Gen. Stanley McChrystal Takes Command In Afghanistan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Gen. Stanley McChrystal Takes Command In Afghanistan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JASON STRAZIUSO | June 15, 2009 06:28 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, right, salutes during his assumption of a command ceremony as the head of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan in Kabul, Monday, June 15, 2009. At left is German Gen. Egon Ramms, commander of the NATO's Joint Force Command. (AP Photo/Ricardo Mazalan)

KABUL — Gen. Stanley McChrystal, a former top special operations commander, took charge of nearly 90,000 U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan on Monday, telling them they must protect Afghan civilians from all kinds of violence. McChrystal takes over the Afghan campaign at a critical moment: violence, troop levels and U.S. military deaths have all hit record highs, and President Hamid Karzai has increased pressure on U.S. forces to prevent civilian deaths.

Seeking to shake up the direction of the war, Defense Secretary Robert Gates sent McChrystal to lead the 42-nation effort in Kabul in the middle of U.S. Gen. David McKiernan's two-year assignment, effectively ending the career of a four-star general whom McChrystal called a "fellow soldier and friend."

McChrystal is expected to take a more unconventional approach to the increasingly violent campaign in Afghanistan, relying on decades of experience with special operators _ elite military units like Navy SEALs and Army's Delta Force that carry out dangerous and secretive missions.

Speaking before several hundred troops at a ceremony filled with colorful flags and a military band at a heavily fortified base in central Kabul, McChrystal said the international mission "must recapture the excitement and inspiration that ignited this country" after the 2001 fall of the Taliban regime.

He immediately addressed civilian casualties, an issue Karzai warned the general about when the two met Sunday.

"The Afghan people are at the center of our mission. In reality, they are the mission. We must protect them from violence, whatever its nature," McChrystal said. "But while operating with care, we will not be timid."

As he spoke, a U.S. flag fluttered softly at half staff over his right shoulder in a silent reminder that the war is on a pace to claim a record number of American lives. Seventy-four U.S. troops have died in Afghanistan this year, a rate that will likely surpass the record 151 killed last year.

The relationship McChrystal has among the military's special operators _ forces that have been involved in some of the deadliest civilian casualty cases in Afghanistan _ is seen as one of his key assets.

Story continues below

Navy Rear Adm. Greg Smith, a new one-star commander sent to Kabul to help shape the military's public relations efforts, said McChrystal can tell those forces that "every single decision has to be considered in the strategic context" _ including a firefight leading to a dropping of bombs that might kill civilians.

McChrystal will visit commanders around Afghanistan this week and communicate that message "in a real clear tone," Smith said. The commanders will likely discuss civilian casualties during the McChrystal's "listening tour," and he may issue updated guidance to troops afterward, Smith said.

In new guidelines issued Monday, McChrystal told troops they must know "precisely what effects will be caused by our actions," Smith said.

The top U.N. representative in Afghanistan, Kai Eide, told NATO defense ministers in Brussels on Friday that there is "an urgent need to review the operations of special forces." Civilian casualties overshadow the positive trends in Afghanistan, he said.

"The political costs are simply disproportionate to the military gains," Eide said.

McChrystal will command the largest international force ever in Afghanistan. A record 56,000 U.S. troops are in the country, alongside 32,000 troops from 41 other countries.

President Barack Obama has increased the U.S. focus on Afghanistan this year, ordering 21,000 new troops to the country even as the U.S. begins to pull troops out of Iraq. There is expected to be about 68,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan by the end of the year.

American Marines have poured into Helmand province over last several weeks in an effort to stamp out an insurgency that has a strong hold in the world's largest opium poppy-growing region.

Militant attacks have risen steadily in the last three years and have reached a new high. Afghanistan saw 400 insurgent attacks during the first week of June, an eight-fold increase over January 2004, according to U.S. Gen. David Petraeus.

On Sunday, Karzai warned McChrystal that the "most important element of the mission" is to protect Afghan civilians.

Civilian casualties during military operations have long been a point of friction between Karzai and the U.S. The most contentious civilian deaths in U.S. military operations in recent years have involved U.S. Special Operations Forces, which McChrystal commanded from 2006 to mid-2008.

In early May, dozens of civilians were killed when U.S. and Afghan troops backed by U.S. fighter aircraft battled militants in southwestern Farah province. The Afghan government says 140 civilians died, while an Afghan human rights group says about 100 died. The U.S. says no more than 30 civilians were killed in addition to 60 to 65 militants.

McChrystal has already pledged to review operating procedures with an eye to minimizing civilian deaths.

"Although I expect stiff fighting ahead, the measure of effectiveness will not be enemy killed," he told Congress this month. "It will be the number of Afghans shielded from violence."

KABUL — Gen. Stanley McChrystal, a former top special operations commander, took charge of nearly 90,000 U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan on Monday, telling them they must protect Afghan civi...
KABUL — Gen. Stanley McChrystal, a former top special operations commander, took charge of nearly 90,000 U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan on Monday, telling them they must protect Afghan civi...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
 
Comments
46
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I don't understand why we don't use (and apparently have not used) thousands and thousands of special forces to infiltrate Pakistan and make it pure hell on the taliban and their friends. Hell I don't care if they are Blackwater guys. Put a bounty out there by paying these guys some gaudawful pay. Might even find Bin Laden along the way. I guess having a special forces general in command is a step in the right direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 06/15/2009

they are special forces specifically because they are limited in number and have skills which would take years and a lot more resources to grow into a larger regular force. Most special forces guys have their masters and some even have doctorates. They speak a foreign language and each member of the group is trained in multiple areas so if one goes down the rest can still accomplish their mission.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 06/16/2009
- polaris12 I'm a Fan of polaris12 17 fans permalink

"Although I expect stiff fighting ahead, the measure of effectiveness will not be enemy killed," he told Congress this month. "It will be the number of Afghans shielded from violence." To shield them from violence - we had to kill them. Like in 'to save the village, we had to destroy it." Military logic is unchanging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 06/15/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 745 fans permalink
photo

Just got this email alert from democrats.com today:

*Just 39 House Progressives could end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan/Pakistan (Af/Pak) by opposing the Pentagon's demand for another $95 billion. That's because all 178 Republicans will vote no over $5 billion for the IMF.

Nearly 15,000 of you emailed your Representatives, and 34 House Progressives responded to you by opposing the $95 billion. So now we need just 5 more. 15 are leaning no, and 20 are undecided. *

5 more progressives will give enough votes to stop the war supplemental bill, to continue fighting the wars. Without funding from congress, the DOD would have to start withdrawing troops. The same tactic and coalition of repubs and progressives ended the bombing of Serbia, and Viet nam was ended by congress not funding it ,as well. There is precedence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 06/15/2009

Right, just as President Bush 43 was denied funding by the Democrats from 2006 on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 06/15/2009
- oldgeek1 I'm a Fan of oldgeek1 41 fans permalink

BS. Funding has never been an issue or problem from the Congress.

The funding priorities were set by the Pentagon.

Afghanistan was not considered as important.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 06/15/2009
- newyorkid I'm a Fan of newyorkid 40 fans permalink
photo

The probIem is the facts on the ground. Palestinians have an inaIienable right to return to their homes and their 1948 lands been returned to them. Nobody can sign a "hoax" agreement ignoring or proxying their right to return.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 06/15/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 745 fans permalink
photo

yer on the wrong thread.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 06/15/2009

lol ya really

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 06/16/2009
- newyorkid I'm a Fan of newyorkid 40 fans permalink
photo

The greatest sIander is lsraeI itself....There is no lsraeI, there is only occupied PaIestine...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 06/15/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 745 fans permalink
photo

Those tactics are not going to get your cause, anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 06/15/2009
photo

Stop. Put down your rhetoric; step away from confrontation. Take a deep breath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/15/2009

oh i get it you could be a hasbara person trying to annoy the living S**t outta us so we take our hatred on Palestinians?? Non sequitars will get you no where

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 AM on 06/16/2009
- newyorkid I'm a Fan of newyorkid 40 fans permalink
photo

PaIestine belongs to the PaIestinians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 06/15/2009
- rcozad I'm a Fan of rcozad 21 fans permalink

if I had falsified a report and told lies to cover up the fact that a report regarding an incident as flagrant as the Tillman fragging had been totally fabricated I would have been fired by my company not , as the case with McChrystal , be promoted and honored!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 06/15/2009
- Jazzman323 I'm a Fan of Jazzman323 54 fans permalink
photo

What is the purpose of Obama's war in Afghanistan, and what is his exit strategy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 06/15/2009
- smchp I'm a Fan of smchp 77 fans permalink
photo

Do you remember 9/11? Google it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 06/15/2009
- Z2221344 I'm a Fan of Z2221344 5 fans permalink
photo

No no, we already dealt with the perpetrators of 9/11 when we invaded Iraq! After all it was the Iraqi Taliban under the sinister command of Saddam Hussein who allowed Osama Bin Laden to live in freedom among the mountainous boarder region between Iraq and Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 06/15/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 745 fans permalink
photo

Not his war. Our war .Yer right, though, we still have no exit strategy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 06/15/2009
- x76 I'm a Fan of x76 16 fans permalink
photo

How will the US do with 70,000 pairs of boots on the ground what the USSR failed to do with 500,000 pairs of boots on the ground? Is the Unocal pipeline really worth it? Does the US military take on these kind of assignments for US corporations often?

Wouldn't we be a lot smarter to use the billions of dollars we're squandering turning rubble into dust to develop cheaper solar energy and alcohol-based automotive fuel? Do a little research on your own and learn that the early cars were designed to run on alcohol -- not gasoline.

Gen. McChrystal. How manly. Going to go show those Taliban who's a real man, yes? Every dog thinks himself lion in his master's front yard.

Bring 'em home, Stanley, there are no US interests in Afghanistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 06/15/2009
- smchp I'm a Fan of smchp 77 fans permalink
photo

Your comparing apples and oranges. The Russians were at war with Afghanistan. The US is at war with Al Qaeda. The Afghans know the US is on THEIR side and is not there to take over the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 06/15/2009
- jrb35 I'm a Fan of jrb35 14 fans permalink

Exactly. The Soviets tried to OCCUPY Afghanistan and impose Communism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 06/15/2009

We need to use our full capability by throwing in thousands of special forces to raise hell in and among the enemy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 06/15/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 192 fans permalink
photo

We are fighting their war, not our war, and so it will cost more lives and in the end largely be ineffective..it will become a war of attrition and I know all about that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 06/15/2009

Not if we fight it to win. If you fight a guerilla war you got to become the same as your enemy. Leave the tanks behind and go behind their lines. Maybe we don't have the balls to do it. If not, get out because then you are right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 06/15/2009
- ljc I'm a Fan of ljc 152 fans permalink

He covered up Pat Tillman's murder. He covered up Pat Tillman's murder.

Why can't I find the Senate vote on this guy at their website? I want to know who voted against him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 06/15/2009
photo

yes ... very troubling. But was it murder or fratricide?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 06/15/2009

Murder, Murder is when one deliberetly kills another. Where is the evidence for your charge?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 06/15/2009
- iceage7 I'm a Fan of iceage7 149 fans permalink

Any president would be doing the same thing. Hillary, Ron Paul, Palin, Mccain, Gore..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 06/15/2009
- iceage7 I'm a Fan of iceage7 149 fans permalink

Obama is just cleaning up the mess bush left behind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 06/15/2009

ditto

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 06/15/2009

It's becoming quite tiresome to hear and read that "Obama is just cleaning up the mess Bush left behind". Just as the economy is most emphatically Obama's the war in Iraq and Afghanistan belong to Obama. Remember, even during the campaign Obama stated that he would increase the U.S. combat presence in Afghanistan. Posted pandereing will not cut it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 06/15/2009
- judiNJ I'm a Fan of judiNJ 59 fans permalink
photo

For heaven's sake, now is not the time to turn our backs on Afghanistan yet again. We did after the fall of the Iron Curtain, Bush did it when he decided to run off to Iraq and he (Bush) sure did not want to embarrass the Bush family's buddy, the bin Laden family so he left Osama bin Laden in Tora Bora to live another day. Maybe now I can find some peace for the friends I lost in the WTC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 06/15/2009
- Peacein09 I'm a Fan of Peacein09 13 fans permalink
photo

I would like to know if McChrystal reported to Cheney during the Bush years. I'd like to know if he was involved in special assignment assassinations. I would like to know if he was in charge of kidnapping people from other countries and sending them to Guantanamo. What kind of man is McChrystal? Now, someone who may have renditioned people for torture has been given control of NATO forces in Afghanistan. Was he told "do whatever necessary" to stop the violence? Is he going to work closely with the head of the diplomatic arm of our country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 06/15/2009
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 110 fans permalink

It's dismaying that Obama won't even back down on this. If just the photos are supposedly so inflammatory, what does the presence of this man bode over there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 06/15/2009
photo

Stanley McChrystal DID report to Cheney. He took direct orders from Cheney. He is still lying for Cheney today and could still put things in motion for a dirty op if Cheney asked him to and would be able to cover it up so that no one would ever find out about it. If it happenened Obama would be the last person on the planet would would find out about it. McChrystal's Task Force 626 was highly mobile and has authority to go anywhere in the world and capture torture interrogate and kill ANYONE on the orders of the elite insiders like Dick Cheney, Jim Baker. By their actions they kill the horses of populist movements or torture them into giving false confessions which bolster the ruling world elite. They help the Saudi's maintain strict royal control over their cowering population.

This is the shadow government coming back again to play a major part just like they did during the Carter Administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 06/15/2009
- PavePusher I'm a Fan of PavePusher 4 fans permalink

Loosen the tin foil my friend...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 06/15/2009
photo

I would like to know if you have ever considered reality before launching into such a sensational tirade. I'd like to know if you serially post comments to every piece of information you read because you think that keyword-dropping makes you seem like an intellectual, and in tune with the world's affairs. I would like to know more about "special assignement assasinations," besides what Tom Clancy clued you in on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 06/15/2009
- gage I'm a Fan of gage 19 fans permalink
photo

Seymour Hersh is a li ar, and Keith Olbermann was dumb enough to believe him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 06/15/2009
- washlib I'm a Fan of washlib 37 fans permalink
photo

Seymour Hersh is the BEST investigative journalist in the country bar none. Just because you don't believe him isnt HIS fault, it's your inability to handle the horrible awful truth, that some men will do anything to get and keep their power including Chen.ey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 06/15/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect