North Korea Threatens To Wipe Out The U.S. "Once And For All"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - North Korea Threatens To Wipe Out The U.S. "Once And For All" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JAE-SOON CHANG | June 24, 2009 11:47 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
South Korean war veterans wave national flags during a rally denouncing North Korea's nuclear program and former South Korean President Kim Dae-jung's sunshine policy of offering the North aid as a way to facilitate reconciliation, in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, June 24, 2009. An American destroyer was tailing a North Korean ship suspected of transporting weapons toward Myanmar, as anticipation mounted Wednesday that the North could soon conduct short- or medium-range missiles tests. (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man)

SEOUL, South Korea — North Korea condemned a recent U.S. pledge to provide nuclear defense of South Korea, saying Thursday that the move boosts its justification to have atomic bombs and invites a potential "fire shower of nuclear retaliation."

The commentary in Pyongyang's main Rodong Sinmun newspaper was the North's latest reaction to last week's summit between President Barack Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak. The allies issued a joint statement committing the U.S. to defend the South with nuclear weapons.

It also came as an American destroyer trailed a North Korean ship suspected of shipping weapons in violation of a U.N. resolution punishing Pyongyang's May 25 nuclear test, and as anticipation mounted that the North might test-fire short- or mid-range missiles in the coming days.

The North's newspaper claimed that the "nuclear umbrella" commitment made it more likely for the U.S. to mount a nuclear attack on the communist North, and only "provides us with a stronger justification to have nuclear deterrent."

It also amounts to "asking for the calamitous situation of having a fire shower of nuclear retaliation all over South Korea" in case of a conflict, the paper said.

North Korea has long claimed that the U.S. is plotting to invade it and has used the claim to justify its development of nuclear weapons. The U.S. has repeatedly said it has no intention of attacking the North.

In a separate editorial marking the 1950 outbreak of the Korean War, the Rodong said the North "will never give up nuclear deterrent ... and will further strengthen it" as long as Washington remains hostile.

The war ended in 1952 with a truce, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula divided and in a state of war. The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect against hostilities.

Story continues below
advertisement

Ties between the two Koreas warmed significantly after the first-ever summit of their leaders in 2000, but relations soured after the conservative Lee took office last year.

The Rodong called Lee a "hound" of the U.S. "master" in Thursday's commentary.

The new U.N. resolution seeks to clamp down on North Korea's trading of banned arms and weapons-related material by requiring U.N. member states to request inspections of ships carrying suspected cargo.

North Korea has said it would consider interception of its ships a declaration of war.

The U.S. has been seeking to get key nations to enforce the sanctions aggressively. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called the foreign ministers of Russia and China to discuss efforts to enforce the U.N. punishments, State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said.

The Kang Nam is believed to be the first North Korean ship to be tracked under the resolution. It left the North Korean port of Nampo a week ago and is believed bound for Myanmar, South Korean and U.S. officials said.

Myanmar state television on Wednesday evening said another North Korean vessel was expected to pick up a load of rice and that the government had no information about the Kang Nam.

A senior U.S. defense official said Wednesday that the ship had already cleared the Taiwan Strait.

He said he didn't know how much range the Kang Nam has _ whether or when it may need to stop in some port to refuel _ but that the ship has in the past stopped in Hong Kong's port.

Another U.S. defense official said he tended to doubt reports that the Kang Nam was carrying nuclear-related equipment, saying the information officials have received seems to indicate the cargo is conventional munitions.

The U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing intelligence.

The U.S. and its allies have not decided whether to contact and request inspection of the ship, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Wednesday. He said he didn't believe a decision would come soon.

Reports about possible missile launches from the North highlighted the tension on the Korean peninsula.

The North has designated a no-sail zone off its east coast from June 25 to July 10 for military drills.

A senior South Korean government official said the ban is believed connected to North Korean plans to fire short- or mid-range missiles. He spoke on condition of anonymity, citing department policy.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported that the North may fire a Scud missile with a range of up to 310 miles (500 kilometers) or a short-range ground-to-ship missile with a range of 100 miles (160 kilometers) during the no-sail period.

U.S. defense and counterproliferation officials in Washington said they also expected the North to launch short- to medium-range missiles. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence.

North Korea had warned previously it would fire a long-range missile as a response to U.N. Security Council condemnation of an April rocket launch seen as a cover for its ballistic missile technology.

___

Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul and Pauline Jelinek, Pamela Hess and Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

SEOUL, South Korea — North Korea condemned a recent U.S. pledge to provide nuclear defense of South Korea, saying Thursday that the move boosts its justification to have atomic bombs and invites...
SEOUL, South Korea — North Korea condemned a recent U.S. pledge to provide nuclear defense of South Korea, saying Thursday that the move boosts its justification to have atomic bombs and invites...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1616
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (42 pages total)
- RandPaul I'm a Fan of RandPaul 15 fans permalink

Why are they poking this Syko with sticks ......

Why are they even bothering

?

more wa r with Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 06/24/2009
- Firbolg I'm a Fan of Firbolg 40 fans permalink
photo

If they are just prepared to wait, we are doing a good job of wiping oursleves out on our own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 06/24/2009
- flossophy I'm a Fan of flossophy 356 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, maybe Obama should reduce missile defense... that'd be a great idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 06/24/2009
- Mister Wu I'm a Fan of Mister Wu 14 fans permalink

Conventional bombing them to the stone age and we won't need it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 06/24/2009
- phlashba I'm a Fan of phlashba 15 fans permalink

Hey what's new in your death cult? Drink any good blood lately?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 06/24/2009
- Firbolg I'm a Fan of Firbolg 40 fans permalink
photo

The stone age would represent and upgrade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 06/24/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 47 fans permalink
photo

Anybody out there familiar with the story of David and Goliath?
There is a whole school of military strategy based on how a megapower is vulnerable to attack by unorthodox or guerilla tactics used by a "little guy." This was true in our own revolution. The colonials would never have beaten the redcoats if they'd played by the conventional rules of war, so they didn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 06/24/2009

In a lot of cases they did, and frequently lost. The big difference here is N.Korea is claiming they will be the attacker. In most cases of guerrilla tactics it is the defender using them. If N.Korea wants to attack, we'll defend ourselves, most likely by destroying assets and impeding their ability to strike.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 06/24/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 47 fans permalink
photo

Well now, just for the sake of argument....Let's look at this from North Korea's viewpoint. There's been a constant threat to their security in the form of a foreign occupational force in South Korea that has been there almost 6 decades. Who is the aggressor from NK's point of view? It's a matter of perspective, don't you think?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 06/25/2009

Well, will you hurry up, before my house goes into foreclosure?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 06/24/2009

ok lets have some fun with north korea! lets build an undestructable wall around it add a bubble to the top and ocean side, then cut a whole in the top and stick a giant hose in it and finally pump ocean water into the whole place. lets just get rid of the whole damn country at once! wouldn't that be sweet!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 06/24/2009

Dear Sir; your such a little man, why do you want to make such big noise? Spank,Spank, nighty,night.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 06/24/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 61 fans permalink
photo

Korea wants our foreign aid. They won't get it if they "wipe us off the map". This is just hot air with the aim of getting more tax-payer money. Remember - Home of the Brave.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 06/24/2009

LoL... the lil dude want's to wipe out America.... makes me laugh... WE WILL CRUSH YOU boy and your dumplings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 06/24/2009
- 1988 I'm a Fan of 1988 permalink
photo

to be honest, i find this terrifying
If they declare war, China will obv back them
WWIII ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 06/24/2009

Not sure that China would jump being N.Korea, in more recent talks China sided with the UN on scolding them for ignoring the directives. This isn't a re-creation of the Korean War, China has no interest in stopping the spread of capitalism this time, they have a belligerent neighbor that wants to play with the big kids.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 06/24/2009

I fail at typing today, jump BEHIND N.Korea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 06/24/2009
- dj5850 I'm a Fan of dj5850 14 fans permalink

No China wouldn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 06/24/2009
- nabrum I'm a Fan of nabrum 3 fans permalink

Let's just drop an unarmed missile on the NK "Dear Leader's" home. And then maybe another on the HQ of the armed forces. Tell them in advance. And since they are unarmed, China can suck it up. Minor destruction, and possibly no lives lost, but THEN tell them to SHUT UP. Dear leader will have to change his pants. Nothing else seems to work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 06/24/2009

I think Lil Kim should not tick President Obama off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 06/24/2009
- 1988 I'm a Fan of 1988 permalink
photo

lmao! lil kim

now i have magic stick stuck in my head

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 06/24/2009

This is rediculous. What the hell are they thinking?
-Crystal Wacker

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 06/24/2009

i never believe the media!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 06/24/2009
- dausone I'm a Fan of dausone 3 fans permalink

I combed through KCNA's site and didn't find any recent articles from which AP is pulling from. I did this because of the "..." which was mysteriously left out of the quote from AP. I've never had the desire to look through the KCNA site before but it does provide some interesting dialogue if you care to be objective about the situation, especially in light of the 59th anniversary of the American war with Korea. Here is a link to the entire article which I believe Ap is referencing, and the exact quote from the article un-paraphrased:

"It is the independent mode of the DPRK's (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) counter-action to decisively counter the enemy's "confrontation" with all-out confrontation. If the U.S. imperialists get so keen to invade the DPRK and start a war on the Korean Peninsula at any cost, this will only lead them to the abyss of self-destruction."

http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2009/200906/news17/20090617-09ee.html

Sounds like self-defense to me which isn't really a threat is it?

I realize now after typing this that translations of the original publication will vary. But all in all this is just a prime example of poor journalism at best on the part of AP and HP for tweeking the drama in favor of non-debate or objective reporting, if it even exists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 06/24/2009

I guess the Soviets had Pravda and we have AP, eh? The truth is out there, but at all costs we should not be allowed to see it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 06/24/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (42 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect