Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PHILIP ELLIOTT | June 22, 2009 11:46 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama, surrounded by members of Congress, and others, signs the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Monday, June 22, 2009, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington.(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — Lamenting his first teenage cigarette, President Barack Obama ruefully admitted on Monday that he's spent his adult life fighting the habit. Then he signed the nation's toughest anti-smoking law, aiming to keep thousands of other teens from getting hooked.

Obama praised the historic legislation, which gives the Food and Drug Administration unprecedented authority to regulate what goes into tobacco products, to make public the ingredients and to prohibit marketing campaigns geared toward children.

But he didn't say how his own struggle was coming since he moved into the White House. And aides were no more forthcoming.

As senator, candidate and now president, Obama has veered between frank and cagey about his personal battle with smoking.

He promised his wife, Michelle, more than two years ago that he would quit if she let him seek the White House.

He has often acknowledged since that he has "fallen off the wagon." But he hardly ever provides specifics. And though White House aides pack nicotine gum in their jackets to help him resist, they also refuse to give a clear answer to the question of whether the president still sneaks a smoke now and again.

"I hate it," Michelle Obama told CBS' "60 Minutes" during the presidential campaign's early days. "That's why he doesn't do it anymore, I'm proud to say. I outed him _ I'm the one who outed him on the smoking. That was one of my prerequisites for, you know, entering this race is that, you know, he couldn't be a smoking president."

Well, not exactly.

Story continues below

During Obama's two-year White House bid, he was known to occasionally bum a cigarette from a staff member _ while also making sure to emphasize his efforts to stop for good and his progress from his onetime five-smoke-a-day average.

During Monday's bill signing, Obama focused on how the new law would help keep future generations of kids away from the dangerous habit. The president mentioned his own experience very briefly _ just 30 words.

Almost 90 percent of people who smoke began at 18 or younger, he said.

"I know. I was one of these teenagers," he said. "And so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."

And then he went back to the merits of the bill and the shortcomings of the tobacco industry, which he accused of targeting young people. One key provision in the new law bans candy-flavored cigarettes and the use of other flavored smokes that might appeal to teenagers. Ads aimed at young people also are banned.

Aides refused to elaborate on his own situation.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he hadn't asked Obama about his smoking and made plain that he didn't plan to. The presidential spokesman stuck to vague language that left the impression Obama still occasionally falls off the wagon, but he did not say so directly.

"I don't, honestly, see the need to get a whole lot more specific than the fact that it's a continuing struggle," Gibbs said. "He struggles with it every day."

Still, it's not as if Obama was ever even a pack-a-day puffer.

"I've never been a heavy smoker," Obama told The Chicago Tribune in 2007. "I've quit periodically over the last several years. I've got an ironclad demand from my wife that in the stresses of the campaign I don't succumb. I've been chewing Nicorette strenuously."

Loading...
 
Filed by Lila Shapiro
 
Comments
859
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

Thanks Obama. Even though you're awesome enough to chose to stop smoking for yourself, you're right--the rest of us aren't. Thanks for doing our thinking for us.
We, the weak-minded hoi polloi, salute you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

No, instead, you weak-minded hoi polloi are saluting F.o.x "N.ews." Who's telling you you have to quit smoking? Hm. Now that I say that, it was never mentioned, was it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

I didn't read anywhere in the bill where it said you have to give up smoking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

Sure, the law doesn't ban all smoking (yet).

But it does ban smoking certain things:
The law bans most cigarette flavorings.
The law will soon ban menthols (it orders the FDA to study the issue of whether menthol should also be banned).
The law will change the formulations of cigarettes and cigars.
The government can also issue new rules on nicotine content, flavorings, and other product features.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 06/22/2009
- toushe I'm a Fan of toushe 8 fans permalink

This bill signing was nothing but another dog and pony show.A good photo op.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 06/22/2009
- PJay1 I'm a Fan of PJay1 63 fans permalink
photo

Yup.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 06/22/2009
- betty22 I'm a Fan of betty22 12 fans permalink

never mind...misspoken....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 06/22/2009
- betty22 I'm a Fan of betty22 12 fans permalink

no I just care for someone saying can't have too much cigarettes....too much chocolate...too much this and that..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 06/22/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 37 fans permalink
photo

Nice of President Obama to restrict a practice for others that he engages in himself. I'm still waiting for a new attempt to prohibit sale of beer, wine, and liquor for which an enormously better case can be made for public protection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 06/22/2009

I bet drunk driving kills as many, if not more, people every year than smoking-related diseases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

Repression with good intentions is still repression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/22/2009

Smoking cost the taxpayers big bucks. Cancers and other illness are a big industry for the medical people. Why bother to smoke,,,its costly, has no vitamins or minerals and decreases energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/22/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 37 fans permalink
photo

Eating fast food costs the taxpayers big bucks. Coronary heart disease and other illnesses are a big industry for the medical people. Why bother to eat Big Macs or Quarter Pounders .. it's costly, increases cholesterol, has few vitamins or minerals, and increases obesity.

Since when does every activity have to be justified to Big Brother or risk being banned?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 06/22/2009

Good shot, Oldtt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

smoking does not cost anybody anything save the cost to the smoker of a pack of smokes. Taxpayer dollars used to treat smoking related illnesses is a problem of socialism, not freedom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Still unsure what to do since slavery has been abolished the Tobacco giants now are faced with the fact that they can no longer peddle their drug to children are thinking about going into green energy. Their first move is to develop a tobacco that can generate electricity. They are seeking new non smokers to try their products.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

Healthiness is the new morality.
The question is no longer "is it good or evil?"
Now the question is "is it good for you or evil?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 06/22/2009
- betty22 I'm a Fan of betty22 12 fans permalink

alcohol kills more people...illness..drunk driving accidents...violent crimes...... then smoking...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Your logic is impeccable. Because we're not taking care of EVERY thing that kills people, why do anything about this thing that kills people?

Ban illness. Good luck getting that one passed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 06/22/2009
- Sabreen60 I'm a Fan of Sabreen60 71 fans permalink
photo

Care to post a link. And btw, alcohol is regulated. So the gov't is telling you what to do. Last time I looked moonshine is still illegal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 06/22/2009

Not everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

People get drunk, beat their spouse, drive away then have a smoke. That covers it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/22/2009
- angelv I'm a Fan of angelv 2 fans permalink

from a quick google search, i've seen 440 000 deaths attributed to smoking cigs, 75 000 from alcohol and related incidents....

the violent crimes link is a stretch but even if it weren't, I doubt that alcohol related violent crimes would account for over 300 000 more deaths.....

so, provide some links to refute

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 06/22/2009
- Oldtt I'm a Fan of Oldtt 37 fans permalink
photo

Whenever you have a large, enthusiastic, unimpeded lobby dedicated to elimination of some hated practice, I guarantee that a Google search will uncover any number of facts to support the movement. It's easy to produce huge numbers of victims by making some primary assumptions and then extrapolating them through the entire population. It's like blaming millions of deaths in WW2 on sales of toy cap pistols to pre-war youths. Deaths and illnesses are caused by multiple factors which comprise ordinary living and are not susceptible to being eradicated by benign government actions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 06/22/2009
- betty22 I'm a Fan of betty22 12 fans permalink

stop telling me what to do...next alcohol which kills more people ....illnesses....drunk driving accidents....violent crimes.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Who's telling you what to do? Are you a tobacco conglomerate?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

maybe betty enjoys flavored tobacco products.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 06/22/2009

Here's what you should do:

1. Stop pretending it's not an addiction.
2. Stop telling me that I can't tell you what to do. (It's not fair.)
3. Breathe deeply, hold that breath. Release when we say it's okay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 06/22/2009
- tb92 I'm a Fan of tb92 99 fans permalink
photo

A choice to protect the people instead of the corporations. More please!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

No, this is nothing of the sort...this bill was written by a major tobacco lobby firm and pushed through as a means of protecting what position they have....It is actually a protective measure for the cigarette makers.....One more time, this is not the change I voted for......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009

This is indeed the problem. Once again big business wins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 06/22/2009
- Alethea I'm a Fan of Alethea 68 fans permalink
photo

How so?

It seems to me that limiting their advertising ability and the different kinds of products they can produce is not in the best interests of that industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 06/22/2009
- tb92 I'm a Fan of tb92 99 fans permalink
photo

Interesting. Proof, please?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 06/22/2009
- bobbyperu I'm a Fan of bobbyperu 6 fans permalink
photo

Phillip Morris actually wrote the bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

I thought that Democrats were the same party that wanted to legalize marijuana?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Your point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Your right... that doesn't do any damage. What a joke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009
- AprilPA I'm a Fan of AprilPA 12 fans permalink
photo

Some people smoke marijuana by buying flavored cigars taking out the tobacco in those cigars and using the wraps to roll up the marijuana. Now these flavored cigars are banned. Guess people will have to find some other way to smoke marijuana.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 06/22/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 35 fans permalink
photo

Not all of us. Seems you don't "think" much at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 06/22/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

marijuana does not cause death....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 06/22/2009
- toushe I'm a Fan of toushe 8 fans permalink

It's made all libs brain d e a d !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

if you light something on fire and inhale the smoke, it will cause cancer. this is a jab at big business, not a gain for public health. it's a good jab at big business, but let's call it what it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Marijuana has not yet been proven to cause cancer has it? The answer is no, therefore, what is your point?

Pot is less dangerous than nicotine and alcohol and they are both legal. Again, what is your point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 06/22/2009

It's perfectly consistent. The overall philosophy is that we should regulate behavior that causes harm to others. We can't have a totalitarian police state. None of us want that. This means that our laws, except for those governing severe things like violence, can never be perfectly enforced. Instead, we develop incentives that help implement policies not enforceable by force.

This is the whole idea of a s.in tax. People will always s.in. So, instead of having laws you can't enforce, tax it!

First of all, the verdict is not out yet on the health effects of marijuana. Our *coug*h personally interested friends here at huffpost will probably tell you that it is harmless. I personally think that it is harmful, perhaps less so than tobacco, but we won't know until we get it out of the shadows and study it. If it is legal, we can tax it, study it, and regulate it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 06/22/2009
- tb92 I'm a Fan of tb92 99 fans permalink
photo

Quite a few studies have been done. They found no connection to cancer. In fact, some showed a decrease in cancer among pot smokers. They did find, however, an increase in emphysema and lung irritation.

For some people, though, pot is a medicine that can extend and improve their lives. You can't say that about cigarettes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

so because the President has struggled with an addition that means that businesses that produce a legal product sold only to consenting adults and the dangers of abuse are well known and established and this legal product which already carries a warning and is heavily taxed, these businesses should further have their freedoms eroded?
Furthermore, I,as a consenting adult, should have my options for a legal product further limited and I should be shielded from receiving advertisements about a legal product I enjoy?

To think we used to call the President the Leader fo the Free World.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 06/22/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 35 fans permalink
photo

No one is telling you that you can't smoke. Do you truly think you will "suffer" from less tobacco advertising? Besides, it is the advertising that particularly appeals to young people that is being targeted.

Your whining is very unattractive, especially if you are over 18. Grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

i believe that when our rights are attacked that we all suffer. If a legal business today can be told what methods of speech it may and may not use based on what a bureaucrat feels is healthy or unhealthy then what speech will be restricted tomorrow?

We already have laws that prohibit children from buying tobacco and prohibiting children from using tobacco. If a store is selling this product to children then that store is at fault, not the tobacco company. It is also the advertising that particularly appeals to all consumers. Shoppers don't buy a product they don't know about or have no reason to believe is superior to the product they currently buy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 06/22/2009
- JimBozo I'm a Fan of JimBozo 14 fans permalink
photo

I thought cigarette advertising toward children was already banned. Remember Joe the Camel? That was already ridiculous, just because it was a cartoon character, not a photo or woodcut. Fritz the Cat (X-rated) was also a cartoon character, but nobody can say that was directed toward children, either.

Pure BS! I've never seen any cigarette advertising meant to appeal to children, going all the way back 1900.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

I think that Reagan said it best. If you want to get rid of something tax it to death. The American People are supporting this policy all around the country. You are more than welcome to continue to purchase a pack of smokes. The key is to stop kids from thinking that smoking is cool. This flavored cig thing has not been heavy until recent when they lost a huge market share and they tried to gain NEW smokers. Do adults just pick up the addiction? No they have to get new smokers by getting KIDS to start an addiction. Fight a good fight marine not one that kills children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

I'm sorry, did the Presi.dent write this bill? Did he vote overwhelmingly in favor of it in the Senate and in the House? Did he do all of this BE.CAUS.E of his addiction?

No, he signed what CONGR.ES.S did, in SPIT.E of his addiction. Making this all about Obam.a and his sm.oking struggle.s is completely ridi.culous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

it is true that all federal laws are originate in the House or the Senate, however, it is naive to believe that the President can't call for certain legislation and work with Senators and Reps to draft a bill that he wants

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Obviously your comprehension skills are a little rusty:

"The new law bans candy and fruit flavors in tobacco products, and it limits advertising that could attract young people.

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act also allows the FDA to lower the amount of addiction-causing nicotine in tobacco products and block misleading labels such "low tar" and "light." Tobacco companies also will be required to cover their cartons with large graphic warnings.

The law won't let the FDA ban nicotine or tobacco outright.

"It is a law that will save American lives," Obama said."

You can continue to kill yourself...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

for now I can but my product choices are going to be limited. Also, these legal businesses will have their free speech rights eroded. How long until another business receives the same govt muzzle?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 06/22/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

The "free world" is very expensive, and lucrative to those who do its bidding....Change is not coming to America...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

If I tried to market a new product today that k illed 400,000 Americans every year (as cigar.ettes do), I would be run out of business and sent to pris0n.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

ANother great move by our great president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

sarcasm gets lost on people here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 06/22/2009
- toushe I'm a Fan of toushe 8 fans permalink

Just think if no one buys cigs then who is the gov. going to tax to make up for all that lost money. WHO'S NEXT!!! TAX PEOPLE THAT BREATH AIR !!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 06/22/2009

I got it....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 06/22/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect