iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kodak Kills Kodachrome Film

CAROLYN THOMPSON   06/22/09 04:15 PM ET   AP

Earns Eastman Kodak

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Sorry, Paul Simon, Kodak is taking your Kodachrome away.

The Eastman Kodak Co. announced Monday it's retiring its oldest film stock because of declining customer demand in an increasingly digital age.

The world's first commercially successful color film, immortalized in song by Simon, spent 74 years in Kodak's portfolio. It enjoyed its heyday in the 1950s and '60s but in recent years has nudged closer to obscurity: Sales of Kodachrome are now just a fraction of 1 percent of the company's total sales of still-picture films, and only one commercial lab in the world still processes it.

Those numbers and the unique materials needed to make it convinced Kodak to call its most recent manufacturing run the last, said Mary Jane Hellyar, the outgoing president of Kodak's Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group.

"Kodachrome is particularly difficult (to retire) because it really has become kind of an icon," Hellyar said.

The company now gets about 70 percent of its revenue from its digital business, but plans to stay in the film business "as far into the future as possible," Hellyar said. She points to the seven new professional still films and several new motion picture films introduced in the last few years and to a strategy that emphasizes efficiency.

"Anywhere where we can have common components and common design and common chemistry that let us build multiple films off of those same components, then we're in a much stronger position to be able to continue to meet customers' needs," she said.

Kodachrome, because of a unique formula, didn't fit in with the philosophy and was made only about once a year.

Simon sang about it in 1973 in the aptly titled "Kodachrome."

"They give us those nice bright colors. They give us the greens of summers. Makes you think all the world's a sunny day," he sang. "... So Mama don't take my Kodachrome away."

Indeed, Kodachrome was favored by still and motion picture photographers for its rich but realistic tones, vibrant colors and durability.

It was the basis not only for countless family slideshows on carousel projectors over the years but also for world-renowned images, including Abraham Zapruder's 8 mm reel of President John F. Kennedy's assassination on Nov. 22, 1963.

Photojournalist Steve McCurry's widely recognized portrait of an Afghan refugee girl, shot on Kodachrome, appeared on the cover of National Geographic in 1985. At Kodak's request, McCurry will shoot one of the last rolls of Kodachrome film and donate the images to the George Eastman House museum, which honors the company's founder, in Rochester.

For McCurry, who after 25 years with Kodachrome moved on to digital photography and other films in the last few years, the project will close out an era.

"I want to take (the last roll) with me and somehow make every frame count ... just as a way to honor the memory and always be able to look back with fond memories at how it capped and ended my shooting Kodachrome," McCurry said last week from Singapore, where he has an exhibition at the Asian Civilizations Museum.

As a tribute to the film, Kodak has compiled on its Web site a gallery of iconic images, including McCurry's Afghan girl and others from photographers Eric Meola and Peter Guttman.

Guttman used Kodachrome for 16 years, until about 1990, before switching to Kodak's more modern Ektachrome film, and he calls it "the visual crib that I was nurtured in." He used it to create a widely published image of a snowman beneath a solar eclipse, shot in the dead of winter in North Dakota.

"I was pretty much entranced by the incredibly realistic tones and really beautiful color," Guttman said, "but it didn't have that artificial Crayola coloration of some of the other products that were out there."

Unlike any other color film, Kodachrome is purely black and white when exposed. The three primary colors that mix to form the spectrum are added in three development steps rather than built into its layers.

Because of the complexity, only Dwayne's Photo, in Parsons, Kan., still processes Kodachrome film. The lab has agreed to continue through 2010, Kodak said.

Grant Steinle, vice president of operations and head of lab operations at Dwayne's, said the southeast Kansas shop was fielding calls Monday from customers asking whether it would continue to handle Kodachrome, which accounts for 20 percent of the lab's business. Steinle said he understood why Kodak reached its decision, but it was still disappointing.

"Kodachrome is still an important part of our business," he said during a phone interview Monday.

Hellyar estimates the retail supply of Kodachrome will run out in the fall, though it could be sooner if devotees stockpile. In the U.S., Kodachrome film is available only through photo specialty dealers. In Europe, some retailers, including the Boots chain, carry it.

___

On the Net:

Kodak: http://www.kodak.com

___

Associated Press Writer Sheila Ellis contributed to this report from Kansas City, Mo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 109
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:56 PM on 07/06/2009
Don't worry too much about preserving digital. It's true that we don't know how well CD's and DVD's will last. In fact, the ones you burn yourself may not even last 20 years. But you can protect yourself from this by having multiple backups and making fresh copies periodically. That's something you couldn't do with slides. One fire, and your slides are gone. Multiple off-site backups of digital media is highly survivable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alessandro Machi
DebtSUSPENSIONrights.blogspot.com
06:36 AM on 06/25/2009
Kodak still makes 35mm motion picture film, still film, and even super-8 film.

Super-8 film stocks include two Ektachrome motion picture stocks, 2 BW Reversal motion picture film stocks, and two VISION 3 negative motion picture stocks.

Super-8 film has it's own look that has only become more powerful and vivid in the digital age.

Learn more at http://www.super-8mm.com and http://www.super-8mm.net
11:31 AM on 06/24/2009
Another "artists material" like polaroid bites the dust, hoprfully some less profit driven concern will carry on manufacturing the product but users must keep up the pressure by actually using film, not just harking back because unlike digital solutions Anologue film cannot just hahg around on standby you have to get out there and use it.
03:19 PM on 06/23/2009
1st 100 days - There are 2.9 million more people unemployed in May than there were unemployed in January. The unemployment rate went from 7.6% to 9.4%.
Since May 2008, we have lost 5.5 million jobs. The biggest losers were:
Manufacturing 1.5 million lost
Finance & Prof Serv 1.5 million lost
Construction 1.1 million lost
Retail & Leisure 1.3 million lost

hat tip to href=".http://www.iamned.com"> for providing good finance and economics articles

where is the change? where is hope? why cant ppl find jobs?
06:53 PM on 06/23/2009
Because they took Kodachrome away, Beavis.
01:59 PM on 06/23/2009
I sent rolls of Kodachrome to Dwayne's in my Intro to Filmmaking class in college. Made my incompetent cinematography look almost passable when I got it back. I suppose this just means someone needs to develop an awesome Kodachrome filter for Final Cut...

I just said the complete wrong thing, didn't I?
01:43 PM on 06/23/2009
Taking a picture isn't always about capturing reality, it can be about capturing an emotion. Digital might be able to get the colors of a shot as they really are but film can inhance the tones and give it life.
Just like Black and White isn't real but it is quite beautiful, and digital black and white just doesn't have the tonal range as a silver gelatin fiber print.
Kodak has had bad management for about twenty years now. They are the ones that decided to phase out an award winning film with an industrial ektachrome. And they reduced the silver content of their papers in the 90's so most pro's went to Ilford or agfa.
06:38 AM on 06/23/2009
RIP, Kodachrome. You brightened my life.
photo
Stalling
Holy Money
07:20 PM on 06/22/2009
I've shot a lot of Kodachrome on Super 8 (which they discontinued years ago) nothing matches it. Even the best video won't have the same rich colors. I've seen Kodachrome from the 30s still intact and brilliant as ever. It is a sad day when Kodachrome is retired.
05:58 PM on 06/22/2009
Just before the digital age.began, I worked for a photographer for 4 years. We shot with all kinds of film and I was amazed at the colors Kodachrome made compared the other films. My boss showed me that outdated Kodachrome kept in an icebox made dazzling sunset photos that I believe it even brought out colors that we can see in the normal spectrum. While some folks have gone with Fuji's Velvia film which is great for day-glow color effects, I will never forget my time viewing Kodachrome slides. I will miss you my friend.
05:23 PM on 06/22/2009
I only use my film camera. I use the digital only when I have to. I love film. This is sad.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
photo
rabiddog6708
This Dog's bite is Worse Than his Bark
05:20 PM on 06/22/2009
The world changes. Technology also k illed the typewriter, carbon paper......and soon the payphone will be a relic of the past. Before long, all the movies you see in the cinemas will be digital and 35 mm film stock will be a thing of the past, like VHS tapes, Vinyl albums....
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
10:46 PM on 06/23/2009
Don't count 35mm film out too soon.

Chinese entrepreneurs have been buying up Kodak's production tooling as Kodak takes the lines down. Small companies are finding they can profit from film where giant Kodak could not.

While past performance is no guarantee of future value, it looks to me like the Chinese see a future for film.

I wouldn't advise betting the ranch against them
05:14 PM on 06/22/2009
If the truth were being reported we'd be having riots in the streets. And meanwhile the top execs in banks and brokeragesa that caused such a mess are STILL employed and making millions while laying off THOUSANDS of people that actually do work. If you know anyone in banking that's still employed, odds are they are doing the work of three people so the top execs can show 'savings' and contineu collecting mega-incomes.

good articles: href=".http://www.bit.ly/12NCJR>recommended reading
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Irish55
05:05 PM on 06/22/2009
This is so sad. What has happened to Kodak? They have been so terribly mismanaged for the past 20 years (or so) they are driving this once great company into the ground. I was born and raised in the Rochester area - so many parents of the kids I grew up with worked for Kodak, their kids worked for Kodak and so on.

In the end, Kodak has noone but themselves to blame. They were the ones who 'discovered" the capability of the digital process - and sat on it. For years - allowing others to take the lead. What once was a proud, thriving company is now a shell of itself -- because of this decision and so many other bad ones. George Eastman is probably turning over in his grave.
05:44 PM on 06/22/2009
Kodak thought it was invulnerable. That's usually what kills them...
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
11:00 PM on 06/23/2009
Kodak is a very profitable company. They're just not making as much of it from film as they used to.

Seventy percent of profits from digital - thirty percent from film. Kodachrome was less than 1% of that 30%. It cost more to manufacture Kodachrome than Kodak made from selling Kodachrome.

What really killed Kodachrome is the quality of Kodak's (and Fuji's) E-6 and C-41 films. Kodachrome is difficult to process and it takes some really nasty chemicals to process it. There's no mini-lab that can handle it.

That's not true of C-41 & E-6 films.

I love Kodachrome, but the economics of manufacture and processing made it non-competitive in the market.

I shoot E-6 and get 99% of what Kodachrome gave me. I can do it for less than half the cost, and I can get it processed TODAY.
05:01 PM on 06/22/2009
I recently bought a new phone the Samsung i8510 Innov8 that has mechanical shutter and 8 Megapixel.

Takes fantastic photos especially in Macro mode. Toook a photo of a rose by my house about 2 inches away. Spectacular.

I have sold my old 6 MP standalone camera because this phone rocks. GPS, best music player ,. better than IPOD.

I don't think its available yet in the USA.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
missviv
09:41 PM on 06/22/2009
Who needs photographers when you have.. camera phones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markseibold
Retired Artist-Astronomy Teacher
04:25 PM on 06/22/2009
Those who never took a Kodachrome photograph and projected them as sides onto a screen (I had taken possibly several hundred to maybe a thousand in the 1970's and still have these artfully made transparencies today), will never know what they have missed.

The senseless comments here about technology changes for the better and that we could mourn over Dageurrotypes gone is missing the point. I think a few commenters here do still see it in the artistic way that many youth today will miss (yet you can find old rolls remaining and get the chemistry to develop it if you make some efforts) but the real art of wet film I believe should be experienced to understand light and film theory as an art form. The student simply learns more as an intrinsic method to produce an image that digital does not approach with button pushing automatic image making and manipulation in say Photoshop. I have used it all, and now resort to the digital for recording my award winning astronomy pastel sketch art but I will miss the film processing for Kodachrome. Ask the digital age kids to make an oil painiting or to play an acoustic instrument instead of an ipod. They will counter with "not enough time for this as too busy on text messaging". You will see what we are losing with the convenience of technology to take the traditional arts away.

Mark Seibold- Artist-Astronomer, Portland Oregon
markseibold.com