EPA Approves California's Plan To Impose Strict Emissions Regulations

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - EPA Approves California's Plan To Impose Strict Emissions Regulations stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

H. JOSEF HEBERT | June 30, 2009 05:47 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency took a major step toward tougher reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks Tuesday by giving California the green light to impose new requirements that could become the national model for combatting tailpipe pollution linked to global warming.

The EPA granted California's long-standing request _ denied by the Bush administration _ for a waiver to allow it to pursue more stringent air pollution rules than required by the federal government. It cleared the way to implement immediately a 2002 state pollution law requiring new cars to increase their fuel economy 40 percent by 2016.

State regulations to implement the law have been in limbo for five years because the Bush administration refused to provide a waiver required by the federal Clean Air Act. Thirteen other states and the District of Columbia have said they want to impose the same requirements as California once the EPA gave the go-ahead.

"This decision puts the law and science first," EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a statement, suggesting that Stephen Johnson, her predecessor at EPA, had ignored historic and traditional legal interpretations on how the Clean Air Act should address the issue when he denied the waiver in March 2008.

Granting California's request "is consistent with the Clean Air Act as it has been used for the last 40 years," Jackson said.

"After being asleep at the wheel ... the federal government has finally stepped up," said California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, noting the state first requested the waiver in December 2005.

The California regulation requires automakers to increase the fuel economy of cars and trucks sold in the state by 40 percent to an average of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016. Improved auto fuel efficiency results in less carbon dioxide being emitted from vehicle tailpipes because less fuel is burned for every mile traveled.

The EPA decision also is viewed as setting the stage for tougher national vehicle fuel economy requirements promised by President Barack Obama in May when he announced an agreement to push through federal standards at least as stringent as those being enacted in California.

Story continues below
advertisement

Jackson said the California waiver decision "reinforces the historic agreement on nationwide emission standards" announced by Obama. That agreement has the support of automakers, many of the states and environmentalists. Obama said he wanted nationwide regulations boosting the average fuel economy of new cars and small trucks to be 35.5 mpg by 2016, four years ahead of what Congress required as part of a new energy law in 2007.

But automakers reacted cautiously to Tuesday's action.

"We are hopeful the granting of this waiver will not undermine the enormous efforts put forth to create the national program," Dave McCurdy, president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said in a statement. He said the federal approach agreed to in May "moves us towards a policy that ensures that consumers in all 50 states have access to highly fuel efficient vehicles at an affordable price."

But environmentalists said the decision to give California the go-ahead for putting into place its emission requirements was long overdue and essential for developing the national program.

"This is putting the federal seal of approval on California's leadership in cleaning up global warming pollution from our cars, SUVs, pickups and minivans," said David Doniger, director of the Climate Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who had sharply criticized Johnson, the Bush administration EPA chief, for repeatedly postponing action and then rejecting the California waiver request, applauded the EPA decision Tuesday. She said it was "putting science and the law back into the driver's seat rather than politics and special interests."

Governors and officials from many of the states ready to adopt the California standard also welcomed the development.

Granting the waiver to California "affirms states' rights to combat global warming," said New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

In addition to New York, other states that have said they want to follow California's lead are: Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

___

On the Net:

Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency took a major step toward tougher reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks Tuesday by giving California the green light to impo...
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency took a major step toward tougher reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks Tuesday by giving California the green light to impo...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Too bad this sort of legislation wasn't kept earlier when it was passed. The EV1 was killed in order to defeat that legislation. I hope this sticks and better cars begin to be manufactured for us in the states. No more tank size gas guzzlers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 AM on 07/01/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

My car already exceeds the future standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 06/30/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 184 fans permalink
photo

Proving once again conservatives only believe in "State's Rights" when it involves unfair discrimination and domestic terrorism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 06/30/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 141 fans permalink

Great point! They want to give abortion legislation to the states, but yet want a national Defense of Marriage Act. Why do they not want to let the state's decide on gay marriage or acting, as in this case, on emission regulations?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 06/30/2009

the auto and oil industries have had their own way for generations.....and I'm not sure it's worked out real well. It's wonderful to see the Obama administration give California the tools to actually deal with the pollution which has plagued many areas of the state for something like fifty years.....I'm sure we'll hear "the sky is falling" from industry lobbyists, but it's nice that people seem more and more ready to face reality and take the necessary actions

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 06/30/2009
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 208 fans permalink

This picture looks like something out of a science fiction movie and is a very sad testament to the selfishness of those who have voted over and over again to leave this kind of world to our children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 06/30/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 184 fans permalink
photo

Wingnuts think the world is going to end, and they will magically be teleported to another planet or something.

So they way they see it, their future is not in our reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 06/30/2009
- oregonbird I'm a Fan of oregonbird 67 fans permalink
photo

This is Off-Topic, but I am attempting to rally some voices -- and comments, and direct contact with HP -- regarding a difficult, verboten subject on the site:

"A strange, Austrian sadism has surfaced as Schwarzenegger reaches the waning period of his first venture into politics."

That is a line from an article entitled, "Arnold Schwarzenegger: Sticking It to "America's Best", available on this site. It was written by Joseph A. Palermo, Associate Professor of History -- at some unnamed school, presumably.

This sentence is inserted into what is otherwise an argument against the financial choices made by the California governor. There is no other mention of the governor's place of birth, no explanation or excuse offered for using his heritage as an adjective to an attributed kink for receiving pleasure from dealing out pain.

This is r.a.c.ism, pure and simple. Please let HP know that, in these times, it is not something that you will accept. News reports of r.a.c.ism, the people involved and responsible for such things, are the responsibility of any legitimate news source. But in an opinion piece, blatent hatred of a naturalized citizen -- or a foreign national, for that matter -- based on his place of birth, is not acceptable. Please help make that clear to HP.

This article should be removed from the site, and the author advised as to the reason.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 06/30/2009
- BeasleysMom I'm a Fan of BeasleysMom 134 fans permalink

How can anyone look at this picture or look at photos of other major metro areas taken from a distance and deny that damage is being done to the atmosphere? Amazing that some people deny what is right in front of their eyes or they just don't care about "the children and grandchildren."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 06/30/2009
- gs425 I'm a Fan of gs425 8 fans permalink
photo

Uhhh probably that the whole 'cap and tax' scheme revolves around odorless gas that you cannot SEE! If you want to make a point about CO2, don't use a picture that is contradictory.

Also, if you're concerned about you kids and thiers, maybe you should worry about the rampant spending that has been going on for the last 15-20 years and the percentage level of GDP that it has risen to. Considering that the emmission in the US are about 10x cleaner now than they where just 30 years ago...out of control spending should be your biggest concern.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Wait a minute! You mean California has had LAX emission standards?

Please get serious. They have had strict standards. Part of the fiscal problem, not part of the solution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 06/30/2009
photo

Energy rates going way up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 06/30/2009
- mobedda I'm a Fan of mobedda 8 fans permalink
photo

So does your IQ, one hopes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 06/30/2009
- marinade I'm a Fan of marinade 39 fans permalink

Then use less. Duh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 06/30/2009
- BeasleysMom I'm a Fan of BeasleysMom 134 fans permalink

Fear mon gering, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 06/30/2009

I'll remember you said that when the energy rates go up again this winter and people complain about being cold. Oh wait, you DimLibs can just blame Bush again . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 06/30/2009
- wadenelson1 I'm a Fan of wadenelson1 218 fans permalink
photo

Let's review the history of automotive emissions progress. California proposed tighter standards after LA's air started looking like Bejing's does today.

Detroit's lawyers shrieked it just "couldn't be done."

Honda's engineers just went ahead and did it.

California made it law, despite yelling and screaming from Detroit. Catalytic converters and fuel injection came in, leaded gas went out. AFE went up with fuel injection.

Guess what. It wasn't all that expensive, and the air looked and tasted a lot better. The rest of the country followed California.

So here we are, round II, and Conservatives and Detroit are shrieking again.

And it's the exact same with coal fired power plants. THEY CAN be built cleaner. Once again the industry lobbyists are shrieking, it's IMPOSSIBLE & IT WILL COST TOO MUCH!

Cleaning up pollution creates jobs. Automotive engineers, hybrid engineers, power plant engineers, emissions & scrubber engineers, and our country desperately needs both clean air AND JOBS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 06/30/2009
- drumz I'm a Fan of drumz 53 fans permalink
photo

But won't it hurt bidness?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 06/30/2009
- marinade I'm a Fan of marinade 39 fans permalink

Overbuilding and the mortgage debacle are responsible for hurting business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 06/30/2009

Good for California, they've been on the right track for years . . . LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 06/30/2009
- mobedda I'm a Fan of mobedda 8 fans permalink
photo

Who's paying you to hang out on all the climate threads, troll?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 06/30/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect