Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PHILIP ELLIOTT | June 22, 2009 11:46 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama, surrounded by members of Congress, and others, signs the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Monday, June 22, 2009, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington.(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — Lamenting his first teenage cigarette, President Barack Obama ruefully admitted on Monday that he's spent his adult life fighting the habit. Then he signed the nation's toughest anti-smoking law, aiming to keep thousands of other teens from getting hooked.

Obama praised the historic legislation, which gives the Food and Drug Administration unprecedented authority to regulate what goes into tobacco products, to make public the ingredients and to prohibit marketing campaigns geared toward children.

But he didn't say how his own struggle was coming since he moved into the White House. And aides were no more forthcoming.

As senator, candidate and now president, Obama has veered between frank and cagey about his personal battle with smoking.

He promised his wife, Michelle, more than two years ago that he would quit if she let him seek the White House.

He has often acknowledged since that he has "fallen off the wagon." But he hardly ever provides specifics. And though White House aides pack nicotine gum in their jackets to help him resist, they also refuse to give a clear answer to the question of whether the president still sneaks a smoke now and again.

"I hate it," Michelle Obama told CBS' "60 Minutes" during the presidential campaign's early days. "That's why he doesn't do it anymore, I'm proud to say. I outed him _ I'm the one who outed him on the smoking. That was one of my prerequisites for, you know, entering this race is that, you know, he couldn't be a smoking president."

Well, not exactly.

Story continues below

During Obama's two-year White House bid, he was known to occasionally bum a cigarette from a staff member _ while also making sure to emphasize his efforts to stop for good and his progress from his onetime five-smoke-a-day average.

During Monday's bill signing, Obama focused on how the new law would help keep future generations of kids away from the dangerous habit. The president mentioned his own experience very briefly _ just 30 words.

Almost 90 percent of people who smoke began at 18 or younger, he said.

"I know. I was one of these teenagers," he said. "And so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."

And then he went back to the merits of the bill and the shortcomings of the tobacco industry, which he accused of targeting young people. One key provision in the new law bans candy-flavored cigarettes and the use of other flavored smokes that might appeal to teenagers. Ads aimed at young people also are banned.

Aides refused to elaborate on his own situation.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he hadn't asked Obama about his smoking and made plain that he didn't plan to. The presidential spokesman stuck to vague language that left the impression Obama still occasionally falls off the wagon, but he did not say so directly.

"I don't, honestly, see the need to get a whole lot more specific than the fact that it's a continuing struggle," Gibbs said. "He struggles with it every day."

Still, it's not as if Obama was ever even a pack-a-day puffer.

"I've never been a heavy smoker," Obama told The Chicago Tribune in 2007. "I've quit periodically over the last several years. I've got an ironclad demand from my wife that in the stresses of the campaign I don't succumb. I've been chewing Nicorette strenuously."

Loading...
 
Filed by Lila Shapiro
 
Comments
859
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
photo

The FDA may not be able to regulate tobacco and nicotine (yet), but they can certainly rein in the 599 additives commonly found in cigarettes http://quitsmoking.about.com/cs/nicotineinhaler/a/cigingredients.htmm). Now all we need is a stronger FDA.

I like that Obama used the cries of the right wing regarding almost every regulation they've passed or attempted to pass: the children. Conservatives are against the same wall they've been pushing legislators against: support this legislation or you hate kids. Nice turn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 06/22/2009
- jestanle I'm a Fan of jestanle 7 fans permalink
photo

One freedom at a time.....no flavored tobacco, no big engines that get under 34 mpg, no SUV's, no trucks, higher taxes on alcohol, sugary drinks, fatty foods. Next up for regulation are guns and media content. We have become a nation of lemmings with no sense of self reliance or responsibility crying for our free health care and government handouts led by one bad leader after another.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 06/22/2009

See, here's the problem with this kind of libertarian argument:
I am not "free" to not pay the tax dollars that go to the massive health care costs for uninsured smokers. When individual behavior causes damage that the public must pay to fix, it is no longer "just someone's choice". It becomes a matter of public responsibility.

Feel free to strawman that and apply it to an absurd situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 43 fans permalink

10 years ago, this was the "absurd situation".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 06/22/2009
- angrified I'm a Fan of angrified 4 fans permalink

zing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 06/22/2009
- jestanle I'm a Fan of jestanle 7 fans permalink
photo

What is public responsibility? Your argument can be applied to every spectrum of the population. When parents don't raise their children correctly and they have behavioral disorders or become obese we end up paying for them, so do you raise taxes on bad parents? You have to draw the line somewhere, trust me your tax burden will get worse once a socialized healthcare system is put into place. How about a return to individual responsibility? I guess you believe it "takes a village" eh comrade?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/22/2009
- -0013 I'm a Fan of -0013 11 fans permalink

Ban all fast food then. Force poor people to spend more money on healthy food. I don't want any of my money going to treat the morbidly obese people in this country who make no effort to lose weight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- Y3rMawm I'm a Fan of Y3rMawm 13 fans permalink

Exactly why the public should not be paying for any of it.

How long before this extends to your Twinkies? Sodas? Oh they will just require Nutrasweet, and all will be "good".

What about when you are not allowed to engage in other perceived risky endeavors, because risk management principles must be applied to public expenditures to save money? Surely you have/had some hobbies?

Or are you are really saying that it's OK to violate the civil liberties of somebody else, because it does not affect you, other than financially, and you happen to disagree with their particular activity? Your favorite activity is next on the chopping block. Be careful what you wish for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 06/22/2009

Too bad, so sad. Back into your shiny metal box, lemming. While you're at it, learn to speak for yourself, rookie tr0ll.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 06/22/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 35 fans permalink
photo

Oh please, it is the government's responsibility to inform and protect its citizens. Billions can be saved in health care costs if more people quit smoking. I say to whiners like you that I will listen to you when you sign off on all treatment for smoking-related illnesses unless you pay the full cost with your own money. It drives up insurance costs for everyone when insurers have to pay to treat smokers.

Try thinking of someone besides your self!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 06/22/2009

I will assume this is snark. Too st*pid otherwise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 06/22/2009

Smoking is a choice. Can we protect kids from being brought to psychiatrists by their parents or pressured by their schools and given addictive drugs like amphetamines and benzodiazepines? (I know how my comment will play out, so I will just stop you now and say that I am not a scientologist, i hate that they are associated with anti-psychiatry movements because they delegitimize the fact that psychiatry should be more closely scrutinized, and there is always some commenter who doesn't believe me when I say I'm not a scientologist, to him I say: xenu, xenu, xenu {a scientologist couldn't mention xenu in public}--i think i need to make this my signature somehow)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 06/22/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 35 fans permalink
photo

You may not be a scientologist, but you don't know what you're talking about anyway. Psychiatry is part of medicine. Psychiatrists are medical doctors, went to med school, did residencies, studied longer to specialize in helping people who suffer greatly from under diagnosed and under treated illnesses. How dare you speak for parents you don't even know! Many families have been saved from the brink of total dysfunction with the help of a good psychiatrist and well-managed medications.

Smoking is a choice in the beginning, but it is an addiction, that is more difficult for some to break than others. I detest smoking, but I have some compassion for those who try and fail, and I encourage them to keep trying. I have little sympathy for any addict who doesn't admit the problem and at least try--which includes getting competent medical help.

Thank god you are not making the laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 06/22/2009
- Y3rMawm I'm a Fan of Y3rMawm 13 fans permalink

If Einstein were a child in today's Amerikan Fascism Indoctrination Facilities (READ: Skewls), he would have been immediately thrown on Ritalin, and we would not have had an Einstein.

Of course, this problem exists because of .gov is involved in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 06/22/2009
- Anthro I'm a Fan of Anthro 35 fans permalink
photo

There is absolutely NO reason someone on Ritalin could not come up with the Theory of Relativity, in fact; he might do so in less time than if he were not taking the Ritalin (or other type of stimulant medication that is legal and prescribed by medical doctors for children and adults who have attentional difficulties that prevent them from living a full and productive life).

I don't know that Einstein suffered from ADHD, but Ritalin has nothing to do with whether or not geniuses function.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/22/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 73 fans permalink

I'm waiting for Bill Orally to spin this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

It's only a matter of time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 06/22/2009
- toushe I'm a Fan of toushe 8 fans permalink

You folks just can't accept the truth,that is sad ,what a great role model barry signing the tobacco bill! One thing the country can always rely on libs are their own worst enemy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Let's have a lesson on punctuation! You can use things called commas [ , ] and periods [ . ], strategically placed in your sentences, and magically your meaning becomes clear!

You use them to separate out thoughts so that things don't run together! People can then tell what you're trying to say! Then everyone is happy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

All grammar na.zi aside, if I'm reading your comment correctly, you're being sarcastic in saying that Obama's being a great role model in signing this bill. Personally, I think he IS being a great role model in doing so. Even though he's struggling with quitting himself, he knows that this needs to be done, so he's stepping up to the plate and hitting a homer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

LinkedIn is running a poll right now on this very topic:

"With regards to tobacco advertising, government should:"
a) regulate it more strictly
b) ban advertising altogether
c) leave the rules as is

you can vote and see the results here:
http://polls.linkedin.com/p/43807/wshgq

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 06/22/2009
- yankees I'm a Fan of yankees 22 fans permalink

Obama accused the tobacco industry of targeting young people, exposing them to a "constant and insidious barrage of advertising where they live, where they learn and where they play. Most insidiously, they are offered products with flavorings that mask the taste of tobacco and make it even more tempting."

This paragraph certainly describes Obama, himself. Stop controlling our lives!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 06/22/2009
- Davwbaird I'm a Fan of Davwbaird 24 fans permalink
photo

like you know better? Like you are super human? like you don't have a conscience?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 06/22/2009
- Aabby I'm a Fan of Aabby 30 fans permalink
photo

lol, sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Obama said, ""The decades-long effort to protect our children from the harmful effects of tobacco has emerged victorious."

You must hate kids.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

As a Republican I would like to help you here. You may not agree with many of his policies but programing our children to smoke is controlling our lives. For hundreds of years people have been programed to start the addiction early and it be a life long addiction. There is no difference between a tobacco company hooking our children and people on the product and a crack dealer except one is given tax breaks and an ear in congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 06/22/2009

What about guns? I was taught at an early age to use a gun, but I'm not addicted. I know people who are, but that's different because with a gun, you aren't harming yourself. You usually harm someone else. The people who choose to harm themselves remove themselves from the gene pool and the traffic gets a little better. Smokers who choose to harm themselves don't necessarily want to live a long life surrounded by idiots where longstanding problems never get solved and people are used as simple articles of commerce so that someone else can enjoy caviar, yachts, and golf (while their legalized slave labor works their lives away).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 06/22/2009

This entire argument is really a joke. Anyone born less that 40 years ago inherently knows that cigarettes are bad and kill people. For goodness sake, we grew up being told this over and over. Every ad and package has a vivid warning. If someone is so stupid to think smoking is good for you, I'll buy them a carton myself.

This bill was unnecessary, it will only make a few large tobacco firms stay in business forever and wipe out the smaller companies. The remaining companies will still sell zillions of the deadly little sticks, with or without flavorings & focus ads.

As far as costs to society, why not just charge people who smoke more $$$ for health care services. A simple blood test can determine if you are a smoker. Smokers will get a surcharge of "X"%, enough to cover extra costs. Seems fair. I'm all for people doing what they want, but I agree other should not have to pay for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 06/22/2009
- MaryK2924 I'm a Fan of MaryK2924 8 fans permalink

Pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Does anyone know where I can read this bill in full?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 06/22/2009

Obama is making it up as they go...This just in...Hugo Chavez(A Obama supporter)he calls him"Conrad Obama"...is also a fan of Ahmadinejad

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

I've spent quite a few minutes trying to make any sense out of this comment. I'm giving up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 06/22/2009
- toushe I'm a Fan of toushe 8 fans permalink

Get in touch with someone on capital hill, they read nothing and somehow they always get the P Hs here to agree with it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 06/22/2009
- Candw1 I'm a Fan of Candw1 12 fans permalink
photo

OK so now that we have supplanted smokers rights, let's go after the liquor, beer and wine drinkers....
let's target and tax them to death as well. Drunk drivers kill people, let's put the restaurants and bars out of business that serve them. Let's go after anybody that eats sugar in any form, no more cakes, cookies and desserts, after all that makes people fat and that's unsightly. Let's also target anyone that buys anything made in another country....... I have brown eyes so lets tax anyone with blue eyes and green eyes, they shouldn't have any rights. Let's also target and tax to death parents that let their kids run wild, that's a plan worth getting behind. Let's target anyone or any thing that we don't agree with, it seems to be the American way now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 06/22/2009
- zipowitz I'm a Fan of zipowitz 39 fans permalink

And then let's "bail them out" when their business starts failing. LOL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 06/22/2009

2 Conservatives in a row...i love it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 06/22/2009
- jbrantow I'm a Fan of jbrantow 40 fans permalink

not much fun when you're considered a second class citizen....huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 06/22/2009
- Sabreen60 I'm a Fan of Sabreen60 70 fans permalink
photo

So you'd be ok with someone bl0wing sm0ke in your newborn baby's face while sitting in a restaurant. We don't need to "go after" people who choose a negative life style. But type II diabetes is self inflicted. If you watched the documentary "Sicko", then you'd know that doctors in some other countries are paid more if they get their patients to live a more healthy life style, e.g., not smoking, losing weight and exercising.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 06/22/2009

You can't smoke in restaurants anymore!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 06/22/2009
- Davwbaird I'm a Fan of Davwbaird 24 fans permalink
photo

Get a life.Humans have to be protected against themselves at times. Smoking costs us all in health care costs and quality of living..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 06/22/2009
- bbmill37 I'm a Fan of bbmill37 5 fans permalink

Couldn't agree more, Candw1. We have no rights anymore. I have written to every senator and legislator I can think of complaining about the discrimination that smokers are subjected to. I want to know WHY someone can't open a restaurant or bar that caters specifically to SMOKERS? Then all the self-righteous alcoholics who don't smoke can frequent their own Non-Smoking places of business. Discrimination is discrimination. What I do with my body is MY business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 06/22/2009

When u get cancer, keep telling yourself that, just make sure u don't commit murder with your second hand smoke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 06/22/2009
- MaryK2924 I'm a Fan of MaryK2924 8 fans permalink

Second hand smoke isn't just your business, it does affect other people. It was just a matter of time before this happened. I'm glad my husband and I chose to quit, much more for health reasons than anything else, but it makes things alot easier, most states, including mine, don't let you smoke indoors in public places anymore anyway. My house smells much cleaner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

You might do well with a "smokers only" restaurant as long as you have deep- fried Snikers bars and deep-fried Twinkies on the menu. Be sure to have one of those portable defibrillators mounted on the wall for easy access.

Imagine the collective effect on health care costs if everyone had the good sense to live a healthy lifestyle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 06/22/2009

bbmill37, very good point I've been railing against for years. For an 8 or 9 member city council to ban smoking in its cities' bars is not only discriminatory towards bar owners, it's unconstitutional--flat out. See our constitution--freedom of enterprise--which is to say that a business owner can dictate how her or his business shall be run, and who will or will not be allowed inside the doors of that business. Believe it or not, most of these city and county boards use the reason, "its bad for children." Excuse me, but children have no business being brought in to bars-- but people do it, and it's the same people who say ridiculous things like, "... blowing smoke in my baby's face."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 06/22/2009
- toyboat I'm a Fan of toyboat 4 fans permalink
photo

If only he would enact legislation this tough on the robber barron bankers who raped this country of it's wealth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 06/22/2009
- Whinger I'm a Fan of Whinger 48 fans permalink
photo

OK Limbaugh, extinguish the cigar, there's enough pollutants coming out of you as it is!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 06/22/2009
- jtmoney I'm a Fan of jtmoney 11 fans permalink

this is a long term tie-in to his health care plans. he's always said that it's health care that is bankrupting the country, not wars or social security. it will take 50 years for any of this to show any rea results, but he's clearly trying to eliminate health care problems for Americans in the future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 06/22/2009
- GunneraGirl I'm a Fan of GunneraGirl 141 fans permalink
photo

It's called PREVENTION and it's a hell of lot wiser and more compassionate approach than what we have going now. smart. smart. smart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 06/22/2009

No, not wars bankrupting the country, certainly not. How many trillion into Iraq, now? No, no, not wars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Next up: a ban on fruit-flavored coal burning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 06/22/2009

This bill is really good PR after a series of botched moves that are draining Obama's political capital. And if Menthol is included among those substances prohibited by the law that's gonna backfire. I used to be a smoker and menthol is a favorite among smokers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 325 fans permalink
photo

I think menthol was exempted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 06/22/2009
- blukazoo I'm a Fan of blukazoo 14 fans permalink

menthol isn't considered a "flavor" in this case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 06/22/2009
- Davwbaird I'm a Fan of Davwbaird 24 fans permalink
photo

I used to be smoker but it was the chromium vats at the chevrolet ave assembly plant in flint that go me one summer when re roofing the area around the vats. An are that my father had done 20 years or so before. He died from Shay drager. So now I have COPD most from the chromium issue and that was before the EPA. So this stuff pays off at least at some point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- 3M Rocker I'm a Fan of 3M Rocker 3 fans permalink

Why don't they just outlaw tobacco if it actually kills 400,000 a year - or whatever crazy number they're throwing around now? I'm a smoker and I would love to quit - but have found it to be the most difficult thing I've ever faced IN MY LIFE because of addiction. If they banned cigs, most people would quit. Some would turn to black markets, but the reason most people continue to quit is that they are addicted and the object of their addiction is readily available at any store.

Of course, we all know why they don't ban it. They make alot of revenue from the taxes. Money trumps lives as usual. And on top of that, they pass half-measure laws and ordinances that create a pariah status for smokers, as they continue to raise taxes on the back of our addiction.

And you people who mock addiction seem to lack a basic level of decency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 06/22/2009
- DrToketee I'm a Fan of DrToketee 19 fans permalink

I'm skeptical. I'm still waiting for the "Butt ... "

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 06/22/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 19 fans permalink
photo

but?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 06/22/2009
- teron678 I'm a Fan of teron678 131 fans permalink
photo

you mean "But"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 06/22/2009

seriously?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 06/22/2009
- blukazoo I'm a Fan of blukazoo 14 fans permalink

cigarette butt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 06/22/2009
- reggieb I'm a Fan of reggieb 84 fans permalink

butter?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Did you mean "sha-bang-bang?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 06/22/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect