Credit Card Issuers Getting In Their Licks Ahead Of Reform

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Credit Card Issuers Getting In Their Licks Ahead Of Reform stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07- 1-09 12:30 PM   |   Updated: 08- 1-09 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Chase

As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed into law by President Barack Obama, some lenders are making good on those threats.

Kezia Richards of Pennsylvania told the Huffington Post that last week she received a notice from Chase that her minimum monthly payments would be increasing from 2 to 5 percent of her total balance on her two Chase credit cards.

"It came in the mail like junk mail," she said, noting that in the past she usually ignored mail from Chase but had been opening the letters more recently.

"This one made me physically sick when I read it," she said.

Richards, 37, said that she's carrying roughly $35,000 in debt. She said that the more-than-doubling of her minimum payments, starting in August, would mean the amount she'd owe every month would jump from more than $700 to more than $1,700 -- an amount she said she'll have trouble paying. When she called Chase to get an explanation for the hike, she said she was told, "due to the poor economy and the legislation that's been passed, Chase needs to recoup its funds."

Richards said that Chase told her the increase would apply to 850,000 of its cardholders. Chase told the Huffington Post that the changes would apply to less than 1 percent of its approximately 100 million active accounts.

"Chase has recently increased the monthly minimum payment on select accounts that have carried balances. Effective August 2009, impacted cardmembers will have their minimum payment increased from 2% to 5% of the statement balance," said Chase spokeswoman Stephanie Jacobson in a statement. "Tens of millions of Chase customers have taken advantage of our promotional low rate financing over the last five years. Most of these loans have been paid back in less than 24 months. However, there have been a small percentage of customers that have not made as much progress in paying down these loans."

Chase is not the only lender to take action that will raise costs for consumers since Obama signed the reforms into law in May. USAToday reported Monday that Chase and Bank of America are both raising balance transfer fees, and that Capital One and Citibank have raised interest rates. The Financial Times reported Wednesday that Citi is raising rates on millions of its customers in exactly the way the new legislation is supposed to prohibit.

Story continues below

Consumer advocates saw this coming. "Given that the statute was inspired in part by credit card companies changing terms, and that the statute is not yet effective, it is hardly surprising that the companies continue to change their terms," wrote law professor and consumer protection expert Jeff Sovern in an email. "I wonder whether the latest changes can in fact be laid at the statute's feet, or would have happened anyway and are just being blamed on the statute."

The new restrictions will not take effect until next year. Chase's increased minimum payment requirements will not be prohibited by the reforms. Sovern said that while the statute will bar increases in some of the terms governing repayment of outstanding balances, such as arbitrary hikes of interest rates charged on those balances, credit card companies can increase the minimum payment by up to double the original percentage.

For people with large balances on their cards, the minimum payment increase can be particularly difficult.

Jeff and Brenda Dale of Illinois said that they received notice from Chase that both their maximum balance-transfer fee and minimum monthly payments would rise to 5 percent of their roughly $60,000 balance. Brenda Dale said that she recently lost her job as an accounting manager and doubts the couple will be able to afford their new minimum payment amounts, which will jump from around $1,200 to nearly $3,000.

"I was pulling in between $60,000 to $65,000. Now I'm drawing $310 a week from unemployment," said Brenda Dale, who added that she'll be staring bankruptcy in the face if she can't find a job before September. "I can't send the 5 percent. They can't get blood from a turnip."

As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed in...
As lawmakers worked out credit card reform legislation earlier this year, card issuers argued that tough restrictions would make credit costlier for consumers. Now that tough reform has been signed in...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
285
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- CaliRN I'm a Fan of CaliRN 4 fans permalink
photo

There seem to be more warnings about the coming credit card default "bubble" where defaults on credit card accounts will possibly exceed the damage done by the housing bubble and subsequent home foreclosures.

If this occurs, will we see a repeat of the bailouts of Wall Street firms and banks?

If these companies are bailed out, is it fair??? The companies that will need the most help will be the credit card companies that have been operating under unfair business/financial practices in unilaterally modifying terms, conditions and interest rates for credit card accounts.

Personally, I feel we are not even close to this economic crisis being over. Unemployment rates are rising while consumer debt continues to rise. This is a very bad combination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 07/01/2009
- swisskabab I'm a Fan of swisskabab 6 fans permalink

< If this occurs, will we see a repeat of the bailouts of Wall Street firms and banks? >

Great question. I think CaliRN has a very pertinent question ... what is the banks' game plan. Are they
doing this to raise their capital reserves ? Or is it something more sinister as CaliRN asks ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 07/01/2009
photo

The banks have massive amounts of reserves due to the money creation the Fed has created in the past nine months http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXCRESNS?cid=1233). The problem is that since all the economic fundamentals are getting worse, there is no incentive for banks to loan money, and there won't be for a long time due to the capital destruction that has occurred in the past decade. The game plan is for banks to wait out the tough times by accumulating deposits and loaning out as little money as possible. Unfortunately, I can almost guarantee that the Administration or Fed will be forcing banks to loan sometime in the near future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 07/01/2009
- Anne Ross I'm a Fan of Anne Ross 2 fans permalink
photo

And the banks who received the bailout money are now using it to lobby against laws that would enforce regulation and oversight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 07/01/2009

I've tried for months to get a consumers' Opt Out day going where we cut up our cards and send tons of plastic (to be recycled, of course) to the megabanks. Got very little interest in the concept. One of the problems with opting out is that companies are making it extremely difficult to get new credit cards, so many people would have to go cold turkey on plastic. Even the community banks and credit unions are being hard asses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 07/01/2009

The megabank robber barons make me want to puke. Our gutless Congress and president should have made the reforms retroactive to July of 2008 to prevent the fox eating as many chickens it could before the hen house finally got a pit bull to guard it. All the execs at these megabanks should each get 150 years apiece so they can join the other ripoff con man Bernie Madoff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 07/01/2009

PREEMPTIVE STRIKE - That is all it is! Thanks our elected leaders!!!
They are not alone. Look at bristol myers per wsj dated 4/15/09.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123975436561018959.html
"Hospitals and pharmaceutical companies have been pushing through hefty price increases aimed at bolstering earnings, even as government and private insurers are struggling to rein in healthcare costs."

"The prices of a dozen top-selling drugs increased by double digits in the first quarter from a year earlier. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Sprycel was up 32.7%, and Pfizer Inc.'s Sutent rose 14.3%. Erectile-dysfunction medicines are also getting pricier, including Pfizer's Viagra, up 20.7%, and Eli Lilly & Co.'s Cialis, up 14.2%. Another costlier class of medicines is used to treat attention-deficit disorder, such as Lilly's Strattera, whose price has increased 15.6% over the past year."

"Credit Suisse's Catherine Arnold said that drug companies have increased prices so aggressively in recent months to wring sales out of products before any healthcare cost-cutting efforts eat into profits."

"When the government is talking about more aggressive discounts, your start price is going to determine your end price," she said. "I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like this."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 07/01/2009

I wonder how many of those drugs are actually doing anyone any good anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 07/01/2009
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

...especially with the side effects, side effects, side effects....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 07/01/2009

I wonder how much good most of those dr.ugs really do folks anyway.

I've got an 82-year-old uncle who takes a handful of vitamins and an aspirin a day and he's healthier than most people my age.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 07/01/2009
- zukervati I'm a Fan of zukervati 25 fans permalink
photo

Amazing, given the "Judeo-Christian" values that are espoused by the CONServatives who continue to defend these banks and their egrigious profits at all cost, no one from their rank and file questions the high interest rates that these banks charge. You don't hear their politicians at the deis or priests at the pulpit question this most repressive and excesive form of usury - revolving credit card interst rate!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 07/01/2009

I got a letter Monday telling me that my interest rate had been raised to 24.9%. I have never been late on a payment, and I always pay at least twice the minimum payment due. I only have around $1200 in credit card debt, so this doesn't sound like a big deal, but....as much as I would love to just pay the thing off and cut it up, in protest of their unfaithful business policies, things have been arranged for us now so that without a credit card, you will find it hard to rent a car, to book a hotel room, or any number of other transactions in which non-plastic is penalized. In addition, not having a credit card will actually lower your credit rating! So it looks to me like they've got you coming and going!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 07/01/2009

Welcome to the ever-growing club. I got one of those letters last week, raising my rate from 16% to 24% - a 50% increase! - without my having paid late or otherwise screwed up. I am opting out, which will close the account and allow me to pay it off at my original rate. We have that right in New York - I'm not sure if it's true everywhere.

As for not being able to rent a car, etc., without plastic, guess who set up those conditions? And credit scores are a bank-instituted scam of the first order. They're just another way for banks to get away with charging higher rates to people who can least afford it and have the least ability to do anything about it.

Welcome to modern-day American capitalism. One of these days people will get fed up and when the Republicans and neocons are screaming "socialism" at progressive politicians, it will start sounding like a good idea instead of an accusation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 07/01/2009
- MIKEinNYC I'm a Fan of MIKEinNYC 69 fans permalink
photo

The federal government should remove Federal caps on interest rates and usury and allow the states to set their own caps, which many of them do now. In New York, for instance, interest rates are capped at 16% for individual borrowers and 24% as to corporations. Higher rates are defined as "usury" and the creditor is precluded from collecting the entire debt.

At the same time Congress should require the credit card companies to abide by the maximum interest rates in effect in their CUSTOMERS' state of residence, instead of the rate which prevails in the states where the credit card companies are located, which is what they do now.

Alternatively, what they can require the credit card companies to use the interest rates in effect in the place where the indebtedness is incurred. This would mean that if I, a NY resident, use my credit card in another state, the money that is advanced to me by the credit card company in the other state would incur interest at the maximum rate permitted in that other state.

As an analogy, if you are in my state where the maximum speed limit is 55mph and you come from a state where the speed limit is 80mph you'd better drive at 55mph. In my state it makes no difference what the speed limit is where you come from.

This seems fair and the federal government gets to avoid being accused of being overly meddlesome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 07/01/2009
- SamKnause I'm a Fan of SamKnause 76 fans permalink

I received Chase checks in the mail for 3.99% fixed rate until balance was paid, as long as I was never late. I have never been late. I don't even think I have the card, I just used the checks. I had windows put in my home to help with heating and cooling costs, and had a new roof put on. I couldn't get a 3.99% rate at any bank or even a refinance. I always called before I used a check to see what the monthly payments would be to make sure I could afford them. I paid it down. I got another check, and had my barn repaired at 3.99% interest. I have been paying on it. I have never been late, have excellent credit. I did not buy things I did not need, such as a cell phone, DVD player, clothes, Cd's, etc. I live a simple basic life. Chase informed me my 2% minimum payment is going up to 5%. My payment will increase from $326.00 to over $800.00. That is more then my house payment. For all the people who keep saying live within your means, I think I did, but the rules changed in favor of big banks in the middle of the game.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 07/01/2009
- Jachyra I'm a Fan of Jachyra 2 fans permalink

I agree that they were a bit sly about it, but technically, they've done exactly what they've promised... they never raised your interest rate... it sounds like they never said anything about not raising the minimum payment, and I would imagine that, when you called them originally to verify the terms, had you asked them whether or not they reserved the right to increase the minimum payment at any time they probably would have said yes. Its just that you never even considered that possibility (as most people wouldn't).

However, in all fairness, who in their right mind puts something on their credit card with the intention of paying just the minimum... I think its pretty much common knowledge that if you just pay the minimum payment it takes on average 20 to 30 years to pay off a balance and you end up paying a ton of money in interest over the life of the balance. I think most people anticipate paying a lot more than the minimum payment whenever they make large purchases on a credit card... if not, perhaps thats part of the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 07/01/2009
- SamKnause I'm a Fan of SamKnause 76 fans permalink

Thank you for your reply. As I stated I paid the bill down once and used another check. I always pay above the minimum including the months interest. You are right I did not think to ask that question about increasing minimum payments. I think the reason they are doing this is because they can't raise the interest rates, so they will get you one way or another. All it will accomplish is many more defaults. Also as I stated earlier a 3.99% interest rate in excellent and that is why I decided to improve my home this way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 07/01/2009
- MIKEinNYC I'm a Fan of MIKEinNYC 69 fans permalink
photo

And that's exactly how people got embroiled in the mortgage crises.

They took mortgages at low, adjustable teaser rates which eventually got jacked up to exorbitant levels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 07/01/2009
- SamKnause I'm a Fan of SamKnause 76 fans permalink

Thanks for your reply. I do not think it is the same thing. This was not a teaser rate, it is a fixed rate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 07/01/2009

Pay attention Mike, you sound a bit Rushy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 07/01/2009
- Anne Ross I'm a Fan of Anne Ross 2 fans permalink
photo

It seems crazy that has been little or no media exposure on minimum payment increase by Chase.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/01/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

EVERYBODY is in a similar situation. I had a 785 (old scale) credit score, a $25K line on my CHASE card, and literally charged over $1 Million on the card over 10+ years. All of my business expenses went on the card. Many months, depending on travel, etc. I paid interim payments to ensure that there was adequate credit available. 120 on time payments. ZERO late payments. Zero overlimit periods. The vast majority of months I paid the entire balance off in full. I moved. I put in a pro-active change of address with Chase. I did not receive a statement......until the statement with my 20% rate increase-retroactive of course. My interest rate got jacked to 29.9% from 9.9%. Phone calls to no avail. Supervisor escalation to no avail. "Be a good customer for 6 months ....and we'll review your account...." So, I cashed in my remaining 200,000+ miles and had them buy me (4) $1000 international airline tickets, and a few sleeves of golf balls, and FedExed a check, and a letter, and my cut up card to Jamie Dimon's attention. Phuque them. This was a little over a year ago. They dinged me a few hundred, and lost me for life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 07/01/2009

It is evident from reading these threads that some corporate, and political leaders are unaware of the Internet dynamic! Mainstream America is acutely aware of the financial sector's very uneven playing field!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 07/01/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

Ah...yes....but will Mainstream America ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT? Like affirmatively kill the too big too fail banks by en masse removing all of their money and accounts and use of services from them....? Immediately? In a concerted fashion? Purge them? Stop being enabling customers? Otherwise, all of this outrage is just noise. And, the too big too fail crowd, our government, the administration, our congress is deaf.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 07/01/2009
- mmerose I'm a Fan of mmerose 11 fans permalink

You know, its been a long time since I took basic contract law in law school, but it seems to me there is a major body of precedent having to do with the enforceability of contracts between parties where one has much more power than the other. In other words, the law protects the weaker party against unfairness, or overreaching by the stronger party. Seems to me this was a really fundamental principle, as in "inalienable."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 07/01/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

You're talking about ADHESION CONTRACTS, and the principle that contracts written exclusively by one powerful party, are construed in the light most favorable to the non-drafting and less powerful party.

Unfortunately, the banks wote all the contract laws pertaining to credit card terms through their lobbyists, and ARBITRATION based on their terms is mandated. And, they even wrote the 2005 Bankruptcy "Reform" Act. which precludes individual Chapter 7 filings. A Chapter 13 must be filed with a payment plan for creditors (Credit Cards get new special consideration), this Chapter 13 plan must fail BEFORE a Chapter 7 can be filed........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 07/01/2009
- mmerose I'm a Fan of mmerose 11 fans permalink

Thank you! I guess I am toying with the idea that just because an adhesion contract has been legislated, can't the legislation be unconstitutional?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 07/01/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

People, WE need revolution. WE need to take back our power, and WE need to force change.

The social contract is broken. On all levels. Wake up. The banks are not bound by it, and haven't been for some time, and they own our elected officials and regulatory institutions. Our elected officials are more concerned about the oligarchs than they are about us, based on their actions, not words-they have repeatedly chosen to bail out the oligarchs with our money, while WE the people languish-they could have just as easily bailed us out with our money, and bypassed the oligarchs.

No one will take care of you. No one can be counted on to do the right thing. No one is bound by the social contract.

We need to affirmatively kill these too big too fail financial institutions. Ourselves. The government and the administration haven't done it and won't do it. Nothing will change until WE force it.

WE can kill these banks. If everyone yanked all their money out of this group of banks, or merely one to make a point and send a message, in a concerted fashion, closed all accounts, and refused to use any of these banks' or bank's services, they would die. Period. Regardless of how much more the government and the regulators bail them out. Game over. On to the next...

The time is right. NOW. Put up, or shut up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 07/01/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 244 fans permalink
photo

I had a credit card, ONCE, back in the 1990's. It was a card that Sears issues. At the time I was working for them. Had a $2000 limit, but with the changing interest rates, it might as well been $20,000 on the card. It literally took me years to pay off that card. If you paid the minimum like they wanted, that wasn't enough to cover the interest. That's how they fool you. So I'd pay and pay and pay, and I'm noticing the balance is going higher and higher. At one point, my card with that $2k limit was now over $2500 balance. Compound this with the fact that in order to skirt minimum wage laws, they were only paying us salespersons at the time $3.80 an hour plus commission. Anyways, between my struggling to make ends meet with crappy jobs that paid peanuts, I finally told them something had to give, lol. Either they stop interest and let me paid it off, or I'll just stop making payments. Funny, when it went into collection, the interest stopped compounding, LOL. In the end, they had to deal with me more on my terms from that point on. As the article says, can't get blood from a turnip. Plus I was able to show and prove I already paid off everything I had initially charged, twice over. And they still had me owing $2700. Finally we agreed, $500 one time payment and it would all be settled.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 07/01/2009

Default. They are going to screw your credit rating anyway, so default now and keep your cash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 07/01/2009
- HisPetGoat I'm a Fan of HisPetGoat 75 fans permalink
photo

If millions of usury victims would do that at the same time I don't think the courts cound handle it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 07/01/2009

BINGO!!!

Banksters would be leaping out of high windows with abandon.

Good thing all the way around if you ask me. heh

(p.s. LOVE your avatar...reminds me of the movie "Babe" and gives me a ~giggle~)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 07/01/2009
- thromulese I'm a Fan of thromulese 24 fans permalink
photo

Chase SUCKS!

I had one of their cards and never missed a payment and was never late. They increased my interest rate to a whopping 30%. When I called them they refused to reduce it and claimed they increased the rate due to number of companies checking my credit reports. When I pressed them further it turned out that THEY were checking my credit every month and thereby causing the very situation that they were charging me for.

Chase is a greedy soulless corporate thief. I paid off the balance cancelled the card and will never ever ever hold another one of their cards.

Again. Because it bears repeating:

Chase SUCKS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 07/01/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect