Leahy: "Unbelievable" Sotomayor Attacks Demand Earlier Hearing (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Leahy: "Unbelievable" Sotomayor Attacks Demand Earlier Hearing (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 06- 2-09 12:43 PM   |   Updated: 06- 3-09 12:15 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Leahy

WASHINGTON — AP The Senate's top Democrat praised federal judge Sonia Sotomayor Tuesday as an extraordinarily well-qualified Supreme Court nominee whose background as an "underdog" appeals to Americans.

"We have the whole package here," said Sen. Harry Reid, seated beside Sotomayor before the two met in his Capitol office. He called her life story "compelling."

"America identifies with the underdog, and you've been an underdog many times in your life, but always the top dog," Reid, D-Nev., said of Sotomayor, the New York-born daughter of Puerto Rican parents who would be the first Hispanic and the third woman on the high court.

Citing her Princeton and Yale education and long experience as a lawyer and judge, Reid said: "We could not have anyone better qualified."

The visit was the start of a daylong schedule of meet-and-greets with Republicans and Democrats designed to let senators get to know President Barack Obama's nominee before they debate confirming her.

Sotomayor was also meeting with the top Republican, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and leaders of the Judiciary Committee, Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., and senior GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

Leahy, who plans to meet Wednesday with Sessions on a schedule for the hearings, said he's eager to give Sotomayor the chance to respond to "unbelievable attacks" by Republican critics like radio host Rush Limbaugh and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who have branded her a racist because of remarks she made in 2001 that her experiences as a "wise Latina" would allow her to make better decisions than a white male.

"Ultimately and completely, a judge has to follow the law no matter what their upbringing has been," the Vermont Democrat quoted President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee in a private meeting the two had on Capitol Hill.

Story continues below
advertisement

Leahy had asked Sotomayor, 54, what she meant when she said in 2001 that her decisions as a "wise Latina" would be better than those of a white male. Prominent Republicans have cited the 2001 remark to call her a racist.

Leahy said the judge told him: "Of course one's life experience shapes who you are, but ... as a judge, you follow the law."

Watch:

Leahy called the criticism against Sotomayor "among the most vicious attacks that have been received by anybody," and lamented that as a nominee she's unable to directly answer them.

"I know how difficult it is for somebody who is nominated," he said. "They can't answer charges. They can't speak out. But they're a nominee. It's different than those that run for elected office and we're in a debate a day."

So he asked the judge whether he could repeat publicly what she told him privately about how her personal experiences -- she is the New York-born daughter of Puerto Rican parents who was reared in a Bronx housing project and went on to Princeton and Yale on her way to the highest echelons of the legal profession -- would shape her rulings.

Leahy quoted Sotomayor as saying, "There's not one law for one race or another; there's not one law for one color or another; there's not one for rich and one for poor; there's only one law."

Leahy is pushing for a swift series of hearings on Sotomayor's confirmation, and has said the harshly worded criticism of her necessitates a quick timetable.

"Because the defacto leader of the Republican Party equated her to the head of the Ku Klux Klan pretty well demands that she have a hearing earlier than later," Leahy told reporters on his way to meet with Sotomayor. He's planning to meet Wednesday with Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Judiciary Committee Republican, to discuss the schedule.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh and former House Speaker New Gingrich have both branded Sotomayor a racist, and Limbaugh went on to compare choosing her for the high court to nominating former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.

Leahy defended Sotomayor on Tuesday, saying he was proud of his own Irish-Italian background and his wife's French-Canadian background. "Does that make us racist?" he said. "She is not a racist."

He declined to discuss with reporters what he planned to ask the judge during their one-on-one session. Despite the serious subject matter, the visit began with a jovial scene captured by dozens of news photographers in which the two chatted about Leahy's grandchildren.

Sessions, who has said that he doesn't want to rush the nomination, responded that he doesn't "it would be irresponsible" to wait until September to hold a hearing. "I would urge the Chairman to keep an open mind on that," he told reporters. "We'll talk, I think, tomorrow."

Sotomayor was scheduled to meet with 10 senators during her first day on Capitol Hill, retreating to Vice President Joe Biden's office between sessions to huddle with the White House team, heavy with confirmation battle veterans, that's guiding her nomination.

Among those she was to see Tuesday were Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, members of the Judiciary Committee. Rounding out her schedule was lunch with her home state Democratic senators, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, her unofficial chaperone during the confirmation process, and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

Feinstein said she would ask Sotomayor about the "wise Latina" comment, which she said had been "made into something egregious." She said she also wants to discuss important constitutional topics including abortion, a hot-button issue on which Sotomayor's views are not known .

"I'll ask her how she views the constitutional right to privacy," Feinstein said, adding that she "might" inquire about Sotomayor's position on the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established a woman's right to end her pregnancy.

Sessions was asked if he queried Sotomayor on the "wise Latina" remark. "No," he responded. "We talked about the idea and the concept of personal feelings, to some degree, you know, how that influences a decision and how it should not ... we talked about it briefly and did not go into that in a lot of detail. I did tell her that, You know, i do think that we may well talk again. So we might get into more specific details. But I frankly haven't had the opportunity to study her record enough to fairly ask a lot."

Senate aides in both parties are preparing for Sotomayor's voluminous response to a 10-page questionnaire the Judiciary panel sent her last week _ an extensive survey of her life, public statements, rulings and political activities _ which will add copious detail to a so-far broad debate over her fitness and qualifications for the Supreme Court.

Barring a huge surprise, she is expected to be confirmed. Democrats control 59 seats in the Senate, where a majority vote is needed for confirmation, and another seven Republicans previously voted to confirm Sotomayor for a lower court.

Sotomayor, 54, would replace retiring Justice David Souter.

Obama wants the Senate to confirm Sotomayor before its August vacation. The White House formally started the clock on Monday, sending her nomination to the Senate.

___

Associated Press Writers Ann Sanner and Laurie Kellman contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — AP The Senate's top Democrat praised federal judge Sonia Sotomayor Tuesday as an extraordinarily well-qualified Supreme Court nominee whose background as an "underdog" appeals to Am...
WASHINGTON — AP The Senate's top Democrat praised federal judge Sonia Sotomayor Tuesday as an extraordinarily well-qualified Supreme Court nominee whose background as an "underdog" appeals to Am...
Filed by Rachel Weiner
 
Comments
2237
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (27 pages total)
photo

There is experience and then there is e-x-p-e-r-­i-e-n-c-e.

Two applicants for a job, both with 20 years of experience. However, one of them has 20 years of different experiences in the job, and the other has the same experience of his first year in the job twenty times over.

I'm not impressed with hearing that Sotomayor has "the most experience of all judges' cumulative experience in the history of the world". I still want to see what she's done, how she's interpreted laws, the breadth of her intellect and anything else I can glean from her decisions. You should want to see and know all of that, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 06/02/2009

Many of her writings and decisions are online. Get some experience looking them up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 06/02/2009

Sotomayor has worked in almost every aspect and at nearly every aspect of the judicial system over the course of her career. Her opinions in many cases are easily available online, as are actual analyses of them, as opposed to self-serving summaries that misrepresent them to suit one side or the other of the argument. You'll find some of it at http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 AM on 06/03/2009
- serena1313 I'm a Fan of serena1313 42 fans permalink



Judge Sotomayor is a highly accomplished woman, but you'd never know it by the sardonic disrespectful comments being made about her. The three lines of attacks most used against her include: racist, empathy and activist judge at first glance appear disconnected, but aren't according to George Lakoff.

He argues, combined they serve a political purpose to woo back conservative populists: mostly working white men. And top most on their mind is job security; It is a matter of survival and when threatened man's most basic instinct is to fight or take flight.

The attacks on Sotomayor play into those fears. Conservatives argue because she is driven by e_motions Sotomayor will use her position on the Supreme Court to promote minorities and women. Therefore she becomes a threat to white males. And as a result thereof they will return to the fold.

However their argument falls apart because empathy is not about personal feelings, 'it is the basis of our democracy. Empathy is the reason we have the principles of freedom and fairness which are the necessary components of Justice.'

here is the link:

http://www.truthout.org/053109A#comment-57013

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 06/02/2009

Regarding "follow the law" and "judicial activism": In legal cases there is the law and there are things called facts. There often is some doubt about what is represented to be a fact and what is a fact. The certainty of the facts are "judged". Of all of the facts, some of the facts are decided to be worthy of note. Which facts are worthy of note and which are not are "judged". Of the noteworthy facts, some have more weight than others. How all of the facts taken together are weighed, is, you guessed it, "judged". It's not a simple matter of "following the law". If it were, a computer could do it. You wouldn't need a human at all. This is why human qualities and life experience are relevant, for anyone who, really, didn't think they were.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 06/02/2009
- yathink I'm a Fan of yathink 4 fans permalink

Maybe Leahy should have insisted that Manuel Miranda and other senate staffers, who hacked his email in 2002-2003 to spy on Dem senators plans for judicial nominees, should be in jail.

See:
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/06/miranda-my-call-for-filibuster-actually-a-call-for-great-debate.php?ref=fpb

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 06/02/2009
photo

I believe that my life experience as a white male makes me more qualified to become a judge than a Hispanic woman without the same experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

I would argue we already have an adequate amount of white male life experience on the court.

Would you contend otherwise?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 06/02/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 273 fans permalink
photo

I could swear (and do, frequently) that some other clunk posted this same "talking" point on HP today. Can't they even make up their own cwap?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 06/02/2009
- tvlandman I'm a Fan of tvlandman 6 fans permalink

"Cwap"?? Barney Frank, is that you??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 06/03/2009

So does Sonia Sotomayor. Read the entire passage. You're either foolish or you just don't care what nonsense you post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 06/02/2009
- Disuberence I'm a Fan of Disuberence 130 fans permalink
photo

I believe that my life experience as a white male makes me unable to properly empathize with someone that had to face discrimination based on race. Hardships based solely on their ethnic background and upbringing. Just like in the real world... book smarts only go so far. I can read about poverty, racism, etc. all day. It doesn't replace living it. Not at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 06/02/2009
- yathink I'm a Fan of yathink 4 fans permalink

You, sir, are what is wrong with country. You are obviously wanting to control over half the population with your belief you are always right. Bet you aren't married and that most women want nothing to do with you. Go away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 06/02/2009
- tvlandman I'm a Fan of tvlandman 6 fans permalink

I think the "buckeyedave"'s comment was simply being sarcastic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 06/03/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Can someone point me to a list of keywords the moderator is using to screen?

Comments that just observe facts and comply with the FAQ completely get bounced.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 06/02/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 273 fans permalink
photo

A thesaurus will help you post just about anything. Make terms up. Play with the spelling. Use puns. Space the letters. Etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Great tips! Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 06/02/2009
photo

Attacks similar to Thomas and Alito? Just politics a usual. So friggin deal with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 06/02/2009
- WowJones I'm a Fan of WowJones 79 fans permalink
photo

The attacks on Thomas were not the same as Ailito, not by a long shot. Thomas was getting a pass until serious charges were brought to bear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Please explain how you think Thomas' [non-existent] record on the bench merited less scrutiny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 06/02/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 273 fans permalink
photo

But he sure knew how to find a hair on a coke can!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 06/02/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 465 fans permalink
photo

Ahh, for the good old days when Democrats weren't such wussies! Don't some of you know that being a fair weather friend is being no friend at all?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Don't get your point.

Leahy is a long time supporter of Sotomayor and has delivered a consistent message of support over more than a decade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 06/02/2009
- roald I'm a Fan of roald 16 fans permalink

Over the last eight years, and perhaps longer, the Democrats in Congress have not stood up for what they believe. They have caved over and over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

I'm glad to see Sen. Leahy supporting Sotomayor. The sooner they get the confirmation over the better.

Stand with Sotomayor
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/sotomayorstand
Constitutional Values
http://www.constitutionalvalues.org/
Judge Sotomayor’s Appellate Opinions in Civil Cases
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/
Debunking the Reversal Rate Red-Herring
http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200906020003
Sotomayer in Context
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/sotomayor-in-context.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 06/02/2009

Leahy on 1998 Sotomayor Nomination

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d38JqolUOlw

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Oh yes, this is great!

And shows the Republican S H A M E in this matter is nothing new.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 06/02/2009
- whatthel I'm a Fan of whatthel 238 fans permalink
photo

Leahy is a De@d Head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

He is a fan of the Grateful Dead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 06/02/2009
- whatthel I'm a Fan of whatthel 238 fans permalink
photo

Leahy is a Dead Head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 06/02/2009
- Buddy McCue I'm a Fan of Buddy McCue 134 fans permalink
photo

What are you trying to say? Do you have a point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 06/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

Oh this is great, refreshing ... Brian Wms. special with the President !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 06/02/2009
- judyc I'm a Fan of judyc 64 fans permalink
photo

or the show about global demise on ABC,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 06/02/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 465 fans permalink
photo

Global demise? Only 5.5 billion years to go!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 06/02/2009
- whatthel I'm a Fan of whatthel 238 fans permalink
photo

Leahy is one of the most famous Dead Heads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 06/02/2009
- henrywolff I'm a Fan of henrywolff 25 fans permalink
photo

From Politico--

"But Sotomayor did not concede that she used a “poor” choice of words, as Obama himself suggested ..."

So was it a poor choice or not?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 06/02/2009
- WowJones I'm a Fan of WowJones 79 fans permalink
photo

She's big girl, she speaks for herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 06/02/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 465 fans permalink
photo

I for one am still waiting to hear the full truth about her involvement in "Whale Wars," new season Fridays 9 pm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 06/02/2009
- henrywolff I'm a Fan of henrywolff 25 fans permalink
photo

'This time they've gone too far...."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

It was a poor choice of words in that she could have anticipated Republicans would take it out of context at some point in time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 06/02/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 465 fans permalink
photo

Honesty is the best policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 06/02/2009
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 167 fans permalink

still throwing your feces, i see...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 06/02/2009
- Ponderus I'm a Fan of Ponderus 273 fans permalink
photo

He has to get rid of them somehow.

It's along walk to the outhouse.

And them critters is out at night.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 06/02/2009
photo

Nobody has come to the plate to deny the racism charge either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

She is not a racist.

It has been said many times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 06/02/2009
- Artemis34 I'm a Fan of Artemis34 121 fans permalink

Untrue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 06/02/2009

I deny the racism charge. After reviewing her rulings in many cases it is abundantly clear that Sonia is not and never has been racist. Unlike some of her most vocal detractors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 06/02/2009
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 465 fans permalink
photo

Imagine the outcry when the first openly gay or lesbian is nominated to the highest court in the land. But by then there will be no republicans. That should be in six years, tops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 06/02/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

I hope I'm still alive & lucid !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 06/02/2009
photo

Sure let the circus begin with an LGBT judge. That would be an awesome show.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 06/02/2009
- swo68 I'm a Fan of swo68 14 fans permalink

If they have said things along the lines of "I can make better decisions because I'm gay," then yes, there will be an outcry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 06/02/2009

Why? In some situations that would probably be true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 06/02/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (27 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect