Weapons Makers Look Overseas As Pentagon Cuts Back

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Weapons Makers Look Overseas As Pentagon Cuts Back stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

STEPHEN MANNING | June 13, 2009 03:01 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Foreign governments looking to kick the tires of fighter jets and cargo planes at this week's air show in Paris will likely hear a clear message from U.S. defense contractors: We need your business now more than ever.

With the United States looking to cut defense costs and rethinking the way it fights wars, many defense companies are looking for international buyers to take the big, pricey weapons that the Pentagon no longer wants or needs fewer of. U.S. contractors are chasing some lucrative deals, but could also face some legal and political hurdles as they hawk weapons overseas.

Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp. are competing to sell fighter planes to countries such as India and Brazil. Boeing is trying to spark international interest in its C-17 cargo plane. Middle Eastern nations fearful of threats from Iran are bulking up on missile defense equipment from Lockheed and Raytheon Co.

"This is a world market right now," says Chris Chadwick, Boeing's president of military aircraft.

Globalization is nothing new for many U.S. industries, which often use overseas operations and sales to tap into fast-growing areas like China and as a hedge against domestic downturns. Some of the nation's biggest manufacturers, companies like Caterpillar and General Electric, make more than half of their sales overseas.

But the defense industry is closely tethered to one primary buyer _ the U.S. government. It has been a lucrative relationship. Defense spending is up more than 40 percent over the past eight years, fueled in part by spending on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Much of the money flowed to defense contractors that supply the Pentagon with everything from warships to bullets.

Overseas arms sales represent a relatively small segment of defense contractor sales. But many are turning to the global markets for growth now that the appetite for big and expensive weapons is waning in the United States. The push is helped by countries worried about security threats from nations such as North Korea and Iran. Many European allies need to upgrade their aging equipment, and are turning to U.S. companies as likely suppliers.

However, budgets for big weapons are getting tighter as costs like personnel expenses eat up more Pentagon resources. Defense Secretary Robert Gates proposes spending more money on tools like unmanned drones to fight insurgencies instead of big and pricey equipment like $140 million apiece for F-22 fighters jets meant for more conventional wars.

Story continues below
advertisement

In the 2008 fiscal year, the military spent $164 billion to buy weapons. For the 2010 fiscal year, the Pentagon proposes spending only $131 billion, though that number will probably grow when Congress adds weapons spending as it reviews the budget.

Big defense companies would take a hit. Lockheed will have to shut down its assembly line at its big Marietta, Ga. plant, putting thousands of jobs at risk. Boeing, which gets 80 percent of its defense unit sales from the Pentagon, could stop selling the $276 million C-17.

"There is a softness in the home market right now," said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group.

That could grant some new life to programs that would be cut under the Pentagon's new budget.

The F-22 program is slated to end at 187 planes for the U.S. Air Force, far fewer than originally envisioned. Japan and Australia are considered potential sources of new sales, but federal law barring export of the technologically sensitive plane would have to be overturned. The prospects of that remain unclear.

Congress put eight more C-17s back into the budget. Boeing wants to make 16 per year and hopes to cover the shortfall overseas. It recently cut a deal to make four for the United Arab Emirates. The contractor is also trying to persuade foreign governments to buy the F-18 instead of the F-35, made by a team led by Lockheed.

Defense companies will display their jets, engines, missiles, pilotless drones and other hardware for several days this week at an airfield outside Paris. The show is one of the biggest that brings together contractors and militaries from around the globe to broker weapons deals.

New markets have emerged. Iraq wants to buy Lockheed fighter jets, Boeing helicopters and Abrams tanks made by General Dynamics Corp. to rebuild its military. The nation was the second largest potential buyer of U.S. military equipment last year, behind Israel, according to a March report by the Arms Control Association, a Washington think tank.

The Pentagon notified Congress it planned to sell $74.5 billion worth of U.S. military equipment to 25 countries in 2008, nearly double its proposed arms sales from 2007. Iraq accounted for $18.7 billion of that total.

Congress must approve weapons sales to foreign governments that are negotiated between U.S. contractors and foreign countries through the Defense Department. Not all notifications lead to sales and they cover mostly large purchases, but Congress has never moved to block a sale once it was formally notified.

But providing weapons to foreign governments is often politically sensitive. The Pentagon and Congress are supposed to consider the effect that helping nations increase firepower will have on regional conflicts or stability, like the rivalry between Pakistan and India or rearming Iraq in a volatile Middle East. For example, the sale of F-16s to Pakistan was long delayed due to Pakistan's development of nuclear weapons.

Regional stability could be an issue for sales to India, which is being courted by Lockheed and Boeing for the right to build 126 fighter jets, a contract potentially worth $11 billion. India already bought $2.1 billion worth of anti-submarine planes from Boeing earlier this year.

"Fighter jet sales to India would most certainly be viewed by Pakistan as a problematic development," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association.

In Europe, U.S. defense companies will face stiff competition from suppliers like Saab, European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co., and BAE Systems. Lockheed, for example, is trying to hold together a coalition of nine potential F-35 buyers also being courted by makers of the Eurofighter jet.

Affordability remains an issue, especially for European buyers saddled with struggling economies. But defense analysts said European nations that need to upgrade their aging equipment and those like India that are building their militaries will provide ample markets for U.S. defense companies.

"Weapons could be the single biggest U.S. export item over the next 10 years," said Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute.

WASHINGTON — Foreign governments looking to kick the tires of fighter jets and cargo planes at this week's air show in Paris will likely hear a clear message from U.S. defense contractors: We ne...
WASHINGTON — Foreign governments looking to kick the tires of fighter jets and cargo planes at this week's air show in Paris will likely hear a clear message from U.S. defense contractors: We ne...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
34
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- EAHARA I'm a Fan of EAHARA 2 fans permalink
photo

What an absolutely SICK business to be in, if you think about it. Your ability to make a living, the ability of the people who work for you to make a living, depends on getting sick despots like Kim Mentally Ill Jung, George the Chimp Bush, and other crackpots and tin horns, to start wars!!! In fact, the prospect of peace is something that you wouldn't want to hear about or try to promote as it would put you out of business.

Not only that, but your "business" depends upon continually selling goods of death, so that it is not enough that we have enough nukes in the world to blow apart the entire galaxy if they all went off simultaneous, but nooooooooooooooooo -- you have to have MORE AND MORE!!

I'm for deterrence and I'm for a strong defense, but PEOPLE!!!! HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH!!!! Billions and billions spent on arming countries to the TEETH while millions of the poor starve to death every year??? That is OBSCENE by anyone's standards. Yet the war machines grind on and the journalists in all countries continue to put out horror stories and scare tactics about what will happen if we don't have every single war toy imaginable to mankind. Omigod.....our children will be slaughtered, our women raped, our country taken over if we don't spend another gazillion dollars this year. And the next, and the next, and the next!!

The more I think about this garbage, I get physically ill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 06/22/2009

Did anyone read anything back in May of 2007 about Tony Blair trading a missle defense system to Libya's dictator Ghaddafi for BP access to Libya's natural gas and oil fields?

Of course not. The media in this country buried that story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 06/14/2009
photo

War, huh, what is it good for?
Bringing in the profits,
Say it again, yeah
Wah, huh, what is it good for....

To paraphase the people who believe in all Americans being armed

When all the world has guns, we'll all be safer. Ha Ha Ha
Carried to extremes, when all the world has nukes, we ought to be safe as we could ever be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 06/14/2009
- Billy Hell I'm a Fan of Billy Hell 44 fans permalink
photo

Peru for one, is going to need a whole lot more US weapons before it can successfully overcome resistance to the recently signed "Fair Trade Agreement". How else do you expect US corporations to pillage it's resources for negligible "royalties" while enjoying huge tax subsidies and vastly reduced electricity charges?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 06/13/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms ControI Association. is a s0n of a b !tch...a h0 a m0ther fk!ng a h0Ie!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 06/13/2009

Peace is such a downer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 06/14/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 06/13/2009
- Logout I'm a Fan of Logout 3 fans permalink

d

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 06/13/2009
- DingoDave I'm a Fan of DingoDave 31 fans permalink
photo

The military budget of the U.S. Department of Defense. [formerly the Department of War] is astonishing and frightening to many of us in the rest of the world

As of 2009, the United States government is spending about $1 trillion annually on defense-related purposes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

The United States and its closest allies [including Australia] are responsible for approximately two-thirds of global military spending (of which, in turn, the U.S. is responsible for the vast majority). Military spending accounts for 19% of the United States' federal budget, and approximately half of its federal discretionary spending, which comprises all of the U.S. government's money not accounted for by pre-existing obligations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Defense

If the American people are satisfied with how your government is allocating your resources in the face of such frightening statistics, then you deserve the levels of poverty and social degredation which you are now experiencing. Your government is setting you up for WWIII, and like lemmings, many of you appear to be enthusiastically hurling yourselves towards the edge of the precipice.
Heaven help us all if the millitary industrial complex of the United States achieves it's goals in the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 06/13/2009

Is it not strange that in PEACETIME

The government says..If you kill or injure somebody we will put you in jail..

The church says Thou Shalt not Kill..

Business says buy our products so we can make more money

Is it not strange that in WARTIME

The Government says ..If you don’t go and kill and injure somebody we will put you in jail

The church says Thou Shall Kill..

Business says buy our munitions so we can make more money no matter what side you are on..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 06/14/2009
- atlantajoe I'm a Fan of atlantajoe 8 fans permalink

What church has said thall shall kill ? And the statement about kill or go to jail was just as juvenile

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 06/14/2009
- samjung23 I'm a Fan of samjung23 10 fans permalink

Nice.

Still think the private industry is so great? Now Boeing and Lockheed will feel pressured to sell their weapons technology overseas just to make a buck. One way or the other, they'll find a way to do it.

Corporations don't care about America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 06/13/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

We sell guns to the Arabs, dynamite to the Jews!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 06/13/2009
- Greenman7 I'm a Fan of Greenman7 2 fans permalink

Great we can look forward to being killed by our own weapons all over the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 06/13/2009
photo

It's been that way for at least half a century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 06/14/2009

Far longer than that, dear.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/10/05/dynasty_of_death_part_1

And everyone still thinks the Bush family made their money in the oil biz...Ha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 06/14/2009

No 1 in selling death

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 06/13/2009
- Skedaddle I'm a Fan of Skedaddle 2 fans permalink

ah the free market. tis a great thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 06/13/2009

And many other private businesses (and employers) will soon follow...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 06/13/2009
- plzchuteme I'm a Fan of plzchuteme 30 fans permalink
photo

Reminds me of lyrics from a Tim Hardin song: "Smugglin' Man."

"...I sell guns to the Arabs, I sell dynamite to the Jews!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 06/13/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect