EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Unemployment Rate: 9.4 Percent In May

JEANNINE AVERSA   06/ 5/09 10:21 PM ET   AP

May Unemployment Figures

WASHINGTON — Employers throttled back on layoffs in May and cut the fewest jobs in any month since the financial crisis erupted last fall _ raising the brightest hope yet that an economic recovery will take hold later this year.

But with companies still reluctant to hire, the nation's jobless rate rose to a quarter-century high of 9.4 percent, and it likely will keep rising into 2010, possibly within striking distance of its post-World War II peak of 10.8 percent.

The economy shed 345,000 jobs in May, the Labor Department said Friday _ half what it was losing in a month at the start of the year. But the report also underscored how hard it has been for America's 14.5 million unemployed to find new jobs.

"Less bad, yes," Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, said, summarizing the economy. "Good, no."

Companies probably won't ramp up hiring until they feel sure a recovery is here to stay. Still, considering the damage the recession has wrought _ 6 million jobs lost since December 2007 _ it was encouraging that employers cut far fewer jobs in May.

The 345,000 jobs lost was down sharply from 504,000 in April, and an even bigger improvement over the average of nearly 700,000 jobs lost monthly during the first quarter of this year.

"The light at the end of the tunnel just got a lot brighter," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight.

But not so bright that economists expect more employers to start hiring again this year. Economists expect the pace of layoffs to keep tapering off, but they don't think the economy will begin to create jobs steadily until late next year at the earliest.

"Payrolls are learning to crawl but far from walking," said Michael Feroli, economist at JPMorgan Economics.

Stocks rallied on the better-than-expected news, but then surrendered most of the gains. The Dow Jones industrial average made a brief foray into positive territory for 2009, then pulled back to close up about 13 points at 8,763.13.

The job losses was the fewest since September and the fourth straight month in which the pace of layoffs slowed. In another heartening note, job losses for March and April turned out to be 82,000 less than the government had reported.

"This tide is turning," said Richard Yamarone, economist at Argus Research. "We expect this trend of slower job loss to continue throughout the year."

With no place for the out-of-work to land, the unemployment rate bolted to 9.4 percent from 8.9 percent in April. It was the highest rate since August 1983.

Hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps feeling more confident about their job prospects, streamed back into the labor force last month looking for work. That was a factor in the jobless rate's rise, economists said.

Labor Secretary Hilda Solis called the uptick in unemployment "unacceptable" and pledged to bring it down by helping the unemployed get new skills or training.

Including laid-off workers who have given up looking for new jobs or have settled for part-time work, the so-called underemployment rate would be 16.4 percent in May, the highest on record dating to 1994.

And the number of people out of work six months or more rose to nearly 4 million in May, a record and triple the total from when the recession began.

Dan Blatt, 37, who found a retail job in January after being laid off in October, is one of the lucky few. "I'd be frantic if I didn't have anything now," he said while attending a job fair in New York and looking for something even better.

To cut costs and perhaps avoid imposing further layoffs, employers trimmed workers' hours in May. The average work week fell to 33.1 hours, the lowest on record dating to 1964.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke repeated his prediction this week that the recession will end this year, but again warned that any recovery will be gradual.

Against that backdrop, many economists say the jobless rate will hit 10 percent by the end of this year and will keep rising into 2010. Some economists think it could near 11 percent. The highest since World War II was 10.8 percent at the end of 1982.

"Let me be very clear: A lower job-rate loss is not our goal," Vice President Joe Biden said. "`Less bad' is not how we're going to measure success."

Biden said he will join Obama on Monday in seeking to put more juice into the president's stimulus effort, including higher spending on public works projects. Biden did not provide details.

Solis and some economists credited the stimulus with helping to reduce layoffs in May. But other analysts said the benefits of the stimulus wouldn't really kick in until later this year or more likely next year.

The construction industry saw particular improvement in May, losing 59,000 jobs compared with 108,000 in April. Retailers eliminated 17,500, down from 36,500. Financial activities axed 30,000, down from 45,000.

But factories cut 156,000 jobs in May, slightly more than in April. The government, adding workers for the 2010 Census, reduced its employment by 7,000 after bulking up by 92,000 in April.

Education, health care, leisure and hospitality were among the industries adding jobs.

The Fed says unemployment will remain elevated into 2011, with a tepid economic recovery. The job market may not return to normal _ meaning a roughly 5 percent unemployment rate _ until 2013, economists say.

Still, evidence is mounting that the recession is letting up, with fresh signs emerging earlier this week. The number of people drawing continuing unemployment benefits dipped for the first time in 20 weeks, and first-time claims also fell. Builders are boosting spending on construction projects, and home sales are somewhat firmer.

But ripple effects from the twin bankruptcies of General Motors and Chrysler could muddy the job market this month.

___

AP Business Writer Tali Arbel in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Employers throttled back on layoffs in May and cut the fewest jobs in any month since the financial crisis erupted last fall _ raising the brightest hope yet that an economic recove...
WASHINGTON — Employers throttled back on layoffs in May and cut the fewest jobs in any month since the financial crisis erupted last fall _ raising the brightest hope yet that an economic recove...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,896
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
11:58 PM on 06/07/2009
122112
05:30 PM on 06/07/2009
Add another million lost jobs due to botched auto bailout

Wall Street demands short term profits or the stock price quickly suffers and the top management is forced out. GM is not allowed to structure their costs for long term profitabil­ity. The car czar Rattner from Wall Street is pursuing this approach. He does not know the auto industry but has been given the power to demand Bankruptcy under his terms. He got rid of the CEO and board of Directors and replaced them with his loyalists.

Wall Street forced the auto industry into a Depression and the rest of the economy into a recession through their financial corruption which froze credit. Wall Street speculator­s suddenly changed the public market by tripling gas prices and making cars from GM and Chrysler unpopular overnight. Wall Street created the credit freeze which shut out most loans for sales and leases.

Now Wall Street car czar Rattner is forcing the dismantlin­g of GM and Chrysler under conditions created by Wall Street. The "lean" Chrysler will have permanentl­y lost 2/3rds of their market share because of Rattner (see Chrysler's president Senate testimony this week). This week the GM CEO said 98% of the American market cars will be built in America but when more candid a couple weeks ago said they are going to ramp up imports from China.

Obama dump your Wall Street appointees who are wrecking our economy.
http://www­.gregpalas­t.com/gran­d-theft-au­to-how-ste­vie-the-ra­t-bankrupt­ed-gm/
09:46 AM on 06/07/2009
Considerin­g the don't count the underemplo­yed or people that have become frustrated and ceased looking for employment­, I am pretty sure we have already passed that 10.8 percent benchmark, last estimate I saw was 15.6%

http://art­icles.mone­ycentral.m­sn.com/lea­rn-how-to-­invest/The­-real-unem­ployment-r­ate.aspx
09:50 AM on 06/07/2009
Correction­; over 20%

http://www­.shadowsta­ts.com/alt­ernate_dat­a
01:17 PM on 06/06/2009
I was unemployed until recently. I decided to work from home online and started doing research. With all the scams on the internet, I was skeptical at first. Then I cam across at website that offered a scam-free Work from Home Jobs Database Directory that featured establishe­d companies looking for employees to work from home. The Database made it so simple to submit my applicatio­ns to these companies, and I didn't have to sort through all the scams and gimmicks wanting me to send them money. I work for two companies, and have health insurance as well. I have a career, and I work from my own home. Go to http://www­.ucanworkf­romhomeonl­ine.com and start working from your own home and making a real salary. I am glad that I did, and you will be too!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
texastrixie
I invented the internet.
03:11 PM on 06/06/2009
I am sure this is a real person without a hidden agenda BUT please be warned that one of the old/new scams on the web is to collect all your info in a job applicatio­n (SSN!) so that your identity can be scammed. Personally I would be interested­, but have no idea how to check out if this is a scam or a legitimate business.
11:02 AM on 06/06/2009
"What was particular­ly concerning to me in the most recent report was the figure that government jobs in the month of May declined by 7,000. While this is not a lot relative to the size of government in the economy, it is still a negative number. My concern is that this number should have been way up. While less than 10% of the $789 billion stimulus package has been spent to date, most of what has been spent has been direct aid to state and municipal government­s. Combined with the nearly $2 trillion projected federal budget deficit resulting in very large borrowing needs for the federal government­, government employment should have gone up. It doesn’t matter whether one thinks growing the government is a good or bad idea. This economy needs something to hang its hat on."

http://www­.escapethe­newgreatde­pression.c­om
10:48 AM on 06/06/2009
Bush gave us a recession. Obama has given us a depression­. Thanks. SO much for change.
12:53 AM on 06/07/2009
Silly remarks by someone who hasn't paid any attention to the economy over the last year....
06:10 AM on 06/06/2009
Note today's headline "Foreign brands gain US entry with GM's dismantlin­g"

Thanks Obama for permanentl­y ruining the American economy. You should not have handed control over to the Wall Street manipulato­rs. Your Car czar Rattner is a self serving Gordon Gekko who forced the dismantlin­g of our auto industry and handed our market to foreign manufactur­ers. Yes Rattner is known as the DNC's ATM machine because he can raise millions in "donations­" . But in order to keep the "donations­" flowing he sacrifices a million good paying jobs. No doubt Rattner will be able to raise millions more from his new "go to" list of benefactor­s feeding off the carcas he created.
08:00 PM on 06/05/2009
I wonder what the unemployme­nt rate is for those who should, shall we say, not be here in America? You know, the people who aren't law-abidin­g citizens who, if you mention any of the words that describe them, the watchful eyes of the sense-errs delete logical questions over. I'd really like to know, but I'll bet it's a LOT lower than 9.4 percent.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WorkingClass
07:53 PM on 06/06/2009
You mean the wet backs? Most of them are going home.
02:27 AM on 06/07/2009
Well, any good census showing employment informatio­n should exclude those numbers anyway, so I'm curious to know whether or not those numbers have been adjusted for iIIegals. Also, "unemploym­ent" means someone without a job that has looked for a job in the last month. Anyone who has stopped looking is considered out of the work force.

In reality, the number would be higher, but not due to an unnatural occurrence­.
07:30 PM on 06/05/2009
Microsoft just announced that it will offshore jobs if Obama reduces their tax incentives­.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
firesideone
06:28 PM on 06/05/2009
JohnConser­vative, GEM-592, AtomicSpas­h,

I need to head out for evening - or the wife will tor.t.ure me beyond even Che.ney's acceptance levels.

But wanted to thank you for a great discussion thread. It was truly a pleasure. Wish they could all be like that :).

Its funny, I think we are all closer than what you might think in our views. If we could just throw away the predisposi­tions and political posturing, and focus on solving the problem, I suspect more often than not, we'd use the same tools. Maybe we should all run for congress. :)

Anyway, good night. Again, it was a pleasure and an honor to participat­e in your thread.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
firesideone
06:30 PM on 06/05/2009
Oops - forgot grave-robb­er on the salutation­s list. Sorry.
02:59 AM on 06/06/2009
I sincerely appreciate it... both the acknowledg­ment and the conversati­on.
06:57 PM on 06/05/2009
Thanks for the constructi­ve discussion­, all.
04:57 PM on 06/05/2009
I guess now that the world knows for certain that supply side economics leads to world wide economic collapse, the conservati­ves will have to rename it and say... oh no, this new economic theory that remarkably mirrors supply isn't really supply side.

do not allow your lying eyes to deceive you
photo
forpeace
The World is beautiful, but people don't see that.
04:22 PM on 06/05/2009
Off Topic.

Wendy Long Chief Counsel for the r.ight-w.i­ng Judicial Confirmati­on Network takes a swing at Sotomayor ...... And Misses

http://thi­nkprogress­.org/2009/­06/05/long­-sotomayor­-punishmen­t/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CostaMesaJoe
04:11 PM on 06/05/2009
JOHNCON:

First, thank you for considerin­g me as a "leader" here at HP.
Not sure how that happened, but thanks for the promotion.

Second, I don't consider myself an economic guru.

Hume laid out an argument against Reaganomic­s and you said it was false.

I then challeged you to bring forth your own argument in order to refute his.

NOTHING, came from you.

Now, here is a challenge from you, where once again, you offer no plan of your own; but would love to hear from us.
Tell me, CON, what type of economic legislatio­n do you believe will work? I'm all ears.

CONS love to rip ideas, but cleverly never offer any themselves­. Wonder why?

I know one thing, we are in this mess after eight years of CON-contro­l and frankly, I simply dismiss anything CONS or their representa­tives have to say.
Whatever they, or you may say; it won't be an alternativ­e that will appeal to anyone at this point.

Hence your current, feeble political position.
photo
forpeace
The World is beautiful, but people don't see that.
04:16 PM on 06/05/2009
CostaMesaJ­oe
----------­------
Nice response!
photo
stunsitfel
Liberale sind verlorene Schafe
04:22 PM on 06/05/2009
You want a response and say you will dismiss anything said. Spoken like a true lib.

Just about as dumb as getting out of a money problem by spending more money.
04:07 PM on 06/05/2009
From Lilith33: Carter was taken down by the oil companies and you guys put them in the whitehouse­.And who took down the internatio­nal economy again?The world wont forget.Goo­d for you.
Reply: Carter was taken down because his economic policies didn't work and his foreign policy was weak. Even after years of the media picturing Ronald Reagan as a crazy old man who you wouldn't want near the red button, he won in a landslide. Once the public got to see him in his last and second to last debate with Carter, the majority decided he wasn't risky and voted him in. Subsequent­ly from 1980 to 1990 the federal tax revenues collected nearly doubled even with the tax cuts that Carter warned us would be "inflation­ary." And the Berlin Wall fell during the first part of his successor'­s turn in the White House. http://the­closetcons­ervative.c­om
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
firesideone
04:28 PM on 06/05/2009
Doubling of tax revenues over a period of 10 years is far from unique to Reagan. Extrapolat­ing the revenues from 1976 to 1980, and taking them to 1984, it would have certainly happened under Carter. For that time period, however, the deficit run up was unique. And it did lead to inflation.

Oh, and I'd hardly call his foreign policy weak. Controvers­ial, maybe. But not weak.

I submit that the only thing between Carter and a second term was the hostage rescue mission failure.
04:07 PM on 06/05/2009
All thanks to Barney Frank and the idiots who bought houses they couldnt afford.

Thanks guys.