Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill, Cites Own Struggle stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PHILIP ELLIOTT | June 22, 2009 11:46 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama, surrounded by members of Congress, and others, signs the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Monday, June 22, 2009, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington.(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — Lamenting his first teenage cigarette, President Barack Obama ruefully admitted on Monday that he's spent his adult life fighting the habit. Then he signed the nation's toughest anti-smoking law, aiming to keep thousands of other teens from getting hooked.

Obama praised the historic legislation, which gives the Food and Drug Administration unprecedented authority to regulate what goes into tobacco products, to make public the ingredients and to prohibit marketing campaigns geared toward children.

But he didn't say how his own struggle was coming since he moved into the White House. And aides were no more forthcoming.

As senator, candidate and now president, Obama has veered between frank and cagey about his personal battle with smoking.

He promised his wife, Michelle, more than two years ago that he would quit if she let him seek the White House.

He has often acknowledged since that he has "fallen off the wagon." But he hardly ever provides specifics. And though White House aides pack nicotine gum in their jackets to help him resist, they also refuse to give a clear answer to the question of whether the president still sneaks a smoke now and again.

"I hate it," Michelle Obama told CBS' "60 Minutes" during the presidential campaign's early days. "That's why he doesn't do it anymore, I'm proud to say. I outed him _ I'm the one who outed him on the smoking. That was one of my prerequisites for, you know, entering this race is that, you know, he couldn't be a smoking president."

Well, not exactly.

Story continues below
advertisement

During Obama's two-year White House bid, he was known to occasionally bum a cigarette from a staff member _ while also making sure to emphasize his efforts to stop for good and his progress from his onetime five-smoke-a-day average.

During Monday's bill signing, Obama focused on how the new law would help keep future generations of kids away from the dangerous habit. The president mentioned his own experience very briefly _ just 30 words.

Almost 90 percent of people who smoke began at 18 or younger, he said.

"I know. I was one of these teenagers," he said. "And so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."

And then he went back to the merits of the bill and the shortcomings of the tobacco industry, which he accused of targeting young people. One key provision in the new law bans candy-flavored cigarettes and the use of other flavored smokes that might appeal to teenagers. Ads aimed at young people also are banned.

Aides refused to elaborate on his own situation.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he hadn't asked Obama about his smoking and made plain that he didn't plan to. The presidential spokesman stuck to vague language that left the impression Obama still occasionally falls off the wagon, but he did not say so directly.

"I don't, honestly, see the need to get a whole lot more specific than the fact that it's a continuing struggle," Gibbs said. "He struggles with it every day."

Still, it's not as if Obama was ever even a pack-a-day puffer.

"I've never been a heavy smoker," Obama told The Chicago Tribune in 2007. "I've quit periodically over the last several years. I've got an ironclad demand from my wife that in the stresses of the campaign I don't succumb. I've been chewing Nicorette strenuously."

Loading...
 
Filed by Lila Shapiro
 
Comments
859
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (14 pages total)

I couldn't help but wonder if, when he finally signs a bill supporting federal marriage rights for GLBT people, he will have to also personalize it saying something about the irony that his belief that marraige should be only between a man and a woman. Will he feel it necessary to remind us that he is straight? Why should he personalize policy? What should his own belief system, with all of its basis and bias on religion, personal experience, and so on, be connected with the laws of this "free" nation? The fact is that he smokes and that made him feel a little uncomfortable in signing legislature that is meant to protect the health of the citizens. I sure wish that the fact that is staight wouldn't continue to distort his view about the correctness of federally recognizing gay realtionships with the rights and responsibilities of marriage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

If he didn't address his struggle to quit smoking, he'd be labeled a hypocrite. And now, because he DID address it, he's being called out on that too for even signing the bill in the first place. He can't win. Think what you want (and I really do mean that in the nicest possible way), but I think he made the better of the two choices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 06/22/2009

I wasn't trying to criticize his decission to comment on the fact that he smokes while signing the bill. I agree with you, it was almost inescapable.

I was just commenting on the fact that the whole experience underscored the relationship between the personal experience on this planet of those that legislate and their position on matters that effect the entire nation. This makes me very uncomfortable. The founding father's did a great job of creating an infrastructure for the nation that was far beyond the often petty and very incorrect personal believes that they held as evidenced by their actions. The were able to abstract for the sake of the nation.

Obama did abstract today on the subject of smoking. Good for him.

In the case of gay marriage, if Obama were gay and had been elected (which we know would not yet be possible), the gay marriage legislation would be through pronto. As he has no skin in the game, he doesn't get how important it is for a minority of folks in the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 06/22/2009
- Pema I'm a Fan of Pema 48 fans permalink
photo

int he nicest way possible, it isnt your rights being trampled on, its not your taxes without the same benefits. they arent my rights, but its a human rights issue i stand firmly with my brothers and sisters on this planet who have love for the same sex. both are important and all it takes is a stroke of the pen but his religous views are involved..­.less projection and more campaign promises kept i say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 06/22/2009
- Highwind I'm a Fan of Highwind 7 fans permalink
photo

He personalizing the policy because he is a smoker and he knows how much trouble is it for people to quit smoking. I think you are projecting on him what you think he might do in the case of a gay marriage bill. He has no experience being gay, so why would be talk about his personal experience with it. Unless he has gay friends or family members, I really don't see him talking about that if he was to EVER sign a gay marriage bill or LBGT rights bill, etc. I really don't see the relevance of your comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 06/22/2009
- Pema I'm a Fan of Pema 48 fans permalink
photo

When are the campaign promises to be fullfilled? skirt around....­we wont give up on gay rights and human rights abuses by the government in our military bases and gulags.
anti smoking is fine but its a distraction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 06/22/2009
- bbmill37 I'm a Fan of bbmill37 5 fans permalink

Hogwash, Glenn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 06/22/2009
- TheFobster I'm a Fan of TheFobster 10 fans permalink

Taking away our rights, one bill at a time...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

I don't remember "Congress shall make no law restricting the freedom to advertise harmful products to children" in the Bill of Rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 42 fans permalink

What if someone's pursuit of happiness includes enjoying a cherry tobacco pipe after working 40% of the workday to pay the government's bills?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 06/22/2009

So you think it is ok to target children with cigarette ads? Because the Bill of Rights does not mention it. The founding fathers were very smart people, but how could they know then what corporate greed would turn this country into? Tobacco companies and pharmaceutical companies, for example benefit from getting everyone hooked on their product. Surely there must be something that bothers you that is not protected by the Bill of Rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 06/22/2009

The last time I saw a tobacco ad was about 10 years ago. Joe Camel has been around a long time, if that's what you're talking about. Are we going to forget that cigarettes exist if they don't advertise at all? No. Just like we won't forget that McDonald's sells crappy hamburgers if we don't see a commercial or billboard. If we have a health problem, I'm sure our doctor can diagnose it and suggest a drug for it before we have to ask him/her about it (because the commercial told us to ask our doctor). If they saved that money and put it toward research for cures, we might someday be able to cure diseases, not just treat them and suffer the chain of side effects that just leads to other problems. It's all about money and greed. They want to reduce nicotine so people have to buy more cigarettes. Everybody should stop drinking milk. I think there is a hormone that makes young calves follow the herd more readily. Since we are the only species on the planet that drinks another species' bodily fluids well into adulthood, obedience and herd-mentality might be the reason they want us to drink it. Has anyone ever tried pig's milk? Why not? Tiger's milk might have a hormone that makes the drinker pick-off weaker members of the herd and eat them! Think about milk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/22/2009
- GunneraGirl I'm a Fan of GunneraGirl 130 fans permalink
photo

Your right to inhale, ingest or imbibe harmful and dangerous substances ends at where it impacts others. Kill yourself if you want to, but leave the rest of us out of your plans,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 06/22/2009
- DMHendrix I'm a Fan of DMHendrix 94 fans permalink
photo

You can still smoke...so puff away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 06/22/2009
- BillN I'm a Fan of BillN 23 fans permalink
photo

It's NOT your right, when you are suffering from COPD or lung cancer in your old age, to drain money from the Medicare system to treat your self-inflicted, usually-fatal illness.

Both of my parents died from smoking-related illnesses. The ICU nurse who took care of them both for several weeks, told me that 6 out of every 10 dying people in their unit are there because of smoking-related illnesses. It's time that this whole ridiculous mess stopped. Paying subsidies to tobacco farmers at the same time Medicare is paying out for the illness that tobacco creates. Those dollars could certainly be put to better use.

Secondhand smoke is a Group-A carcinogen - equivalent to Asbestos. If your kids or other members of your family are breathing your smoke, you are killing them too.

Nicotine does not occur naturally in tobacco. The tobacco companies ADD it to their product so that you stay hooked. I wonder how many other industries could legally distribute an addictive drug in their product to keep their customers buying from them.

I suggest you heed the warnings on the package. What they're saying there are true facts. After you've successfully quit, then use the $200+ dollars you are saving every month to pay down your mortgage, take your family out to dinner, or put it in savings for a nice vacation somewhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

Are you a tobacco company?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

As a smoker who's trying to quit (3rd try now), I'm glad to see this bill signed into law. I didn't start until my mid-30s (dumb!) but it's been 30 years now and I am truly hooked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 06/22/2009
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 82 fans permalink
photo

My mother quit smoking Cold Turkey, in 1960 by putting a rubber band around her wrist and she snapped herself with it every time she wanted a cigarette. That was after having smoked for 35 years. She still got emphasema (COPD) and died last year. I never took up tobacco smoking except the occasional cigar.

I have a problem with the supposed COMMANDER in CHIEF of our brave military, not actually quitting smoking. He dabbled a bit into the helplessness of addiction and all that, but I did not hear a commitment from him to protect the father of his two girls (himself) by quitting. If he can't quit smoking after admitting that he wants to, then how can he make other difficult decisions. (I just put my flak jacket on because I expect a lot of irrational response here, while I hope for some reasonable response from others.)
Thanks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 69 fans permalink
photo

If you are having a problem with our COMMANDER in CHIEF then take a break and watch this Jib and Jab: Barack Obama Superhero, then we can talk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 06/22/2009
- cbates I'm a Fan of cbates 36 fans permalink
photo

I agree that he should and must quit. It would show his conviction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 06/22/2009
- Sabreen60 I'm a Fan of Sabreen60 63 fans permalink
photo

Oh please. Since you were never a smoker, how can you pass judgment. Just because someone finds it hard to quit doesn't mean he/she is unable to make other hard decisions. That is just preposterous. Your premise is preposterous. Everyday 10's of thousands of people all over the world make tough decisions. Politicians, doctors, clergy and people in d@mn near every profession smoked before understanding it's harmful effects. Don't you know that people who help found this country smoked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 06/22/2009
- Highwind I'm a Fan of Highwind 7 fans permalink
photo

Oh, so your upset that our President hasn't quit smoking on your timeline? Give me a break. He is not beholden to you or anything else on this issue. It is a struggle to quit smoking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 06/22/2009

You've never smoked, so get off your high horse about people quitting. Nicotine is more addictive than heroin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 06/22/2009
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 82 fans permalink
photo

Please go light up a couple and suck deep

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

it is just leading up to creating another substance that will be considered illegal. if it's illegal, then they can put you into one of their work camps (private, for-profit prisons) who needs illegal immigrants if you've got your own private source of slaves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 06/22/2009
- LadyBeryl I'm a Fan of LadyBeryl 30 fans permalink
photo

Oh please. You just made that up. Fearmongering and lying just won't work anymore. Try something else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 42 fans permalink

"The new law bans candy and fruit flavors in tobacco products"

So does this mean clove cigarettes, minty dip, and flavored pipe tobacco are BANNED?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 315 fans permalink
photo

Dunno. Menthol cigarettes will still be legal ... at least for a while. They're going to be "studied." That was a concession Philip Morris got out of the bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 06/22/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 15 fans permalink
photo

can't see kids smoking clove cigs...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 06/22/2009
- gotborked I'm a Fan of gotborked 42 fans permalink

Then why ban them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 315 fans permalink
photo

Oh, I think kids do like clove cigarettes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Trust me, they do. A recent "kid" myself, I can confirm this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 06/22/2009
- wietog I'm a Fan of wietog 25 fans permalink
photo

Kids do. I did. And my aunt introduced me to them. They were so "exotic" that we got woozy in her car from the second-hand smoke. It's like huffing a spice rack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 06/22/2009
- sak I'm a Fan of sak 27 fans permalink

I just love the fact that senators and congressmen from the souther states will scream bloody murder to protect a single fetus, yet happily expose children to tobacco products, including snuff and chew, to make a buck. Hypocrisy could not be more perfectly illustrated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 315 fans permalink
photo

Do you see how much money those Southern congressmen and senators get from Big Tobacco? Mitch McConnell over $400,000; Richard Burr, $360,000, etc., etc., etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- Highwind I'm a Fan of Highwind 7 fans permalink
photo

Main reason why I don't care what they think about any issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 06/22/2009
- viper234 I'm a Fan of viper234 39 fans permalink

This won't stop people from smoking. This will just make people who choose to smoke, smoke more to get the rigt "dose" of nicotine for their "fix." People have to want to quit smoking, in order to break the addiction. Laws don't work. Laws didn't work during the prohibition of alchohol, and they won't work for cigarettes either. Education is best since millions of Americans quit smoking on their own based on simply learning about the dangers of smoking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

It's not intended to stop people from smoking. It's intended to prevent kids from starting.

It's mostly intended to prevent advertising to children and misleading labels and disinformation about what goes into the product. Is that such a bad thing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 315 fans permalink
photo

I think there's a lot of misinformation about what this really means. I see a lot of comments about tobacco being made illegal and being banned and choices being taken away. Nothing like that is taking place. You're right. This is primarily about controlling the marketing of tobacco products.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 06/22/2009

The main reason people quit smoking is not because they get better educated. It is usually because they start to have problems breathing or they have a heart attack or worse, cancer. Nobody believes tobacco is actually good for them unless they are selling it. Why do you think they have to go after children. If you make it into your twenties and do no smoke, chances are you never will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 06/22/2009
- trambusto I'm a Fan of trambusto 2 fans permalink

I started smoking in 1988 and quit in 2005. Europe was far ahead of us on regulating tobacco products, and California was way out ahead of the nation in terms of encouraging tobacco users to change their behavior.

I applaud this change. I hope it helps those who still need to quit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 06/22/2009
- jestanle I'm a Fan of jestanle 5 fans permalink
photo

Yeah...no one smokes in Europe or California.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 06/22/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 315 fans permalink
photo

I don't know about Europe, but California has one of the lowest smoking rates in the nation -- only about 15 percent. That compares to 20 percent national and 25 percent in the Deep South.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 06/22/2009
- Chandidevi I'm a Fan of Chandidevi 25 fans permalink

God bless President Obama for signing this legislation. The tobacco companies do inject nicotine with higher levels of addictive substances, which is an outrage. Thank you again and again, President Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 06/22/2009
- PINO I'm a Fan of PINO 18 fans permalink
photo

For What. If you smoke, you will only smoke more because you wont get the full hit of nicotine and tar from these new sics. So obama in essence is promoting capitalism. The cigarette company's will only sell more cigs.

what a pinhead

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 06/22/2009
- reggieb I'm a Fan of reggieb 84 fans permalink

nonsense

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 06/22/2009
- teron678 I'm a Fan of teron678 126 fans permalink
photo

You Spun & fell flat on your face ........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 06/22/2009
- BillN I'm a Fan of BillN 23 fans permalink
photo

Less nicotine in the product will also make it easier for you to quit. Anyone who uses this as an excuse to buy MORE cigarettes - is the REAL pinhead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 06/22/2009
- talkitreal I'm a Fan of talkitreal 45 fans permalink

Good move!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 06/22/2009
- Golfer59 I'm a Fan of Golfer59 10 fans permalink
photo

Who care about this President Obama??? Sign something with some "Teeth" to like HEALTH CARE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 06/22/2009
- FrReader I'm a Fan of FrReader 12 fans permalink
photo

Think about what you're saying!! The stu.pidity of some commenters is staggering.

Has Obama been handed a senate and house-approved HEALTH CARE reform bill yet? No. So how exactly do you expect him to sign one?

A lot of people care about this, actually. This has a lot of TEETH. Like the president said, close to 90% of people who smoke started before they were 18. If you didn't know it's illegal to buy cigarettes if you're under 17. So this bill will help prevent Big Tobacco from advertising to children, hopefully thereby reducing addiction to the #1 preventable cause of death. How is this NOT important?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 06/22/2009

Advertising to children? I haven't seen any advertising directed at children. Are there SpongeBob cigarettes? Hannah Montana snuff? Please give an example or two.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 06/22/2009
- Aesthete I'm a Fan of Aesthete 31 fans permalink

Since smoking contributes mightily to the high cost of health care, reducing the number of people who smoke will reduce the level of morbidity and disease that result from smoking and have an impact on health care costs for everybody. Also reducing the number of people exposed to secondhand smoke will help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 06/22/2009
photo

This is the big priority? Are there not bigger fish to fry right now? (like Bush, Cheney war crimes?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 06/22/2009

Bush won the war in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 06/22/2009
- bosunj I'm a Fan of bosunj 12 fans permalink
photo

Really? When?

Troops are still dying in Iraq everyday. How dare you spew this filth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 06/22/2009
- jbrantow I'm a Fan of jbrantow 39 fans permalink

won? don't you mean paid off the agressors. Why are there still troops being blown up over there. Why aren't you over there....O­h that's right you have you're yellow ribbon on your car so that's good enough. patriotic chicken hawk

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 06/22/2009
- reggieb I'm a Fan of reggieb 84 fans permalink

right after he cured cancer

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 06/22/2009
- RobDykstra I'm a Fan of RobDykstra 11 fans permalink

Smoking is bad but killing innocent people in Iraq is okay.

Also tasering kids and little ole ladies.

What a country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 06/22/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 69 fans permalink
photo

I agree, it would be a much better bill if it were the ban against waging wars and 'tasering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- rudyinbama I'm a Fan of rudyinbama 23 fans permalink

If everybody stopped smoking, they'd have to raise a lot of taxes somewhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/22/2009
- trebutts I'm a Fan of trebutts 9 fans permalink

That's like comparing apples and oranges. Makes no sense. Because there is a war going on abroad, we're not supposed to take care of matters at home? We're also in the midst of the war, but that doesn't mean that we let all hell break loose at home. In no way does passing a bill on cigarettes diminish the fact that what is happening in Iraq is not okay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 06/22/2009

Is this struggle to kick the habit kind of the same to keep the thermostat at 80 in the White House during the winter while lecturing Americans to adjust their thermostats to save energy? What is the carbon footprint of the white house anyway? And do they have to buy carbon credits by say putting a government agency to pasture and closing off their building in DC? Curious minds want to know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 06/22/2009
- reggieb I'm a Fan of reggieb 84 fans permalink

faux curious

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 06/22/2009
- AngieMom57 I'm a Fan of AngieMom57 69 fans permalink
photo

Jimmy Carter had solar panels at the White House, Bush took them down instead of adding on and improving.­..such is life, live and learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 06/22/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect