Meltdown 101: Reform plan's impact on consumers

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Meltdown 101: Reform plan's impact on consumers stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVE CARPENTER | June 16, 2009 06:56 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

American consumers have fallen victim to one financial scandal after another in the past decade, from accounting fraud at Enron to illegal late trading by mutual funds to the subprime mortgage meltdown.

President Barack Obama hopes to put the brakes on that trend with a series of regulatory reforms that his administration says will guard the nation's financial system against its own excess. The formal announcement comes Wednesday, but much of the substance was disclosed by the administration on Tuesday.

The centerpiece of the package is the creation of a new agency, and there also are proposals to protect people who have mortgages or use credit cards.

Here are some questions and answers about the proposed reforms and their likely impact on consumers.

Q: What's being created and why?

A: The Consumer Financial Protection Agency, if approved by Congress, will have broad authority to protect consumers of credit, savings, payment and other consumer financial products and services. It would be independent of agencies that now share those oversight duties and take away some power from some, most notably the Federal Reserve.

It's being proposed in response to widespread criticism that banks, lenders and credit card companies have used unfair and deceptive practices to dupe consumers and saddle them with debt.

Q: What exactly would the new agency be able to do?

Story continues below
advertisement

A: It could write rules, reform mortgage laws, examine financial institutions' practices, enforce compliance through penalties, ban unfair practices and require that companies be "clear and conspicuous" in informing consumers of costs, penalties and risks. It also would allow states to pass laws that are stricter than the federal standards.

One signal that administration officials are determined not to let this be just another layer of bureaucracy and complexity: their use of the term "plain vanilla." The agency would require banks and other financial institutions to offer a basic, "plain vanilla" mortgage product with straightforward terms _ such as a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage loan.

Consumers could still opt for more complicated products, though they would be subject to more stringent rules and disclosures than they are now.

Q: Will these reforms help people stay out of trouble with their mortgages?

A: They should help avoid future troubles. It would set guidelines for mortgages, and certain subprime mortgages clearly would be banned. Mortgage companies and banks would not be able to issue mortgages "or other credit products" that they knew consumers would not be able to pay back.

The reforms also would ban unfair practices such as "yield spread premiums" _ side payments from lenders that encourage mortgage brokers to push consumers into higher-priced loans than they should qualify for. And they would require that brokers be paid over time based on people's continued loan performance, rather than in a lump sum at closing.

Prepayment penalties, which can lock borrowers into bad loans, also would be banned.

Q: What if I'm already facing foreclosure? Is this going to help me?

A: Perhaps not immediately. But the summary being circulated by administration officials makes it sound as if the new agency would have the authority to order institutions to negotiate fairly with consumers facing foreclosure.

Q: Could the new agency have prevented the subprime mortgage mess?

A: It's conceivable. Data surfaced as early as 2001 about subprime mortgage loans, yet despite all the warning bells going off it wasn't until fairly recently that firm action was taken to try to halt aggressive lending practices and improper underwriting.

Consumer advocates in particular say a lot of trouble could have been prevented if reforms had been put in place earlier.

"The Fed slept for 10 years after Congress gave it authority over predatory mortgage lending and did not issue rules till after the crisis had peaked two years ago," said Ed Mierzwinski, senior fellow on consumer issues at the Washington-based Public Interest Research Group.

Q: Will this stop credit card companies from raising rates and fees?

A: It won't automatically ban all rate increases, but the new agency could have the power to set a maximum interest rate and maximum fees. It could also limit the amount interest could be increased at any one time and penalize companies that don't do what it says.

Q: What about all the fine print in credit card statements _ is that going to go away?

A: It won't go away entirely. But the insistence on transparency and understandable communications _ with the threat of penalties for companies that don't comply _ should improve things.

Q: What obstacles does the Obama administration face in trying to get the reforms approved?

A: The package of proposals is certain to face stiff opposition on Capitol Hill. Big banks and industry groups oppose the consumer protection plan. They argue that empowering a new agency with sweeping authority could actually lessen consumer access to loans and other products. And Republicans and some others have questioned the proposal to give the Fed expanded powers to supervise "too big to fail" institutions, as well as the additional spending the reforms entail.

American consumers have fallen victim to one financial scandal after another in the past decade, from accounting fraud at Enron to illegal late trading by mutual funds to the subprime mortgage meltdow...
American consumers have fallen victim to one financial scandal after another in the past decade, from accounting fraud at Enron to illegal late trading by mutual funds to the subprime mortgage meltdow...
Loading...
 
Filed by Ryan McCarthy
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Something else that needs to be included in the 'agency' is credit reporting. These companies need to be held accountable for what 'THEY' provide to lenders. The inaccuracy of the data alone causes many problems. They charge US to look at OUR information. WE did not ask them to retain this information on us. It is THEIR responsibility to make sure they have accurate information but they don't they put it on us, at our expense/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 06/18/2009

Hi,

We have just added your latest post "Meltdown 101: Reform plan's impact on consumers" to our http://www.au-toloan.info. You can check the inclusion of the post, Visit http://www.au-toloan.info/story.php?title=meltdown-101-reform-plans-impact-on-consumers/ We are delighted to invite you to submit all your future posts to the directory for getting a huge base of visitors to your website and gaining a valuable backlink to your site.

Warm Regards

Au-toloan.info Team

http://www.au-toloan.info

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 AM on 06/18/2009

On the face of it, this new agency to regulate consumer financial products sounds fantastic. *But* the agency has to have real power to enforce and regulate. The once powerful FDA is now just a shell of what once was.

Special interests fueled on consumer dollars, use those dollars against the consumer. Consumers need some acknowledgement that they power this economy and have rights. The scale tipped toward lobbying industries is acting as a destructive force on America's economy and morale, not unlike those falsely valued tranched securities helped destroy the financial sector. There is no "value" there just predation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 06/17/2009

Another government bureaucracy. More taxpayers' dollars falling into an endless pit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 06/17/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 56 fans permalink

Reading the Q and A from the article doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy. It could, it might, it may, it won't right away.

Seems to be just another layer of bureaucrap. Thanks Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 06/17/2009
- SangZe I'm a Fan of SangZe 36 fans permalink

Just what we need, another government bureau that will take years to make a decision, and spend lots of taxpayer money in the process. Of course, it will have no teeth, but it will write a few wimpy regulations and publish a bundle of pamphlets praising its own merit. Stand back, folks, and watch it grow . . . and grow . . . and grow . . . until it needs to be regulated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 06/17/2009
- sculptor I'm a Fan of sculptor 7 fans permalink

The devil is in the details. Much of what's been crafted to date by the Obama Administration has sounded fine in the press but either has been full of subtle (or not so subtle) flaws so in practice it accomplishes little. In addition, Congress has a meddling way of throwing wrenches in anything that vaguely resembles a functional gear. These two combined have yielded a dysfunctional bail-out, useless foreclosure prevention measures, useless bankruptcy reform and so far little to help the man on the street (and I don't mean Wall street.) That said, I hope the hell they pull this one off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 06/17/2009
photo

Doesn't sound to me like much is actually going to be done. Clamp down on all of those financial institutions like you did to GM and Chrysler President Obama. It just looks like a sugar coated double standard again.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 06/17/2009

The administration didn't "clamp" down on GM and Chrysler. I believe they gave them a lot of money to delay the inevitable bankruptcy, though. Or do you really claim that both companies would have been OK if the government had left them alone? Really? Based on what evidence?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 06/17/2009
- fleaba I'm a Fan of fleaba 13 fans permalink

They can start by taking on the banks horrific fees and not posting deposits for days at a time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 06/16/2009

Here's an idea: find a way to eliminate the ridiculous closing costs when buying/selling a home. Why, in this day and age, when everything is computerized do we have to pay so much for a "title search" and all the legal BS? Why should it cost $3,000, $4,000... $10,000 to do a real estate transaction? This is real estates dirty little secret... Those closing costs are loaded with kick backs to realtors. It's all a drag on the real economy, money that could be spent on home improvements, i.e., real goods and services instead of a bunch of lawyers printing forms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 06/16/2009

You have hit on a key point. We should be focusing on the "real economy" as you say. That is making things people want. The U.S. keeps bragging about how our system is adaptable. How it enables entrepreneurs. How it encourages mobility. A lot of this is pure garbage. The key factor these days, starting largely in the 80s, is that there are a lot of "iron rice bowls" with vested interests making huge profits by ripping off the available wealth. That kind of thing is something we considered bad when it was preventing Asia from developing. Now it is our problem.

My grandfather used to complain that, when he bought his first house, it was easy and he paid a lawyer almost nothing. Then things got more and more complicated. Contracts became confusing for laymen. Lawyers cost more. Title searches and title insurance became necessary.

None of that is "conservative" in the true sense. Conservative would be sticking to the old and simple system.

The current system is worse than paying people to dig holes and then fill them in. It is a hidden tax. Not up and up.

For the whole economy, simplify, simplify, simplify.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 AM on 06/17/2009
- jerrypl I'm a Fan of jerrypl 60 fans permalink
photo

I am so sick of Barack's smoke and mirrors! The only consumer protection are as follows:

1. let the banks that are insolvent fail. Make sure the law says that the FDIC can take them over.
2. End all the "socialization" programs that have given away the US treasury to banks through various
Fed and Treasury handout programs.
3. Demand Congress force American overseas corporations to either pay the 35% tax on their profits, or
slap them with import tariffs, and sanctions.
4. Begin a Jobs New Deal program using the money spent on banks for new manufacturing.
5. Either abolish the Federal Reserve Bank or take them over as a US National Bank and stop paying
interest to this private bank in order to borrow money that was sold to them in the form of bonds.

Obama lacks courage. He is a coward. He gives good speeches, as Hillary once said. He is too busy trying to be the good guy instead of the tough new kid on the block demanding change we can believe in!

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 06/16/2009
- platanoman I'm a Fan of platanoman 29 fans permalink
photo

Craziness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 06/16/2009

I think, Jerry, you need to run for president next time. After all, you know so much better what the country needs than the current president, it would be a shame if you didn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 06/17/2009
- LeonBNJ I'm a Fan of LeonBNJ 23 fans permalink

Various consumer contracts like car loans for example, must be in 'plain English', with major items such as interest rates, and so on specified. The same should be for credit cards, mortgage loans, any consumer transation. Also make illegal bans on going to your hometown local court, vs their choice of jusisdiction, bans on class actions, require arbitration or mediation where they get to choose the venue and arbritrators/mediators. Severely limit how interest rates can be adjusted and require specified cause. Limit the use of your credit ratings information. Require free notice of your credit scores along with your credit record at least once a year or any time if a major (5% or more) reduction in your FICO score. Ban the use of univesal default.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 06/16/2009

These things are in plain enough English that anybody who has a little common sense can smell the rat that hides behind them. Of course, since "Johnny can't read" and "Johnny can't do math, either", Johnny has a real problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 06/17/2009

Consumer "protection"...trust us, we know what's good for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 06/16/2009
photo

maybe ..how has wall street and the banks costumer "protection" been working

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 06/16/2009
photo

Aye to that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 06/17/2009

I'd rather trust them than the sharks. The basis is making things simple and not letting these companies rob folks. That's right, I said ROB. It's pulling the entire economy down.

Usury laws are a traditional Christian (or other religion) response to loan sharking and other financial sharp practice. The current system, in which they have been gutted, is not only non-conservative but un-Christian. Not to mention immoral.

There have to be rules. Or, we could go real free market and allow regular bank robbery besides robbery by the institutions. Not that I would suggest it, but it would level the playing field.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 AM on 06/17/2009

As opposed to the companies and institutions that have been siphoning all the wealth out of our country for years! It's time they had some regulation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/17/2009
- Servility I'm a Fan of Servility 12 fans permalink

Another new agency... Sigh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 06/16/2009
- opticsopen I'm a Fan of opticsopen 7 fans permalink

30 years ago when I was in college this country had a consumer protection agency that I had used more than once. Once I had ordered an item and 6 months later still did not have the item even after contacting the seller multiple times. I contacted the consumer protection agency and within 2 weeks I had the item as well as a letter of apology. Then there was Reagan, he eliminated the consumer protection agency. I thought it was a bad idea at the time but always thought most of his ideas were bad. Since then I have needed a like agency numerous times and had no where to turn. Thank you Obama for giving us back what was wrongly taken away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 06/16/2009

Yep. The Consumer Protection Agency was the brainchild of Ralph Nader, one of the most vilified men in America, oddly enough.

Americans are, for the most part, ungrateful f00ls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 06/16/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect