North Korea Ship, Maybe Loaded With Weapons, Passes China

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - North Korea Ship, Maybe Loaded With Weapons, Passes China stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HYUNG-JIN KIM | June 23, 2009 09:37 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this Oct. 24, 2006 file photo, North Korean ship, the Kang Nam I, is anchored in Hong Kong waters. The U.S. military is tracking the ship that may be carrying illicit weapons, the first vessel monitored under tougher new United Nations rules meant to rein in and punish the Stalinst state after it conducted a nuclear test, officials said Thursday, June 18, 2009. (AP Photo/Vincent Yu, File)

SEOUL, South Korea — An American destroyer tailed a North Korean ship Tuesday as it sailed along China's coast, U.S. officials said, amid concerns the vessel is carrying illicit arms destined for Myanmar.

The sailing sets up the first test of a new U.N. Security Council resolution that authorizes member states to inspect North Korean vessels suspected of carrying banned weapons or materials. The sanctions are punishment for an underground nuclear test the North carried out last month in defiance of past resolutions.

A U.S. official said last week that the American destroyer has no orders to intercept the ship, but experts say the vessel will need to stop to refuel soon. The resolution prohibits member states from providing such services to ships accused of bearing banned goods.

Nearby Singapore _ the world's largest refueling hub _ says it will "act appropriately" if the ship docks at its port with suspicious goods on board.

Meanwhile, U.S. defense and counterproliferation officials said Tuesday that an impending missile test threatened by North Korea is expected to launch short- to medium-range missiles rather than a long-range missile similar to one tested in April. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence.

Japanese media have reported that the North Koreans appear to be preparing for a long-range test planned sometime around July 4 and to be fired toward Hawaii.

The North Korean-flagged Kang Nam left the port of Nampo last Wednesday, with the U.S. destroyer following it. Two Pentagon officials described a relay operation in which the destroyer USS John S. McCain would hand over surveillance of the ship to the destroyer USS McCampbell. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence.

The North has said it would consider any interception "an act of war," and an editorial Tuesday in its main Rodong Sinmun newspaper said the Korean peninsula was on the brink of a nuclear war.

Story continues below
advertisement

"A grave situation is being forged in the Korean peninsula where a nuclear war could happen with any accidental factor due to the sanctions," said the editorial carried on the government-run Uriminzokkiri Web site.

But an armed skirmish is unlikely, analysts say, though the North Korean crew may have rifles.

"A cargo ship can't confront a warship," said Baek Seung-joo of the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.

In the event that the American destroyer does ask to inspect the Kang Nam and North Korea refuses, the U.N. resolution states the ship must be directed to a port of Pyongyang's choosing. It was not clear which port the ship would be taken to, though on Tuesday one of the Pentagon officials said it was about 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of the Taiwan Strait _ close to both the Chinese and Taiwanese coasts.

It's not clear exactly what the Kang Nam has on board, but it has transported illicit goods in the past. A South Korean intelligence official said Monday that his agency believes the North Korean ship is carrying small weapons. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing the sensitive nature of the information, said he could provide no further details.

In 2007, the ship _ now registered to Kumrung Trading Co. Ltd. of Pyongyang _ was similarly accused by Western diplomats of transporting weapons illegally to Myanmar. At the time, however, Myanmar authorities said they found no suspicious cargo on board.

The Pentagon official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence, said the chief suspicion is that the ship is headed to Myanmar.

The North is believed to have sold guns, artillery and other small weapons to Myanmar in the past. The Southeast Asian nation is the target of U.S. and EU arms embargoes because of its poor human rights record and failure to hand power to a democratically elected government. There are concerns it could use small arms in the counterinsurgency campaigns it conducts against ethnic minorities.

The Kang Nam is expected to dock at Myanmar's Thilawa port, some 20 miles (30 kilometers) south of Yangon, in the next few days, said the Irrawaddy, an online magazine operated by independent exiled journalists from Myanmar, citing an unidentified port official.

A shipping expert said a vessel the size of the Kang Nam would need to refuel in Singapore if it wants to travel the 4,100-mile (6,660-kilometer) distance between Nampo and Myanmar.

The journey from Nanpo to Singapore should take about nine days, and another four days after refueling to reach Myanmar, the official from Sinokor Merchant Marine Co. in Seoul said Tuesday. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he wasn't authorized to discuss shipping routes from North Korea.

Singapore, the world's busiest port and a top refueling center, is also North Korea's second-largest trading partner after China, said Hong Hyun-ik, an analyst at the Sejong Institute think tank in South Korea.

But the city state insisted its officials would "act appropriately" if asked to confront a North Korean ship believed to be carrying banned cargo.

Yoon Duk-min, a professor at the state-run Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security in Seoul, predicted North Korea would allow an inspection in Singapore.

At most, Singapore may refuse to let the ship refuel, Hong said. He also speculated that the Kang Nam may not have banned cargo on board, knowing the ship could be subject to scrutiny.

In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said China will "strictly observe" and implement the resolution. He urged other nations to also heed the U.N. guidelines requiring "reasonable grounds" to request an inspection.

"Under the current circumstances, we call upon all parties to refrain from acts that might escalate the tension," he said Tuesday.

Meanwhile, the U.S. and North Korea's neighbors were discussing how to deal with the increasingly defiant country.

In Beijing, U.S. and Chinese defense officials were holding their first high-level bilateral military talks in 18 months. U.S. Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy was to head later in the week to Tokyo and Seoul.

Washington's top military commander in South Korea, meanwhile, warned that the communist regime is bolstering its guerrilla warfare capacity.

Gen. Walter Sharp, who commands the 28,500 U.S. troops positioned in South Korea, said the North could employ roadside bombs and other guerrilla tactics if war breaks out again on the Korean peninsula. The two Koreas technically remain at war because their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953.

___

Associated Press writers Jae-soon Chang in Seoul, Pauline Jelinek, Pamela Hess and Lolita Baldor in Washington, Grant Peck in Bangkok, Alex Kennedy in Singapore, Jill Lawless in London and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

SEOUL, South Korea — An American destroyer tailed a North Korean ship Tuesday as it sailed along China's coast, U.S. officials said, amid concerns the vessel is carrying illicit arms destined fo...
SEOUL, South Korea — An American destroyer tailed a North Korean ship Tuesday as it sailed along China's coast, U.S. officials said, amid concerns the vessel is carrying illicit arms destined fo...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
14
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- expired I'm a Fan of expired 25 fans permalink

LIve Poll for Health Care Town Hall Tonight:

Watch the Town Hall live at 10 PM EDT on ABC.
Participate in the lie poll at
http://www.livepoll.net/Obama_PCToday.html

Please participate and relay the word and URL to your friends.

Don
http://www.livepoll.net

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 06/24/2009
- Ishmael1 I'm a Fan of Ishmael1 15 fans permalink
photo

If anyone were truly serious about stopping this ship, here's how it could be done with plausible deniability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wfRCMv3sNo

Aww, Gee, Your Majesty. Your ship must have hit an uncharted shoal and was lost with all hands. Not to worry though. Your brave seamen will not have died in vain. We have updated all of our charts for the area and have issued a notice to mariners to mark theirs' so everybody give's a wide berth to Kim's Reef.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 06/23/2009

That's not a North Korean warship is it? Because, if it is then rumors of North Korea's mighty military have apparently been greatly exaggerated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 06/23/2009
- CAP6 I'm a Fan of CAP6 15 fans permalink

Obviously a cargo vessel. But you're right, NK's navy su*cks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 06/23/2009
- Steamboater I'm a Fan of Steamboater 164 fans permalink
photo

The UN never meant for their resolution to mean anything and neither did Obama when he made this grand announcement that our ships would track any ships from North Korea etc. If we need the permisssion of the country that sends these ships out, how far is that ever to get anyone, and if we act tough but aren't willing to back it up and board these ships to confirm our suspicions, we might as well never have our ships leave port. North Korea isn't going to war with anyone. It's a country that threatens and bullies with it's own people starving and the little runt who runs that country knows very well war would mean he and his son's end. It's about time someone stood up to him and not with empty threats either. China won't do anything. This ship, which has a history of carryinng weapons etc to the junta in Myanmar and Iran etc , could have been stopped with some harsh words alone from the Chinese, but China is no better than the country it aids and abets in it's terror over it's populace. The only one who might back up his words with action--just might--is the Singapore, that is IF a request is made by us to stop it and fat chance for that happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 06/23/2009
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 104 fans permalink
photo

All 10 ASEAN countries have a non-agression pact with NK.
Singapore is one.

Additionally, China and Russia have their own non-aggression pacts with NK.

Have a cigar and relax a bit. It ain't all that urgent...and comparing NK to pre-WWI Germany is a real stretch.

I suggest you spend more time on logistics.
I think you will discover it is way premature to be talking tactics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 06/23/2009
- wakeup804 I'm a Fan of wakeup804 18 fans permalink

We have no right to board any country's ship on a maybe. Look what happened to the Somali pirates when they boarded one of our ships. We cannot just run ruffshod over the world because we are the United States. It is no secret North Korea has nuclear materials and has had them for years, and how do you think these materials have been transported over the years, probably by ship. So today this is news why????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 06/23/2009
- Steamboater I'm a Fan of Steamboater 164 fans permalink
photo

wakeup804 WAKE UP. You're not dealing with a benign dictator. The man is paranoid and out of control and runs one of the worst dictatorships on the planet. North Korea is a threat to all of us. This isn't a matter of running roughshod over any country but really seuring our own secuty and that includes yours. The same argument was used to let Germany 'secretly' defy international law and build up their weaponary after WWI. Before it's too late for all of us, NK needs some tough love and talk backed up with walk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 06/23/2009

Because we don't have a fool for a president anymore, that's why this is news. Obama may ask, based on recently passed UN sanctions that Singapore to refuse to refuel this ship. Singapore may agree to not refuel it. Why do you ask why this is news?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 06/23/2009
- Oblique I'm a Fan of Oblique 3 fans permalink

As long as the Chinese get rid of Kim Jong Il and his spawn they can take over North Korea.... be our guest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 06/23/2009
photo

The Chinese have a peace agreement with the Kims, so this will not happen. In fact, many (myself included) suspect that while China is not directly pulling the strings here, they fully support NK proliferating weapons in order to establish itself as a world power. Yes, North Korea is at this point a poor country, but with respect from the world and the chance of reclaiming South Korea (a possibility if they achieve nuclear deterrance), they could be a military and economic power in 10 years. This is their goal. And it helps the Chinese, who can continue to increase their economic influence across Asia and the world while the US continues to decline economically.

The world will look very different 25 years from now, as it looked different 25 years before now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 06/23/2009
- victorsays I'm a Fan of victorsays 6 fans permalink

For any reconciliation, the US need to get out of South Korea. As longs as an enemy is living in on of the brother's home, the brother will be come an enemy.

The US doesn't want peace anywhere but the Western world. I think another WW III would be nice to settle unsettled scores.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 06/23/2009
- CAP6 I'm a Fan of CAP6 15 fans permalink

Unfortunately, it appears I may have been correct when I made these comments a few days ago on another thread.
The North Korean regime is unpredictable and does possess the capabilities to do great harm to not only South Korea, but to other countries in the region as well with respect to her inventory of short and medium range missiles. With approximately 70% of her conventional forces poised in a "forward leaning" posture within 100 miles of the DMZ, NK could quickly overwhelm defensive forces south of the border, with devastating consequences to people and infrastructure. However, NK's ability to wage sustained combat are limited and she will face devastating retaliation for any attack on SK. At the end of the day, NK will lose the fight, a fact Kim Jong Ill and the "Brilliant One" are well aware of. Therefore, I don't believe NK will launch a massive conventional invasion of SK when it is fully aware such an attack would be the end game for the NK regime. Beginning in the early 1990's, NK re-equipped, and forward deployed the majority of its ground forces. The army places great emphasis on special operations and has the 2nd largest special operations forces in the world. If NK intends to act offensively against SK, it may choose a limited approach by employing these special operations units to wreak havoc on SK's infrastructure as opposed to the "end game" approach.

posted Jun 13, 2009 at 11:37:11

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 06/23/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect