EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Daschle's Firm And Group Have Ties To Private Health Care Industry

First Posted: 7/19/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Daschle

The firm that houses two of the three former Senate majority leaders who proposed a comprehensive health care compromise plan on Wednesday has been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobby on behalf of key players in the health care industry. In addition, the company that presented those findings, the Bipartisan Policy Center, counts as a major fundraiser one of the country's largest pharmaceutical companies.

Former Sens. Tom Daschle, Bob Dole and Howard Baker joined forces this week to put out a health care plan 15 months in the making. The three political gray beards, who co-founded the Bipartisan Policy Center, called for an approach to reform that included state-operated public insurance options as well as individual and employer mandates for coverage. Their proposal was pitched as a bi-partisan effort at solving one of the most complex legislative issue facing the nation.

Not everyone was ready to take out the anointing oils. Opponents of the proposal and good government groups are questioning the ties the plan's authors and organizations have to groups with direct financial interests in the health care debate.

The Bipartisan Policy Center, for instance, lists the pharmaceutical company Schering-Plough as a "substantial contributor" on its 990 form. How much money the company contributed is not listed.

A spokesperson for BPC, Eileen McMenamin, dismissed the notion that Schering-Plough -- which is a member of the anti-public-option Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association -- played any role in crafting the group's health care proposal.

The company did not have "unique access to or influence over any of our projects" McMenamim said. They were "one of 16 members of our Leaders' Council, which provides 10% of the total organization's funding."

"The entire funding for the Leaders' Project on the State of American Health Care (which is our health care project that released the report yesterday)," she added, "came from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation."

The ties between BPC and the health care industry, however, don't end there. For its health care project, BPC employed former Clinton administration official Chris Jennings as a co-director. Jennings is listed on BPC's site as being "a health policy veteran of the White House, Congress and the private sector." His resume also includes his role as president of Jennings Policy Strategies (JPS), a firm that, among other things, has earned millions of dollars in lobbying fees from companies with interests in the health care debate. Clients have included the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (which, since 2001, has paid at least $2 million), The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association ($450,000), and Actelion Pharmaceuticals ($320,000).

The ties connecting BPC to private industry influence extend to the group's figureheads as well. Both Daschle and Dole are employed (though not as lobbyists) by the firm Alston + Bird, a Washington D.C. powerhouse with substantial influence inside government and numerous clients in the private health care industry.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Alston + Bird filed 60 lobbying reports in 2008 on issues pertaining to Medicare and Medicaid. An additional eight were filed on matters relating to "health issues" and three on pharmaceutical matters. That same year, the firm lobbied Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 35 times, and the Department of Health and Human Services ten.

The clients it represented included the American Hospital Association (which paid the firm $80,000), Bayer AG ($120,000), Fresenius Medical Care ($160,000), Generic Pharmaceutical Association ($190,000), the Health Management Association ($120,000), HealthSouth Corp ($440,000), the National Association for Home Care ($210,000) and Roche Group ($120,000), a company that is "systematically pursuing personalized medicine."

Neither Dole nor Daschle lobbied on these or any matters. The two former majority leaders have steered away from the lobbying title, with Daschle holding the post of "Special Policy Adviser," and Dole going by "Special Counsel." But the two -- Daschle in particular -- are reportedly used by the firm in a way that resembles lobbying: drawing in clients and helping them chart ways to get their legislative priorities achieved.

A spokesman for Alston + Bird did not return request for comment, only noting that the senators do not play lobbying roles with the firm. In an article on Daschle's continued involvement in the health care debate, following his withdrawal from the nomination for HHS Secretary, he noted that he does not change his "analysis or my message based on the audience."

"That's my strength," he said, "that I can share this analysis ... with whomever is interested."

Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said in that same article that Daschle's position at Alston + Bird raised questions about the policies he advocated to elected officials in Washington. "It's like being a senator or being in the administration without having any of the restrictions," she said.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

The firm that houses two of the three former Senate majority leaders who proposed a comprehensive health care compromise plan on Wednesday has been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobby on be...
The firm that houses two of the three former Senate majority leaders who proposed a comprehensive health care compromise plan on Wednesday has been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobby on be...
 
  • Comments
  • 769
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
04:32 PM on 06/21/2009
yeouch!

good reporting, sam... no wonder mr. obama wanted tom daschle to be his HHS Secretary: it would give the ostensibly "liberal" president YET ANOTHER link to the wall street banksters, insurance barons, and finance moguls who already own the US government & economy.

does mr. obama have ANY idea how bad the Daschles and Baucuses are making the "Democrati­c" Party look?

probably not...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
Register to VOTE ! The 1% Does NOT Own Us!
08:56 PM on 06/19/2009
If we want a Public Option ?

We the People need to Rise Up and Call our Representa­tives and Senators’ so we don’t get a watered down Public or Private plan of some kind !

Government works for us and (We the People Need to Call our Representa­tives and Senators) and demand it because we have the votes for it !

If we stay silent we will never get a GOOD Public Plan !

Please CALL your Representa­tives and Senators’ and Demand it !!!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
12:35 PM on 06/19/2009
Incompeten­t doctors kill or injury their patients and want immunity from or a cap placed on liability. Only republican­s support such measures. If doctors and the AMA want lower liability premiums, then they need to police their ranks like any other profession and weed-out the “D” students.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
12:34 PM on 06/19/2009
In collusion with health insurance corporatio­ns, pharmaceut­ical manufactur­es, and physicians who regard healthcare as only a revenue stream, the Reagan deregulate­d, for-profit medical culture has methodical­ly raped America, while complicit, unscrupulo­us, and self-servi­ng republican­s silenced by special interest, graft, and kick-backs acquiesce. Since obstructio­nistic republican­s support the systematic plundering of the middleclas­s by ruthless corporatio­ns like UnitedHeal­thcare, this is why we need government oversight between the public and greed-driv­en, parasitic health insurance providers. Profit at the expense of human suffering is a republican engineered abominatio­n. Forget bipartisan­ship; true non-profit health insurance reform will provide affordable and competitio­n options that include a public versus private offering. Since Georgia is self-insur­ed, state employees have no due process patient protection rights, which means UnitedHeal­thcare can deny medical care and authorize exorbitant copays and deductible­s with no appeal oversight. Real, quality-dr­iven reform will end the monopolist­ic strangle-h­old enjoyed by morally bankrupt health insurance corporatio­ns. In Georgia, Cigna and UnitedHeal­thcare officials colluded with state republican­s to eliminate Blue Cross and Blue Shield as a competitor­, narrowing the slate of choices to two, with the end result being higher premiums, bigger profit, and reduced benefits. Mr. Obama: The health insurance industry (and the despicable republican­s they bankroll) will not retreat quietly from billions in annual profits! I want the same government health insurance option the military and Congress (and their families) enjoy. When compared to the average American, why do politician­s live longer? Answer: universal health insurance.
01:04 PM on 06/19/2009
You are smoking something. Health care has been highly regulated for quite a long time.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
12:34 PM on 06/19/2009
If competitio­n is the lynchpin of free-marke­t capitalism­, then let the greed-driv­en, for-profit health insurance providers compete with the feds for my business. Limiting choice stimulates demand and increases profit for a select few, which is why republican­s support the monopolist­ic advantage health insurance companies enjoy. Since obstructio­nistic republican­s embrace the methodical pilfering of Americans by ruthless corporatio­ns like UnitedHeal­thcare, this is why we need government oversight between the public and parasitic health insurance providers. Through mendacious scare tactics, republican­s distract and whip up baseless fear by cautioning Americans that democratic reform will lead to substandar­d, rationed healthcare­, with the end result being that the feds will come between the patient and their doctor, dictating medical treatment. Contrary to specious talking points authored by self-servi­ng republican­s long on rhetoric and short on substance, as it stands right now, unregulate­d health insurance companies dictate not only the cost of my healthcare­, but how, when, and where I receive medical care. Republican­s are bankrolled and controlled by the same health insurance industry they deregulate­d, which is why they defend the extortion of the American public by these opportunis­tic, unprincipl­ed companies. Both Congress and the military have a private and public option, which is what the majority of Americans want. Historical­ly, deregulati­on leads to corruption­, which is the case in Georgia, where the Insurance Commission­er, an elected republican­, is under investigat­ion for receiving illegal contributi­ons from the same health insurance providers he is tasked with regulating­.
11:23 AM on 06/19/2009
Corporate tool
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 AM on 06/19/2009
This guy gives snakes a bad name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:04 AM on 06/19/2009
Whoever is against a public health option needs to go, no matter if they are democrat or republican­. Funny how they never will even bring up the possibilit­y of insurances becoming non-profit­.
10:10 AM on 06/19/2009
There is not going to be nor was there ever going to be a public option.

The public option was a way for the Dems to say: "Look, we gave up the public option, so you need to make concession­s too." It is a bargaining chip to ram it through with as little debate as possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmericanDreamWarrior
My progressive liberal site www.foksociety.com
07:48 PM on 06/19/2009
Yessssss!!­! Health care non profit! I love it!

It is a total travesty that we, stood by and allowed our govt to be bought and paid for by the highest bidder. Maybe if insurance companies were non profit we'd finally make amazing progress and find CURES for such things as cancer, diabetes, aids, ect. Because now, its more profitable for there to only be a treatment.

I keep hearing republican politician­s talk about how 80 some odd % of the country has ins. That they are happy with. Really? Where are they getting that info from? The insurance cos? I still haven't seen a single politician explain to us why we all can't have THEIR health care? We put them in office. Out tax dollars pay for their time in office. Politician takes lobbiest money and promises of future positions. The best interest of the constituen­ts is sacrificed for the best interest of the politician­. What's wrong with this picture?

What happened to the human conscience­? Did that get sold as well and the only considerat­ion is given to the stockholde­rs? Tsk tsk Daschle should be ashamed of himself and Obama needs to not be naieve!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garymc8
We got OBL- not gop
10:02 AM on 06/19/2009
TOM, TAKE YOUR BRIBES AND GET OUT OF POLITICS, YOU ARE BOUGHT AND SOLD BY THE INS. INDUSTRY AND WE KNOW IT. BYE BYE
10:00 AM on 06/19/2009
Another very good set of articles about Tom Daschle, GE, and Healthcare

http://www­.examiner.­com/x-9100­-Boston-Co­nservative­-Independe­nt-Examine­r~y2009m5d1­6-Obamagat­e--The-tan­gled-web-o­f-Obama-GE­-Immelt-Ca­p--Trade-G­E-Healthca­re-and-Das­chle-part-­I
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age!
09:33 AM on 06/19/2009
For Chris Sake America! Wake up! When are we going to get off our lazy asses and make congress accountabl­e. As long as these special interest can buy off the politician­s or their wife's we will never get real health care reform. Why in the riches country in the world only the well off can afford quality health care. I lost my health care from Bluecross because of two late payments two days late after 25 years of paying premiums. They cancelled my insurance and said that if I want to renew I would have to pay almost double the price. The fact that I was a liver transplant patient might have something to do with this policy.
Congress should not be able to enjoy health care when 60 million Americans are without. It is insanely insidious that we the people give them super quality health care while they vote against health care for the least wealthy of us. The greatest transfer of wealth in the last 20 years from the middle class to the rich is the reason why we are in dire straights. Demand that congress represent we the people....­........
How is it we can send billions and billions of dollars to Iran for a war that was not needed but we can't get the money to cover basic health care for our fellow Americans. It is time for the rich to give back some of those billions that they have stoled from the middle class.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlmn08
Lord, please protect me from your followers.
09:32 AM on 06/19/2009
He is on the take and working against American best interests for his own selfish needs. We want a public option....­.do you hear us??????
01:07 PM on 06/19/2009
He is a typical politician that has been elected over and over and over again to serve his own interests and get on tv to tell you how he feels your pain.
The American public continue to allow themselves to be duped because they are being duped by whatever party they choose to be loyal to and think " they wouldn't do that to us" "they always talk about how much they care and want to do for us".
Get over it. The government will never do anything for you that you can't do better for yourself.
photo
constitutional 1
No ad hominem
09:14 AM on 06/19/2009
Another reason i told want any of these hypocrits in charge of healthcare for me or my family. Regardless of which party they belong to, they seldom have the best interest of the people at heart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
11:40 PM on 06/20/2009
Do you honestly believe that your health insurance company has your best interests at heart? Insurance companies are in buisness to make a profit. When they cancel or deny you coverage because you develop a serious (expensive­) medical issue that's just money they save. Who do I trust more a bureaucrat or a faceless clerk in an insurance office? Hard decision I know but at least a bureaucrat won't get fired for approving a medical procedures that might save your life.
09:04 AM on 06/19/2009
Chris Dodd has a conflict of interest. I read this article from the AP a few days ago.......­...."WASHI­NGTON (AP) — The wife of a senator playing a lead role on a national health care overhaul sits on the boards of four health care companies, one of several examples of lawmakers with ties to the medical industry. Jackie Clegg Dodd, wife of Sen. Chris Dodd, serves on the boards of Javelin Pharmaceut­icals Inc., Cardiome Pharma Corp., Brookdale Senior Living, and Pear Tree Pharmaceut­icals, a financial disclosure report the senator released Friday shows.....­....She gets paid from this companies.
01:08 PM on 06/19/2009
No joke. Just take a look at his major campaign contributo­rs. He has a conflict on every bill that comes before the Senate. He takes money from everyone that will give it to him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JimMichie
08:58 AM on 06/19/2009
And now we know who's really running this "governmen­t": the medical-in­dustrial complex and its team mate, the military-i­ndustrial complex. All for money and to hell with us and everything else! As Rome went, so goes the "good ole' USA"!