North Korea Sanctions Unanimously Expanded By U.N. Security Council

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - North Korea Sanctions Unanimously Expanded By U.N. Security Council stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

EDITH M. LEDERER | June 12, 2009 07:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
United Nations Security Council votes unanimously to adopt a resolution imposing sanctions on North Korea, Friday, June 12, 2009, at United Nations headquarters. The resolution will impose new sanctions on the reclusive communist nation's weapons exports and financial dealings, and allow inspections of suspect cargo in ports and on the high seas. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council imposed punishing new sanctions on North Korea Friday, toughening an arms embargo and authorizing ship searches on the high seas in an attempt to thwart the reclusive nation's nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

The unanimous support for the resolution reflected international disapproval for recent actions by North Korea, which defied the council by conducting a second nuclear test on May 25 and heightened global tensions with recent missile launches that raised the specter of a renegade nuclear state.

North Korea has repeatedly warned that it would view new sanctions as a declaration of war, but it boycotted Friday's vote _ in sharp contrast to the October 2006 Security Council meeting where sanctions were imposed after the country's first nuclear test. Then, the North Korean ambassador immediately rejected the resolution, accused council members of "gangster-like" action and walked out of the council chamber.

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice, who shepherded the resolution through two weeks of complex and sometimes difficult negotiations, told reporters in Washington that the administration was "very pleased" with the council's "unprecedented" and "innovative" action.

She cautioned that North Korea could react to the resolution with "further provocation."

"There's reason to believe they may respond in an irresponsible fashion to this," she said.

North Korea said Monday in its main newspaper that it would respond to any new sanctions with "corresponding self-defense measures." On Tuesday, the North said it would use nuclear weapons in a "merciless offensive" if provoked.

The resolution seeks to deprive North Korea of financing and material for its weapons program and bans the communist country's lucrative arms exports, especially missiles. It does not ban normal trade, but does call on international financial institutions to halt grants, aid or loans to the North except for humanitarian, development and denuclearization programs.

Story continues below
advertisement

China and Russia, the North's closest allies, supported the resolution, but stressed that it did not authorize the use of force against North Korea, a key demand by both countries. Diplomats said during the negotiations both countries pushed to ensure that the measures not hurt ordinary people in North Korea who face daily hardships.

Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin called the North's repeat nuclear test "a serious blow" to efforts to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and said the resolution was "an appropriate response," targeted at the weapons programs.

China's U.N. Ambassador Zhang Yesui said the nuclear test had affected regional peace and security. He strongly urged North Korea to promote the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and return quickly to Beijing-hosted six-party talks aimed at dismantling its nuclear program.

The resolution demonstrates the international community's "firm opposition" to the atomic test, Zhang said, but it also "sends a positive signal" by showing the council's determination to resolve the issue "peacefully through dialogue and negotiations."

The provisions most likely to anger the North Koreans deal with searches of cargo heading to or from the country.

The resolution calls on all countries to inspect North Korea cargo at their airports, seaports or on land if they have "information that provides reasonable grounds to believe" it contains banned arms or weapons, or the material to make them.

It also calls on all 192 U.N. member states to inspect vessels carrying suspect cargo on the high seas if approval is given by the country whose flag the ship sails under. If the country refuses to give approval, it must direct the vessel "to an appropriate and convenient port for the required inspection by the local authorities."

The resolution does not authorize the use of force. But if a country refuses to order a vessel to a port for inspection, it would be violation of the resolution and the country licensing the vessel would face possible sanctions by the Security Council.

As a sign of China's uneasiness about ship searches, Zhang stressed that "countries have to act prudently, in strict accordance with domestic and international laws, and under the precondition of reasonable grounds and sufficient evidence."

Rice said the United States would "intensify our existing efforts to gather information that would allow us to determine if there is a suspect vessel on the high seas," she said.

If a vessel refuses inspection, Rice said, the United States will "shine a spotlight on it, to make it very difficult for that contraband to continue to be carried forward."

However, she said, while the U.S. will work to ensure that full implementation is achieved and "the bite is felt ... we're not going to get into a tit-for-tat reaction to every North Korean provocative act."

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, a former South Korean foreign minister, urged all concerned parties "to refrain from taking any measures that can exacerbate tensions in the region and to exert their best efforts to re-engage in dialogue, including through the six-party talks," U.N. spokeswoman Michele Montas said.

In other key provisions, the resolution demands a halt to any further nuclear tests or missile launches and reiterates the council's demand that the North abandon all nuclear weapons, return to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, allow U.N. nuclear inspections, and rejoin six-party talks.

The previous sanctions resolution imposed an arms embargo on heavy weapons, a ban on material that could be used in missiles or weapons of mass destruction and a ban on luxury goods favored by North Korea's ruling elite. It also ordered an asset freeze and travel ban on companies and individuals involved in the country's nuclear and weapons programs.

The new resolution calls on all countries to prevent financial institutions or individuals in their countries from providing financing or resources that could contribute to North Korea's "nuclear-related, ballistic missile-related, or other weapons of mass destruction-related programs or activities."

U.S. deputy ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo called the measures "innovative" and "robust."

"This resolution will give us new tools to impair North Korea's ability to proliferate and threaten international stability," she told the council.

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council imposed punishing new sanctions on North Korea Friday, toughening an arms embargo and authorizing ship searches on the high seas in an attempt to thwar...
UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council imposed punishing new sanctions on North Korea Friday, toughening an arms embargo and authorizing ship searches on the high seas in an attempt to thwar...
Loading...
 
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
 
Comments
117
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 06/14/2009
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 18 fans permalink

It seems like if we'd just ignore this guy he'd just fade away into oblivion. I don't buy that they are any kind of threat to the U.S. or Japan. South Korea is a little too close, but with all of our troops we have there, they won't pull anything too radical.

Just keep him mighty ronery, and he may just kick off from lack of attention.

I don't see how any more sanctions will change anything. They've had sanctions for decades and nothing has changed, like Cuba.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 06/14/2009

exactly...­the little kid screaming for attention. If you ignore them they stop. If you appease them they do it over and over again

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 06/14/2009
photo

...looks like "Beloved Jacket"
needs replacement too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 06/14/2009
- Cogs I'm a Fan of Cogs 25 fans permalink

The North Korean ambassador walked out of the U.N. meeting and stepped into a waiting limo to drive him to his mansion in time for dinner. Meanwhile, people are being starved to death in his country. The ambassador might play a little golf on Sunday if the weather holds. Meanwhile, people are being brutalized in his country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 06/13/2009
- Calvincito I'm a Fan of Calvincito 7 fans permalink
photo

I think he's bluffing his ass off. Wasn't it about a year ago that efforts to launch missles to determine payload capabilities were a bust?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 06/13/2009
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 107 fans permalink
photo

What was your information source?
USA MSM?
Even this and other similar blogs?
Are you sure you are accurately informed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 06/13/2009

doesn't change the fact that NK poses no real threat to the US or SK and JP which are our allies and under our nuclear umbrella

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 06/14/2009
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

Perhaps the civilized world should consider going for a new Guinness Book of World Records...­a parking lot the size and shape of NK that glows in the dark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 06/13/2009
- Conejo I'm a Fan of Conejo 9 fans permalink
photo

The pentagon already has plans for destroying the nuclear facility at Yongbyon as well as neutralizing the fortifications and massive armament in the hills overlooking Seoul. They had said in the past that this was a possibility if N. Korea had started weaponizing plutonium. OK, Barak, are you going to put your money where their mouth is, or is it too risky?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 06/13/2009
photo

I'm really glad you aren't in charge. What you're talking about is last and least ideas which would lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of people on both sides. Grow up and join the adults.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 06/13/2009
- Paulo1 I'm a Fan of Paulo1 41 fans permalink

OK since we seem to be doing militarism this morning. How about we set it up with the Israeli's and do a nice joint strike. One on Iran and one on N. Korea. See if we can coordinate the blasts to the sounds of Oh Fortuna.

I love movies like that but have to agree with Organic Guy, Good thing we are not in charge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 06/13/2009
- Cedman I'm a Fan of Cedman 26 fans permalink

Even if they had the capabilty to launch a nuke (and they don't) they would be wiped off the face of the earth before it ever went off. NK is playin poker with an empty hand and the world needs to call their bluff. China is reluctant to push NK because they don't want a failed state on their border with millions of refugees streamin in. Also, it is not in China's interest to have a unified pro-American Korea with more military bases near its mainland. The one thing that would really motivate China to pressure NK hard would be a decision by Japan to deploy its own nukes to match NK. Japan's history of aggression and previous invasions of China would motivate the Chineese to put the squeeze on NK to disarm...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 AM on 06/13/2009

And Japan's agression and invasion of Korea would motivate South Korea to go nuclear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 AM on 06/15/2009
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 64 fans permalink
photo

A very important step - despite the ridiculous warning from North Korea that there will be consequences if sanctions are imposed. Very important and helpful that China and Russia voted to impose the sanctions.

I think the world in North Korea must be very, very, very, VERY small.

So North Korea wants to play a game of chicken? - let's go folks!
*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 06/12/2009
- Shavano I'm a Fan of Shavano 7 fans permalink

My son is stationed in SK and has been on alert for months. This is the first time that he feels that the world has come together to understand what is happening over there. I can say from personal experience that our soldiers and airmen feel legitimized by having the UN agree with the United States on sanctioning NK for there stance in this nuclear provocation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 06/12/2009

I pray for your son's safety. NK should only take this bluster so far. Guaranteed whatever they start, we will finish it, also under Obama we will wager for diplomacy first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 06/14/2009
- Conejo I'm a Fan of Conejo 9 fans permalink
photo

This warning is not ridiculous. North Korea has the capability of launching a blitzkrieg type attack on S. Korea with their massive fortifications and weaponry along the demilitarized zone. They could easily launch a surprise attack on Seoul and kill thousands of people before the USA had time to retaliate. N. Korea can easily start another Korean war but they cannot win one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 06/13/2009

NK would be suicidal to instigate another war. Sure their 60,000 artillery aimed at the South will devastate it, and their missiles and army will probably drive miles into the South. But nothing makes a man fight harder than for his survival, his country and his way of life. The South Koreans will make them pay heavily and before our marines, soldiers and airforce get there to join their side the North would already be feeling the pinch. The elite ruling class in NK are playing games but even they no their are not immortal. An attack on SK will definitely be the end of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 06/14/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 44 fans permalink
photo

I wonder how the DPRK will respond.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 06/12/2009
- Shavano I'm a Fan of Shavano 7 fans permalink

I'm guessing more rhetoric and bravado, at least for a while. It's the first time they've been confronted with a united stance. And, I mean the first time; China nor Russia has ever publicly derided or sanctioned them. Their major ally right now seems to be Iran. I think they've run the gamut of the bluff and now it's time to put up or shut up. Putting up means annihilation, I am certain they will choose existence albeit with plenty of smoke and mirrors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 06/12/2009
photo

A "merciless offensive" against the South Koreans and American soldiers in SK, along with nuclear weapons. Thats what's been promised at least, lets see if they follow through. As much as I liked the idea of keeping Gates before, I didn't like his "I'll see your 20 kilotons and raise you 5 megatons" argument. (Not sure who on the board I stole that from but I liked it, credit claimable)

-3pp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 06/12/2009

but thats precisely what will happen...t­heir best weapon is nothing compared to our best.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 06/14/2009
photo

One thing is certain...­if NK lobs even so much as a DU laced firecracker beyond its borders, every other country on the planet is then on notice that they are intent on attacking them.
Do you seriously think that these neighboring countries are going to want to contemplate an invasion? I don't think China is interested in a protracted war with NK so much as they would be interested in just exterminating 80 to 90 percent of the population and laying waste to the entire habitable landscape and being done with it once and for all.

Now, assuming that this turns out to be the only seriously rational option, who do you think China will turn to for help in delivering the ginormous can of RAID?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 06/12/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

My friend in South Korea says that this is just more posturing. The North Korean government has a big-time inferiority complex, and they do stupid stuff stuff all the time to rattle the cage and shake things up. They have everything to lose and not much to gain by pursuing this. It's just a ploy to get attention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 06/12/2009
photo

South Korea and China hate Japan more then N. Korea. If the N. and S. Unite, then China and Japan will be under attack from a unified Korea.

Very complex.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 06/12/2009
- CAP6 I'm a Fan of CAP6 15 fans permalink

Might be a little to complex AND confusing for most, perhaps even you? If China & SK are anti- Japan, how does China come under attack from a unified Korea?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 06/12/2009
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 107 fans permalink
photo

China and NK has a non-aggression pact.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 06/13/2009
- DD1Prime I'm a Fan of DD1Prime 5 fans permalink

North Korea is a problem that has festered for 53 years. This fictional "country" has been one big concentration camp for 27 million people (now down to 22 million after deaths from hunger and state executions), all of whom have suffered with no freedom, as the Kims spent 70%+ of the national wealth on building the largest army in Asia - for the purpose of destroying their closest neighbor in a grand invasion "someday."

One day North Koreans will be free to tell their stories, and China and Russia will have to tapdance for centuries to excuse empowering a family of madmen to create a Communist dystopia only George Orwell could have imagined.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 06/12/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 44 fans permalink
photo

Thanks for that comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 06/12/2009

no truer words bud

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 06/14/2009
- Shavano I'm a Fan of Shavano 7 fans permalink

This is clear, unambiguous proof that Obama's foreign policy and tone have accomplished in less than one year what Bush and his policy makers couldn't accomplish in eight years. A unanimous security council agreement with both the Chinese and Russian's, not only signing off on it, but urging North Korea back to the six party talks.

Bush and his team never would have gotten China or Russia to agree to stopping and searching ships suspected of trafficking goods into North Korea, economic and other sanctions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 06/12/2009

What a incredible chande UN AMB. Rice has made to the discourse at the United Nations. Quiet, diplomatic and respectful rather than that arrogant, in your face VBoulton who liked to "negotiate and bully in public.

So nice also that your new Ambassador actually believes in the United Nations.I am not saying she is totally responsible for the new cooperation but I do think she has helped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 06/12/2009
- Shavano I'm a Fan of Shavano 7 fans permalink

I agree, it's top down. When you try to dictate and bully', people resent it and feel it is because you have other intentions. When your honest and assume best intentions you at least have a chance. An olive branch is always better as the first quarry than a sword. You must always be able to stand up for your beliefs, but you first must be able to listen and find common ground. A bully is a bully whether they come from a "democratic" nation or a "dictatorial" nation. We, as a world of people have much more in common than the rhetoric of our sometimes belligerent government posturing would admit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 06/12/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect