Deed-In-Lieu Vs. Foreclosure: A Couple Has No Option But To Hand Over The Keys

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Deed-In-Lieu Vs. Foreclosure: A Couple Has No Option But To Hand Over The Keys stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Margo Irvin
First Posted: 06-30-09 11:33 AM   |   Updated: 07-31-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Foreclosure

This is Dispatches from the Displaced, where we share the stories of homeowners hit hard by the housing crisis. Foreclosure is both emotionally and financially devastating -- it's a black mark, like bankruptcy, that remains on a credit report for seven years. We've heard from people across the US who have tried to avoid foreclosure through short sales and loan modifications, but some homeowners who haven't had any luck with either turn to another alternative: a Deed in Lieu of foreclosure.

Essentially, in a deed in lieu of foreclosure, a homeowner who is unable to make their mortgage payments hands over their property to the lender instead of going through foreclosure proceedings.

Jenny Kakasuleff and Brandon Rogers, a couple from Indiana, ended up pursuing a deed in lieu when it became clear that negotiations with their lender were going nowhere fast. Although they had received two short sale offers for their home, the bank wouldn't accept them, and instead of going into foreclosure, Jenny and Brandon decided to provide a deed in lieu and hand over the keys:

My husband and I bought our first home in 2005 -- we were 24 and 26 years old at the time -- and I was selling real estate (prior to completing my degree). Our mortgage increased from $900 to $1100 in 2008 due to property tax increases, which just so happened to be when our income took a hit.

When it became clear we could no longer afford our home, we tried to put it on the market to sell it, but it was no longer worth what we owed. After allowing the payment to go for a few months (the bank would only consider a short-sale if we were delinquent), we managed to convince the bank to consider a short-sale. We received two offers for our home -- as a former real estate professional, they were fair offers, not unlike what the bank could receive if they foreclosed on the property and attempted to sell it -- yet the bank denied both.

We wish that they would have worked with us on refinancing, or bringing down our payment, or even on accepting an offer. They did not accept the offers, in my opinion, because we were insured through FHA, so why take less than the home was worth, when the bank can just foreclose and receive any difference they are unable to get through the sale from the government?

They don't care that we'll never be able to buy a house again, or that we tried to do right by them. We have now applied to give them a deed in lieu of foreclosure--an option that we are told is not as bad as a real foreclosure. We'll see what happens.

I understand that lots of people got into homes they couldn't afford; but what about people like us? We could afford the home when we bought it, but we came across tough times and property taxes raised our payment. We tried to do right by the bank and dispense with the home when it was clear we could no longer afford it.

"At this point," Jenny said, "we are waiting for the bank to accept the deed, and we have reason to believe they will."


Find out more about Dispatches from the Displaced, HuffPost's Eyes&Ears series of reader-submitted foreclosure stories. And send us your foreclosure stories at submissions+foreclosure@huffingtonpost.com. You can sign up here to receive further updates about our foreclosure project.


Get HuffPost Eyes&Ears on Facebook and Twitter!

This is Dispatches from the Displaced, where we share the stories of homeowners hit hard by the housing crisis. Foreclosure is both emotionally and financially devastating -- it's a black mark, like b...
This is Dispatches from the Displaced, where we share the stories of homeowners hit hard by the housing crisis. Foreclosure is both emotionally and financially devastating -- it's a black mark, like b...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
39
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

De-regulation is the direct cause of the financial industry collapse. Mortgage companies can now charge whatever they want in late fees, attorney fees, etc. The answer lies in the balance sheet. The stock value of a company is directly determined by a companies net worth. To put it simply, Assets-Liabilities= Net Worth. The higher the net worth, the higher the stock value. Included in receivables is your payment - an asset which increases a companies net worth, and in turn, it's stock value. This is why mortgage companies will not negotiate. Lowering interest rates and eliminating late/attorney fees will directly, negatively affect receivables, and in turn, net worth, and in turn, a drop in stock value.

A friend was laid off, could not make all of her house payment. Countrywide refused to accept a partial payment and added an additionl $600 in late/attorney fees. Had made her payment, on time for 7 years. If they had accepted partial payment and not tacked on the additional fees, their receivables (a current asset) would have decreased, as would net worth, and in turn their stock value. This has been a systematic industry practice to inflate stock value. De-regulation is directly the source of this problem. Charging whatever a mortgage company wants highly inflates their stock value by creating higher receivables - their assets. Eventually auditors will deem these receivables uncollectable and mortgagers are forced to remove them from the balance sheet - this is what caused the collapse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/14/2009

Maybe the should consider a short sale perhaps.
maybe this is post a little self serving be we are helping people sell there
home they can no longer afford. We at www.619sho­rtsale.com are having great
success working with banks on the home owners behalf. We prefer a short sale solution
but sometime recommend a loan modification.

Regards

Simon
www.619sho­rtsale.com
1-619-631-4546

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 07/22/2009

Take back the trillions of $$$ given to the banks, who just sit on it and make it totally ineffective then start government incentive to create realistic industries that give employment and generate real productive income, some of which would hopefully be from exports.

Every other country, especially China and most of Europe have goverment incentives to protect it's industries. No matter what you call it it's a form of protectionism and its inevitable. We should stop being naive and take care of our own house. The only ones who win if we don't are the multinational corporations who don't care where they get their hand out.

hat tip to: http://investmintideas.blogspot.com for the good articles

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 07/01/2009

when will hue ubble stop bursting?

hat tip to: http://investmintideas.blogspot.com for the good articles

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 07/01/2009
- Lorianne I'm a Fan of Lorianne 58 fans permalink
photo

"Our mortgage increased from $900 to $1100 in 2008 due to property tax increases, which just so happened to be when our income took a hit."

Didn't take long into the article to find out these people do not understand finances.
Their mortgage didn't go up, their property taxes did!

Move to a saner property tax area!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/01/2009

That is a MAJOR tax increase! That's RIDICULOUS! Our property taxes are around 1.5% of the value of the home at purchase. This increase means that if your house payment was around $900 - you bought the house for roughly 100k. Your taxes should hover around the sane amount of $1000/yr (about $83/mo). So essentially they more than doubled your taxes...DOUBLED THEM!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 07/06/2009
- NHGranite I'm a Fan of NHGranite 55 fans permalink
photo

There is some flaw in the system that I can't put my finger on. The banks won't help homeowners, they will not modify the loans to any degree, they will not respond to phone calls, paperwork, politicians or homeowners. So there must be a financial gain in their favor with a foreclosure. Somebody is profiting from both ends of this problem. Who is buying up all the properties?

I wonder if an amortized loan is only in the bank's best interest, and I do mean "interest". It takes 7 years to start paying on principle on a 30 year note. Most homeowners have refinanced so often they never pay towards principle.

The other issue is most of the sensible homeowners who didn't go out on a limb but are now facing foreclosure, had a catastrophic change in circumstances. I did loan mods and almost every situation was caused or made worse by a medical issue. If you were counting on 2 incomes and one person got sick, and medical bills piled up, banks didn't care. Most owners do not qualify for state assistance. The middle class has become the ones falling through the cracks in the safety net. Deplorable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 07/01/2009
- sc300nc I'm a Fan of sc300nc 52 fans permalink

The only recourse we the people have is to not re-elect those that did this to us. Senators, congressman, presidents. The only way we are going to take back the government is to show them that they in fact do work for us and we control their job security.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 07/01/2009
- jerichoj8 I'm a Fan of jerichoj8 2 fans permalink

Why don't they ask them to PRODUCE THE NOTE? If they don't have a note, they don't have a claim in many states. Start from a position of strength.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 07/01/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 140 fans permalink

"Deed in lieu" is a euphemism for the concept of the Land Lord ... in the feudal sense of the word. This is definitely the next stage of greed which a great many Money Lords now have their eyes upon.

It works like this, "serf." There is, on the one hand, the Landed Gentry ... the land-lords who own the land throughout the country ... and on the other hand, there is you. A serf. You are locked into working the lord's lands, much like a sharecropper, because you have an obligation but no land. And you will never again be able to own any because the land lord will not release you from your fealty to him.

In time, as was once contemplated in this country and is true elsewhere, only the Land Lords will have the right to vote. Those who do not Own Land will no longer have this privilege. The serfs will toil for them, in comp'ny towns and comp'ny houses.

On paper, this looks wonderful if you are Landed, which of course your friendly neighborhood corrupt politician will be.

Feudalism ... it's (koff koff) the wave of the future.

As for your situation: don't be a fool. Either you own the property or you don't. Never pay for something you don't own unless they explicitly call it "rent" and give you the rights of a renter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 07/01/2009
photo

THe banks are clear that thye are only negotiating if you have a predatory rate or if you are delinquent...even if you tell them in advance that in a few months you will not be able to make the payment they simply won't work anything out.At that point you ruin your credit and choose to go delinquent like this couple or you find another solution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 06/30/2009

"After allowing the payment to go for a few months..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 06/30/2009
- Tiggy I'm a Fan of Tiggy 24 fans permalink

At the market height we could have bought every house currently in foreclosure, avoided the crisis and spent far less. Did we? No! We could have forced the banks and lending companies to refi these mortgages to prevent further foreclosures. Did we? No! Instead, our government stood by and allowed the initial wave to cripple the system then stood by as more and more businesses laid off which led to more and more loan defaults. Our government elected to save Wall Street from its own bad decisions using hard earned tax dollars and future tax dollars. They allowed almost every business to fail except the banking industry who are still paying out millions in bonuses. I must have been misinformed all those years when hearing the words, "We the People" it is apparent those words are in fact, "We the Wall Street Gurus and Banking Bandits".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Well SAID! 100% agree!

Our banks are the revitalized Mafia without the rules as Kennedy did not end their reign as they s1imed their way up through the Financial System and NOW OWN CONGRESS and the Presidency using their ill-gotten LOOT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 07/01/2009
- karen1p I'm a Fan of karen1p 26 fans permalink
photo

I heartily agree to both of these posts......one question........WTF are "we the people" going to do about it???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 07/01/2009

The housing collapse is far from over as OPTION ARM loans done in 2005-2008 are now resetting. The timing comes down to origination date and if you chose a 3 year, 5 year or 7year term. With values continuing to depreciate, and payments due to double (the difference between interest only payments and fully amortizing payment at reset), the equity loss is also close to doubling. Why would anyone think the banks would want to refinance or modify that loan when your/their loss is $50,000 to $100,000+? The only way out of this mess is if the banks would allow the borrowers a PRINCIPAL REDUCTION...which we all know will not happen. The foreclosures will keep coming at a stalled rate due to government imposed moratorium. BING that word for an eye opener. For ARM reset date information see the you tube videos pertaining to Alt A and Option Arm in the link below. For current bank and economic information, another link is included for those interested.

http://www.youtube.com/user/markmti
http://ml-implode.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

I guess sometimes you just have to take your medicine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 06/30/2009
- dagnome27 I'm a Fan of dagnome27 8 fans permalink
photo

I don't get this - we BAIL OUT the banks with out tax dollars, keeping them from failing, and in exchange, they SCREW homeowners (taxpayers) who need help? Sombody got a lot of 'splainin' to do!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 06/30/2009
- Lorianne I'm a Fan of Lorianne 58 fans permalink
photo

Two wrongs do not make a right

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/01/2009
- Deborah I'm a Fan of Deborah 4 fans permalink

No one is talking about the destruction of the credit ratings for millions of people in this country.

Huge numbers of Americans will never recoup their wages, credit ratings or ability to spend money.

This little talked about fact is going to keep this country from recovering from this downturn for a VERY long time.

The baby boomers have been devastated by this, and there is no recovery time for them. This will add additional burdens to the economy as they turn to government programs to survive.

The recovery is focusing on the big banks and industries, and forgetting that if no one is buying, this economy is going nowhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 06/30/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 140 fans permalink

It is the Great Depression of 2008/2009 and, amazingly enough, it is caused by financial crime and high crime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 07/01/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect