayor is expected to visit 10 senators, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.; Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the chairman of the Judiciary Committee; and Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the panel's top Republican.

She's also slated to meet with the No. 2 Democrat and Republican, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and to lunch privately with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., a Judiciary member and her unofficial chaperone during the confirmation process.

The roughly half-hour, closed-door meetings _ known as "courtesy calls" _ are as important for the courtly tone they set for the beginning of the Senate's debate on Sotomayor as for the few moments of candid conversation they offer senators and the nominee. A more substantive and freewheeling discussion of her record and past will come with the impending release of the detailed questionnaire, which will likely yield fodder for her supporters and detractors.

Sotomayor, 54, would replace retiring Justice David Souter.

First, she'll have to meet with many of the senators who get to vote on her confirmation. Her Tuesday visits include two Judiciary members, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, as well as home-state Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.

The White House has not identified any one person to shepherd Sotomayor's confirmation, but rather a team of insiders working on her behalf. They are helping her with the questionnaire, prepping her for her hearings, reaching out to Capitol Hill and working on strategies to stay on message in the media.

The team meets each morning and evening with Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, and senior Obama adviser David Axelrod.

Leading the group is Cynthia Hogan, chief counsel to Vice President Joe Biden. She was Biden's lead counsel when he was chairman of the Judiciary Committee during the Senate confirmation reviews of justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Other key members are Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, chief counsel of Judiciary during the confirmation hearings of justices Clarence Thomas and David Souter; White House counsel Greg Craig and deputy counsel Cassandra Butts, both heavily involved in Sotomayor's vetting; White House associate counsel Susan Davies, who served as top counsel to the Judiciary Committee under Leahy; deputy communications director Dan Pfeiffer, who oversaw the media rollout of Sotomayor's nomination; and Stephanie Cutter, a strategist seasoned in Senate politics, campaigns and the Clinton White House.

The administration is reaching outside for help, too. Ricki Seidman, who held senior roles in the Clinton White House and worked for the Obama campaign as a top aide to Biden, is coordinating the White House's message with those of supportive interest groups.

Obama wants the Senate to confirm Sotomayor before its August vacation. The White House formally started the clock Monday, sending her nomination to the Senate.

Leahy on Monday stepped up his calls for quick Judiciary Committee hearings, saying the sessions are Sotomayor's only opportunity to respond to harshly worded criticism by prominent Republicans such as talk-show host Rush Limbaugh and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Both have called Sotomayor a racist for 2001 comments in which she said the decisions of a "wise Latina" judge would be superior to those of a white male. Limbaugh on Friday compared choosing her to tapping a former Ku Klux Klan leader for the job.

In a conference call with reporters, Leahy said: "I'll give everyone plenty of time to read all her cases and prepare for it. But I'm not going to sit around and wait forever and just have these attacks go on, be unanswered."

Democrats hope the incendiary remarks by some Republicans outside Congress will enhance their chances of getting GOP senators, who have been much more tempered in their comments, to agree to a swift timetable for her confirmation. That could mean hearings as early as the first full week of July.

But McConnell seemed to suggest that was unlikely.

"Judge Sotomayor has a long record and it will take a long time to get through it," the GOP leader said Monday on the Senate floor.

___

Associated Press writer John Curran in Montpelier, Vt., contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of he...
WASHINGTON — Venturing into a tradition of protocol and politics, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepared Monday to greet the senators who will decide her judicial future as control of he...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
346
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- caterpol I'm a Fan of caterpol 58 fans permalink

Limbaugh and Gingrich are not providing cover. They're doing the exact opposite. They're exposing the GOP for what it is and what it stands for. This situation is hardly subtle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 06/01/2009
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 76 fans permalink

Very good observation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 06/01/2009
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 142 fans permalink
photo

2010 and next elections all you Republicans will see the results of your idle position
with Sotomayor,let others do it your dirty job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 06/01/2009

Maybe. However, the reality is by the time Nov 2010 rolls around, nobody will remember the whole thing about how Justice Sotomayor was treated by the Repubes. The Repubes count on the fact that most Americans can't remember what happened last WEEK, much less 18 months ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 06/01/2009
- Hank10303 I'm a Fan of Hank10303 46 fans permalink

What lacks common sense to me is this - if Judge Sotomayor is going to be Justice Sotomayor regardless of what the republican party does why attack her on false grounds of bigotry and isolate the Latin vote? To what point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 06/01/2009

They are not attacking her like that the senate the only ones that matter have said they just want to know what she meant by the remark and some other rulings to, it is politics and the dems do the same thing to. Look at 2006 with Obama and Kennedy what they said and threathen to do. it is all politics and Rush is just playing to the radio. people have to get over being so thin skinned. It is just politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 06/01/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 118 fans permalink

To appeal to their white male base.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

You actually expect them to be thinking ahead? They can't - they are still stuck on yesteryear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 06/01/2009
- kalimuzo I'm a Fan of kalimuzo 4 fans permalink
photo

As a political junkie I have noticed a few things about voters over the years. First, most people have very busy lives and pay attention to what you are selling only when it affects them directly. That is why the old race card is always effective, people fear that they will lose their jobs because of that minority, or property values will go down because a minority moved in e.t.c. The flip side is people on the other side that feel they are under attack, that is why the southern strategy took African Americans from 50/50 party registration to 92% democratic, the republicans pushed African Americans out and have lost them for a long time. In 1993 Pete Wilson ran a horrible campaign for Governor and lost Californian hispanics for the GOP. I guarantee that this Sotomayo thing has already cost the GOP. The train has left and I can assure you that Hispanic democratic votes have gone to 80% for a long time. You can make the same argument for Jewish voters (78%).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 06/01/2009

Right

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 06/01/2009

God you liberals are so double standard, in 2006 it was ok for Ted Kennedy and other dems to say Alito was prejudice because they thought a club he belonged to was racist, Obama and the dems even threathen to filabuster. People it is politics they said her remark was racist and it could be seen that way, if a white guy said something like that about a latino or black person they would be called racist. It can not be a one way street, she is being nominated for the highest court in the country and it is alifetime appointment. From the news it is apparent that she has been shooting for this position her entire life. She is in a poistion were words and actions can come back and hurt you. Just like in the tape were she is joking about the appeals court making poilicy she even said ,I should not be saying this on tape, stuff like that shows that she knew it was wrong to say even if it does happen. People that run for public office has to know that their life is on view for everyone to look at an judge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 06/01/2009

I'm confused..­.these same G.O.P. folks were rather quick on the draw to label Rev. Wright speech harmful, so tell me again why they can't condemn Limbaug , Gringrich, Glenn "Hey Hispanic Chick Lady" Beck , Hannity & Tancredo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 06/01/2009
- Cat401 I'm a Fan of Cat401 3 fans permalink

Latino 2010 and 2012 make your votes count. NO GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 06/01/2009
- Clayton139 I'm a Fan of Clayton139 25 fans permalink
photo

Yes !

She seems to be better than the politicians that confirm her !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 06/01/2009

Right

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 06/01/2009
- 4evryoung I'm a Fan of 4evryoung 6 fans permalink

Personally I wish Obama had not tried to "walk back" her comment.

I'm sure a Democrat will give her the opportunity to explain her remarks within the context of the entire statement. Just as I would like to hear "her postion on the ruling on the NewHaven FD case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

No one has walked her remark back. And it wasnt a remark, it was a very long speech. Maybe you should read it some time before you formulate an opinion. Would you also like to hear her position on the 78 out of 90 race related cases in which she rejected the claim of discrimination?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 06/01/2009

And the ruling on the 2nd amendment that she made about states rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 06/01/2009
- Wigelah I'm a Fan of Wigelah 5 fans permalink

Jerks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 06/01/2009
- pangurban I'm a Fan of pangurban 23 fans permalink
photo

Guess they don't want the next guv of Californium to be a Republican

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 06/01/2009
- Badfickle I'm a Fan of Badfickle 118 fans permalink

of course they do. The present governor trashed the place. Better to let a democrat have to clean up the mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

The Kindergarden Cop has been a complete failure. Thankfully, he can't run again!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 06/01/2009
- regellner I'm a Fan of regellner 423 fans permalink
photo

Some day, this two-front-­seemingly-­bipolar attack stategy will backfire on the GOP, hopefully soon.

In relation to the Sotomayor nomination, I have the following links of interest:

http://www.examiner.com/x-11326-Charlotte-Liberal-Examiner~y2009m5d26-Sotomayor-selected-as-Supreme-Court-nominee-partisan-battle-lines-drawn-in-Senate

http://www.examiner.com/x-11326-Charlotte-Liberal-Examiner~y2009m5d26-Empathy-is-positive-to-the-Sotomayor-Supreme-Court-selection


Also, I have an article pertaining to the GOP at:

http://www.examiner.com/x-11326-Charlotte-Liberal-Examiner~y2009m5d22-Republicans-should-reflect-on-their-own-name-change-to-suit-their-identity


Raymond Gellner – Charlotte Liberal Examiner at Examiner.com
http://www.examiner.com/x-11326-Charlotte-Liberal-Examiner

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/01/2009
- Pablo175 I'm a Fan of Pablo175 16 fans permalink

Do her children both go to Princeton?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/01/2009
- Rictracee I'm a Fan of Rictracee 108 fans permalink
photo

I am ok with the GOP race baiting too.. they just showing their true colors... any minority that considers themselves to be a republican­... they suffer from stockholmes syndrome..­. the GOP is the old white mans partry..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 06/01/2009

Stockholm Syndrome..­.very true indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 06/01/2009
- Roguewolf I'm a Fan of Roguewolf 36 fans permalink
photo

Sotomayor is the one that brought race into it. Her decisions about the law should not be based on her experience as a Latina Woman but her knowledge of the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 06/01/2009
- JMBrodie I'm a Fan of JMBrodie 263 fans permalink
photo

Nice try. No, that is really not the issue here, but it does make for quick reading.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/01/2009
- Roguewolf I'm a Fan of Roguewolf 36 fans permalink
photo

"Justice [Sandra Day] O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases," she declared. "I am . . . not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, . . . there can never be a universal definition of wise. Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." Justice O"Connor was speaking of a wise old man and a wise old woman reaching the same conclusion, Sotomayor is the one that brought r@ce into it. Why did she have to say latina and white? Also, notice how O"Connor used wise in both describing the Old Man and the Old Woman but Sotomayor drops the wise from white male but keeps it for Latina Woman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 06/01/2009

What is the issue? And I'm not just being argumentative here, but I've heard many people say that she was not suggesting that a Latina will make better judgments than a white male. I'm curious what your interpretation of her statement is (and, yes, I've read the statement in context).

Some have suggested that she was arguing for diversity and that she simply misspoke. It would have to have been a mistake, because that sentence, even in the context, cannot mean that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 06/01/2009
photo

So Samuel Alito was wrong when he said exactly the same thing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 06/01/2009
- JMBrodie I'm a Fan of JMBrodie 263 fans permalink
photo

Remember, whe Alito says it, it is OK because he has a name Americans can pronounce.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 06/01/2009
- WasteNJ I'm a Fan of WasteNJ 28 fans permalink
photo

Do they (the GOP) really think that letting Gingrich and Limbaugh stay out front on this will actually give them political cover for the election coming up? Do they think Hispanic voters will differentiate between them, when they are all against the appointment of the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice for absolutely no reason??

Business as usual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 06/01/2009

Talk about not getting political cover for this behaviour, the connection is actually being pointed out on most Hispanic speaking newsbroadcasts. If politicians in the Southwest expect to receive a vote from any Hispanic resident, you would think they would come out loud and strong in defense of Sotomayer and not give the first amendment whitewash excuse.

Keep up the good work boys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 06/01/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect