U.S. Marines Launch Major Operation In Afghanistan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - U.S. Marines Launch Major Operation In Afghanistan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JASON STRAZIUSO | July 1, 2009 10:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

NAWA, Afghanistan — Thousands of U.S. Marines and hundreds of Afghan troops poured into Taliban-infested villages of southern Afghanistan with armor and helicopters Thursday in the first major operation under President Barack Obama's strategy to stabilize the country.

The offensive in the once-forgotten war was launched shortly after 1 a.m. Thursday local time in Helmand province, a Taliban stronghold and the world's largest opium poppy producing area. The goal is to clear insurgents from the hotly contested region before the nation's Aug. 20 presidential election.

Officials described the operation, dubbed Khanjar, or "Strike of the Sword," as the largest and fastest-moving of the war's new phase, involving nearly 4,000 of the newly arrived Marines and 650 Afghan forces. British forces last week led similar, but smaller, missions to clear out insurgents in Helmand and neighboring Kandahar provinces.

"Where we go we will stay, and where we stay, we will hold, build and work toward transition of all security responsibilities to Afghan forces," Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Larry Nicholson said in a statement.

Transport helicopters carried hundreds of Marines into the village of Nawa, some 20 miles (30 kilometers) south of the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah, in a region where no U.S. or other NATO troops have operated in large numbers.

Daybreak brought the sporadic crackle of gunfire, but no heavy fighting immediately broke out. Medical helicopters circled overhead and landed, indicating possible early casualties among the Marines.

A roadside bomb early in the mission wounded one Marine, but he was able to continue, spokesman Capt. Bill Pelletier said.

Southern Afghanistan is a Taliban stronghold but also a region where Afghan President Hamid Karzai is seeking votes from fellow Pashtun tribesmen.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Pentagon is deploying 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan in time for the elections and expects the total number of U.S. forces there to reach 68,000 by year's end. That is double the number of troops in Afghanistan in 2008, but still half of much as are now in Iraq.

The Taliban, who took control of Afghanistan in 1996 and were ousted from power following a U.S.-led invasion in 2001, have made a violent comeback, wreaking havoc in much of the country's south and east, forcing the United States to pour in the new troops.

Pelletier said troops in Thursday's operation were sent in by a mixture of aircraft and ground transport under the cover of darkness.

The operation aims to show "the Afghan people that when we come in we are going to stay long enough to set up their own institutions," Pelletier said.

Once on the ground, the troops will meet with local leaders, hear their needs, and act on them, Pelletier said.

"We do not want people of Helmand province to see us as an enemy, we want to protect them from the enemy," Pelletier said.

"We are kind of forging new ground here. We are going to a place nobody has been before," said Capt. Drew Schoenmaker, 31, from Greene, New York, who commands Bravo Company of the 1st Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment.

Reversing the insurgency's momentum has been a key component of the new U.S. strategy, and thousands of additional troops allow commanders to push and stay into areas where international and Afghan troops had no permanent presence before.

While Marine troops were the bulk of the force, recently arrived U.S. Army helicopters were also taking part in the operation in Helmand province.

In March, Obama unveiled his strategy for Afghanistan, seeking to defeat al-Qaida terrorists there and in Pakistan with a bigger force and a new commander. Taliban and other extremists, including those allied with al-Qaida, routinely cross the two nations' border in Afghanistan's remote south.

The governor of Helmand province predicted the operation would be "very effective."

"The security forces will build bases to provide security for the local people so that they can carry out every activity with this favorable background, and take their lives forward in peace," Gov. Gulab Mangal said in a Pentagon news release.

Obama aims to boost the Afghan army from 80,000 to 134,000 troops by 2011 _ and greatly increase training by U.S. troops accompanying them _ so the Afghan military can take control of the war. The White House also is pushing forces to set clear goals for a war gone awry, provide more resources and make a better case for international support.

There is no timetable for withdrawal, and the White House has not estimated how many billions of dollars its plan will cost.

__

Associated Press writers Fisnik Abrashi in Kabul and Lara Jakes in Washington contributed to this report.

NAWA, Afghanistan — Thousands of U.S. Marines and hundreds of Afghan troops poured into Taliban-infested villages of southern Afghanistan with armor and helicopters Thursday in the first major o...
NAWA, Afghanistan — Thousands of U.S. Marines and hundreds of Afghan troops poured into Taliban-infested villages of southern Afghanistan with armor and helicopters Thursday in the first major o...
Filed by Cara Parks  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
3910
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (47 pages total)
- PUAAN I'm a Fan of PUAAN 15 fans permalink
photo

Let me add my voice to the many here who have commented ...

I'm still confused. Weren't we looking for bin Laden and Al Quaida? And weren't our soldiers supposed to be coming home? I wish our soldiers all the best and dearly hope there are no injuries or fatalities among them. But, seriously, what EXACTLY is the mission? Are we just over in everyone else's country to go after "the bad guys," whoever that happens to be at that moment? There are "bad guys" everywhere, even in America.

Are we still wanting to capture bin Laden and bring him to justice? Yes? Then let's do it. And then bring our troops home. I thought that was the plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

In effect we've only just restarted the hunt for Useeme bin Layinlow. Dubya kind've forgot him after Great Dog peed in his ear to get the Iraq Invasion started. While we're at it, we're trying to make it safe for someone, anyone to rat him him bin Layinlow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Bin Laden isn't in A-Stan so that makes your point rather moot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 07/02/2009
- JustSteve I'm a Fan of JustSteve 3 fans permalink

Actually, I believe W's words were something like he "didn't care" about bin Layinlow.

And so, that not caring re-destablized Afghanistan, and started new problems in Pakistan. We are now trying to fix what we've already broken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

Here we go again:

Obama's plan, announce July 15, 2008... Wait!! That was before he was elected even!!!

You best talk to some Americans then, because the country elected Obama... He won with this plan as a major plank in his platform:

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/07/obama_afghanist.html

I watched the speech live at the time.... The detail on this operation starts at 19:30 into the speech:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSSWpe79MNI

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/dreyfuss/447844/whisky_tango_foxtrot

There is a cap on additional troops ^^^

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 07/02/2009
- JustSteve I'm a Fan of JustSteve 3 fans permalink

Darn politician that actually DOES what he said he was going to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 07/02/2009
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 22 fans permalink

PUAAN -"Are we still wanting to capture bin Laden and bring him to justice? Yes? Then let's do it. And then bring our troops home. I thought that was the plan."

Don't confuse the propaganda with the 'plan'. What you describe was never the plan.

Wlcome to the world of George Orwell and the 'Big Lie'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 07/02/2009
- poco767c I'm a Fan of poco767c 349 fans permalink
photo

I honestly believe that the situation in the middle east is rooted in our stagnant foreign policy towards the region dating back decades.

The middle east has always been seen as a resource as opposed to a unique and sovereign region. During the cold war the middle east became a battle ground for control of resources and not ideology. We have engaged with those who would talk with us, namely the Saudi's, those who have not been willing to play ball have been demonized.
The conditions for religious extremism in Iran and other countries have grown worse because of our attitude towards them. Our support for Israel regardless of their actions has only exacerbated the situation. I am not saying we abandon Israel to it's fate in a hostile region but it cannot act with impunity and expect America to stand blithely by.

It is time to revise how we not only view the middle east, but how we do business with them and engage their populations. Only by removing our own biases against them can we ever hope combat the culture of hatred towards the west. As it stands we do the work of the extremists and recruiters for them, by playing the role of the 'great satan'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 07/02/2009

poco : I don't know about that " great satan " business ( Whatever that means... )...

But, your post is spot on !


-ralph

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

as always...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 07/02/2009
- poco767c I'm a Fan of poco767c 349 fans permalink
photo

Thanks.

Great satan is a phase used throughout the muslim world by certain extremist groups to describe the west, particularly the US.
It is rooted in Islam and used to cast America as doing the work of satan and therefore making them not just politically and ideologically opposed to Isalmic nations, but completely incompatible with the Islamic faith.

America's actions often do little to dispel this myth

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 07/02/2009
- MadHeart I'm a Fan of MadHeart 129 fans permalink

Gen. Smedley Butler: War is a racket.
Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower: Beware the military/industrial complex.

Both ignored, of course, as the feeding of the warmongering military/industrial complex's maws continue. Its appetitte will never be satisfied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 07/02/2009
- tanya1111 I'm a Fan of tanya1111 83 fans permalink
photo

NOW to the tune of almost a trillion a year.... WOWZERS... Read "THY WILL BE DONE" by GERARD COLBY.... for a step by step manual on how the oil barons became our invisible kings... laundering our taxes through the war machine...­. hard to find as libris and expensive but really really worth the read....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

We're working on developing a new complex. We already have a racket. It's called the Internet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

Obama's plan, announce July 15, 2008... Wait!! That was before he was elected even!!!

You best talk to some Americans then, because the country elected Obama... He won with this plan as a major plank in his platform:

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/07/obama_afghanist.html

I watched the speech live at the time.... The detail on this operation starts at 19:30 into the speech:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSSWpe79MNI

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/dreyfuss/447844/whisky_tango_foxtrot

There is a cap on additional troops ^^^

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 07/02/2009
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

War is never justified.

When you look close enough, you will see that sound judgment was always ignored. Avaricious profit-making was allowed. And, foresight was eschewed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 07/02/2009
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 317 fans permalink
photo

Cosigned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

exactly right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 07/02/2009

HOOOOOORAH! SEMPER FI!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

so you're blogging from your foxhole somewhere? Or rather in the safety of your home sitting sipping on your coffee draped in your bvds?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

katooom: NOWERE does Obama set the objective for Afg. He vaguely mentions AlQaeda and Taliban supression, but what does that mean? When is it accomplished?

In that campaign speech, which I watched also, he laid out the problems, but not specifically what our goals are. When will these interventions be OVER?

Are we nation building? Are we pursuing BinLaden? When will it be OVER?

We need to pull out of Iraq, Afg, Pak, EVERYWHERE, NOW.
----------­----------­-------

Chill my friend. Midterms come up Nov 4th, 2010... Midterms..­. Do you know like an election?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSSWpe79MNI

I will add, I am re-reviewing the speech, and he explains it all. He does not set time limits but it is all explained one year ago. July 15th, 2008 ~20 mins into the speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
- emrogers I'm a Fan of emrogers 63 fans permalink
photo

He must have forgotten to call you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

Don't know when it will be over; but, I suspect that it will have something to do with the Afghani's being able to make a decent living while not growing opium, with the government being something more than a cardboard cutout; and, with ensuring al qaeda moves elsewhere. Of course, if we happen to find Useeme bin Layinlow, we might be tempted to make be over tomorrow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 07/02/2009
- katooom I'm a Fan of katooom 18 fans permalink
photo

The last para of the above article is very bothersome:

"Obama aims to boost the Afghan army from 80,000 to 134,000 troops by 2011 _ and greatly increase training by U.S. troops accompanying them .... There is no timetable for withdrawal, and the White House has not estimated how many billions of dollars its plan will cost."

Sounds like escalation/nation building to me.

As far as mid-terms in '10, I doubt there will be many NEW faces to vote for. Same old song and I'm sick of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 07/02/2009
- doneflyin I'm a Fan of doneflyin 31 fans permalink

I believe the objective is access to the vast natural gas fields in the Caspian Sea area.

These wars are all about natural resources. We are using our military might to preserve our decrepit capitalist­/corporate system.
After all this is where we have spent the majority of our tax dollars the last 60 years.
This is the only way we can "compete" in the global market. We invade a country because we can, kill it's people and take what we want.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 07/02/2009
- Adartist777 I'm a Fan of Adartist777 101 fans permalink
photo

All I have to say is good luck to our troops and hope they succeed in their mission without casualties or injuries. The mission is a sound one. I see this as a rescue mission of Afghanistan citizens currently being held hostage by the Taliban.

While some Afghani citizens may embrace the Taliban culture, there are many more that live in horrible fear for their lives and their family's lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

I wish luck to the innocents too. May they not be counted as civilian casualties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 239 fans permalink
photo

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Good post my friend. Hope you're doing well

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 07/02/2009
- williamina I'm a Fan of williamina 7 fans permalink

Thanks for staying loyal to Bush and also for your continued support of the current President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 07/02/2009
- furey I'm a Fan of furey 6 fans permalink

"To prepare for proposed construction in 2010, the Afghan government has reportedly given assurances it will clear the route of land mines, and make the path free of Taliban influence.

In a report to be released today, energy economist John Foster says the pipeline is part of a wider struggle by the United States to counter the influence of Russia and Iran over energy trade in the region.

The so-called Turkmenist­an-Afghani­stan-Pakis­tan-India pipeline has strong support from Washington because the U.S. government is eager to block a competing pipeline that would bring gas to Pakistan and India from Iran.

The TAPI pipeline would also diminish Russia’s dominance of Central Asian energy exports."

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/the-ones-who-attacked-us/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

co-sign as to the "luck" portion of your post to our troops, although I would much prefer them on the home front protecting our interests here. However I will reluctantly refer to the experts on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

sorry, this was meant as a response to the post offered by Adartist. Sometimes the brain gets ahead of the fingers :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 119 fans permalink

Oil and gas are the goal. Always have been. Nothing honorable or patriotic or just - only the fight for acquisition of resources that someone is afraid someone else will get to first.

Google architects and engineers for nine-eleven truth. There are well over 700 of them now. They are just starting to speak out. Let's at least give them a voice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 07/02/2009
- JustSteve I'm a Fan of JustSteve 3 fans permalink

So, you understand that Afghanistan is not an oil-producing country, right?

The reason why we LEFT Afghanistan before we finished the work there a few years ago was precisely because it is not a country rich in resources, and the previous administration could care less about the festering sore they made.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 07/02/2009
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 317 fans permalink
photo

Th "Great Game" of the 19th Century over the possession of Central Asia never stopped, in fact...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru permalink

Agreed.

War is wrong ALL the time - not only sometimes.
-------------

I don't like absolutes. If someone invades my country and wants to k1ll my family... that's wrong. I will fight to my last breath to stop them. That's now a war not an invasion.

Invasions are often wrong. But not all wars or all invasions are so wrong. You're effectively saying that there's never a circumstance in which conflict with arms is the only way out and as others already pointed out, WWII was exactly like that.

Somehow I don't believe the N@zis had a strong interest in peace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

co-sign CB, but I'm getting used to that fact :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

The N@zis could have been stopped early in their development except too many industries (including american ones) were making tons of money feeding the war machine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 07/02/2009
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

Wherever hatred is detected, there is sure to be an unthinking, unfeeling person with dollar-signs in their eyes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

That's arguably true but it seems like pretty wild speculation.

You have to remember Adolf tried to overthrow the Republic in the early 1920's by storming of all things, a post office in Munich. When that failed, he next tried a more "legitimate" method of being voted into power. It's not legit of course because he used violence and coercion to win power.

Also, his turn around of the German economy astonished everyone. He was hailed in the 30's as a moderate would you believe and an economic reformer who spoke of peace. He was Time's man of the year.

Hard to see how anyone overseas could possibly prevent his rise to power or his rearmament of Germany because they were too busy giving him honours and awards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 07/02/2009
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 119 fans permalink

Yup. That would include the Bush ancestors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

The enablers of N@zism were the "winners" of WWI.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 239 fans permalink
photo

Well said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 07/02/2009
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 317 fans permalink
photo

Costa, You certainly got my point.

But I am really, REALLY getting tired of any .N.A.Z.I.s popping up as certainly as the Sun rises in the morning, as soon as I say something against american war mongering and war policy.

Can we dispense with that - PLEASE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

does it not represent an honest counter opinion to the argument?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Well no. Sorry mate. I can't promise that.

That's because it's a valid case in point and it's the single best known counter example to the perfect ideal of pacifism.

I do not bring up N@zism because it's some kind of slur on the German people. I lived in Germany and I've lived in Austria too and especially Germany has become the greenest, most peace-loving nation on Earth. You don't find a lot of h@te crimes there. There's no big r@cist political parties like in other parts of the world. I loved Germany. It's very open as a culture and society and there's no attempt to deny the holocaust there.

The persistent use of N@zism and n@zi-insults to discredit Germans of today is a total disgrace and I share your intolerance of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 07/02/2009
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

The principle is absolute -- not the ways to achieve the principle.
Nothing can test you more in life than this one principle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 07/02/2009
- twogunmojo I'm a Fan of twogunmojo 28 fans permalink

Poppies...

The War On Drugs takes a new direction in the War On Terror battlefield of Afghanistan:

ROME — The Obama administration’s special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan told allies on Saturday that the United States was shifting its drug policy in Afghanistan away from eradicating opium poppy fields and toward interdicting drug supplies and cultivating alternative crops.

“The Western policies against the opium crop, the poppy crop, have been a failure,” the envoy, Richard C. Holbrooke, told reporters on the margins of the Group of 8 conference in the northern Italian city of Trieste, Reuters reported. “They did not result in any damage to the Taliban, but they put farmers out of work and they alienated people and drove people into the arms of the Taliban.”
Mr. Holbrooke said the United States would begin phasing out eradication efforts, which generally have involved spraying or plowing under poppy fields, often under fire from Taliban militants or angry farmers. Instead, he said, more emphasis would be placed on helping Afghan farmers make a living through other crops and on seizing both drugs coming out of the country and growing and processing supplies coming in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

No recent change in policy unless you consider 2008 recent. From the same AP article,

"According to a U.N. report this week, opium eradication reached a high in 2003, after the Taliban were ousted from power, with over 21,000 hectares (51,900 acres) destroyed. In 2008, only 5,480 hectares (13,500 acres) were cut down, compared with 19,047 hectares (47,000 acres) in 2007."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

'Khanjar' is really a dagger not a 'sword'. Hope their operation logistics is better than the translation of the name of this offensive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

Apparently, the AP's boss worrisd about size.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 07/02/2009
- furey I'm a Fan of furey 6 fans permalink

"To prepare for proposed construction in 2010, the Afghan government has reportedly given assurances it will clear the route of land mines, and make the path free of Taliban influence.

In a report to be released today, energy economist John Foster says the pipeline is part of a wider struggle by the United States to counter the influence of Russia and Iran over energy trade in the region.

The so-called Turkmenist­an-Afghani­stan-Pakis­tan-India pipeline has strong support from Washington because the U.S. government is eager to block a competing pipeline that would bring gas to Pakistan and India from Iran.

The TAPI pipeline would also diminish Russia’s dominance of Central Asian energy exports."

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/05/11/the-gas-must-flow/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 07/02/2009
- MadHeart I'm a Fan of MadHeart 129 fans permalink

War is always about resources, at its core.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 07/02/2009
- Xavieer I'm a Fan of Xavieer 90 fans permalink
photo

Triple A palin was in kosovo ??? I thought Putin didn't allow her to come come come past the last snow bank on mystery island....­........He­y google???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Di.ck Dastard.le­y---one of the all time greats, along with his faithful sidekick, Mutt.ley. Cool avatar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 07/02/2009
- Xavieer I'm a Fan of Xavieer 90 fans permalink
photo

Well Tro//s h8te me with a passion, and Libs stamp me as a bully so ...... Yeah thats me..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

LMAO...Sar­kozy patched things up with her & Putin during a phone call. Rumor has it that it wasn't really Sarkozy, however.


She was visiting the Alaska Guardsmen that are here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 07/02/2009
- Xavieer I'm a Fan of Xavieer 90 fans permalink
photo

I bet it was cold!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

OT - Everybody who has followed any of my posting has surely seen me post the google link on Grover Norquist "drown government" - We had a Norquist discussion last night which... well... um..

http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=15084

This was new information to me ^ I already knew Norquist had been closely associted with convicted felons Jack Abramoff and David Safavian.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 07/02/2009
- BronxBorn I'm a Fan of BronxBorn 50 fans permalink
photo

Norquist is married to a Muslim women. It doesn't matter to me at all (mixed marriage here), but I think A lot of Mr. Norquist followers might take exception, since they are crazy and mean to start.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 07/02/2009
- levibatgirl I'm a Fan of levibatgirl 277 fans permalink
photo

Holy cr@p!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

co-sign


i read and saved, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 07/02/2009
- tanya1111 I'm a Fan of tanya1111 83 fans permalink
photo

THANKS FOR LINK

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 07/02/2009

It's all about the money for him, doesn't matter who the client is or what he or she does... kinda reminds me of Chase during WWII...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 07/02/2009
- twogunmojo I'm a Fan of twogunmojo 28 fans permalink

lets see...afte­r 9/11 bush told everyone to go out and spend money...no­w obama wants us to go out and spend money we don't have and pay citibank 30% interest..­..and the obamas wars are going to cost how much over the next 2 years.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 07/02/2009
- bubbuh I'm a Fan of bubbuh 128 fans permalink
photo

links

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 07/02/2009
- rich misty I'm a Fan of rich misty 1043 fans permalink
photo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBzVbMi8C48

Deficits don't matter. - Richard Cheney

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 07/02/2009
- BronxBorn I'm a Fan of BronxBorn 50 fans permalink
photo

So.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 07/02/2009
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

Just ask for forgiveness, it'll be granted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 07/02/2009
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

Just another fallacious talking point. Bush telling people to "go shopping" was his way of saying "go on with things as normal". Too bad he couldn't connect the dots on what that really meant.

Obama is not asking people to spend money they don't have. He's saying be responsible with your spending.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

I am watching O. closely, but I see he is a warmonger. The Bush-Obama wars continue to bankrupt our country. I am not happy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 07/02/2009
- DACC I'm a Fan of DACC 185 fans permalink
photo

and you are an uniformed f00/ to post such drivel, CLEARLY. I will support your right to spew it but I will discount it entirely for the rhetoric it apparently represents. ragingliberal??
try again please and this time with feeling please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 07/02/2009
photo

Bush & Cheney were warmongers­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 07/02/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (47 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect