Credit Card Issuers Getting In Their Licks Ahead Of Reform

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Credit Card Issuers Getting In Their Licks Ahead Of Reform stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07- 1-09 12:30 PM   |   Updated: 08- 1-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Chase

As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed into law by President Barack Obama, some lenders are making good on those threats.

Kezia Richards of Pennsylvania told the Huffington Post that last week she received a notice from Chase that her minimum monthly payments would be increasing from 2 to 5 percent of her total balance on her two Chase credit cards.

"It came in the mail like junk mail," she said, noting that in the past she usually ignored mail from Chase but had been opening the letters more recently.

"This one made me physically sick when I read it," she said.

Richards, 37, said that she's carrying roughly $35,000 in debt. She said that the more-than-doubling of her minimum payments, starting in August, would mean the amount she'd owe every month would jump from more than $700 to more than $1,700 -- an amount she said she'll have trouble paying. When she called Chase to get an explanation for the hike, she said she was told, "due to the poor economy and the legislation that's been passed, Chase needs to recoup its funds."

Richards said that Chase told her the increase would apply to 850,000 of its cardholders. Chase told the Huffington Post that the changes would apply to less than 1 percent of its approximately 100 million active accounts.

"Chase has recently increased the monthly minimum payment on select accounts that have carried balances. Effective August 2009, impacted cardmembers will have their minimum payment increased from 2% to 5% of the statement balance," said Chase spokeswoman Stephanie Jacobson in a statement. "Tens of millions of Chase customers have taken advantage of our promotional low rate financing over the last five years. Most of these loans have been paid back in less than 24 months. However, there have been a small percentage of customers that have not made as much progress in paying down these loans."

Chase is not the only lender to take action that will raise costs for consumers since Obama signed the reforms into law in May. USAToday reported Monday that Chase and Bank of America are both raising balance transfer fees, and that Capital One and Citibank have raised interest rates. The Financial Times reported Wednesday that Citi is raising rates on millions of its customers in exactly the way the new legislation is supposed to prohibit.

Story continues below
advertisement

Consumer advocates saw this coming. "Given that the statute was inspired in part by credit card companies changing terms, and that the statute is not yet effective, it is hardly surprising that the companies continue to change their terms," wrote law professor and consumer protection expert Jeff Sovern in an email. "I wonder whether the latest changes can in fact be laid at the statute's feet, or would have happened anyway and are just being blamed on the statute."

The new restrictions will not take effect until next year. Chase's increased minimum payment requirements will not be prohibited by the reforms. Sovern said that while the statute will bar increases in some of the terms governing repayment of outstanding balances, such as arbitrary hikes of interest rates charged on those balances, credit card companies can increase the minimum payment by up to double the original percentage.

For people with large balances on their cards, the minimum payment increase can be particularly difficult.

Jeff and Brenda Dale of Illinois said that they received notice from Chase that both their maximum balance-transfer fee and minimum monthly payments would rise to 5 percent of their roughly $60,000 balance. Brenda Dale said that she recently lost her job as an accounting manager and doubts the couple will be able to afford their new minimum payment amounts, which will jump from around $1,200 to nearly $3,000.

"I was pulling in between $60,000 to $65,000. Now I'm drawing $310 a week from unemployment," said Brenda Dale, who added that she'll be staring bankruptcy in the face if she can't find a job before September. "I can't send the 5 percent. They can't get blood from a turnip."

As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed in...
As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed in...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
285
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

Congress should have never allowed the effective date of the reform legislation to be a year out. These guys have a year to stick it to everyone, while they reap the benefit of their taxpayer bailouts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 AM on 07/02/2009
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 72 fans permalink

If Congress was looking out for the little guy they would give us tax credits of 40% for all interest paid, state income taxes and property taxes.... over and above the deductions and exemptions­....

but this is AMERICA and we believe that the RICHER SHOULD GET RICHER and the devil take the rest of us...I am so ready to spit that the top 400 people with the average income of 250 million pay 17% in taxes...wh­ile the rest of us eat the regressive payroll tax and an income tax that is horrendous while 50% of the income is taxed at equal or lower rates and they sit there and LET THE MONEY ROLL IN while milllions are loosing homes because of medical bankrupcie­s....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

"Chase spokeswoman Stephanie Jacobson in a statement. "Tens of millions of Chase customers have taken advantage of our promotional low rate financing over the last five years. Most of these loans have been paid back in less than 24 months. However, there have been a small percentage of customers that have not made as much progress in paying down these loans.] "

While I'm sure that some customers haven't paid down their low-rate promotion financing, spreading the blame to hurt others is hardly a fitting response. Credit card companies -- any creditors -- are barracudas -- and if they miss snapping up the fish they wanted, any swimming by will do. I want to know what "select" customers are and how they are chosen. Charging $1700 from $700 and other such unreasonable hikes is just unmitigated greed and will drive people into being unable to pay, swelling the ranks of "credit unworthy" with people who were doing just fine paying their debts. Note I said "their debts" -- NOT someone else's. Any action taken by creditors against the slow or too-low payers should be taken against them and only them. Creditors have no right to involve anyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 AM on 07/02/2009
- GHDiel I'm a Fan of GHDiel 2 fans permalink

The banks are really in a panic. And as is true of all decisions made in a state of panic, this greedy grabbing of income using exorbitant fees and penalties, to overcharge a solid base of their customers, will only come back to bite them...the­n once again, 'us'. There ought to be a law to prevent this 'shoveling' of money...if for no reason other than to save banks from themselves, and ultimately, to save 'us'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 07/02/2009
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 72 fans permalink

The banks are in the CATBIRD seat with Obama and the Treasury and the Fed giving them handouts..­.. There is no one in the top 100 employees who is not a multimillionaire because of the regressive tax structure in this country...­. They KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 07/02/2009

It's hard not to be judgmental about folks who are heavily in debt to credit cards, but there are many reasons why credit card debt may be high in a particular family. Autism therapy is expensive and not covered by insurance. We have a 12yo who is now without any real deficits because we used our credit cards to "afford" treatment.­. I'd do it again in a heartbeat. That child easily cost us $100K what with loss of income and cost of therapy. We are a middle class couple with 3 kids under 18, and both of us work. We have a son with type 1 diabetes, and he has an insulin pump. We easily fork over $5K a year in co-pays for medical visits, pump supplies, insulin, and diabetic test strips. I want to run over the older folks who get their power chairs "at no cost to [them]." My parents have pensions and Medicare; I have a 401K (lol!) and private insurance. We are a perfect example of a middle class family getting squeezed from all sides. I have my senators and representative on speed dial; this health care reform has got to come soon. Lets quit blaming the folks who are doing the best they can in tough circumstances (no way would we have been offered so much credit if we weren't responsible payers) and let's go after these criminal banks. Chase? NEVER AGAIN.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 AM on 07/02/2009
- fcsakes I'm a Fan of fcsakes 83 fans permalink
photo

I was feeling pretty bad about your situation until I got to the sentence, "I want to run over the older folks who get their power chairs at no cost to [them]." What a despicable thing to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 07/02/2009

Sorry you think it is despicable­...it was meant to be tongue in cheek. Go to any gambling casino and try not to get run over by a power chair. Those folks on fixed incomes that can't afford (or refuse to pay) a co-pay on their mobility device sure are plentiful in the casinos. I think every one of us needs to own some portion of our health care costs, otherwise there is a tendency to abuse it as an entitlement. I think any public plan should reward careful consumers of health care dollars and penalize those who are wasteful in seeking care that is not necessary; i.e., demanding an MRI just because they have insurance to pay for it and not because it is necessary for diagnosis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/02/2009
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 72 fans permalink

Rosette2251, what treatment worked for your autistic child? what were the symptoms and how did you discover what worked for that child? my granddaughter is autistic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 07/02/2009

Schatsie, I'm sorry your family is dealing with autism; it can be horrendous. Briefly, my daughter was 3, not talking, not pointing at things, very docile, a "good baby." Had the hearing tested; she could hear. Went to speech therapist who suggested an occupational therapist she knew who practiced sensory integration therapy. At that time, 10 years ago, SIT was considered quackery in this country, and so was the Tomatis listening therapy that we did. Check out http://www.sacarin.com for info. The therapy gave us a child who would interact and could be taught, although at the developmental stage of a 1 year old. I quit working, and our entire family forced this child to interact, always talking to her, engaging her, and she continued with weekly speech and OT as well as a special ed preschool. We never left her alone to withdraw into herself. I copied at home what the therapists did in the office. We were extremely fortunate. I wish you and your granddaughter well. It is a very tough and tear-stained road.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 07/02/2009
- HumbleSage I'm a Fan of HumbleSage 7 fans permalink

I tried to use my Credit Card like a Debit--I put money in it before I used it. So the Company sent the money back to me because I was over my $20,000 limit! With my own money I went over their limit of lending to me! I do not use my Credit card at all now. I keep it just to have it. My Company went from charging me 9% to 24% interest and I have never carried a balance for the last 10 years. I guess I am a bad customer--they never made any interest off of me.

Now I hear that my Bank where I have my Debit card will start charging big bucks for overdrafts--which I never have. Get it?? They can only make money on folks who can't use money properly. And do you want a laugh? In got less than $100.00 interest on a Money Market with $22,000 in it for the year, that's less than .5%!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 AM on 07/02/2009
- Happylib I'm a Fan of Happylib 76 fans permalink
photo

I don't mean to sound cold but why are people carrying up to 60, 000 dollars in credit card debt. I don't carry a penny in credit card debt....wh­en you are in hock to these companies then they control your life. I am having a hard time feeling sorry for the many poor choices of the American consumer. This has got to change....­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 07/02/2009

Happylib, this is a special case. The folks Chase are targeting are carrying debt for a long period of time at superb rates--and are doing so precisely because they have been able to meet Chase's terms for many months or even years.

That's not to say that everyone who took advantage of this offer did so for sound reasons. But it is to say that these offers aren't the kinds of deals that will "control your life". With rates that low, even paying the 2% minimums means that your balance is dropping by at least 1.5% per MONTH, much faster than even a 15 year mortgage.

Hope that helps.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 07/02/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

It depends on the income. Not everyone can have that kind of credit!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 07/02/2009

I am not really sure of the point of this article. Assuming interest rate of 18% then paying $700 a momth would cost Ms Richards $65,000 to pay off, while paying $1700 a month, it would cost Ms Richards $42,500 to pay off. Paying $1700 is a very good thing for Ms Richards as she saves over $20,000. Of couse, the problem is Ms Richards likely cannot pay the $1700. So, if Ms Richards is forced into bankruptcy, I assume the bank may not get paid at all. So, how does the bank benefit by this move? The article explains 'Chase needs to recoup it's funds'. Are banks assuming most of these people won't be able to pay off the debt so they are trying to get as much money as they can before these people go broke? Is this bank's in a panic?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 07/02/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 23 fans permalink
photo

I think you hit on it with the idea of making as much as they can as quickly as they can. As usual, they are thinking short term. Instead of fostering long-term customer relationships and making it POSSIBLE for people to honor their end of the bargain, they are taking the money and running. That kind of short-term thinking is part of what has created the current mess, and yet Congress encourages it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 07/02/2009

Not a big surprise. Just sad to think how many more will be forced into foreclosure or bankruptcy as a result and the economy will continue its downward spiral.

Even the new credit card legislation allows increased or default interest rates if you miss a payment... enter the increased minimum payment. It will address all the complaints from those who "had never missed a payment" so far.

What were we thinking when we didn't nationalize the biggest banks? Best we can hope for is that they get busted up due to the systemic risk they pose. First will be Citi and it will happen before the end of the summer. Maybe the other banks will understand the message. Obama isn't overlooking what they are doing, he's choosing the proper time to act.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

I'm getting out of this credit card game. I'm tired of making the banks rich from fees and jacked up rates while I'm scraping by to make payments. Against prevailing financial advice, I withdrew money from my 401K to pay off my cards. They tell you to save for the future, but the way things are going, there probably won't be a financial system by the time I retire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 07/01/2009
- fatmo I'm a Fan of fatmo 3 fans permalink

Good move! Your 401k is only make 3 to 5 % while your charge card is 12 to 20 %. The 401k money is going to the wall street banks and giving them huge salarys. That is why they want you too keep your money in the 401k. They get from you from your charge cards & your 401k !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 AM on 07/02/2009
- fcsakes I'm a Fan of fcsakes 83 fans permalink
photo

I did exactly the same thing over a decade ago. Turns out to be one of the best moves I ever made, but it did take awhile to get over reaching for the wallet to get that damn card out every time I saw something I "just had to have."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 07/02/2009

Good to get out of the credit card trap. It sucks that you had to raid your 401k but honestly its better to be out of debt and stay that way. any money you earn here on is yours and yours alone. you're not getting paid to pay someone else. Its freedom and welcome to the educated few who know how to manage our finances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 07/02/2009
- SamKnause I'm a Fan of SamKnause 71 fans permalink

I don't think you should ride so high on your horse. You will not be able to manage your finances so well if you become unemployed or suffer a catastrophic illness. You are assuming that people who have credit card debt are uneducated and know nothing about finances. You should not be so smug and unfeeling, it is not becoming, or helpful to anyone who played by the rules, and had the rules changed in the middle of the game.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 07/02/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 159 fans permalink
photo

We didn't Nationalize the Banks so nothing has changed all we did was reward the bad guys and then enrich them all over again...

It's been one abuse after another all because we failed to Nationalize these major corrupt banks...AI­G the Credit Card Companies we could have really turned this thing around..ha­d we Nationalize and be giving low interest loans to stimulate the economy...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 07/01/2009

What better argument (among many) for a Consumer Financial Protection Agency .

There are more, many more. The "boilerplate" attacks, clever charges and fees, continue unabated. Ethics have a place no longer either with banks or their law firms, in the name of "working on behalf of the shareholders," a mere fiction belied by distended salaries and posh offices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 07/01/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 67 fans permalink

Why is anyone doing business with these banks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 07/02/2009
- Faraja I'm a Fan of Faraja 2 fans permalink
photo

"Richards, 37, said that she's carrying roughly $35,000 in debt. She said that the more-than-doubling of her minimum payments, starting in August, would mean the amount she'd owe every month would jump from more than $700 to more than $1,700 -- an amount she said she'll have trouble paying."

"Brenda Dale said that she recently lost her job as an accounting manager and doubts the couple will be able to afford their new minimum payment amounts, which will jump from around $1,200 to nearly $3,000."

I I think Richards and Brenda need to see a Financial Advisor asap. I can't believe some people are paying that much for the damn credit card! No wonder we are in recession.

In Debt We Trust!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 07/01/2009
- rbchilds I'm a Fan of rbchilds 14 fans permalink
photo

These folks to seriously liquidate, file for bankruptcy immediately.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 07/01/2009
- Faraja I'm a Fan of Faraja 2 fans permalink
photo

Filing bankruptcy will not help these folks. Mandatory 1 year Financial Literacy Course will help them better than Bankruptcy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 AM on 07/02/2009
- FRE I'm a Fan of FRE permalink

Whether we want to or not, we are FORCED to use credit cards!!

If we do not establish a good credit rating by borrowing money ( which usually means using credit cards), we have to pay more for home and vehicle insurance. Then, if we want to borrow money to buy a home, we will have real problems doing so if we have not established a credit rating. Of course, we can generally avoid interest charges on our credit cards by paying them off in full every time we receive a bill. But, if we happen to be out of town when the bill arrives and, as a result, pay it off a bit late, then we are stung!!

The credit card companies are blood suckers. Action should be taken so that there will be no penalty for failing to borrow money to establish a credit rating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 07/01/2009

Yes, there's no getting around the fact that in order to establish credit you need to obtain a credit card or take out a loan so you can show you are someone who will make your scheduled payments on time and in full. People who have gotten themselves into trouble with by charging things they really can't afford have no one to blame but themselves. If you can't afford to pay your bill in full each month then you shouldn't be using your credit card to make purchases. What happened to waiting and saving your money so you can purchase an item? People use their credit cards like strung out junkies. They need to get their fix and never stop to think about tomorrow and where they will get the money to make their payments. Their debt increases in leaps and bounds and then they're have enslaved themselves to the credit card companies with payments that are endless. These companies know that people will not exercise restraint and they hope that you get in over your head so they can bleed you dry with fees, penalties and higher interest rates. Smarten up America!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 07/02/2009
- Anne Ross I'm a Fan of Anne Ross 2 fans permalink
photo

I think everyone should contact Senator Chris Dodd who is in charge of the Banking and Finance Committee in Washington. Call the press, It is a waste of time to talk to Chase since they sound like Robots and are obviously reading from a script. Also contact the FTC and file a report. I heard there is a class action law suit filed against Chase ( with a very large NYC firm) for hiking minimum monthly payments and charging a ten dollar fee. I am sure they would be happy to add another 850,000 clients to their suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/01/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 29 fans permalink
photo

Talking to Chris Dodd, or his wife IS a waste of time.
Talking to the press IS a waste of time.

Waiting for anyone in the Administration, Congress, or the Regulators to do the right thing IS a waste of time.

The social contract is broken.

No one will do the right thing. No one will take care of you. Nothing has changed, nor, will anything change.

UNLESS WE FIRE THESE BANKS, REMOVE ALL OF OUR MONEY FROM THEM, CLOSE ALL OF OUR ACCOUNTS AT THEM, AND REFUSE TO USE THEIR SERVICES EVER AGAIN.

Tomorrow..­........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 07/01/2009
- Anne Ross I'm a Fan of Anne Ross 2 fans permalink
photo

STILL THERE IS POWER IN NUMBERS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 07/01/2009

Hdaryl01 I am not finished trying. Good luck on your revolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 07/01/2009
- Anne Ross I'm a Fan of Anne Ross 2 fans permalink
photo

It is really unbelievable that our tax money has been used to bailout the banks and now they are turning around and exploiting all of their credit card holders. The notice of the monthly percentage hike was sent to 850,000 consumers that were promised a 3.99% rate for the lifetime of their loan. This rate was offered only to individuals with an excellent credit payment and good credit scores. Because of this guarantee, many switch their balances from other credit cards on to Chase, thinking that Chase would honor their part of the agreement. They didn't do anything illegal, but their practices certainly are unethical and ruthless. I am sick of people gloating and blaming unfortunate individuals that were taken advantage of by the dishonesty of current banking and financial system. The banking system created a mess with mortgages and the real estate market, and now they are preying on consumers of credit cards. I hope the greed of the banks don't cause our world economy to totally tank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 07/01/2009
- SamKnause I'm a Fan of SamKnause 71 fans permalink

I agree with you 100%. I could not have said it better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/01/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect