Allen Stanford Jailed On Fraud Charges

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Allen Stanford Jailed On Fraud Charges stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DEVLIN BARRETT | June 20, 2009 02:54 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
An artist rendering shows Texas billionaire, R. Allen Stanford, second from left, is flanked by his attorneys Christina Sarchio, left, and Maria Jankowski, second from right, during a hearing at Federal court in front of U.S. Magistrate M. Hannah Lauck in Richmond, Va., Friday, June 19, 2009. Prosecutor Steven Tyrrell is at right. (AP Photo/William J. Hennessy Jr.)

WASHINGTON — Brash Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford has been jailed on charges his international banking empire was really just a Ponzi scheme built on lies, bluster and bribery.

The Justice Department announced Friday charges against Stanford and six others who allegedly helped the tycoon run a $7 billion swindle. At a court hearing in Richmond, Va., a federal judge agreed with prosecutors that Stanford poses a flight risk and ordered him to remain in custody until a future detention hearing in Houston.

Among those charged were executives of Stanford Financial Group and a former Antiguan bank regulator who prosecutors say should have caught the fraud but instead took bribes to let the scheme continue.

Robert Khuzami, the enforcement director for the Securities and Exchange Commission, said investigators have built "an impressive criminal case from the rubble of this massive fraud."

If convicted of all charges in the 21-count indictment, Stanford could face as much as 250 years in prison, officials said.

Dick DeGuerin, Stanford's lawyer, said in a written statement that Stanford was "confident that a fair jury will find him not guilty of any criminal wrongdoing."

The indictment unsealed Friday in Houston charged Stanford and other executives at his firm falsely claimed to have grown $1.2 billion in assets in 2001 to roughly $8.5 billion by the end of 2008. The operation had roughly 30,000 investors, officials said.

Investigators say that even as Stanford claimed healthy returns for those investors, he was secretly diverting more than $1.6 billion in personal loans to himself.

Story continues below
advertisement

Court papers charge Stanford and top executives orchestrated the massive fraud by advising clients to buy certificates of deposit from the Antigua-based Stanford International Bank. Stanford and the other executives were charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Stanford was also charged with conspiring to obstruct an SEC proceeding.

While Stanford is less well-known than the infamous swindler Bernard Madoff, authorities say both men's businesses were based on the same type of scam _ faking investment returns while attracting new investors to keep the operation afloat.

"This case is a typical Ponzi scheme, robbing Peter to pay Paul," said Gregory Campbell of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

Authorities say they are investigating 100 other possible Ponzi schemes, although none on the scale of the Stanford or Madoff cases.

"We will find you, we will stop you, and we will make you pay for your crime," said Campbell.

Stanford, 59, has been working since February to challenge what his attorney called "the false accusations against him." DeGuerin said that rather than resulting from fraud or a Ponzi scheme, "the present insolvency of the Stanford Companies was caused by the SEC's heavy-handed actions, which have destroyed and continue to destroy much of the value" of the companies and their investors.

A group of cheated Stanford investors said in a statement that their losses "are devastating, as senior citizens are losing their homes, going without medical care, and becoming a burden on their children and families."

Stanford surrendered to the FBI Thursday and appeared in federal court in Richmond, Va., Friday afternoon, where authorities convinced Magistrate Judge Hannah Lauck to keep him behind bars for the time being.

Prosecutor Steven Tyrrell said at the hearing that more than $1 billion from Stanford's alleged scheme remains unaccounted for, and if anyone has access to it, it's Stanford.

The others indicted in the case were Stanford executives Laura Pendergest-Holt, Gilberto Lopez and Mark Kuhrt.

A separate indictment unsealed in Florida accused a fourth Stanford worker, Bruce Perraud, of destroying records important to the investigation.

Prosecutors charged Leroy King, the former chief executive officer of Antigua's Financial Services Regulatory Commission, with conspiracy to obstruct an SEC investigation.

In February, King told reporters the commission properly scrutinized Stanford's business.

Prosecutors allege King accepted more than $100,000 in bribes to help Stanford continue his fraud.

At his zenith, Stanford was a larger-than-life figure in Antigua. His enterprises there include a newspaper, two restaurants, a development company and the ornately landscaped Stanford cricket grounds, where he shook up the staid world of professional cricket last year by bankrolling the purse in a $20 million winner-take-all match.

Newly filed SEC documents accuse Stanford and his finance chief, James M. Davis, of conducting a massive Ponzi scheme" in which early investors were paid returns from money put in by later investors. Davis has been cooperating with federal investigators.

Jeff Tillotson, who represents Pendergest-Holt, chief investment officer of Stanford's parent company, told The Associated Press, "We obviously deny that our client has committed any crime." He has said she was "set up" by Stanford.

___

Associated Press writers Marcy Gordon in Washington, Larry O'Dell and Zinie Chen Sampson in Richmond, Va., and Linda Franklin and Regina L. Burns in Dallas contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Brash Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford has been jailed on charges his international banking empire was really just a Ponzi scheme built on lies, bluster and bribery. The Justice...
WASHINGTON — Brash Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford has been jailed on charges his international banking empire was really just a Ponzi scheme built on lies, bluster and bribery. The Justice...
Filed by Nick Graham
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

I guess his snotty little, precious kids will have to go out and get real jobs. The horror, the horror.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 06/23/2009
- jalowe1957 I'm a Fan of jalowe1957 35 fans permalink
photo

Don't think of passing "Go," or collecting your two hundred bucks for doing so. Your next stop is the slammer...as Bernie Madoff's cellmate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 06/22/2009
- jerrypl I'm a Fan of jerrypl 48 fans permalink
photo

Stanford did his own Ponzi scheming. Biden's son did not engage in criminal activity.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 06/22/2009
- nomorefed I'm a Fan of nomorefed 3 fans permalink


If the truth were being reported we'd be having riots in the streets. And meanwhile the top execs in banks and brokeragesa that caused such a mess are STILL employed and making millions while laying off THOUSANDS of people that actually do work. If you know anyone in banking that's still employed, odds are they are doing the work of three people so the top execs can show 'savings' and contineu collecting mega-incomes.

good articles: href=".http://www.bit.ly/12NCJR>recommended reading

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 06/22/2009
- jeanruss I'm a Fan of jeanruss 9 fans permalink

Joe Biden's brother and son had a 50 million fund with Stanford and had to know what he was really doing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 06/22/2009
- Papago12 I'm a Fan of Papago12 2 fans permalink

Why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 06/22/2009
- Deli I'm a Fan of Deli 25 fans permalink
photo

"We will find you, we will stop you, and we will make you pay for your crime," said Campbell.

Yeah, right. About $7 billion too late. What a joke the SEC is and has been. During the dotcom boom it totally looked the other way while "analysts" touted firms with zero customers and sales into the $350 a share range.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 AM on 06/22/2009
- nomorefed I'm a Fan of nomorefed 3 fans permalink


Your house is worth $125,000 but you paid $250,000 don"t worry with "Mark-To-Market" Neutered you can say whatever you want to about your home value and no one can refute you!
Now when you go in for a loan, simply declare the house is worth $300,000 and along with your clean "ON-THE-BOOKS Balance Sheet" with no visible other debts means you get money from the FED at 1% interest or maybe less!
Why can"t this world be true for ALL AMERICANS like it is for Wall Street?
We do not own Congress and they DO using ill-gotten FUNDS!
Are the Wall Street Banks really healthy? With "OFF-THE-BOOKS" accounting and "MARK-TO-MARKET" Neutered who knows what the truth is!

good articles: href=".http://kl.am/tsc> recommended website

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

This is where he doesn't answer the question whether he is CIA.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/06/allen-stanford-cries-thre_n_183638.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 06/21/2009
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Keep in mind that we do not all the details of what exactly happened and how whatever crimes may have been made, but I would like to ask if anybody knows what the difference between this and McC's K eating and his bank problems. The prices on the street for illicit substances has come down. Planes that have brought over prisoners to Guantanamo are being caught with tons of stuff in them. Could these promises made to investors of impossible returns be just a cover to launder what the CIA can't seem to stop doing? If their spending is above what has come in, it would appear that there was more going on than just defraudment. Asked in interview whether he was CIA, he would not answer the question.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/10/allen-stanford-us-drug-in_n_201347.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 06/21/2009
photo


Great so many other FRAUDSTERS can be jailed as well! BRAVO!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 06/21/2009
- trimom I'm a Fan of trimom 2 fans permalink

Jailed? Bravo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 06/21/2009
- jeffp26 I'm a Fan of jeffp26 25 fans permalink
photo

If the former banking minister of Antigua was charged with not stopping Stanford because he was bribed to do so, shouldn't the SEC employees who did not catch Madoff, and were stupid enough not to take bribes, also be charged?

Seriously, they aided and abetted Madoff. And one of those people is Madoff's triple named lawyer Ira Lee Sorkin, who ran the SEC office in NYC while Madoff was running his ponzi scheme.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 06/21/2009
- bellabeach I'm a Fan of bellabeach 12 fans permalink

Good ridance to Sir Stanford....now we need to go to the bankers who made all the subprime loans!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 06/21/2009
- gakabani I'm a Fan of gakabani 20 fans permalink
photo

Ok, one more but where is Bush?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 06/21/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect