Senate Passes Historic Anti-Smoking Bill

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Senate Passes Historic Anti-Smoking Bill stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JIM ABRAMS | June 11, 2009 09:17 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A customer at the Red Key Taven in Indianapolis smokes a cigarette, Thursday, June 11, 2009. The U.S. Senate voted Thursday on legislation that for the first time would give the new powers to control the production and marketing of tobacco products. South Carolina has the lowest state sales tax on cigarettes in the country. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

WASHINGTON — The Senate struck a historic blow against smoking in America Thursday, voting overwhelmingly to give regulators new power to limit nicotine in the cigarettes that kill nearly a half-million people a year, to drastically curtail ads that glorify tobacco and to ban flavored products aimed at spreading the habit to young people.

President Barack Obama, who has spoken of his own struggle to quit smoking, said he was eager to sign the legislation, and the House planned a vote for Friday. Cigarette foes said the measure would not only cut deaths but reduce the $100 billion in annual health care costs linked to tobacco.

Fierce opposition by the industry and tobacco-state lawmakers had prevented passage for years, along with veto threats by the George W. Bush White House. In the end, the nation's biggest tobacco company supported the measure, though rivals suggested that was because it could lock in Philip Morris' share of the market.

Cigarette smoking kills about 400,000 people in the United States every year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 45 million U.S. adults are smokers, though the prevalence has fallen since the U.S. surgeon general's warning 45 years ago that tobacco causes lung cancer.

The legislation, one of the most dramatic anti-smoking initiatives since the surgeon general's report, would give the Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate the content, marketing and advertising of cigarettes and other tobacco products.

"This legislation represents the strongest action Congress has ever taken to reduce tobacco use, the leading preventable cause of death in the United States," declared Matthew Myers, president of Campaign for Tobacco-free Kids.

The 79-17 Senate vote sent the measure back to the House, which in April passed a similar but not identical version. House acceptance of the Senate bill would send it directly to Obama, who said Thursday that final passage "will make history by giving the scientists and medical experts at the FDA the power to take sensible steps."

"At any given moment, millions are struggling with their habit or worrying about loved ones who smoke," said Obama.

Story continues below
advertisement

His signature would then add tobacco to other huge, nationally important areas that have come under greater government supervision since his presidency began. Those include banking, housing and autos. Still to come, if Congress can agree: health care.

Supporters of FDA regulation of tobacco have struggled for more than a decade to overcome powerful resistance _ from the industry and elsewhere. In 2000 the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the agency did not have the authority under current law to regulate tobacco products, and the Bush administration opposed several previous efforts by Congress to write a new law.

Thursday's legislation gives the FDA power to evaluate the contents of tobacco products and to order changes or bans on those that are a danger to public health. The agency could limit nicotine yields but not ban nicotine or cigarettes.

Regulators could prohibit tobacco companies from using candy or other flavors in cigarettes that tend to attract young smokers, and restrict advertising in publications often read by teenagers. Rules on sales to minors would be toughened, as would warning labels. Tobacco companies would have to get FDA approval for new products, and would be barred from using terms such as "light" or "mild" that imply a smaller health risk.

Costs of the new program would be paid for through a fee imposed on tobacco companies.

"This is a bill that will protect children and will protect America," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., a leading supporter. "Every day that we don't act, 3,500 American kids _ children _ will light up for the first time. That is enough to fill 70 school buses."

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that FDA regulation could reduce underage smoking by 11 percent over the next decade.

The bill, said American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown, "provides a tremendous opportunity to finally hold tobacco companies accountable and restrict efforts to addict more children and adults."

The tobacco lobby, contended Durbin, has long been the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill, "and they managed to create an exemption in virtually every law so that no federal agency could take a look at them and regulate them."

But the industry has also taken hits in recent years as the dangers of smoking became more apparent and states moved to limit smoking in public places. In 1998 the industry agreed to pay the states $206 billion to help cover health care costs, and this year Congress raised the federal cigarette tax by 62 cents, to $1.01 a pack, to fund a health care program for children.

The nation's largest tobacco manufacturer, Philip Morris, USA, has come out in support of the legislation. Its parent company, Altria Group, said in a statement that on balance, "the legislation is an important step forward to achieve the goal we share with others to provide federal regulation of tobacco products."

Its main rivals, however, have voiced opposition, arguing in part that FDA restrictions on new products will lock in Philip Morris' share of the market.

Lawmakers portrayed the bill as a major first step in bringing down health care costs, an essential goal of the health care overhaul legislation that is the top priority of the Obama administration this year.

"This bill may do more in the area of prevention, if adopted, than anything else we may include in the health care bill in the short term," said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., who managed the legislation on the Senate floor in the absence of the ailing Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who has long promoted FDA regulation.

Opponents, led by Republican Sen. Richard Burr of the tobacco-growing state of North Carolina, argued that the FDA, which is in charge of ensuring the safety of food and drug products, was the wrong place to regulate an item that is injurious to health.

He also contended that the bill would restrict tobacco companies, including several based in his state, from developing new products that might be less harmful to users. He unsuccessfully proposed the creation of a new agency that would both regulate tobacco products and encourage efforts to make cigarettes less harmful.

___

The bill is H.R. 1256.

On the Net:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

(This version CORRECTS, deleting reference to minor differences to be worked out with House.)

WASHINGTON — The Senate struck a historic blow against smoking in America Thursday, voting overwhelmingly to give regulators new power to limit nicotine in the cigarettes that kill nearly a half...
WASHINGTON — The Senate struck a historic blow against smoking in America Thursday, voting overwhelmingly to give regulators new power to limit nicotine in the cigarettes that kill nearly a half...
Filed by Susan Crile
 
Comments
2255
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (30 pages total)
- Jaywalkker I'm a Fan of Jaywalkker 51 fans permalink
photo

Why? What more can the FDA do? From reading this bill, it looks like all they'll do is censor ad material.

Tobacco use and its effects are probably the only thing in the public sphere across almost all education levels and political orientations that people agree upon. Growing up, there was more literature and education available to me about the effects of smoking than there was on sex ed (sad). Why do I need a bigger warning label or skull & crossbones on my Camels, when I'll light up anyway? Tar is toxic, the wording "less tar" does not make me think its safe, I choose my lighter cigarettes because its not as harsh on my throat. No cartoon character made me want to smoke or think dromedaries are cool. I started smoking because I wanted an excuse to talk to a girl and shared smoke breaks seemed like a good way.

Smoking spreads as a social habit through peer pressure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Big Brother is coming for you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 06/11/2009
- slaxx I'm a Fan of slaxx 37 fans permalink
photo

do you have any idea how much of your tax dollars and health care premuims go to paying for people with smoking-related illnesses?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 06/11/2009

Do you know that I would blow smoke in your face right now if I could. It's called freedom. Deal with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 06/11/2009
- dredeize I'm a Fan of dredeize 7 fans permalink
photo

Dubya already tried that!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 06/11/2009
- blukazoo I'm a Fan of blukazoo 11 fans permalink

Cigarrettes are the only drugs sold to Americans with virtually no regulation and no requirement to list the hazardous ingredient­s--asbesto­s (to make them burn evenly), arsenic, etc... People purchase them with the misconception that they're smoking tobacco when they're really smoking about 900 chemicals.

Alcohol, drugs, and even food all have restrictions and requirements; its about time there was some form of regulation on tobacco.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 06/11/2009
- lechatnoir I'm a Fan of lechatnoir 7 fans permalink

Throwing a bone to the doctors so they can say they did something tangible, which it is, of course. Now, will that be enough?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 06/11/2009
- Skyhawk I'm a Fan of Skyhawk 22 fans permalink
photo

I'm not a smoker, and I'm not sure this is such a great idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 06/11/2009
- cruzy I'm a Fan of cruzy 8 fans permalink

Why? The law explicitly states that the FDA can NOT ban or limit cigarretes or nicotine. It simply prevents consumer fraud and allows the FDA to ensure that cigarettes are safely manufactured, as much any product which causes cancer can be safely manufactured.

Why should the FDA be able to regulate every other substance people put in their bodies, but somehow cigarettes should be exempt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Consumer fraud? Since there are warnings of the dangers of smoking, where is the fraud?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 06/11/2009
- slaxx I'm a Fan of slaxx 37 fans permalink
photo

agreed. now we need someone to regulate herbal products. we have to greatly expand the FDA or have a new agency regulate things because the FDA is woefully under funded and ill-equipped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 06/11/2009

This is just another way for these Politicians to have control over what I do in the privacy of my home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 06/11/2009
- Graywolf48 I'm a Fan of Graywolf48 77 fans permalink
photo

Huh! This on the heels of rumors about Obama's smoking habit! Is there more to this story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 06/11/2009

What rumors? Obama is a smoker. That's no secret.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 06/11/2009
- cruzy I'm a Fan of cruzy 8 fans permalink

Huh, there is no "rumor." He has publicly admitted he smokes and discussed his struggle to stop smoking. You need to get a dictionary and learn the meaning of the word "rumor."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 06/11/2009

I heard a rumor that Obama is president. Can anyone fill me in?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 06/11/2009
- LREKing I'm a Fan of LREKing 20 fans permalink
photo

What rumor? The story states clearly, "President Barack Obama, who has spoken of his own struggle to quit smoking..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Won't this just make people smoke twice as many cigarettes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Just the stupid people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 06/11/2009
- cruzy I'm a Fan of cruzy 8 fans permalink

What? Why? Your comment makes zero sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 06/11/2009
- slaxx I'm a Fan of slaxx 37 fans permalink
photo

that's what they say, anyway. but nicotine levels in cigarettes has skyrocketed to keep people addicted. it's both a mental and physical addiction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 06/11/2009
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 62 fans permalink

For once they did the right thing. I wonder if either Kansan voted Yea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 06/11/2009
- tubette I'm a Fan of tubette 8 fans permalink
photo


it's only fair to tax and regulate fat people now and food. obesity costs as much to the healthcare system as smokers or more and who knows how much all the obese kids will end up costing the system. if they do this, they have to do food , restaurants, etc. opening up pandora's box here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Excellent news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

I'm a proud liberal and Democrat. But I'm afraid of where this will go. I'm a a pipe-smoker, and I foresee pipe-smokers being trampled all over now over the issues with cigarettes. The hypocrisy of this will be ever-clearer as the Senators pull the cash out of their fancy pockets to get themselves some nice luxury cigars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 06/11/2009
- cruzy I'm a Fan of cruzy 8 fans permalink

The law clearly states that the FDA has no authority to ban cigarrettes or nicotine. It simply prevents consumer fraud by allowing the FDA to prohibit cigarette companies from pretending that "light" cigarettes are somehow healthy, and also stops companies from using candy and teen magazines to promote their products to teenagers. It also allows the FDA to have tobacco companies institute different refining processes so that formaldehyde and other dangerous chemicals are not used, or are used in lesser amounts in producing tobacco products. Food is held to a much higher safety regulatory standard, and yet, there are still plenty of fattening sweets out there for those who wish to indulge in, soI don't see why tobacco products should be held to a lower standard.

Your pipe-smoking is unaffected by this bill, unless you like having lots of formaldehyde in your tobacco.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 06/11/2009
photo

Cruzy, thank you for your reply. You've eased many of my worries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 06/11/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (30 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect