US Announces Shift In Afghanistan Drug Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US Announces Shift In Afghanistan Drug Policy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

NICOLE WINFIELD | 06/27/09 02:21 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this June 20, 2009 image, U.S. Marines from the 2nd MEB, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines pass through a poppy field during operations against the Taliban near Now Zad in Afghanistan's Helmand province. The U.S. announced a new drug policy Saturday, June 27, 2009, for opium-rich Afghanistan, saying it was phasing out funding for eradication efforts and using the money for drug interdiction and alternate crop programs instead. The U.S. envoy for Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke, told The Associated Press that eradication programs weren't working and were only driving farmers into the hands of the Taliban. (AP Photo/David Guttenfelder)

TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate crops, the U.S. envoy for Afghanistan said Saturday.

The aim of the new policy: to deprive the Taliban of the tens of millions of dollars in drug revenues that are fueling its insurgency.

The U.S. envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, told the Associated Press that poppy eradication _ for years a cornerstone of U.S. and U.N. drug trafficking efforts in the country _ was not working and was only driving Afghan farmers into the hands of the Taliban.

"Eradication is a waste of money," Holbrooke said on the sidelines of a Group of Eight foreign ministers' meeting on Afghanistan, during which he briefed regional representatives on the new policy.

"It might destroy some acreage, but it didn't reduce the amount of money the Taliban got by one dollar. It just helped the Taliban. So we're going to phase out eradication," he said. The Afghan foreign minister also attended the G-8 meeting.

Eradication efforts were seen as inefficient because too little was being destroyed at too high a cost, U.N. drug chief Antonio Maria Costa told the AP.

The old policy was also deeply unpopular among powerless small-scale farmers, who often were targeted in the eradication efforts.

Afghanistan is the world's leading source of opium, cultivating 93 percent of the world's heroin-producing crop. While opium cultivation dropped 19 percent last year, it remains concentrated in Afghanistan's southern provinces where the Taliban is strongest and last year earned insurgents an estimated $50 million to $70 million, according to the U.N. drug office.

Story continues below
advertisement

While there was no immediate comment from Kabul on Saturday, the U.S. policy shift was likely to be welcomed by Afghanistan's government. Officials eradicating poppies have often been attacked by militants. Afghan citizens, many of whom rely on farming for sustenance and income, would also invite new agricultural programs.

The new policy calls for assisting farmers who abandon poppy cultivation. Holbrooke said the international community wasn't trying to target Afghan farmers, just the Taliban militants who buy their crops.

"The farmers are not our enemy, they're just growing a crop to make a living," he said. "It's the drug system. So the U.S. policy was driving people into the hands of the Taliban."

While Holbrooke did not provide the AP with a dollar figure for the new U.S. commitment, he told the G-8 ministers that Washington was increasing its funding for agricultural assistance from tens of millions of dollars a year to hundreds of millions of dollars, said Foreign Minister Franco Frattini of Italy, the current G-8 president.

"We're essentially phasing out our support for crop eradication and using the money to work on interdiction, rule of law, alternate crops," Holbrooke told the AP.

The policy also calls for coordinating a crackdown on drug trafficking across Afghanistan's border before the heroin reaches addicts in Europe, Russia and Iran.

In recent months, U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan have begun attacking drug labs and opium storage sites in an effort to deprive the Taliban of drug profits.

The G-8 foreign ministers "strongly appreciated" the policy shift, Frattini said. Costa, of the U.N., said the new focus "seems to be the winning strategy, and I'm glad that all of this has received support from the G-8 ministers."

The G-8 ministers along with Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta issued a statement at the end of their three-day summit Saturday saying it was urgent to find alternatives for farming communities where "narco-trafficking and extremism are endemic."

They said sustainable farming was key to Afghanistan's and Pakistan's future in that it would boost incomes, create jobs, improve rural development and lower regional tensions.

"Food insecurity and chronic poverty are root causes of civil instability and forced migration," the statement said.

The ministers also called for a regional intelligence network to prevent opium from leaving Afghanistan and the chemical precursors needed to turn it into heroin from getting in.

Costa told the G-8 meeting that the recent dip in cultivation was "vulnerable to relapse" without helping farmers with new crops and boosting law enforcement operations to disrupt drug markets, production labs and convoys.

According to a U.N. report this week, opium eradication reached a high in 2003, after the Taliban were ousted from power, with over 21,000 hectares (51,900 acres) destroyed. In 2008, only 5,480 hectares (13,500 acres) were cut down, compared with 19,047 hectares (47,000 acres) in 2007.

Costa said Afghan opium would kill 100,000 people this year in the parts of world where demand for heroin is highest: Europe, Russia and West Asia.

To fight it, he said major powers had to expand their counter-drug efforts to neighboring Pakistan as well as Iran, where half the 7,000 tons of exported Afghan opium transits, "causing the highest addiction rate in the world."

"Facing a grave health epidemic, Iran should be given the chance to engage in common efforts to combat illicit trafficking," he said.

Iran had been invited to attend the G-8 meeting on Afghanistan, because anti-drug efforts in Afghanistan have been identified as a key area where the United States and Iran can work together _ part of President Barack Obama's outreach effort.

But Italy withdrew the invitation after Iran failed to respond and after its bloody postelection crackdown on protesters, which has sparked international condemnation.

___

Associated Press reporter Alessandra Rizzo in Trieste and Jason Straziuso in Kabul contributed to this report.

TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate c...
TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate c...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- Horus45 I'm a Fan of Horus45 33 fans permalink
photo

Our government should deal directly with the farmers and purchase the opium they produce for use in the legal pharmaceutical trade in the production of Morphine and other opiates.
This way we would prevent the Taliban from taking their cut and increase the profit of the farmers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 06/27/2009

Dang, really wanted to say bombing AF & changing the worlds desires for drugs ain't gonna work. Cept eveyone beat me to it. When I was there (2006) & asked bout Hash,the price was cheaper than the cheapest politician in the states, If I remember right the price was a bunch cheaper than a carton of cigarettes in the states per Kilo of hash. Think, the cost in the US of drugs is somewhat many times the cost in AF. Where is the most profit & what politicians profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 06/27/2009
- Scent I'm a Fan of Scent 26 fans permalink

Let me just get this straight. - Because with all the rhetoric and demonizing of drugs the facts are usually - and not without intent - glossed over:

The US "invented" the Taliban and dragged young men into it to fight Russia in a war Brzezinski made them start in the first place. Then the CIA made the Taliban into the leaders of Afghanistan AND made them plant drugs instead of what the farmers WANTED to plant. Then the CIA made gazillions out of the drug trade they controlled.

And suddenly we are the saviors who want to stop drugs being produced?

Sounds to me like one of Cheneys revisionist "history" lessons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 06/27/2009
- Hank007 I'm a Fan of Hank007 80 fans permalink

Seeing as how we are now neck deep in Afghanistan, why not have the drug companies buy their opium for drugs, instead of or in addition to Australia's? (Australia currently grows opium poppies for pharmaceutical use, which is where Big Pharma gets it). Put Afghani opium on the free market, and let them compete legally, instead of trying to fight their domination of the 'illegal' free market.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 06/27/2009

I believe the annual world demand for pharmaceutical opium products is a small fraction of Afghanistan's annual opium crop yield and has been for years. There is a lot of addiction among the rural communities in the poppy growing region. Poverty is the cause: adults smoke opium to depress their appetites and escape the misery of being poor; they give their very young children the drug to calm them down and depress their hunger. It's a pitiful life. If we can successfully bring new crops into the region it will at least help keep people in the future off the drugs by giving them something nutritious to eat instead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

According to this article the: "annual U.S. funding for agricultural development from a few million dollars to a few hundred million dollars" to eliminate the "Taliban and other Afghan militants (making) $50 million to $70 million of last year's opium and heroin trade."
It makes sense to me that the United States should just buy all the opium and heroin from the farmers and then destroy it. It would cost less than the alternatives, would give the farmers a good living and would deprive the Taliban of funding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

make it legal, tax it, get it to addicts so you know who they are and eventually get them off of it, and while this is happening help the farmers change what they grow into food products they can sell...but I don't think the warlords who earn their profits from the opium trade will like that scenario very much...what do you do with them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 06/27/2009
- Dolmance I'm a Fan of Dolmance 25 fans permalink

Thank God, we've got a real President now!!!

The Drug War is the nation's longest running pork project and a virtual machine for failure. Folding that institutionalized failure into our strategy in Afghanistan ran the very real risk of transferring the rot of the War on Drugs to our military efforts there and would have guaranteed defeat.

The Republican's problem is they started believing their own propaganda. But I guess if you repeat a lie often enough, that's what happens. Because if we eradicated every single poppy growing in that part of the world, at best it would cause a drug addict an extra five minutes looking for his next fix.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 06/27/2009
- talkingdog I'm a Fan of talkingdog 24 fans permalink
photo

Big problem / simple solution.

Legalize it and tax it.

No more problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 06/27/2009

Exactly. Our legislators profit too personally from the 'drug wars.' How's that for a conflict of interest? Legalizing will not result in a nation of addicts, it will result in a nation providing help to our addicts and the 'bankrupting' of the criminals who perpetuate the violence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 06/27/2009
- omobob I'm a Fan of omobob 38 fans permalink
photo

Ah, the fly in the ointment. The crust of the biscuit. The eradication of the ONLY cash crop in Afghanistan.
Oddly enough that was also the failed policy of the Taliban. Of course, they didn’t have unlimited monetary resources or proper man power. Transferring out of the opium business will of course make the war lords upset, They farmers growing for the war lords will most likely need monetary aid to supplement income for years to come. Eradication of this centuries old cash crop will transform Afghanistan from an old world drug source to what remains to be seen. This will be Nation rebuilding on a scale far greater than Iraq. Can you imagine Iraq without oil? Now imagine Afghanistan without opium. It’s a tall task, no doubt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 06/27/2009
- batguano I'm a Fan of batguano 48 fans permalink

! We need to separate Marijuana & Industrial Hemp (IH) from all this "drug" talk & waste. Claims of loss of focus, concentration, motivation & productivity have been refuted numerous times! Some of our most revered artists, musicians, scientists, athletes, people of all pursuits & interests have smoked pot to greater or lesser degrees. Bob Dylan, Bing Crosby, Louis Armstrong, Michael Phelps, Carl Sagan, the list is long! Throughout history people have been law-abiding & still experimented with pot, opium, hallucinogens, & have had constructive, non-violent extraordinary careers - something we cannot say for many cops who seem to revel in busting heads. Alcohol abuse & 75,000 deaths annually are tolerated; tobacco abuse & hundreds of thousands of deaths are tolerated, costing our nation billions in health care costs.

“Legal” dangerous drugs pushed by “Big Pharma,” kill tens of thousands (that are identified!) annually & hospitalize millions yearly, solely for obscene profits by Big-Pharma criminals. Marijuana use is claimed to have never directly caused the death of any person. Humans have evolved with Cannabinoids and they have numerous important benefits for us, including Cancer, wasting diseases, blood pressure, MS and other treatments.

RESIST THE PHONEY WAR ON DRUGS! LEGALIZE IT!

http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=748
http://www.thc-ministry.net/cannabinoids.html
http://americanmarijuana.org/Guzman-Cancer.pdf

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 06/27/2009

I completely agree. There are absolutely no beneficial uses for alcohol, quite the opposite-yet, alcohol is more responsible for violence and deaths in this country than all the illegal drugs combined. And, to add insult to injury, it's legal. Personally, I can't stand drunks--9 out of 10 times they're obnoxious and prone to hostile acts. Marijuana users who don't partake in alcohol or other 'recreational' and illegal drugs? Come on, the most harmless thing in the world. Someone using marijuana has more common sense and the ability to distinguish right from wrong than any alcoholic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 06/27/2009
- grn1 I'm a Fan of grn1 6 fans permalink

What could be worse for Afghanistan is biotech multinationals controlling any other countries agricultural sector. Order 81 was to mandate Iraqs. We know what's good for them. Poison to the people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 06/27/2009
- Synoia I'm a Fan of Synoia 6 fans permalink

What works is economics. The farmers will grow the crop than makes the most money.

Drug prohibition changes the risk reward ratio. It prohibits nothing. Until street prices fall, and the risk/reward ratio becomes "normal" (aka: Legalization), then the framers may grow other crops.

Personally I don't believe in trying to prevent drug use in adults. I have a more Darwinian view of drug use. I do believe that hurting others (DWI), and getting kids hooked, should be punished. I do believe getting kids hooked should be punishable by death (are you listening McDonalds?).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 06/27/2009
- batguano I'm a Fan of batguano 48 fans permalink

Maybe this "revelation" will be enlarged to the Coca eradication in South America and the wasteful and oppressive anti Marijuana laws in the US itself. The attacks on subsistance farmers and native cultures has been a fraud and crime against native peoples. The use of cancer-causing herbicides sprayed on "drug crops" (and adjacent food crops) has impacted the children disproportionately and is a continuing crime. The west, especially the US gov must end this total waste of resources and crimes against otherwise innocent people!

The prohibition on Industrial Hemp is at least as short-sighted and stupid as policy. We could be creating jobs by legalizing IH, and cut back on chemical/pesticide use. We waste billions annually on "law enforcement" eradication ditch-weed, feral hemp, in the Mid-West states. It is time to LEGALIZE IT!

RESIST THE PHONEY WAR ON DRUGS!

http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/ncnu02/v5-284.html
http://www.votehemp.com/overview.html
http://nynorml.org/news.html
http://www.cyberessays.com/Politics/92.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 06/27/2009
- zizyphus I'm a Fan of zizyphus 106 fans permalink
photo

This is about controlling the drug routes and getting a gas pipeline through there.

This war and and most of the others going on in the world are about about controlling resources for the benefit of the elite.

Obviously, the simplest solution would be to offer the poor opium farmers a good price for their crop, and contract for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

Thank God.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 06/27/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect