Jackson Kids' Hearing Delayed At Debbie Rowe's Request

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Jackson Kids' Hearing Delayed At Debbie Rowe's Request stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANTHONY MCCARTNEY | July 2, 2009 09:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Robin Hudson of Los Angeles hangs a sign at a makeshift memorial for the late pop star Michael Jackson outside the family home in the Encino section of Los Angeles , Thursday, July 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

LOS ANGELES — The future of Michael Jackson's children was thrown into question Thursday when his ex-wife emerged and won a delay in a custody hearing while she decides whether she wants to raise her two offspring.

It was the first legal move from Deborah Rowe since the entertainer's death. Jackson's will asks for his mother, Katherine, to get permanent custody of all three of his children.

Rowe, who met Jackson as a receptionist in the office of his dermatologist, has characterized their relationship as strictly for the purpose of birthing Jackson children. She is the mother of his two oldest children and received $8.5 million in their divorce, according to court records. His youngest child was conceived with a surrogate.

She has spent very little time with her son Michael Joseph Jr., known as Prince Michael, 12; and daughter Paris Michael Katherine, 11. But Rowe also has opposed the idea of Katherine Jackson getting custody of her children when it came up in the past.

Rowe's attorney, Eric M. George, said Thursday she had not decided whether to seek custody.

Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff rescheduled a guardianship hearing for July 13 at the request of attorneys for Rowe and for Katherine Jackson, 79, who has temporary guardianship of her son's children.

The identity of the surrogate mother of the singer's youngest child, 7-year-old son Prince Michael II, has never been revealed.

Jackson's public memorial was set for 10 a.m. Tuesday at the Staples Center in downtown Los Angeles, according to a press release from the office of the Jackson family's publicist.

Story continues below
advertisement

Randy Phillips, chief executive of AEG Live, which owns the Staples Center and was Jackson's promoter, said tickets would be free. He was not sure how they would be distributed.

But Los Angeles City Councilman Dennis Zine said the Jackson family should consider delaying the public memorial to allow more time to plan. He also said the cash-strapped city doesn't have the money to pay police overtime.

"If you can imagine 100,000 people show up and you have 20,000 capacity (at the Staples Center), there is not sufficient room. Now you have a crowd-control problem," he said. With the July Fourth holiday weekend "it's the worst time ... to work something out."

Another court hearing will proceed as planned Monday on who will take temporary control of Jackson's estate. He left all his assets to the Michael Jackson Family Trust.

A person familiar with the details of the trust said it would be shared between his mother, who gets 40 percent, his three children, who together get 40 percent, and charities for children, which would receive 20 percent. The charities will be determined later by the trust.

The person was not authorized to speak publicly and requested anonymity.

Authorities also were investigating allegations that the 50-year-old Jackson had been consuming painkillers, sedatives and antidepressants.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown said his office was helping Los Angeles police investigate the possible involvement of prescription drugs in Jackson's death.

His Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement is searching a state database that tracks doctors who prescribe controlled substances, how much and to whom.

The federal Drug Enforcement Administration also has joined the investigation. The Los Angeles Police Department asked the DEA to help, a law enforcement official in Washington told the AP on condition of anonymity because of the investigation's sensitivity.

In an interview on NBC's "Today" show, Jackson's brother Jermaine said he would be "hurt" if toxicology reports showed his younger brother abused prescription drugs.

"In this business, the pressures and things that you go through, you never know what one turns to," he said.

___

AP writers Michael R. Blood, Beth Harris in Los Angeles; Michele Salcedo in Washington; contributed to this story.

LOS ANGELES — The future of Michael Jackson's children was thrown into question Thursday when his ex-wife emerged and won a delay in a custody hearing while she decides whether she wants to rais...
LOS ANGELES — The future of Michael Jackson's children was thrown into question Thursday when his ex-wife emerged and won a delay in a custody hearing while she decides whether she wants to rais...
Filed by Katy Hall  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
595
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- MikeRdg I'm a Fan of MikeRdg 16 fans permalink
photo

thought she did not want the children, thought she said was not the natural mother.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 07/03/2009

It is hard to separate the facts from the fictions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 07/03/2009
- johnosahon I'm a Fan of johnosahon 6 fans permalink

and by kids she means "MONEY", right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/03/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 45 fans permalink
photo

If Rowe is a DNA match and she wants to raise the children she gave birth to, I wish her well. Nobody knows what was said between Jackson and Rowe, and nobody ever will. What matters now is the children and whether or not the person who gains custody of them protects and cherishes them. Rowe is a character about whom little is known: Her own heritage may factor into this. http://jta.org/news/article/2009/07/03/1006310/rowe-seeks-parental-rights-over-nation-of-islam

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 07/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 234 fans permalink

Stop ... so you think a family court judge needs to consider a citizen of this country's religion in determining custody of these children ?

Utah & TX folks on those ranches, marrying children, etc.!! Those children were sent back for more of the same in the name of a religion and you say what ??

How twisted and confused are ya !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 07/03/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 45 fans permalink
photo

STOP
You are heading on a tangent into outer space.
I inluced the link to JTA's site because they are running a story which says that Rowe, who is Jewish, is concerned that the children she bore (who are considered Jewish by her faith) will be brought up under the influence of another religion.

I didn't write the story you silly person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 07/03/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 45 fans permalink
photo

And I didn't spell "included" correctly, so string me up kiddo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

She only came out of the wood work so she can get custody to sell them to the hightest bidder. She needs to go back from whence she came.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 07/03/2009

Didn't she already do that? Or is this extended blackmail? How much money can Debbie get out of her kids? Millions. I bet she would walk away again if the price is right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/03/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 54 fans permalink
photo

Yawn...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 07/03/2009
- majordomo2 I'm a Fan of majordomo2 2 fans permalink

Rowe has to take some time to decide whether she wants custody of the children? That alone makes it pretty clear to me that she is not in the right place spiritually or emotionally to take them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 07/03/2009
- LLisaLL I'm a Fan of LLisaLL 7 fans permalink
photo

Debbie Rowe may have her day in court but she's not going to get custody of the kids. The court will view the history of her relationship with them (definition: non-existant with no interest at all) and what happened in the past regarding custody, including statements she has made both in public and private. She voluntarily gave up her rights to them and any claim to the children will prove to be groundless. You are not required to be biologically linked to your children to be their legal parent and there will be no doubt that MJ WAS the legal parent with the right to stipulate who should take care of them. The court will be able to see very easily what is in the best interest of the children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 07/03/2009
- LLisaLL I'm a Fan of LLisaLL 7 fans permalink
photo

Also, the court would be very reluctant, and probably not even entertain, splitting up the 3 children and DR has no claim to the youngest child. She will never win custody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

I agree...I don't know why everyone thinks she's going to get custody. I see why the media is speculating, because of ratings.

But there is no way this woman is going to get full legal cutsody of those kids...def­initely not at this point or in the near future. Mark my words, the kids will remain with their grandmother and Debbie Rowe might be granted visitation at the most.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 07/03/2009
- cocolola I'm a Fan of cocolola 7 fans permalink
photo

If Debbie really wanted a relationship with her (?) children she had every opportunity. And I don't want to hear any BS that Michael would not allow her to see them. There's no way any loving parent would agree to stay away from their kids under any condition. Michael offered her a buy out and she accepted. Period. The end. Also it's interesting that she decided to make a move the day after learning that MJ cut her out of his will. She is ticked off -- big time.

P.S. - There's not a court in this country that would separate Blanket from his silblings. As the supposedly biological mom DR has every right to bid her on her children. However, winning them is another story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 07/03/2009
- Trueheart I'm a Fan of Trueheart 45 fans permalink
photo

You are making things up. You don't know what she thought the arrangement was between her and Jackson. Nobody does. We do know for a fact that as soon as his trial was over, he booted it out of the USA to the Middle East with the kids and made it difficult for any contact between her and the children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

All Rowe is interested in is custody of the money.

As for Kathrine taking care of the kids, a lot of you assume that she is going to have to do it by herself. These people have a lot of money. There are cooks, housekeepers, and it would be a safe bet the nanny the kids have known all their lives will be brought back in. But anyway you look at it, the kids are going to be well taken care of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/03/2009

The Jacksons are BROKE - Katherine/Joe filed Chapter 7 in 2007 citing $24 million in debts. So her hiring Nanny's will be with Michaels children money and not their own. There are also the various abuse allegations against Joe and the total dysfuntional on record of the family. Not to mention that Katherine is 79 years old - so what happens to the children when she dies since Michael only named her and Diana Ross (who is 65) as guardians?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

They have a lot of money. Filing bankruptcy simply means you have more debt than money and bankruptcy gets rid of the debt. Lots of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 07/03/2009
- slipthalo I'm a Fan of slipthalo 6 fans permalink
photo

That's what the childrens' trust money would be for - caring for the children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 07/03/2009

I guess U know them personally. Please don't believe everything U read. Some of us know the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 07/03/2009

Joe supposedly lives in Las Vegas.

With that huge extended family, those children will always be taken care of whether Katherine lives for a couple more decades or not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

This toad of a human being just wants another big pay day. (Sorry. That's insulting to toads.) Any judge in their right mind will throw her and her claims out of court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 07/03/2009
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

Anybody who thinks Michael was crazy and doesn't apply the same criteria to Rowe that they applied to Michael to decide HE was crazy....i­s, well, crazy too. What sane human being would agree to the deal she agreed to with Michael? She was just another sick enabler...­.

If what I read, that she has had no contact with the children since their births is true, there is no way she should have them and given their ages, I am sure the court will seek their input about where they want to go. The one interview I saw with her, she seem shy, awkward and not very kid friendly. No matter what one thinks of Michael, if love is there from a parent, that is basically all kids care about. If he never yelled or hit his children, they don't care if daddy was not the typical dad. My point, they loved and trusted their father, no matter what we thought of him. Having a strong sense of being loved for who you are, goes a long way to making a child stable. On the other hand losing that one parent is probably ten times as hard, because you don't have the other parent whom you trust to help you through that loss. Don't mistake a white woman, who lives by herself with animals as the obvious savior of these kids, I have a feeling she is must as messed up in some ways as Michael.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

Anyone who has to "decide" if she wants her children - does not want them. She wants the money.
They don't even know her. They are better of with the grandmother they know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 07/03/2009
- Nina28 I'm a Fan of Nina28 11 fans permalink
photo

Neither Rowe nor Ross should have the kids should something happen to Katherine Jackson.

I would think that if someone bequeath there children to me in a will that they would ask my permission first. These are children not some favorite object or commodities. Question is, did Michael ever ask Diana Ross to care for his children should his mother pass away and did she agree to it.

All I can think of now when the Jackson name is mentioned, is those poor orphans and how totally dysfunctional and messed up this is. Children should never be bred like dogs much less beaten like one lest the whole cycle of dysfunctional family cycle begins again. What a mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

Ho w do you know he didn't ask Ross to be the Backup Guardian?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 07/03/2009
- Nina28 I'm a Fan of Nina28 11 fans permalink
photo

It was spoken of during the interview of his lawyers that the will is now found, dated 2002, still valid. Names Katherine as main caretaker of his children and estate and Diana Ross as backup. Joe Jackson was completely cut out of the will.

See News Source Associated Press: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MICHAEL_JACKSON?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-07-01-12-52-43

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 07/03/2009
- Nina28 I'm a Fan of Nina28 11 fans permalink
photo

iman2000 : regarding your question, I don't know if he ask Ross, that's why I asked it as a question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/03/2009

Your last paragraph is presumptuous and unproven.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 07/03/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 54 fans permalink
photo

I hope this clarify some of the issues raised here:

http://www.surrogacy.com/legals/article/calaw.html

STo sum it up, MJ is the children's father regardless of whether he contributed with any genetic material - there was never any need for adoption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

It is just time to get a DNA to prove if this woman is even the biological mother or not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 07/03/2009

Their birth certificates listing her as the mother legitimizes her parentage to the children. As well as the fact that she maintains her parental rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/03/2009

She gave up her rights for CASH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 07/03/2009
photo

As far as Ms. Katherine Jackson raising the kids- thats not a problem. "Big Mommas" have always raised grandchildren. Thats nothing new. If ya notice African Americans really dont shove their elderly parents into nursing homes and putting them out to pasture. Big Mommas are the ones who keep the family together- still cooking Sunday dinners well into their 80s and 90s

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 07/03/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 54 fans permalink
photo

Indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

You ain't saying nothing but the truth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

Word!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 07/03/2009
- biglith I'm a Fan of biglith 13 fans permalink

Look what a great job she did the first time around. She was complicit in the abuse of her own children making her unfit to raise these kids.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

There are millions of women in this country that suffer at the hands of an abusive spouse. How do you know the facts of what she did or didn't do. Many of this women can't or won't leave for a variety of reasons. It may not be right that they don't but who the h*ell are you to lay judgement on anyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 07/03/2009
- Nina28 I'm a Fan of Nina28 11 fans permalink
photo

Dear LWilkinson315

How about a shout out for PARENTS raising their OWN children and giving Grandmothers their life to enjoy the visits. Or is that just not how it's done in African American communities?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 07/03/2009
- 702diva I'm a Fan of 702diva 4 fans permalink

"She was complicit in the abuse of her own children" is quite the Libelous statement. What proof do you have that Katherine Jackson was "complicit" in her children being abused?

Before Nicole Brown-Simpson was murdered, woman in this country could be beaten with abandon by their boyfriends/spouses and the cops would look the other way. Domestic violence laws were non-existent or lightweight, restraining orders were just about ignored. The truth of the matter is: you (or I) don't know what occurred in the Jackson family home during the 60s and 70s when Katherine and Joe Jackson raised their children; neither do you know what Katherine Jackson did or did not do to protect her children from a tyrant. Thus and so, speaking of Katherine Jackson's complicity in the abuse of her children when you know no such "fact" to be true is beyond ridiculous!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 07/03/2009

Again, do you personally know this, because I personally know this is A LIE!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 07/03/2009
- Nina28 I'm a Fan of Nina28 11 fans permalink
photo

I'm also going to have to beg to differ on the generalization of elderly in nursing homes. I lived in SF, CA and there are a lot of Black elderly in homes in both my Black Neighborhood.

Why is Gran-ma still cookin' and caring for your kids. Why can't Parents (two of them not just single mommies) start caring for their own kids. When are Americans (black, white, latin) going to start praising that as exemplary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 07/03/2009
- lisakaz2 I'm a Fan of lisakaz2 83 fans permalink
photo

Gawd those poor kids. Lose-lose. Oliver Twist perhaps had it better though at least they have each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

Oh puh leez that Womb Renter sold her kids twice to MJ-- the only thing she cares about is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

I disagree. She's the mother, and she did try to protect them when the molestation case blew open, by trying to get her parental rights restored. She also wants a restraining order against Joe Jackson. MJ was a control freak, who never let the kids anywhere near Rowe. I say let them get to know their real mom, and not spend all of their time in the continuing freak show that is the Jackson camp. As Rowe put it, "I trusted Michael to be a good father and raise them, but he did not hold up his end of the bargain."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

is she the mother? atm its all speculation.

sit tight. We are in for a bumpy ride.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

Numerous comments by her in addition to the lawsuits show she was only in it for the money. If there were no chance she could leach money off the children, she would not be interested in "parenting­."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

You are full of crap! I expected a Wh.ite person to defend their own!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

Oh really. So during the molestation trial, when she disappeared with a second payment, I guess the money won out??? Wake up!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 07/03/2009
photo

You seem to be such an authority. She has stated in the press that she did NOT want a relationship with these kids and that she was not cut out to be a mother.

I am beginning to believe that all of a sudden the people that are coming to the defense of this woman who "sold" the children she agreed to bear is because she is white. And, I'm not playing a race card. It's just a fact from reading hundreds of posts.

I hope the courts abide by what is best for the children and where they want to live. Somehow I don't think they will be choosing to live with a stranger named Debbie Rowe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 07/03/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect