Syria: New Uranium Traces Found, Says UN

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Syria: New Uranium Traces Found, Says UN stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GEORGE JAHN | June 5, 2009 05:14 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

VIENNA — The U.N nuclear agency on Friday reported its second unexplained find of uranium particles at a Syrian nuclear site, in a probe launched by suspicions that a remote desert site hit by Israeli warplanes was a nearly finished plutonium producing reactor.

In a separate report, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran continued to expand its uranium enrichment program despite three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions meant to pressure Tehran into freezing such activities.

And it said the growing pace of enrichment is causing it to review its inspection routine so that it can maintain oversight of the process.

Iran and Syria are under IAEA investigation _ Tehran, since revelations more than six years ago of undeclared nuclear activities that could be used to make weapons, and Syria after Israel bombed a structure in 2006 said by the U.S. to be a reactor built with North Korean help.

But the agency has made little progress for over a year in both cases, and both of the restricted reports made available to The Associated Press on Friday essentially confirmed the status quo _ stonewalling by both countries of the two separate IAEA probes.

Iran says its nuclear activities are peaceful; Damascus denies hiding any nuclear program.

"In order for the agency to complete its assessment, Syria needs to be more cooperative and transparent," said the IAEA in a document that detailed repeated attempts by agency inspectors to press for renewed inspections and documents _ all turned down by Damascus.

Drawing heavily on language of previous reports, the Iran document said Tehran has not "cooperated with the agency ... which gives rise to concerns and which need to be clarified to exclude the possibility of military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program."

Story continues below

The report noted that Tehran continued to rebuff agency efforts to investigate suspicions the Islamic Republic had at least planned to make nuclear weapons.

Without cooperation by the Islamic Republic, the IAEA "will not be in a position to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran," the report said.

Syria and Iran are to come under renewed scrutiny when the 35-nation board of the agency meets June 15 to discuss the two reports.

While the Syrian report was prepared only for the board members, the one on Iran also was transmitted Friday to the Security Council, which for more than three years has tried to pressure Tehran to give up enrichment and other activities of concern.

Tehran says it is exercising its right to develop nuclear power in expanding its enrichment program. But the U.S. other great powers and dozens of additional countries fear Iran might at some point shift from producing low enriched uranium needed for nuclear fuel to making highly enriched matter suitable for use in the core of nuclear warheads.

The IAEA's Iran report reflected continued expansion both in the terms of the equipment in use or being set up and the amount of enriched uranium being turned out by those machines _ centrifuges that spin uranium gas into enriched material.

Nearly 5,000 centrifuges were processing uranium gas at the Natanz facility as of May 31, said the report, while more than 2,000 others were ready for operation. More than nearly 3,000 pounds _ 1,300 kilograms _ of low enriched uranium had been produced as of that date, said the more than four-page report.

That compares to just over 2,220 pounds (1,000 kilograms) mentioned in the last IAEA report in February an amount that experts and U.S. officials subsequently said was enough to process into enough weapons grade uranium for a nuclear warhead.

Commenting on the Iran report, the Washington based Institute for Science and International Security said that at the present pace of production of enriched uranium, Tehran could make two nuclear weapons _ should it choose to do so _ within eight months.

The report said inspectors have told Tehran that "given the increased number of ... (centrifuges) being installed and the increased rate of production ... improvements to the containment and surveillance measures" are needed. A senior U.N official said the IAEA was considering redirecting surveillance equipment and asking Iranian nuclear staff to change their "walking routes" through the underground Natanz facility as part of the changes. He demanded anonymity in exchange for commenting on the confidential report.

Reversing the previous U.S. stance, the Obama administration has said it is ready to talk one-on-one with Iranian officials on the nuclear issue. Obama himself has said Tehran has the right to benefit from nuclear power _ as long as all proliferation concerns are put to rest.

But President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly said his country will not negotiate on its right to enrichment.

On Syria, the agency said the newest traces of uranium were found after months of analysis in environmental samples taken last year of a small experimental reactor in Damascus.

It already reported a similar finding in February at a separate site _ at or near the building bombed by Israel more than two years ago.

As in the case of the earlier find, the uranium particles "are of a type not included in Syria's declared inventory of nuclear material," said the report, saying their origin and potential significance still "needs to be understood."

It also said Syria continued to deny cooperation with North Korea in building its nuclear program.

VIENNA — The U.N nuclear agency on Friday reported its second unexplained find of uranium particles at a Syrian nuclear site, in a probe launched by suspicions that a remote desert site hit by I...
VIENNA — The U.N nuclear agency on Friday reported its second unexplained find of uranium particles at a Syrian nuclear site, in a probe launched by suspicions that a remote desert site hit by I...
Loading...
 
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
 
Comments
46
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 129 fans permalink
photo

These claims become more pathetically convenient all the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 06/06/2009
- Princeton I'm a Fan of Princeton 14 fans permalink

WHEN WILL THE UN INSPECT THE ISRAEL'S NUKE SITES?

Go ahead and give the talking-point answer:

"They haven't signed this or that."

Unless there is balance in this thing, "UN inspection" is a complete joke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 06/06/2009
- arvay I'm a Fan of arvay 140 fans permalink
photo

Absolutely correct.

Israel introduced nuclear weapons into the region, so it's not surprising that others are seeking the ability to deliver crushing retaliation that would make Israel's nuclear threat useless. These weapons don't guarantee survival, they threaten it.

The smart thing would be for the US to convene a regional conference on the issue, Israeli attendance mandatory. Regional nuclear disarmament is the only way Israel can avoid the prospect of annihilation -- a verifiable agreement that will make sure these weapons are never deployed and therefore are never used.

Now, we've arranged for the UAE to gain access to nuclear energy, a clear warning to Iran that we'll arm the Arabs if they persist. Apparently, we've learned nothing since we armed the Taliban to strike at the Soviet Union. We've already seen the effects of such ill-considered policies : we made it easier for India to create more nukes and guess what? Pakistan is building more plutonium reactors to up the ante.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 06/08/2009
- zaz33 I'm a Fan of zaz33 32 fans permalink

HEADLINE =

UN: "New Uranium Traces Found in Syria"

and near the bottom it says

"On Syria, the agency said the newest traces of uranium were found after months of analysis in environmental samples taken last year of a small experimental reactor in Damascus."

Now who wooda thunk the IAEA would have found traces of uraniun near a known experimental
reactor.

This is an excellent example of how the MSM misleads the population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 06/06/2009
- max08 I'm a Fan of max08 51 fans permalink

Complete BS. The NYT lied. So did Reuters. Read for yourself.

IAEA Iran Report, June 5, 2009
http://isis-online.org/publications/iran/IAEA_Iran_Report_5June2009.pdf

IAEA Syria Report, June 5, 2009
http://isis-online.org/publications/syria/IAEA_Syria_Report_5June2009.pdf

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 06/06/2009
- NPA I'm a Fan of NPA 5 fans permalink
photo

The American nuclear arsenal consists of over 7,000 hydrogen nuclear warheads plenty enough for every country on this planet! The U.S. is under the illusion that this will deter hostile intentions directed towards us. The new arms race is has been ongoing for the last 50 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 AM on 06/06/2009
photo

Interesting trick attempted . Iran claims not building the nukes while far away in Syria weapons grade material is manufactured. Interesting chess castling move.
But Israeli intelligence and IAF put an end to it. For now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 06/06/2009
- mazzetta I'm a Fan of mazzetta 15 fans permalink
photo

weapons grade material is manufactured in Syria?

nobody has ever dared to say this, nor israeli officials evidently you haven't any idea about what's needed to enrich uranium...

please, keep quiet if you know nothing about the discussed issue

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 06/06/2009
- Wozzeck I'm a Fan of Wozzeck 23 fans permalink
photo

He gets paid by the word.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 06/06/2009
- mazzetta I'm a Fan of mazzetta 15 fans permalink
photo

it is called "probatio diabolica" when you ak someone to prove he's not performed a crime

just think if someone sued you and you should demonstrate you haven't killed someone

they can't prove Iran is going for N. weapons, so they say Iran is not proving the contrary

but nobody's is saying how is it possible to -prove- such a thing, they are just pushing Iran and asking it to disclose its laboratories and plants, but this is not sufficient to "prove" anything, unless you can always assume there's something more kept in the dark

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 06/06/2009

We need to verify the latitude and longitude coordinates of all the targets, er I mean laboratories and plants in Iran. That is how we used the UN inspectors in Iraq under Clinton. After we withdrew the inspectors, we bombed the military barracks et al. If you recall, our propaganda media including NPR constantly claimed Hussein kicked the inspectors out of Iraq. A bold faced lie repeated often. The reality is Iraq realized the UN inspectiors were being used to obtain targeting information and they refused to let them re-enter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/06/2009
photo

Maybe Israel had nuclear material in the bombs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 06/06/2009
- SonnyBono I'm a Fan of SonnyBono 21 fans permalink

The US is one of the few countries that uses depleted uranium in its shells - since we are the single biggest supplier of military hardware to Israel, its not impossible to suggest that there may have been traces of uranium if the Israeli air force used their cannons on the target site.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 AM on 06/07/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 34 fans permalink
photo

I think you missed lazer's point. The Israeli's of course salted the place with nuclear material when they bombed it so the IAEA would be sure to find traces. They could do it to your neighborhood too. It would be naive to think the Israeli's would NOT have salted the target while bombing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 06/07/2009
- Tom Joad I'm a Fan of Tom Joad 329 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 06/05/2009
- rf dude I'm a Fan of rf dude 29 fans permalink
photo

And, we're not concerned with the *real* nukes in N.Korea

because --- why???

Mebbe because Seoul isn't a " holy city " in a " holy land"???
--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 06/05/2009

That is not true and you know it. Most of the world comminity has demonstrated real concern over the potential threat from NK, including even the Russians and Chinese.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 PM on 06/05/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 245 fans permalink
photo

The demonstrations are quite different, I think is what they are pointing out. Demonstrating against NK is simply embargo's and bellyaching. Demonstrating against Iran or Syria, that's unprovoked bombing attacks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 06/05/2009
- mikefina I'm a Fan of mikefina 54 fans permalink

Yeah, of course they have. Demonstrated real concern.

In fact, the U.N. mentioned it. Almost.

The statement says the rocket launch was "in contravention" to a 2006 Security Council resolution that demanded that North Korea not launch any ballistic missiles. It also calls for North Korea and other nations to "comply fully" with their obligations under that resolution, including certain sanctions.

The resolution allows for an "adjustment" of sanctions, and Monday's statement sets up a committee to make recommendations on such an adjustment by April 24.


Consider yourselves warned. You now have only 5 more years to weaponize your nuclear fuel. after which time we will grab our ankles and kiss our donkey (a...s..s..) goodbye.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 06/06/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 245 fans permalink
photo

Anyone who has ever served in the military knows that we pack a little uranium into our weapons, specifically anti-tank rounds and bunker busting bombs. And guess what was used on this suspected site?

BINGO! Yahtzee!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 06/05/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 34 fans permalink
photo

It is naive to think that Israelis would not have purposefully salted the spot with nuclear material while bombing it. They had every reason to suspect the IAEA would inspect the place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 06/07/2009
- whoa20 I'm a Fan of whoa20 13 fans permalink
photo

I wonder if President Obama has anything to say about this? Or is "Palestine über alles" the motto of the day?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 06/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

I am afraid what you suspect matters more to him...pandering is not the solution...and Obama needs to remember he is OUR President, not the world's....it's all fine and good to secure the admiration of the rest of the world. but we have pressing issues to be attended to at home...let's focus on those FIRST, please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 06/05/2009
- mikefina I'm a Fan of mikefina 54 fans permalink

People. Be careful on the web tonight.

Don't allow yourselves to be trampled by President Obama sycophants running away from this story.

It doesn't fit the narrative.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 06/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

There are myriads of them here, after all, isn't that what it's for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 06/05/2009
- mikefina I'm a Fan of mikefina 54 fans permalink

Si, esta verdad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 06/06/2009
- haval2 I'm a Fan of haval2 48 fans permalink

Don't blame Israel for Syria's uranium.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 06/05/2009
photo

Syria and every other country have a natural right to break the NNPT and clandestinely build nukes.

What could possibly go wrong?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 06/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

You must be being sarcastic...if not, you are scaring me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 06/05/2009
- Princeton I'm a Fan of Princeton 14 fans permalink

This would force all to start real work in eliminating all nuke. No exception.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 06/06/2009
- Kache I'm a Fan of Kache 34 fans permalink
photo

It's worked well for Israel. What could possibly go wrong with 200 nukes aimed at Cairo?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 06/07/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect