iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Number Of People On Unemployment Falls For First Time Since January

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER   06/18/09 08:09 PM ET   AP

Jobs

WASHINGTON — On the surface, the government seemed to signal Thursday that more Americans are finding jobs: The number of people receiving unemployment aid fell for the first time since early January.

But that doesn't necessarily mean more companies are hiring. Fewer people are receiving jobless aid largely because more of them have exhausted their standard unemployment benefits, which typically last 26 weeks.

Government figures, in fact, show the proportion of recipients who used up their jobless benefits averaged 49 percent in May, a record.

And while many analysts expect the recession to end by late summer, they warn that unemployment will stay high into 2010.

"It is unlikely that new hiring has picked up in any meaningful fashion," Joshua Shapiro, chief economist with MFR Inc., a consulting firm, wrote in a note to clients.

Other economists took a more positive view of the Labor Department report: They said it's consistent with other recent figures that suggest the economy is poised to recover from the longest recession since World War II by the July-September quarter.

The number of people receiving unemployment aid fell by 148,000 to 6.69 million in the week that ended June 6 _ the largest drop in more than seven years. The decline broke a string of 21 straight increases in the number of people claiming benefits for more than a week, the last 19 of which were records. (A dip in continuing claims several weeks ago was later revised higher.)

The jobless-benefit rolls "always stabilize or decline right around the end of the recession," wrote Abiel Reinhart, an economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

A group of economists from large banks, including JPMorgan, had forecast earlier this week that the economy will grow by 0.5 percent in the third quarter, after shrinking since last year.

Initial claims for jobless benefits rose by 3,000 to a seasonally adjusted 608,000 in the week ending June 13, above analysts' expectations. But the four-week average, which smooths out fluctuations, fell by 7,000 to 615,750. Figures for continuing claims lag behind those for initial claims by a week.

The four-week average is at its lowest point since mid-February, further evidence that the pace of job cuts is slowing.

In another encouraging sign, the Conference Board on Thursday said its index of leading economic indicators rose for the second straight month in May after seven straight declines. The index rose 1.2 percent, the biggest gain since March 2004.

Conference Board economist Ken Goldstein said if those trends continue, a "slow recovery" should start before the end of the year, but he cautioned that the job market will take longer to rebound.

The financial markets finished mostly up Thursday. The Dow Jones industrial average added about 58 points.

Meanwhile, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage fell to 5.38 percent this week, down from a seven-month high of 5.59 percent a week earlier, mortgage company Freddie Mac said. Rates had risen for three consecutive weeks, along with yields on long-term government debt, as investors worried that the growing federal deficit could trigger inflation.

The drop in the unemployment-benefits rolls could signal a slowing in the rise of the jobless rate, economists said, which reached a 25-year high of 9.4 percent in May. The decline also likely reflects the drop in first-time claims in recent months, meaning fewer people are joining the jobless-aid program.

Still, nearly 2.4 million people are receiving unemployment compensation under an emergency program authorized by Congress last summer and extended by the Obama administration's stimulus package. That program provides an additional 20 to 33 weeks of benefits beyond the standard 26 weeks of benefits.

Economists are closely watching the level of first-time claims, considered a timely, if volatile, indicator of the economy's health. The four-week average of claims has dropped by about 40,000 from its peak of nearly 659,000 in early April. But many economists say it needs to fall further. Bruce Kasman, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co., said a drop in the four-week average to 580,000 by next month would be enough to declare the recession over.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, said initial claims likely have been elevated by the bankruptcies of General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, which have led to plant shutdowns and the closing of auto dealerships. Those factors also could cause fluctuations in the claims numbers in coming weeks.

Consumers and businesses have cut back on spending in response to the housing bust and the financial crisis. Companies have cut a net total of 6 million jobs to cut costs since the downturn began.

Still, job cuts are slowing. The Labor Department said employers eliminated 345,000 positions in May, only about half the monthly average of jobs lost in the first quarter.

More job cuts have been announced in the past week. MySpace, the social networking Web site owned by News Corp., said it will cut nearly 30 percent of its work force, or about 420 jobs. Cessna Aircraft Co., the nation's largest builder of corporate jets, said it will cut 1,300 jobs by August, on top of 6,900 layoffs that it previously announced.

(This version CORRECTS RECASTS 3rd graf to clarify figure is an average; corrects day to Thursday in graf 12. Moving on general news and financial services.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — On the surface, the government seemed to signal Thursday that more Americans are finding jobs: The number of people receiving unemployment aid fell for the first time since early Ja...
WASHINGTON — On the surface, the government seemed to signal Thursday that more Americans are finding jobs: The number of people receiving unemployment aid fell for the first time since early Ja...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 186
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
10:44 PM on 06/18/2009
Trying to rosy up the present and near future does no good. We all know people are exhausting their benefits! Including myself! Their are no jobs anywhere! Why do they have to keep lying to the public when we all know whats not happening and that is jobs! They are not happening!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markm8128
09:49 PM on 06/18/2009
I wonder how many of them died, because they couldn't afford their COBRA plans, and therefore couldn't pay the phenomenal cost of healthcare for serious illnesses? (Go Obama!!)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SCG
08:25 PM on 06/18/2009
" Fewer people are receiving jobless aid largely because more of them have exhausted their standard unemployment benefits, which typically last 26 weeks." -( from above )

End of story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
05:37 PM on 06/18/2009
benefits ran out
of course of course you stupid horse
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
04:03 PM on 06/18/2009
Oh wow, what good news. That just means a record number of Americans have been unemployed for over a year, and their benefits have run out.

We haven't had any kind of increase in hiring, so that's the only conclusion. But hey, Stay the Course, woohoo to The Bush Boom!
04:52 PM on 06/18/2009
Exactly! I know that's true in my husband's case. Although he has found something temporary and part-time...sigh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
05:39 PM on 06/18/2009
Well good luck to you both. The place I work seemed really secure... but even they are laying people off now. Hopefully I won't have that lonely meeting with HR anytime soon.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GerryS
I WANT to pay $1 million per year in taxes, or mor
03:58 PM on 06/18/2009
bushit- their benefits ran out-------------------
03:38 PM on 06/18/2009
They are not considered unemployed only because they exhausted their benefits.
In the midst of a sustained recession, the unemployment numbers mean little except as an indicator that people are getting desperate.
When jobs get created, that'll be news.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:55 PM on 06/18/2009
Exactly.

Government unemployment numbers are bogus.
03:21 PM on 06/18/2009
This "Recession" has created more Democrats than Rush Limbaugh could ever hope to create with his "idiotlog". This is similar to the political effect of the Great Depression where the top marginal tax rate rose from 25% to 70%. Unlike the minor speed bumps of the last 4 recessions I do not think we will soon forget this one.

Raising the top marginal tax rate will serve to rein in the hyper-greed that caused this mess. If the rich are unable to keep most of the multi-million dollar windfalls they get maybe they won't be as hungry for them and won't mind paying the rank and file a living wage.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
11:29 PM on 06/19/2009
Oh, we'll forget it just as soon as it gets fixed. You wait. Things will be running smooth for about two years and then we'll feel safe enough to elect another republican to mess it all up again.
03:17 PM on 06/18/2009
I dont know how this article can be considered positive about the economy when the reason that the number of unemployed on benefits fell because they exhausted their time on the benefits They are still unemployed Nice try at making a rosy sounding story out of data which clearly doesnt show signs of recovery
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:30 PM on 06/18/2009
Sad but true.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
11:30 PM on 06/19/2009
Mortgage rates are down. That is a significant indicator.
03:16 PM on 06/18/2009
Power is much better exercised by political hacks and elected officials that have been bought by wall street lobbyists.

At least the Fed isn't subjected to as great a degree to the wishes of wall street -- they're relatively isolated and have the ability to move above the petty partisan politics. Its not the ideal solution but it is much much better than what there is now.
03:14 PM on 06/18/2009
Watch this clip of Jim Kramer saying that the reason why the stimulus package has not created many jobs is because the money was given to local unions. WHAT???

http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=1840
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwayneosedach
03:14 PM on 06/18/2009
I don't expect this "ray of light" to last more than a month. Unemployment will peak in 2011 in the double digits. And the return to pre-recession employment will take (many) years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaryanneAZ
Raven enjoys the Halloween candy!
02:58 PM on 06/18/2009
Time will tell the story. For me, I see the glass half full and believe that we are on an upswing despite all the naysayers and doubting Thomas' on the board.
03:05 PM on 06/18/2009
we all hope you are right, no matter how bleak the actual data looks.
02:29 PM on 06/18/2009
This is an old trick. If you say "recovery " often enough, maybe one will happen. They're hoping for a self-fulfilling prophecy by spreading false impressions about consumer confidence. The fact is a country doesn't suddenly pop out of a recession when buried under a 3 trillion debt. What usually happens is hyper-inflation (the old $20 dollars for a loaf of bread scenario). There is no recovery in sight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaryanneAZ
Raven enjoys the Halloween candy!
03:02 PM on 06/18/2009
Good news does engender confidence and confidence engenders increased spending and optimism which works to improve hiring ultimately. There are many factors that when viewed together spell a reason to be cautiously optimistic.
12:01 PM on 06/19/2009
What exactly does that mean "cautiously optimistic". That particular oxymoron was coined by the financial industry.
03:06 PM on 06/18/2009
I am looking forward to hyper-inflation so I can pay off those student loans.
02:15 PM on 06/18/2009
Take back the trillions of $$$ given to the banks, who just sit on it and make it totally ineffective then start government incentive to create realistic industries that give employment and generate real productive income, some of which would hopefully be from exports.

Every other country, especially China and most of Europe have goverment incentives to protect it's industries. No matter what you call it it's a form of protectionism and its inevitable. We should stop being naive and take care of our own house. The only ones who win if we don't are the multinational corporations who don't care where they get their hand out.

good finance articles for a slow news day: http://www.bit.ly/12NCJR

Every other country, especially China and most of Europe have goverment incentives to protect it's industries. No matter what you call it it's a form of protectionism and its inevitable. We should stop being naive and take care of our own house. The only ones who win if we don't are the multinational corporations who don't care where they get their hand out.
03:07 PM on 06/18/2009
Banks don't "just sit on it", they funnel it to the super rich.