NY Air Pollution Carries Serious Cancer Risk: Feds

First Posted: 07/25/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:30 PM ET

Smog

AP - Millions of people living in nearly 600 neighborhoods across the country are breathing concentrations of toxic air pollutants that put them at a much greater risk of contracting cancer, according to new data from the Environmental Protection Agency.

Residents of New York, Oregon and California face the highest increased cancer risk from breathing toxic chemicals.

Almost 2.2 million people -- including 862,012 New Yorkers -- live in neighborhoods where the levels of 80 cancer-causing substances released by automobiles, factories and other sources in these areas exceed a 100 in 1 million cancer risk, the study found.

That means that if 1 million people breathed air with similar concentrations over their lifetime, about 100 additional people would be expected to develop cancer because of their exposure to the pollution. Data for this study was collected in 2002.

The average cancer risk across the country is 36 in 1 million, according to the National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment.

That's a decline from the 41.5 in 1 million cancer risk the EPA found when it released the last analysis in 2006. That data covered 1999 emissions.

"If we are in between 10 in 1 million and 100 in 1 million we want to look more deeply at that. If the risk is greater than 100 in 1 million, we don't like that at all ... we want to investigate that risk and do something about it," said Kelly Rimer, an environmental scientist with the EPA, in an interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Parts of Los Angeles, Calif., and Madison County, Ill., had the highest cancer risks in the nation -- 1200 in 1 million and 1100 in 1 million, according to the EPA data. They were followed by two neighborhoods in Allegheny County, Pa., and one in Tuscaloosa County, Ala.

People living in parts of Coconino County, Ariz., and Lyon County, Nev., had the lowest cancer risk from air toxics. The counties with the least toxic air are Kalawao County, Hawaii, and Golden Valley County, Mont.

"Air toxic risks are local. They are a function of the sources nearest to you," said Dave Guinnup, who leads the groups that perform the risk assessments for toxic air pollutants at EPA. "If you are out in the Rocky Mountains, you are going to be closer to 2 in a million. If you are in an industrial area with a lot of traffic, you are going to be closer to 1100 in 1 million."

The analysis predicts the concentrations of 124 different hazardous air pollutants, which are known to cause cancer, respiratory problems and other health effects by coupling estimates of emissions from a variety of sources with models that attempt to simulate how the pollution will disperse in the air. Only 80 of the chemicals evaluated are known to cause cancer, EPA officials said.

The information is used by federal, state and local agencies to identify areas in need of more monitoring and attention.

The entire report can be found on the EPA's Web site.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2009/06/24/2009-06-24_new_yorkers_face_highest_increased_cancer_risk_from_air_pollution_epa_study_find.html#ixzz0JNf6eeWa&C

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

AP - Millions of people living in nearly 600 neighborhoods across the country are breathing concentrations of toxic air pollutants that put them at a much greater risk of contracting cancer, according...
AP - Millions of people living in nearly 600 neighborhoods across the country are breathing concentrations of toxic air pollutants that put them at a much greater risk of contracting cancer, according...
Filed by Jessica Gusman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:31 PM on 07/07/2009
Oregon too???!??! I am completely shocked that its included on this list. Which cities or what part of the state is it referring to?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
felixthecat
05:25 PM on 06/25/2009
those poor carriage horses have to work in such horrible conditions standing behind idling cars with the exhaust blowing in their nostrils. Please help those horses by clicking this action buttion
http://www.ny-class.org/act.html
01:23 PM on 06/25/2009
The big problem here is probably overdiagnosis. The % of people in new york who get their regular mammograms and other types of cancer screenings is probably much higher than in other areas of the country. For example, at my hospital we have an investigational early lung cancer CT screening program to find early lung cancers. The data suggests that they find mostly cancers which would not have had an impact on life expectancy even if left alone. Thus, the diagnosis rate goes up. I'll bet if you specifically looked at the death rate due to cancer it wouldn't be significantly different from other parts of the country. I'll bet our overall life expectancy is actually higher than most places.

What about skin cancer? We have dermatologists by the dozen here taking small insignificant basal cell carcinomas off of people. Most places they would be left alone. Does each one of those basal cell carcinomas count as a "cancer diagnosis" for these statistics? If so, basal cell carcinomas could account for almost our entire increased cancer risk.

I'm very suspicious of these results.

Tom Waite, MD, PhD
New York, NY
07:15 AM on 06/25/2009
It's just so much easier blaming cancer on second hand smoke,aint it?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BronxBorn
08:03 AM on 06/25/2009
I blame it on Jersey :)
09:07 AM on 06/25/2009
We don't get the name Dirty Jerz for nothing! But honestly thats why I live in the boken instead of manhattan. The tall skyscrapers keep all that exhaust and smoke from blowing away.
06:32 AM on 06/25/2009
Chimneys belching black smoke is part of the NYC skyline. Manhattan and the Bronx still have a huge number of commercial buildings burning #6 bunker oil... the SOx and NOx concentrates found in #6 oil emissions are extremely high ... time to outlaw it's use.
04:02 AM on 06/25/2009
I don't buy it -- I just lived in Shanghai half the year where pollution is easily 100 times worse, and yet people live out their lives there and get used to it. Once you visit any of these places you'll find yourself missing the New York air in no time at all.
05:45 AM on 06/25/2009
I dont know man.. I live in Manhattan and I am happier than can be when I get out of the city and take my first breath of fresh air..
07:29 AM on 06/25/2009
AMEN!
Get out in the country and that fresh air is whatever Oliver Douglas (Eddie Arnold) celebrated in the Green Acres theme LOL...

Still, Laura had her stores and Times Square...ha ha!
07:28 AM on 06/25/2009
MISSING New York air?
As a Native New Yorker, I can't say I ever MISS NY air...

Even moving across the Hudson to the notoriously bad air of NJ is still better than what I dealt with in Manhattan...and much worse is LA...when I lived there in Koreatown, only a short distance by sight from Dodger Stadium, there would be days the stadium and the skyline would disappear in the thick, suffocating smog that is so LA...it caused me horrible headaches that I rarely ever got in still stinky NYC...I can't imagine Mexico City or Shanghai...UGH!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
02:35 AM on 06/25/2009
Adopt California pollution stands, after 40 years we all should be driving PZEV cars to begin with, and our buses and trucks should be powered by clean burning nat gas. As a country we're just stupid and lazy.
01:17 AM on 06/25/2009
It's important to keep in mind that much of our air pollution blows in from New Jersey, which second only to So. California in number of cars and truck on highways. Don't mean to scapegoat the folks across the Hudson, but most of us know why gas has always been cheaper there than anywhere else in the Northeast.
11:18 PM on 06/24/2009
600 cities fall into this category with LA topping the list. But the LA folks will find a way of blaming it on livestock, especially cattle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnegie
I am.
10:47 PM on 06/24/2009
I'm confused. I read somewhere that 1 in 4 people will get cancer in their lifetime so what is this 36 out of a million bit?
photo
brooklyncitizen
Quaerite primum regnum dei
12:06 AM on 06/25/2009
you forgot to do the square root and carry the 2
photo
blastocyst
Happy to be here
10:13 PM on 06/24/2009
Ambiance.
And the heavy-air & weather we've had recently concentrates the levels down around nose-height.
09:57 PM on 06/24/2009
after 9/11 what the hell did they think . We were all lied to here. Bush and his flunkies said the air quality was fine , did they think we were that stupid.
08:43 PM on 06/24/2009
I'm glad I'm still smoking my hand-rolled cigarettes. No machine, no filters. It keeps that really bad stuff from getting into my lungs.
07:05 PM on 06/24/2009
Damn, I always wanted to live in NYC too. Not surprising at all though.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ThatOne4Me
06:49 PM on 06/24/2009
Manhattan has it bad.
08:39 PM on 06/24/2009
9/11 released so many tons of airborne toxins that cancer rates for the city overall and Manhattan in particular will probably defy all attempts to quantify cause in coming decades...