Iowa Woman Discovers New Cloud Type

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iowa Woman Discovers New Cloud Type stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL J. CRUMB | June 11, 2009 04:40 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This June 20, 2006 photo provided on Monday, June 8, 2009 and taken by Jane Wiggins from a downtown Cedar Rapids, Iowa office building shows what may become the first new cloud type to be recognized by scientists since 1951. (AP Photo/Jane Wiggins)

DES MOINES, Iowa — Looking out the 11th floor window of her law office, Jane Wiggins did a double take and grabbed her camera. The dark, undulating clouds hovering outside were unlike anything she'd seen before.

"It looked like Armageddon," said Wiggins, a paralegal and amateur photographer in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "The shadows of the clouds, the lights and the darks, and the greenish-yellow backdrop. They seemed to change."

They dissipated within 15 minutes, but the photo Wiggins captured in June 2006 intrigued _ and stumped _ a group of dedicated weather watchers who now are pushing weather authorities to create a new cloud category, something that hasn't been done since 1951.

Breaking into the cloud family would require surviving layers of skeptical international review. Still, Gavin Pretor-Pinney and his England-based Cloud Appreciation Society are determined to establish a new variety. They've given Wiggins' photo and similar pictures taken in different parts of the world to experts in England, and are discussing the subject fervently online.

"They (the clouds) were the first ones that I noted of this type and I was unsure which category to put them under," said Pretor-Pinney, author of "The Cloudspotter's Guide." "When we put pictures up online we list the category, and I wasn't sure how to categorize it."

Some scientists are skeptical. They argue that researchers who have long watched the sky haven't seen anything distinctly new for decades.

There are three main groups of clouds: cumulous, cirrus and stratus. Each has various sub-classifications built on other details of the formation.

Brant Foote, a longtime scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., said the clouds photographed by Wiggins already fit into the existing cumulous classification.

Story continues below

But Pretor-Pinney, who never studied meteorology, believes the clouds merit their own cumulus sub-classification. He proposes they be called altocumulus undulatus asperatus. The last word _ Latin for roughen or agitate _ is a reference to the clouds' undulating surface.

"Not necessarily gentle or steady, but quite violent-looking, turbulent, almost twisted in its appearance," he said.

The group has compiled several photographs documenting the formations from the billowy, rolling clouds shot by Wiggins in Iowa to ones from New Zealand that were much more menacing, hanging lava-like in the sky.

Foote said it would be "very unusual" for such a formation to be recognized as a new variety of cloud.

"People have been looking at clouds for hundreds of years and the general cloud classification is well defined," Foote said. "It's not as if someone discovered a new plant in the Amazon. It's what you've seen every day. There was no atmospheric condition that caused a new kind of cloud to form."

Pretor-Pinney is working with the Royal Meteorological Society in Reading, England, to prepare his case. If that group signs off, the proposal will go to the United Nation's World Meteorological Organization in Geneva.

Society executive director Paul Hardaker said a small panel within the society is gathering evidence to review. Their efforts include talking with those who took the submitted photos to determinine when, where and amid what weather they were taken. Hardaker said meteorologists tend to be skeptical of such proposals.

"We like to believe that just about everything that can be seen has been, but you do get caught once in a while with the odd, new, interesting thing," Hardaker said. "By this stage we think it's sufficiently interesting to explore it further and we're optimistic about the information we've got."

DES MOINES, Iowa — Looking out the 11th floor window of her law office, Jane Wiggins did a double take and grabbed her camera. The dark, undulating clouds hovering outside were unlike anything s...
DES MOINES, Iowa — Looking out the 11th floor window of her law office, Jane Wiggins did a double take and grabbed her camera. The dark, undulating clouds hovering outside were unlike anything s...
Loading...
 
Filed by Johanna Smith
 
Comments
158
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)
- SamSeven I'm a Fan of SamSeven 3 fans permalink

These stange clouds were reported in the UK Press last week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 06/12/2009
- onalimb I'm a Fan of onalimb 5 fans permalink

Extra terrestrial hologram

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 06/12/2009

That's HAARP clouds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 06/12/2009
photo

Agreed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 06/12/2009

Google HAARP coulds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 06/12/2009
- zizyphus I'm a Fan of zizyphus 110 fans permalink
photo

The vast majority of people have never herd of HAARP, and would refuse to believe it if informed of their doings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 06/12/2009
photo

"Cloud formations often exhibit structure that could be the result of something other than blowing winds. Does ionized plasma actually shape the clouds?"

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/arch07/071217electricclouds.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 06/12/2009
- Pema I'm a Fan of Pema 54 fans permalink
photo

"People have been looking at clouds for hundreds of years and the general cloud classification is well defined," Foote said
hundres of years? for over a hundred thousand years is really the correct answer...i guess this was his first interview and got nervous....thats the only thing I can say and keep the mans integrity...lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 06/12/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect