Palin Reimburses Alaska $8,000 For 19 Family Trips

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Palin Reimburses Alaska $8,000 For 19 Family Trips stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RACHEL D'ORO | June 23, 2009 10:10 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Gov. Sarah Palin has paid more than $8,100 to reimburse Alaska for the costs associated with nine trips taken with her children.

Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, says the governor paid $8,143.62 to the state on June 19 for the nine trips, some with more than one of her five children, taken between January 2007 and February of this year. The payment was due Tuesday.

An ethics complaint had alleged Palin abused her power by charging the state when her children traveled with her. The Alaska Personnel Board found no wrongdoing, but Palin agreed to reimburse the state for trips found to be of questionable state interest.

Van Flein and state administrative director Linda Perez sent The Associated Press copies of the check and other documents of the transaction.

The board's investigator, Timothy Petumenos, said in his report that state rules give little guidance to determine ethical standards for travel by the governor's family. But he interpreted the law to require that the state pay only if the first family serves an important state interest.

Van Flein noted that Palin had followed historical practices on first family travel and that her travel requests were processed by the same administrators who processed requests for predecessors, Frank Murkowski and Tony Knowles.

"No one challenged Gov. Murkowski's or Governor Knowles' travel practices," Van Flein said in an e-mail. "The rules were, and are, being changed in midstream for Governor Palin. However, as noted in the agreement at the time 'the Governor wants to exceed minimum legal standards.'"

Anchorage resident Frank Gwartney, a Democrat, filed the complaint in late October. It closely followed a report by The Associated Press that Palin charged the state more than $21,000 for her three daughters' commercial flights, including events where they weren't invited, and later ordered their expense forms amended to specify official state business.

Palin was the Republican vice presidential candidate when the complaint was filed and after the February settlement she called the grievance "an obvious political weapon."

As part of the settlement, the Alaska Department of Law was asked to develop specific rules clarifying when the state should pay for a governor's family travel. That effort is under way, with the goal to have a final draft by the end of the year, according to Judy Bockmon, an assistant attorney general.

Also on Tuesday, the governor's office announced the 15th dismissal of an ethics complaint against Palin or one of her staff. It alleged Kris Perry _ director of the governor's Anchorage office _ worked on state time to benefit Palin's interests during and after her vice presidential run.

The governor's office said the complaint was filed even after Perry obtained an opinion from Perez, her ethics supervisor.

"It is outrageous to file an ethics complaint against a state employee who sought and obtained ethics guidance in advance," Mike Nizich, Palin's chief of staff, said in a statement. "This is not about ethics. This is not about holding the governor or state employees accountable. This is pure harassment."

(This version CORRECTS that payments involved 9 trips with one or more of her children, not 19, which counted each child separately.)

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Gov. Sarah Palin has paid more than $8,100 to reimburse Alaska for the costs associated with nine trips taken with her children. Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, says the...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Gov. Sarah Palin has paid more than $8,100 to reimburse Alaska for the costs associated with nine trips taken with her children. Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, says the...
Loading...
 
Filed by Marcus Baram
 
Comments
273
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- Hank10303 I'm a Fan of Hank10303 48 fans permalink

Interesting how Palin attempted to fleece the state taxpayers while winning her election on the ground of cleaning up government fraud and waste. Her spokesmen states: "..."No one challenged Gov. Murkowski's or Governor Knowles' travel practices," Van Flein said in an e-mail. "The rules were, and are, being changed in midstream for Governor Palin." But, isn't her whole purpose is her expertise in ridding the government of wasteful expenditur­es????????­???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 06/24/2009
- digdeeper I'm a Fan of digdeeper 18 fans permalink

This is Miss sqeeky clean hockey mom, who frowns on those who take from the public purse.
Hmm, she's an opportunist and a taker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 06/24/2009
- SoCalNick I'm a Fan of SoCalNick 82 fans permalink
photo

I want to know where I can take just me and the WIFE 19 times for Only $8,000.00!­!!

You cant go do DISNEYLAND for the weekend 19 times for that . and that is just TWO People!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

Would someone please tell the Governor that Alaska had a 5.5 earthquake a couple days ago!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 06/24/2009

Less government Governor..­.pay your own bills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

Never mind saving money for Alaskan taxpayers. Imagine how little she could have spent to save perhaps her career as well as her daughter had she simply spent a little time talking and a few dollars on condoms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

sighco path ( thru the wilderness­)...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 06/24/2009

Doesn't she live in he own home instead of the captial? So my question is.. Do the people of Alaska pay the bills for both places?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 06/24/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 222 fans permalink

Yup. He collected per diem payments for living in her own home and not working.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 06/24/2009
- jazabelz I'm a Fan of jazabelz 19 fans permalink

Not to mention she used state contractors to build her house!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

Thief...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

If the Republican's nominate Palin she will lose in a McGovern-G­oldwater-M­ondale- type landslide. She represents the far right kook wing of the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 06/24/2009
photo

8,000 dollars for all of those nights in NYC?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 06/24/2009
- kannita I'm a Fan of kannita 7 fans permalink
photo

Why wasn't there some penalty attached to that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 06/24/2009
- grammy11 I'm a Fan of grammy11 5 fans permalink
photo

Or interest?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 06/24/2009

Meantime..­.

"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," the official Korean Central News Agency said.

Let's keep our eye on the ball.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 06/24/2009
- on2them I'm a Fan of on2them 23 fans permalink
photo

You've been pwned Alaska!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 06/24/2009

Lots of talk about hypocrites here. How is it any different the Obamas hauling their kids and granny all over the world? Please don't start about SS would be protecting them anyway. Michelle is one place and granny and the kids are somewhere else doing something else. That takes a lot more protecting than if they were all together or at home. They ALL do this. It is just silly to pick on Palin about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 06/24/2009
- Jappy I'm a Fan of Jappy 3 fans permalink
photo

If you want to compare W with Obama and the protection of a sitting President and his family receive then we can talk. Trying a lame attempt to compare a sitting president with a ditsy Governor is a no go. Palin has to answer to her state not to the nation about her spending spree.

8,000 is peanuts and not nearly enough to cover expenses for approx 5 children on 9 trips counting plane tickets, hotel fees and food. It says right in the article she charged the state 21,000 for 3 daughters plane tickets alone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 06/24/2009
- joemondo I'm a Fan of joemondo 23 fans permalink
photo

Difference: The Obamas are within the rules for the First Family, the Palins were not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 06/24/2009

Obviously, according to the article, she was within the rules.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 06/24/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 222 fans permalink

Obama didn't bring his kids "all over the world" on the government's dime. Nor did he bring them to the vast majority of the campaign stops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 06/24/2009

GOV PALIN IS A CHEAT ON KIDS TRAVEL,BUILDING HER HOME ANDMANY OTHER THINGS,PALIN IS THE WORST CHOICE FOR GOVERNOR OR PRESIDENT ,SHE IS HATESD BY LOTS OF PEOPLE.LET­TERMAN IS MORE WELL LIKED THAN HER,BUT THATS OK,A BETTER FACT ,MY DOG IS BETTER LIKED THAN PALIN HEHEH

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 06/24/2009
- bedfordny I'm a Fan of bedfordny 134 fans permalink

Let me get this straight, she dragged her daughters on trips, INCLUDING the ones they weren't invited to, and now is 'exceeding minimum legal standards' by paying for them for trips they weren't supposed to be on in the first place. Gee, that's big of her. And she's paying less than half that was spent on them.

The board's investigator said that although the rules are left open to interpretation, it's pretty clear that the state is only required to pay if the 'first family serves an important state interest.'

Since when is sightseeing, getting the heck out of Alaska and shopping 'important state interest'?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 06/24/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect