US Announces Shift In Afghanistan Drug Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US Announces Shift In Afghanistan Drug Policy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

NICOLE WINFIELD | 06/27/09 02:21 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this June 20, 2009 image, U.S. Marines from the 2nd MEB, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines pass through a poppy field during operations against the Taliban near Now Zad in Afghanistan's Helmand province. The U.S. announced a new drug policy Saturday, June 27, 2009, for opium-rich Afghanistan, saying it was phasing out funding for eradication efforts and using the money for drug interdiction and alternate crop programs instead. The U.S. envoy for Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke, told The Associated Press that eradication programs weren't working and were only driving farmers into the hands of the Taliban. (AP Photo/David Guttenfelder)

TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate crops, the U.S. envoy for Afghanistan said Saturday.

The aim of the new policy: to deprive the Taliban of the tens of millions of dollars in drug revenues that are fueling its insurgency.

The U.S. envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, told the Associated Press that poppy eradication _ for years a cornerstone of U.S. and U.N. drug trafficking efforts in the country _ was not working and was only driving Afghan farmers into the hands of the Taliban.

"Eradication is a waste of money," Holbrooke said on the sidelines of a Group of Eight foreign ministers' meeting on Afghanistan, during which he briefed regional representatives on the new policy.

"It might destroy some acreage, but it didn't reduce the amount of money the Taliban got by one dollar. It just helped the Taliban. So we're going to phase out eradication," he said. The Afghan foreign minister also attended the G-8 meeting.

Eradication efforts were seen as inefficient because too little was being destroyed at too high a cost, U.N. drug chief Antonio Maria Costa told the AP.

The old policy was also deeply unpopular among powerless small-scale farmers, who often were targeted in the eradication efforts.

Afghanistan is the world's leading source of opium, cultivating 93 percent of the world's heroin-producing crop. While opium cultivation dropped 19 percent last year, it remains concentrated in Afghanistan's southern provinces where the Taliban is strongest and last year earned insurgents an estimated $50 million to $70 million, according to the U.N. drug office.

Story continues below

While there was no immediate comment from Kabul on Saturday, the U.S. policy shift was likely to be welcomed by Afghanistan's government. Officials eradicating poppies have often been attacked by militants. Afghan citizens, many of whom rely on farming for sustenance and income, would also invite new agricultural programs.

The new policy calls for assisting farmers who abandon poppy cultivation. Holbrooke said the international community wasn't trying to target Afghan farmers, just the Taliban militants who buy their crops.

"The farmers are not our enemy, they're just growing a crop to make a living," he said. "It's the drug system. So the U.S. policy was driving people into the hands of the Taliban."

While Holbrooke did not provide the AP with a dollar figure for the new U.S. commitment, he told the G-8 ministers that Washington was increasing its funding for agricultural assistance from tens of millions of dollars a year to hundreds of millions of dollars, said Foreign Minister Franco Frattini of Italy, the current G-8 president.

"We're essentially phasing out our support for crop eradication and using the money to work on interdiction, rule of law, alternate crops," Holbrooke told the AP.

The policy also calls for coordinating a crackdown on drug trafficking across Afghanistan's border before the heroin reaches addicts in Europe, Russia and Iran.

In recent months, U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan have begun attacking drug labs and opium storage sites in an effort to deprive the Taliban of drug profits.

The G-8 foreign ministers "strongly appreciated" the policy shift, Frattini said. Costa, of the U.N., said the new focus "seems to be the winning strategy, and I'm glad that all of this has received support from the G-8 ministers."

The G-8 ministers along with Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta issued a statement at the end of their three-day summit Saturday saying it was urgent to find alternatives for farming communities where "narco-trafficking and extremism are endemic."

They said sustainable farming was key to Afghanistan's and Pakistan's future in that it would boost incomes, create jobs, improve rural development and lower regional tensions.

"Food insecurity and chronic poverty are root causes of civil instability and forced migration," the statement said.

The ministers also called for a regional intelligence network to prevent opium from leaving Afghanistan and the chemical precursors needed to turn it into heroin from getting in.

Costa told the G-8 meeting that the recent dip in cultivation was "vulnerable to relapse" without helping farmers with new crops and boosting law enforcement operations to disrupt drug markets, production labs and convoys.

According to a U.N. report this week, opium eradication reached a high in 2003, after the Taliban were ousted from power, with over 21,000 hectares (51,900 acres) destroyed. In 2008, only 5,480 hectares (13,500 acres) were cut down, compared with 19,047 hectares (47,000 acres) in 2007.

Costa said Afghan opium would kill 100,000 people this year in the parts of world where demand for heroin is highest: Europe, Russia and West Asia.

To fight it, he said major powers had to expand their counter-drug efforts to neighboring Pakistan as well as Iran, where half the 7,000 tons of exported Afghan opium transits, "causing the highest addiction rate in the world."

"Facing a grave health epidemic, Iran should be given the chance to engage in common efforts to combat illicit trafficking," he said.

Iran had been invited to attend the G-8 meeting on Afghanistan, because anti-drug efforts in Afghanistan have been identified as a key area where the United States and Iran can work together _ part of President Barack Obama's outreach effort.

But Italy withdrew the invitation after Iran failed to respond and after its bloody postelection crackdown on protesters, which has sparked international condemnation.

___

Associated Press reporter Alessandra Rizzo in Trieste and Jason Straziuso in Kabul contributed to this report.

TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate c...
TRIESTE, Italy — The U.S. is shifting its strategy against Afghanistan's drug trade, phasing out funding for opium eradication while boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promote alternate c...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Just for the record, I support legalization of probably all drugs. (I leave the door open for arguments to ban particularly dangerous drugs.)

But what puzzles me about such articles is the precision with which the drug business is described. Given that growing, selling, buying, transporting and possessing these drugs are illegal, how does the U.N. or anyone else come up with figures like "cultivating 93 percent of the world's heroin-producing crop" and "opium cultivation dropped 19%." Should I trust these numbers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 06/27/2009

Who put idi.ots in charge of the US's policies? Huh??!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 06/27/2009

Am I brilliant, or why not consider channeling these opium crops into LEGETIMATE, controlled uses instead of trying to overhaul a whole culture?

Is this rocket science or what???!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

what and admit that prohibition does not work? I think the old gray men won't allow that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 06/27/2009
- Stilts9 I'm a Fan of Stilts9 56 fans permalink
photo

Eradication of opium was our stratergery in Afghanistan? LMAO.

I'm tellin' ya, we need to do something about our military leadership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

old gray men running things. If they ever had fun they have forgotten how.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 06/27/2009
- benji85 I'm a Fan of benji85 8 fans permalink
photo

Don't forget we had Bush in charge the past 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 06/27/2009
- FunkyP I'm a Fan of FunkyP 11 fans permalink

Clinton too expanded the drug wars...It's tempting to blame everything on Bush, and often justifiable; this was just a cheap shot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 06/27/2009
- iblogleft I'm a Fan of iblogleft 88 fans permalink
photo

Lemme know what a bottle of Viagra costs, then check the prices for any prescription with opiates in it (they are the cheapest prescriptions you can get), and you will understand why we do not legalize and regulate the opium trade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 06/27/2009
- moUSAnMe I'm a Fan of moUSAnMe 16 fans permalink
photo

we can't control drugs in our country, we most certainly can't control drugs over in Afganistan.
It is there main source of income, if not there only source.
We better be worried about our own over there, remember Veitnam

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/27/2009
- SinisterK9 I'm a Fan of SinisterK9 6 fans permalink
photo

Not even close. While opium is a significant source of income for Afghanistan, it represents 13% of their GDP.

In provinces where security has taken hold, eradication has absolutely worked. From 2006-2007, the number of opium free provinces more than doubled, from 6 to 13. As there are only 35 provinces, this is significant. Especially when you consider that 50% of their entire opium product comes from one single province. The remaining balance comes from 4 others. So in total, out of 35 provinces, only 5 are the problem. And those are the ones controlled by the enemy, and on the border with Pakistan.

Over 98% of farmers in Afghanistan have said they would gladly grow another crop if a feasible alternative was available.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 06/27/2009
- jmad I'm a Fan of jmad 4 fans permalink

WE need to abandon the concept of the enemy. Control freaks breed that concept with fear. Dignity and respect seems difficult, generosity pays back multiples.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 06/27/2009

Umm, darn ,a hundred ?s I would like to ask. Have you seen farming in the south, esp. the kandahar area? Crop! You ain't seen poor until you go out in the field. This is not a 3rd world country. Out in the far areas this is a 4th world country. The only thing that might work is to bring water to the houses, that would be equal to every American living in a mansion. Even in Kandahar 2nd biggest city, most people I know still go to the river to get water- the lucky ones working at the base(when they don't get shot for working there) can get empty gallon jugs so they can go to the river & get more water. Oh crop I am glad I am drunk & will not remember tomorrow about rich people whinning. Oh, in case you did not realize- Iam a good Umerican & hate them there furriners.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

Ya think?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 06/27/2009
- LoadedDice I'm a Fan of LoadedDice 2 fans permalink

Since there are multiple medicinal uses for opium derivatives, including non-additive drugs (e.g., papaverine and narcotine), it seems odd that no one (???) has considering creating sensible, legal and ostensibly profitable channels (for Afganis!) to bring them to market. FYI, it's done in India and presumably elsewhere now. (Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opium_production_in_India) ...But then when it come to economics and science, politicians (i.e., lawyers) are always behind the curve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 06/27/2009

The synthetic opium like drugs aren't nearly as good as the original.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 06/27/2009
- Jonni Rae I'm a Fan of Jonni Rae 22 fans permalink

Yes!!! Why not buy the opium? It is used in pharmeceuticals worldwide. Make it an export. Where is the creativity ? Why grow food when you can grow opium and make a lot more money? Just change the buyers from theTaliban to the drug industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 06/27/2009
photo

Without the war on drugs worldwide, the price of opium would drop so much Afghan growers would not find it worth their time and effort. They might try growing arugula instead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 06/27/2009
- smchp I'm a Fan of smchp 78 fans permalink
photo

where is the change?
{/sarcasm off}

For the first time I feel pretty optimistic about what is happening in Afghanistan/Pakistan. There will be an uptick in violence unfortunately but I appears the US/Pakistan have Al Qaeda on the run for a change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 06/27/2009
- iblogleft I'm a Fan of iblogleft 88 fans permalink
photo

This plan will inevitably fail for the simple fact that there is a market, and market needs are always met, one way or the other.

The Afghans never allowed spraying of crops, so it was never really policy anyway.

If they were too legalize and regulate production, Afghanistan may actually have the ability to sell its product to the market, and become economically viable. God forbid.

An interesting statistic; Though opium production varies wildly year to year, addiction rates for the dreaded heroine have remain steady for decades.

So who is buying this product at rock bottom wholesale prices? If its not drug users, it must be pharmaceutical companies. But why would diamond distributors want to keep an unstable government with penny labor... Oh, I mean big drug companies and opium...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 06/27/2009
- fcsakes I'm a Fan of fcsakes 98 fans permalink
photo

Legalize it, control it and tax it instead of using our tax money to fight a war against drugs that can never be won. Not only will the farmers continue to grow it as it is their sole income, but drug pushers will continue to become filthy rich at our expense and will battle ferociously to maintain that income.

We need to provide centers for the use of those addicted and rehab programs that are free. I suspect that we could build and maintain these at a fraction of what we are now wasting on the useless drug war we have been engaged in for how long now?

Prohibition didn't work before and it doesn't work now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 06/27/2009
- iblogleft I'm a Fan of iblogleft 88 fans permalink
photo

Its like rocket science, only its not :-)

For an administration that touted intelligent, scientific decision making, this looks awfully familiar.

Legalize, regulate, educate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/27/2009
- unitron I'm a Fan of unitron 19 fans permalink

Why not treat the Afghani farmers the way we do (the bigger, richer, and usually corporatized) American farmers?

Pay them to not grow the crop!

Set up a deal where we keep tabs on them and they grow some food crop on their land instead, which they can sell without reducing our payments to them.

Use the military to protect them from anyone who wants to force them to grow poppies for them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 06/27/2009
- DSOTM I'm a Fan of DSOTM 109 fans permalink
photo

Now, maybe the US Government will look at our Marijuana eradication program in the US and realize it is not working, it is a waste of money and it puts the lives of DEA agents and growers at risk.

We have been fighting the so-called "War On Drugs" since the late 1960's, drugs are as american as apple-pie, legalize marijuana, tax it and go after meth labs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 06/27/2009

Legalize it, tax it, get some money into the gov. coffers. Require them to sell it to a gov. pharma. agency, which will of course be a front for the US, then destroy it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 06/27/2009

Great news about the shift on drug policy. Now here is a way to complete the winning of hearts and minds:

Buy their crops! I'll bet that the Taliban doesn't pay the poor farmers much; we can surely pay more than they are willing to. Then turn around and sell to the Pharmas as raw materials, with appropriate safeguards, to recoup some of our expenses. As time goes on, we can give the farmers more industrial capabilities, to increase the value of their product (this would be a good wedge to help us introduce education in practical chemical engineering disciplines). Further, to protect our "investment", enlist the aid of the poppy farmers to track the Taliban. We should also provide protection to the farmers from strong arm tactics by the Taliban. A side benefit is that the farmers get drawn into the web of 21st century world commerce. So, in short, use the poppy fields as a vanguard for improving the lot of the farmers as well as a buffer against terrorism. As the farmers become more integrated into our commercial web, we could give them carrot-and-stick incentives to bring women into the labor force at higher levels, etc.

We decry organized crime for exploitation of the poor and "morally weak" (often, just another way of saying poor); let's show the world that the Mafia business model, when administered by a caring group of people, can lift people up rather than exploiting them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 06/27/2009

finally common sense kicks in. what's hard to understand is thay apparently most people knew that eradication was a failure, should have known from the start, but it takes so so long for the right thing to be done. it is very frustrating to know that idiots are in charge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 06/27/2009

At least they are trying something, if it doesn't work they assess the situation and try something else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 06/27/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect